Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Eugene B. Bowler v. State of Maine, 981 F.2d 1245, 1st Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    Eugene B. Bowler appealed a district court judgment in favor of the State of Maine. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasons cited by the Magistrate Judge in his Recommended Decision. The appeals court also found that the Supreme Court's recent discussion in New York v. United States supported affirming the judgment regarding the Tenth Amendment and Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in favor of the State of Maine.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-12-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 981 F.2d 1245 Docket: 92-1830

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Eugene B. Bowler appealed a district court judgment in favor of the State of Maine. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasons cited by the Magistrate Judge in his Recommended Decision. The appeals court also found that the Supreme Court's recent discussion in New York v. United States supported affirming the judgment regarding the Tenth Amendment and Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in favor of the State of Maine.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    Eugene B. Bowler v. State of Maine, 981 F.2d 1245, 1st Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eugene B. Bowler appealed a district court judgment in favor of the State of Maine. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasons cited by the Magistrate Judge in his Recommended Decision. The appeals court also found that the Supreme Court's recent discussion in New York v. United States supported affirming the judgment regarding the Tenth Amendment and Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in favor of the State of Maine.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    981 F.

    2d 1245

    NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished


    opinions may be cited only in related cases.
    Eugene B. BOWLER, Plaintiff, Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF MAINE, Defendant, Appellee.
    No. 92-1830.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    First Circuit.
    Dec. 29, 1992.

    Eugene B. Bowler on brief pro se.


    Michel E. Carpenter, Attorney General, Phyllis Gardiner, Assistant
    Attorney General, and Thomas D. Warren, Deputy Attorney General, on
    brief for appellee.
    Before Breyer, Chief Judge, Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
    Per Curiam.

    For the reasons cited by the Magistrate Judge in his Recommended Decision of
    May 26, 1992, and in accordance with the Supreme Court's intervening
    discussion in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408, 2417-20 (1992)
    (Tenth Amendment); id. at 2432-33 (Guarantee Clause), we affirm the
    judgment of the district court.

    Affirmed.

    You might also like