Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Many companies practice short selling - Airlines sell a seat before they deliver the
service, Insurance companies collect premiums before they pay claims, farmers sell
the harvest before it’s harvested, etc.
Short Selling is essential for Hedging – estimated that 95-97% of all short interest is
due to hedging.
In the past 25 years, every fraud has been uncovered by either 1.) a whistle blower
or 2.) someone with an economic interest (short seller, journalist)
Short Selling is not just the opposite of going long since short sellers need to 1.)
borrow shares (possibly pay a rebate), 2.) face different regulatory rules, 3.) deal with
negative reinforcement and 4.) face outright bans (such as the German one, however
that will not affect him since he always has the shares, it’s more of an issue for
traders than fundamental shorts since they often buy it back before they secure
delivery).
People say that when you’re long, stocks can only go to zero if you’re wrong but they
can go to infinity if you’re right. “I’ve seen a lot more go to zero than infinity.”
Short selling bans come in near the bottom of the market, which is good news. The
bad news is that it’s the bottom in time, not in price. Market often goes lower after a
ban, but the bottom is at least close by (showed 1932 and 2008 examples).
Opportunity for short sellers is very good – Large alpha of 10-20%/year, over past 30
years has been 15+% annualized alpha with negative correlation to the market (Holy
Grail of finance theory). However the alpha if often lumpy. So you have many
periods of zero returns and then a big year.
Research process has good and bad news: Numbers are obfuscated, short sellers
have no access to management, and the sell side hates you. Those are both good
and bad. Recommends not getting close to management because they either 1.)
don’t know what’s going on or 2.) are telling you a lie. According to S&P and CFO
magazine studies, 2/3 of CFOs have been asked to cook the books by the CEO, while
55% of all respondents did not, 12% did (those add up to 67%).
Sources of Ideas. 1.) experience; 2.) Accounting related 3rd party research; 3.)
screens (although no longer a good source since management knows how to trick
screens now); 4.) other managers (not necessarily short sellers) – “there are very few
original ideas in investing”; 5.) partners/investors in the fund.
1
Regarding point 5, told the story about how one investor is a restaurant franchisor
who told them that Boston Chicken would never work since they were selling
“homemade meal” replacement. Since mom/dad bought the meal and took it home,
they never bought drinks and drinks are where all the profit is made. This got them
looking at BC with more scrutiny and then noticed that management didn’t want to
open any company owned stores since they weren’t profitable and had to loan the
money to franchisees to open stores.
Enron was “1 stop shopping” for all short selling red flags. They marked to model
(only they knew what effect the weather in Seattle would have on their power
contract with MSFT), they had off balance sheet transactions, foul language
conference calls, etc. When all was said and done, they had a $65billion hole,
meaning they were more than just a little optimistic in their model’s assumptions!
He said Lehman also marked to model and had optimistic assumptions. They had a
$600b balance sheet, of which $300b was marked to market. So they had $300b
marked to model, and they had a $150b hole. So on average, their mark to model
portfolio was mis-marked by 50% (or 100% too high)!
Regarding China, he’s not calling for an impending crash, but… there’s a credit
driven property bubble with global implications. It’s a classic boom that goes bust.
There are 30Billion square feet of class A real estate under development in Tier 1, 2,
and 3 cities in China. That’s a 5x5 cubicle for every man, woman, and child in China.
Once that is done being constructed they’ll need to build more in order to keep GDP
growing…
2
the last at $80. We kept it to a 1%-1.5% position. We knew we were in the midst of a
bubble, so we kept it small, but it still cost us 10% over 2 years.
There are 2 ways short sellers handle risk. 1.) Stop Loss orders. We do not believe
price alone should tell if you’re right or wrong, fundamentals should. 2.) % of capital
at risk. We size our positions between 5% max and min ½% (or it’s not worth doing
the research and going through the trouble to short.) Whenever a position gets too
big, we reduce it to keep it inline with the intended % of capital amount.
Q: Thoughts on Regulation?
A: I am the head of the Coalition of Private Investment Companies and we’ve been
calling for registration since 04/05. Back then Washington did not understand the
industry, they still don’t, but they really didn’t then. HFs didn’t take any money from
the government, so it’s a little easier for them to hear our side now. I believe the
short selling in financials in 08 were by other financial institutions who were hedging
their counterparty risk.