Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ann M. Palmer, 976 F.2d 724, 1st Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of various motions filed by the appellants, Ann M. Palmer, Peter R. Tritsch, and Philip F. Mulvey, Jr. relating to requests for attorney's fees, sanctions, and reconsideration. The appellate court found no clear errors in the district court's findings or abuses of discretion in its rulings. It upheld the lower court's decision to deny the sanctions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-09-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 976 F.2d 724 Docket: 91-2274

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of various motions filed by the appellants, Ann M. Palmer, Peter R. Tritsch, and Philip F. Mulvey, Jr. relating to requests for attorney's fees, sanctions, and reconsideration. The appellate court found no clear errors in the district court's findings or abuses of discretion in its rulings. It upheld the lower court's decision to deny the sanctions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Ann M. Palmer, 976 F.2d 724, 1st Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of various motions filed by the appellants, Ann M. Palmer, Peter R. Tritsch, and Philip F. Mulvey, Jr. relating to requests for attorney's fees, sanctions, and reconsideration. The appellate court found no clear errors in the district court's findings or abuses of discretion in its rulings. It upheld the lower court's decision to deny the sanctions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    976 F.

    2d 724

    NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished


    opinions may be cited only in related cases.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee,
    v.
    Ann M. PALMER, et al., Defendants, Appellants.
    No. 91-2274.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    First Circuit.
    September 17, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Massachusetts
    Peter R. Tritsch on brief for appellant Ann M. Palmer.
    Peter R. Tritsch on brief pro se.
    Philip F. Mulvey, Jr. on brief pro se.
    D.Mass.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before Breyer, Chief Judge, Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Selya,
    Circuit Judge.
    Per Curiam.

    The district court's denial of appellants' various motions for attorneys' fees and
    sanctions, and for reconsideration, is affirmed for substantially the reasons
    stated by the district court. Having carefully reviewed the record and the briefs,
    we conclude that the district court adequately explained its reasons for denying
    sanctions. The court's findings are not clearly erroneous, and the court did not
    err or abuse its discretion in denying sanctions. Nor was there any procedural
    irregularity.

    Affirmed.

    You might also like