This document summarizes several studies on the effects of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) on research and development spending and innovation. Lichtenberg and Siegel (1989) found that R&D spending grows at the same rate after LBOs as in comparable public companies. Lerner et al (2011) found that LBOs lead to increases in long-term innovation as measured by citations and importance of patent portfolios. Chou, Gombola and Liu (2006) found that firms with more aggressive earnings management after reverse LBOs had lower stock returns over subsequent years compared to less aggressive firms.
This document summarizes several studies on the effects of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) on research and development spending and innovation. Lichtenberg and Siegel (1989) found that R&D spending grows at the same rate after LBOs as in comparable public companies. Lerner et al (2011) found that LBOs lead to increases in long-term innovation as measured by citations and importance of patent portfolios. Chou, Gombola and Liu (2006) found that firms with more aggressive earnings management after reverse LBOs had lower stock returns over subsequent years compared to less aggressive firms.
This document summarizes several studies on the effects of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) on research and development spending and innovation. Lichtenberg and Siegel (1989) found that R&D spending grows at the same rate after LBOs as in comparable public companies. Lerner et al (2011) found that LBOs lead to increases in long-term innovation as measured by citations and importance of patent portfolios. Chou, Gombola and Liu (2006) found that firms with more aggressive earnings management after reverse LBOs had lower stock returns over subsequent years compared to less aggressive firms.
[Lichtenberg and Siegel, NBER, 1989] R&D as a fraction of sales
grows at the same rate in LBOs as in comparable public companies
(Jensen 1989). Lerner et al (2011) Buyout transactions lead to significant increases in LT innovation. patents applied for by firms in PE transactions are more frequently cited (a proxy for economic importance), show no significant shifts in the fundamental nature of the research, and are more concentrated in the most important and prominent areas of companies innovative portfolios. Long & Ravenscraft (1993) LBOS, DEBT AND RESEARCH-ANDDEVELOPMENT INTENSITY. Holthausen & Larcker (1996) The financial performance of reverse leveraged buyouts. Chou, Gombola & Liu (2006) Earnings Management and Stock Performance of Reverse Leveraged Buyouts. Chou et al (2006) Discretionary current accruals (proxy for earnings management) is positive and significant and also related to post-offering stock returns. LBO firms with the most aggressive signs of earnings management earn post-offering returns between 15-25% lower than those who are more conservative. This performance is evident as early as one year following the offer and remains constant for up to four years. Guo, Edith, Hotchkiss and Song (2009) compares the LBOs between 19902006 vs 1980-1989. They find the former are more conservatively priced and less highly levered. The returns to either pre/post buyout capital invested are large and positive. Gains in operating performance comparable or slightly exceed benchmark firms. Phalippou, Gottschlag (2009) -