Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 8
bilateral contract
contract
executed contract
executory contract
express contract
formal contract
implied-in-fact contract
informal contract
offeree
offeror
promise
promisor
quasi contract
unenforceable contract
unilateral contract
valid contract
void contract
voidable contract
Chapter 9
acceptance
agreement
counteroffer
course of dealing
mailbox rule
option contract
revocation
Chapter 10
accord and satisfaction
consideration
estopped
forbearance
liquidated debt
past consideration
promissory estoppel
release
rescission
Chapter 11
adhesion contract
blue laws
contractual capacity
disaffirmance
emancipation
employment contract
exculpatory clause
necessaries
ratification
reformation
unconscionable contract or clause
usury
Chapter 12
scienter
Knowledge
by the
misrepresenti
ng party that
material facts
have been
falsely
represented or
omitted with
an intent to
deceive.
bilateral Mistake that occurs when both parties to a contract are mistaken about
mistake the same material fact and the mistake is one that a reasonable person
would make; either party can rescind the contract.
material fact A fact to which a reasonable person would attach importance in
determining his or her course of action.
unilateral Mistake that occurs when one party to a contract is mistaken as to a
mistake material fact; the contract normally is enforceable.
Chapter 13
collateral promise
integrated contract
prenuptial agreement
Statute of Frauds
Chapter 14
anticipatory repudiation
breach of contract
commercial impracticability
concurrent conditions
condition
condition precedent
condition subsequent
discharge
frustration of purpose
impossibility of performance
mutual rescission
novation
performance
tender
Chapter 15
consequential damages
incidental damages
liquidated damages
mitigation of damages
nominal damages
penalty
restitution
specific performance
Chapter 16
alienation
assignee
assignment
assignor
delegate
delegation of duties
delegator
incidental beneficiary
intended beneficiary
oblige
obligor
privity of contract
franchise
franchisee
franchisor
sole proprietorship
Chapter 30
articles of partnership
buyout price
certificate of limited partnership
charging order
confession of judgment
dissociation
dissolution
family limited liability partnership (FLLP)
general partner
information return
joint and several liability
limited liability limited partnership (LLLP)
limited liability partnership (LLP)
limited partner
limited partnership
partnership
pass-through entity
winding up
Chapter 31
articles of organization
business trust
cooperative
joint stock company
joint venture
member
operating agreement
syndicate
Chapter 32
ultra vires
alien corporation
articles of incorporation
bond
bond indenture
bylaws
close corporation
commingle
common stock
corporation
dividend
domestic corporation
foreign corporation
holding company
piercing the corporate veil
preferred stock
retained earnings
S corporation
securities
stock
venture capital
Chapter 33
business judgment rule
inside director
outside director
preemptive rights
proxy
quorum
shareholder’s derivative suit
stock certificate
stock warrant
watered stock
Chapter 34
appraisal right
consolidation
dissolution
merger
parent-subsidiary merger
receiver
short-form merger
takeover
target corporation
tender offer
winding up
Chapter 44
adverse possession
condemnation
constructive eviction
conveyance
deed
easement
eminent domain
eviction
fee simple absolute
fixed-term tenancy
fixture
implied warranty of habitability
leasehold estate
license
life estate
nonpossessory interest
periodic tenancy
profit
quitclaim deed
recording statutes
special warranty deed
sublease
taking
tenancy at sufferance
tenancy at will
warranty deed
Ch. 8: Nature and Classification
2A. What are the four basic elements necessary to the formation of a valid contract?
The basic elements for the formation of a valid contract are an agreement, consideration, contractual
capacity, and legality. Defenses to the enforcement of an otherwise valid contract include the lack of
genuineness of assent and improper form.
4A. How does a void contract differ from a voidable contract? What is an unenforceable contract?
A void contract is not a valid contract; it is no contract. A voidable contract is a valid contract, but one
that can be avoided at the option of one or both of the parties.
An unenforceable contract is one that cannot be enforced because of certain legal defenses against it.
