Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Marjorie Harrington, Etc. v. Inhabitants of The Town of Garland, Etc., 715 F.2d 1, 1st Cir. (1983)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    This document is a memorandum and order from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's ruling that the plaintiff's action was barred by res judicata. The Court of Appeals agrees with the district court's reasoning as explained in its comprehensive memorandum and does not provide further explanation. Costs in the amount of $84.04 are taxed in favor of the appellee.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1983-06-29 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 715 F.2d 1 Docket: 83-1033

    Original Title

    Marjorie Harrington, Etc. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Garland, Etc., 715 F.2d 1, 1st Cir. (1983)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a memorandum and order from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's ruling that the plaintiff's action was barred by res judicata. The Court of Appeals agrees with the district court's reasoning as explained in its comprehensive memorandum and does not provide further explanation. Costs in the amount of $84.04 are taxed in favor of the appellee.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Marjorie Harrington, Etc. v. Inhabitants of The Town of Garland, Etc., 715 F.2d 1, 1st Cir. (1983)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a memorandum and order from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirming the district court's ruling that the plaintiff's action was barred by res judicata. The Court of Appeals agrees with the district court's reasoning as explained in its comprehensive memorandum and does not provide further explanation. Costs in the amount of $84.04 are taxed in favor of the appellee.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    715 F.

    2d 1

    Marjorie HARRINGTON, etc., Plaintiff, Appellant,


    v.
    INHABITANTS OF the TOWN OF GARLAND, etc.,
    Defendant, Appellee.
    No. 83-1033.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    First Circuit.
    May 6, 1983.
    Rehearing Denied June 29, 1983.
    1

    Bernard R. Cratty, Cratty & Cratty, Waterville, Me., for plaintiff, appellant.

    Lawrence E. Merrill, Bangor, Me., for defendant, appellee.

    Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, BREYER, Circuit Judge, and RE,* Judge.

    MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


    4

    Having reviewed the record and after briefing and argument, we are in full
    agreement with the district court, 551 F.Supp. 1371, that this action was barred
    by res judicata. As our reasons for reaching this result are substantially the
    same as those set forth at length in the district court's comprehensive
    memorandum and order, we do not reiterate them here. The fact that another
    judge had earlier declined to dismiss did not prevent the district court from
    acting correctly as it did.

    Affirmed. Costs for appellee.

    Costs in favor of the appellee are taxed at $84.04.

    Chief Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by designation

    You might also like