,*

UDK: 347.925(497.11:4-672EU)

: 01.09.2014.
: 01.12.2014.

()
**
: ()
. ,
,
: ,
,
, ,

. ,

( ,
) . ,
;
;
.
,
,
,
,

,
.
: , , , , ,
, .

* mojasevic@prafak.ni.ac.rs

,
( 179046).
**

773

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

1.

2006. 1
.
, ,
:
. , ,
,
20132018. (. ),2
, :
;
, ,
;
. ,
,3 ,
, .
()
, ,
.
,
,
,
. (De Palo, Harley, 2005: 469479)
: , , .
,
,
.
2.

2.1.
() (, ,
2012: 710) - ,
2002. .
,
1 : http://www.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/dokumenti_sekcija.
php?id=45678

2 : http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/files/Nacionalna%20
Strategija%20reforme%20pravosudja%20za%20period%202013.-2018.%20godine.pdf
3 2013. : http://www.mpravde.
gov.rs/sekcija/53/radne-verzije-propisa.php

774

. | . 773-790

-. ,
, (,
),
, : , .

, :
(IFC) (ABA/CEELI).

,
.
.

. 2005.
4 ( : ),
. ,

,
(, ) (
IFC). ,
,
.

- ,
, -
,
, ,

! , ,
2006. 2013. ,
3.500 .5


.
,6 2012. ,7

4 , . , 18/05.

5 : http://novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/drustvo/aktuelno.290.html:460347Gasi-se-Centar-za-medijaciju, : 10. 2014. .

6 : http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/o_sudu/izvestaji/statistika_2012.pdf

7
2011. (2.742.772 ). ,
2010. , ,

775

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

, ,
. :
?

.
2.2.

,
-
, , .
, ,
, .
,
2005. . , (
),

!
( ),
( )
?
, ,

. , (,
, 2011: 11) : ;
;
;
;
, , . ,
(, 2014: 103245)
, ,
:
,

;
,

. : http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/aktuelno/
statistika_o_radu_sudova_za_2011.pdf, http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/o_sudu/izvestaji/
godisnji_izvestaj_o_radu_2010.pdf

776

. | . 773-790

;
;
, , .

, ,
, ,
. ,
.
2008.
,
. (, 2014)

pro futuro ,
2013.
, .
( ) ,
.
(, 2014: 236245)
() :
, ;
;
;
,
, . ,
, ,
, , (, 2014).
, .
3.

3.1.

. ,

, 20. . ,
, ,
1.300 , ,
,
(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 351). , ()
( 2010.
777

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

) (Jean, Jorry, 2013:

34), , , 493
() ,
()
( 110%). ,
,
2010. , ,
(. tax on incoming cases). (De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 352)
:
, , .
(
)
.

,

.
,
(Bruni, Sitzia, 2013: 4950). , 1991. ,

(. Justice of the Peace; . Giudice di Pace);
, 1993. , . 580,
;
, . 281,

; , 2003. . 5

( ); 2006.
. 55 ,

; 2007. , . 179
,
; 2010. , . 183

, . ,
2009. , . 69,

,
28/2010.

778

. | . 773-790

. ,

, .
3.2.

. 580, 1993. ,
,
,
. (De Palo, 2007: 2):
1999. 2005. , ,
, 327 ,
277 , 45
,

.

(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 352)

. ,
,
2001. , 98%
, 2001.

4%
(De Palo, Harley, 2005: 472). ,
(De Palo, Harley, 2005:
473475) (, )
,
. , ,
, (De Palo, Harley,
2005: 476478) :
;
( , );
, , , ,
;

, .

. (Gabellini,
2010: 6465) :
779

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

() ,
(
28/2010), ,
.

(Morek, 2013), 2011.

( ) 2012.
215.689 ,
12%. ,
, 50%.
, 2011. 2012. ,
,
(
). (De Berti, 2012)

. ,
,
, ,
,
0,5% (Colombo, 2012: 79). ,

, .
, 2008. 37 ,
843 2012. ;
35 309
(De Berti, 2012). , (Colombo,
2012: 78) ( ) :

?
, ,
; ,
,
.
4.

4.1.
,
, ().
, ,
780

. | . 773-790

. , :

(. justice of the peace),
(Schlichtungsbehrden) (
) . ,

.
,
40% (Meier, 2006: 45).

