You are on page 1of 17

European Monetary

System and birth of euro


Yuti chandan 37
Prachi Bhimani 38
Rachita revankar 39
Sarashwati Soni 40
Shazia Usmani 41
European monetary system (EMS
)
 July 1978- European council laid the
groundwork for the introduction of an
improved monetary system
 EMS exchange rate mechanism introduced
- an obligation to limit fluctuations
between the latter to certain fluctuation
margins
Initial advantages
 Preventing movements above 2.25% (6%
for Italy) around parity in bilateral
exchange rates with other member
countries
 European Exchange Rate Mechanism
 An extension of European credit facilities
 Monetary cooperation fund
1992 crisis
 Problem with lira, sterling and then rest of
others.
 Italy raised its interest rates
 The Bundesbank did not cut its interest
rates enough
 Foreign exchange markets remained
disturbed
 Abandonment of Sweden
1992 crisis contd….
 Abandonment of Norway
 Ireland witnessed pressure and its
devaluation
 Germany reduced interest rates
 Franc fort policy of France
The Factors Behind the Crisis
 Competitiveness Problems
1. Italy-signs of deteriorating
competitiveness and rise of labor cost
2. Spain and the UK- Unstable cost of labor
3. France, Denmark- rise of economic
power
 German Unification
Options for the EMS

 A Reconstructed ERM
 Monetary Union
 A Federation of Central
Banks
 Floating Exchange Rates
Birth of EURO
 31 December 1998
 Abolish of all existing currencies
 1st used for monetary transfer only due
lack of notes and currencies
 ECB took over the roles of the national
central banks
 ECB carries out monetary policies
Coins And Notes
 Each euro divided into 100 cents
 coins - €2, €1, 50c, 20c, 10c, 5c, 2c, and
1c
 Notes- €500, €200, €100, €50, €20, €10,
€5
 €500 are not issued in all countries
Economic effects

 Optimal currency area-


1. Maximize economic efficiency
2. The stationary expectations model
3. The international risk sharing model
 Transaction costs and risks
1. Remove the cost of exchanging currency
2. Removes exchange rate risks
3. Financial markets more liquid and flexible
Economic effects

 Price parity
1. Prevent arbitrage
 Macroeconomic stability
1. Low levels of inflation
2. national and corporate bonds – more
liquid and lower interest rates
 Trade – 9-14% increase in trade
Economic effects
 Investment
1. Physical investment increased by 5%
2. FDI stocks increased by about 20%
3. In countries with weak currencies the
nos are even better
 Inflation
 Exchange rate risk
Economic effects
 Exchange rate risk
 Financial integration
 Effect on interest rates
 Price convergence
 Tourism
 Flexible exchange rates
 Against other major currencies
The future
 Recent turmoil in Greece
 Each country has its own fiscal policy
 Fiscal and monetary policy donot match
 Sharing of risks lead to collapse of all for
collapse of one
 High debt levels
 Regional Divergences
Conclusion
Our proposal
1. Unification of fiscal policies
 Sharing of debt
 Trying to recover as a whole
 Unification of democracies
2. Separation of EURO
 Each following its own independent
policy
Bibliography
 http://www.iea.org.uk/record.jsp?type=news&ID=121
 http:// news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/europe/euro-
glossary/12168
 http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/En
t-Fac/European-Monetary-System.html#ixzz0pVlFvkeC
 http://uk.reuters.com/article/iduktre64u0tm20100531
 http://library.thinkquest.org/19110/english/index.html
 http:// www.wikipedia.com

You might also like