Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gonzalez v. Marshall, 1st Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views3 pages
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants in a case brought by plaintiff Mardoqueo Gonzalez. The three-judge panel reviewed the record, including briefs and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and affirmed the grant of summary judgment for essentially the same reasons provided by the magistrate judge in his March 24, 1997 report.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-03-16 Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: 97-1879

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants in a case brought by plaintiff Mardoqueo Gonzalez. The three-judge panel reviewed the record, including briefs and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and affirmed the grant of summary judgment for essentially the same reasons provided by the magistrate judge in his March 24, 1997 report.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views3 pages

    Gonzalez v. Marshall, 1st Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants in a case brought by plaintiff Mardoqueo Gonzalez. The three-judge panel reviewed the record, including briefs and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and affirmed the grant of summary judgment for essentially the same reasons provided by the magistrate judge in his March 24, 1997 report.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    USCA1 Opinion

    [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
    ___________________

    No. 97-1879

    MARDO Q. GONZALEZ,

    Plaintiff, Appellant,

    v.

    JOHN MARSHALL, ET AL.,

    Defendants, Appellees.

    ____________________

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

    [Hon. Charles B. Swartwood, III, U.S. District Magistrate Judge]

    ____________________

    Before

    Torruella, Chief Judge,


    Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

    ____________________

    Mardoqueo Gonzalez on brief pro se.


    Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, and
    Ann M. McCarthy, Counsel, Department of Correction, on brief for
    appellees John Marshall, Paul Verdini and Thomas Dickhaut.
    Bruce R. Henry and Morrison, Mahoney & Miller on brief for appellee
    Pauline Sweeney.

    ____________________

    March 12, 1998


    ____________________

    Per Curiam.

    We have carefully reviewed the record in this

    case, including the briefs of the parties and the decisions


    below.

    Essentially for the reasons indicated by the

    magistrate judge in his report and recommendation, dated


    March 24, 1997, the grant of summary judgment to
    defendants/appellees is affirmed.

    You might also like