, , (
) - , 1980.
, ,
. ,
,
, : , ,
, ,
, . 2005.
;

. ,
, .
, 2007. ,
. (. Swiss Mediation Rules)
. , 1. 2011. ,
, (),

.

.8 ,
,
. ,

.
,
; ,
.
. (
),
(Baizeau, Kunz, 2013: 93, 95).
8 2008/52/. ,
.

781

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

4.2.

(Baizeau, Kunz, 2013: 93, 95). ,
; , ,

, , ,
. ,
,
, . ,
,
; ,
. ,
() . ,
(
), , .
() . , ,

. , ,
. ,
(
) (
40%), .
:
[ ] (Meier, 2006: 18). ,
, ,
,
,
.
( , ),
, ,
. ,
(Meier, 2006: 19)

,
!

782

. | . 773-790

5.
5.1. :
(De Roo, Jagtenberg, 2002:
128133) 16. Leidse Vredemakers (. Layden Peacemakers), ,
,
Bereaux de Paix, Juges de Paix.
, ,
( )
. , 19. ,
, (
), ,
.

. , 20. ,
, , ,
(
),
, , ,
,
. ,
20. , (
, ),
,
, , . ,

,
,
, . ,
,
,
. 1993.
(. ),
.

. ,
,
. (De Roo, Jagtenberg,
2002: 130) , , (19962001),
783

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

1.222 , ,
(, 1993. 2002.
2.000, ),
, , ,
. ,
(CEPEJ, 2012: 139)
: 100.000
, : 4.015,
.

. 1996. ,
. ,
2000. 2003.
, :
,
, ,

.
,
(, Journal
for Mediation),
,
, .
5.2.

, . ,
(Pel, 2012)
2008/52/.
, . ,
, - 1995.
, 2000. .
, , ,
- 1980. :9 )
, ) ,
) .
9 : Art. 2, 7, 14, 20 of UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules, A/RES/35/52, 10.12.1980.

784

. | . 773-790

,

, , ,
;
,
, , (De
Roo, Jagtenberg, 2002:135, 145). ,

, .
, ,
, , ,
, .
, ,
, 2011. 52.000 ,
(17.058 33%)
(12.922 25%) (Pel: 2012). , 2010.
(Vogels, van der Zeijden, 2010: 47) (,
69% ) ( )
,
(36,7%, 34,4%). ,
(Vogels, van der Zeijden, 2010: 49)
-,
( )
.
, , ,
,

. ,
(. ) condition sine qua non ,
. , ,
. ,
.
, ,
,
(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 349). ,
2012. , (CEPEJ, 2012: 132141)

, ,
785

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

. , ,
,
. ,
, . (.
), .

.
6.

(, ,
, )
,
, .
, ,
-, . ,
(
). ,
,
, . ,
,
.
2010. , ,
, ,
.

,
( ) . ,
,
, .

. ,
() ,
()
, .

: . ,
(
) .
, ,

786

. | . 773-790

, , ,
, , ,
.

,
,
.
,
,
. ,

,

( , ) . ,
.

Baizeau, D., Kunz, A. C. (2013). Switzerland. U Renate Dendorfer-Ditges (Prir.),

Mediation in 16 jurisdictions worldwide 2013. London: Law Business Research Ltd.
Bruni, A., Sitzia, M. (2013). Italy. U Renate Dendorfer-Ditges (Prir.), Mediation in
16 jurisdictions worldwide 2013. London: Law Business Research Ltd.
Colombo, F. G. (2012). Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Italy: European
Inspiration and National Problems. Ritsumeikan Law Review. 29. 7180
De Berti, G. (2012). Mandatory mediation: the Italian experience, two years on.
[Electronic version]. Retrieved 21, April 2014, from http://www.internationallawoffice.com
De Palo, G. (2007). Cross-Border Commercial Mediation: How Legislation Affects
Mediation Use. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 7, May 2014, from http://www.
europarl.europa.eu/comparl/juri/hearings/20071004/depalo5_en.pdf
De Palo, G., Carmeli, S. (2005). Mediation in Continental Europe: A Meandering Path Toward Efficient Regulation. U C. Newmark i A. Monaghan (Prir.),
Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Practice of Commercial Mediation. Manchester: Tottel Publishing
De Palo, G., Harley, P. (2005). Mediation in Italy: Exploring the Contradictions.
Negotiation Journal, 21(4). 469-479
De Roo, A., Jagtenberg, R. (2002). Mediation in the Netherlands: Past Present
Future. Electronic journal of comparative law. [Electronic version]. Retrieved
28, April 2014, from http://www.ejcl.org/64/art64-8.pdf
787

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

2008/52/ 21. 2008.

European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Council of Europe.

European judicial systems, Edition 2012 (data 2010): Efficiency and quality of
justice. (2012)
Gabellini, R. (2010). The Italian Mediation Law Reform (ADR Bulletin, 12(3), Article 4). [Electronic version]. Retrieved 1, May 2014, from http://epublications.
bond.edu.au/adr/vol12/iss3/4
2012. , http://www.
vk.sud.rs/assets/files/o_sudu/izvestaji/statistika_2012.pdf
2011. , http://www.
vk.sud.rs/assets/files/aktuelno/statistika_o_radu_sudova_za_2011.pdf
2010. http://www.
vk.sud.rs/assets/files/o_sudu/izvestaji/godisnji_izvestaj_o_radu_2010.pdf
Jean, J., Jorry, H. (2013). Judicial systems of the European Union countries: Analysis
of data by the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Council
of Europe
Meier, I. (2006). Mediation and Conciliation in Switzerland. [Electronic version].
Retrieved 27, April 2014, from http://www.175jahre.uzh.ch
, . (2014). : -
. :
, . (2014).
.
. 66
, . (2014). () :
, mimeo
Morek, R. (2013). Mandatory Mediation in Italy Reloaded. [Electronic version].
Retrieved 23, April 2014, from http://kluwermediationblog.com/2013/10/09/
mandatory-mediation-in-italy-reloaded/
a a 2006. , http://www.
srbija.gov.rs/vesti/dokumenti_sekcija.php?id=45678
a a 20132018. ,
http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/files/Nacionalna%20Strategija%20reforme%20
pravosudja%20za%20period%202013.-2018.%20godine.pdf
, ., , . (2011). .
: (IFC).
788

. | . 773-790

, ., , . (2012). :
. :
Pel, M. (2012). [Electronic version]. Retrieved 28, April 2014, from http://kluwermediationblog.com/2012/03/07/promotion-and-legislation-on-mediation-in-the
netherlands/
2013.
. : http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/sekcija/53/radne-verzijepropisa.php
UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules, A/RES/35/52, 10.12.1980
Vogels, R.J.M., van der Zeijden, P.Th. (2010). The Situation Regarding Mediation
in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: The Netherlands Mediation Institute
. . . 18(2005).
http://novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/drustvo/aktuelno.290.html:460347-Gasi-seCentar-za-medijaciju

789

 | 68 | LIII | 2014

Aleksandar Mojaevi, LL.D.

Assistant Professor,
Faculty of Law, University of Ni

Efficiency of (Judicial) Mediation in Serbia as

Compared to some European Countries
Summary

Analysis of efficiency of (judicial) mediation in Serbia and other European countries (Italy, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Denmark) illuminates the causes of
poor representation of this legal institution in our country. Analysis of mediation
in Italy, culturally most closely resembling country to Serbia, indicates that a
legalistic approach to the promotion and implementation of mediation, especially if it is heterogeneous, is not efficient. On the other hand, countries that have
implemented a bottom-up approach (first applied, and then regulate), such
as the Netherlands and Denmark, have developed efficient mediation system.
Switzerland, a country that relied on an approach based on the promotion of
culture of mediation, has a mediation system that has not been developed to the
extent to the developed system of conciliation. In any case, the Italian experience
has taught us that the regulation of mediation is not a sure path to success in the
implementation of this legal institution; Swiss experience highlights the importance of developing a culture of peaceful settlement of disputes; Dutch and Danish experience emphasizes pragmatism in the promotion and implementation
of mediation. Since Serbia lacks an efficient regulatory framework of mediation,
culture of peaceful dispute settlement and pragmatism in implementation of
this legal institution, it seems that the experiences, for the purpose of analysis,
observed countries are more than useful.
Key words: efficiency, mediation, Serbia, the Netherlands, Denmark, Italy,
Switzerland.

790