Ch. 9: Agreement
An acceptance is a voluntary act on the part of the offeree that shows assent, or agreement, to the terms
of an offer. The acceptance must be unequivocal and must be timely communicated to the offeror.
To be legally sufficient, consideration must be “something of legal value.” This may include (1) a
promise to do something that one has no prior legal duty to do, (2) the performance of an act that one is
otherwise not obligated to do, or (3) the refraining from an act that one has a legal right to do.
In an accord and satisfaction, a debtor offers to pay in satisfaction of an obligation, and a creditor
accepts, a lesser amount than the creditor originally claimed to be owed. The accord is the agreement to
pay and to accept less, and the satisfaction is the execution of the accord.
2A. Does an intoxicated person have the capacity to enter into an enforceable contract?
If a person who is sufficiently intoxicated to lack mental capacity enters into a contract, the contract is
voidable at the option of that person. It must be proved that the person’s reason and judgment were
impaired to the extent that he or she did not comprehend the legal consequences of entering into the
contract.
4A. Under what circumstances will a covenant not to compete be enforceable? When will such
covenants not be enforced?
If a covenant not to compete is ancillary to an agreement to sell an ongoing business (enabling the
seller to sell, and the purchaser to buy, the “goodwill” and “reputation” of the business) or is contained
in an employment contract, and is reasonable in terms of time and geographic area, it will be
enforceable. A covenant not to compete that is not ancillary to an agreement to sell an ongoing business
will be void, because it unreasonably restrains trade and is contrary to public policy.
2A. What is the difference between a mistake of value or quality and a mistake of fact?
A mistake as to the value of a deal is an ordinary risk of business for which a court normally will not
provide relief. A mistake concerning a fact important to the subject matter of a contract, however, may
provide a basis for relief.
4A. Does a party to a contract ever have a duty to disclose information to the other party?
Generally, a party to a contract can keep silent without liability, unless a serious potential problem or
latent defect (a crack in a building’s foundation, for example) is known to the seller but would not
reasonably be suspected by the buyer. Failure to disclose may constitute fraud in a fiduciary
relationship.
2A. If it is possible for a contract to be performed within one year, must it be in writing?
If performance of a contract within a year is possible, even if that performance is improbable, the
contract need not be in writing to be enforceable.
4A. If a written contract is required, what terms are considered essential and must be contained in
the written document?
Under the UCC, to be an enforceable contract, a writing need only name the quantity. Under statutes of
frauds covering transactions other than sales of goods, to be enforceable as a contract, a writing must
name the parties, the subject matter, the consideration, and the essential terms with reasonable
certainty. In some states, a contract for a sale of land must include the price and describe the property
with sufficient clarity to allow these terms to be determined without reference to outside sources.
Ch. 14: Performance and Discharge
The most common way to discharge, or terminate, a contract is by the performance of contractual
duties.
4A. When is a breach considered material, and what effect does that have on the other party’s
obligation to perform?
When performance is not substantial, a breach is material. The nonbreaching party is excused from
performing and can sue the breaching party for damages caused by the breach.
2A. What is the standard measure of compensatory damages when a contract is breached? How are
damages computed differently in construction contracts?
In a contract for the sale of goods, the usual measure of compensatory damages is an amount equal to
the difference between the contract price and the market price. When the buyer breaches and the seller
has not yet produced the goods, compensatory damages normally equal the lost profits on the sale
rather than the difference between the contract price and the market price. On the breach of a contract
for a sale of land, when specific performance is not available, the measure of damages is also the
difference between the contract and the market price.
The measure on the breach of a construction contract depends on who breaches, and when. Recovery
for an innocent contractor is generally based on funds expended or expected profit, or both; and for a
nonbreaching owner, the cost to complete the project.
Specific performance might be granted as a remedy when damages are an inadequate remedy and the
subject matter of the contract is unique.
2A. If a contract requires a part to perform personal services, can the right to receive those services
be assigned?
A right under a contract that is uniquely personal cannot be assigned (unless it is only a right to receive
payment).
A beneficiary will be considered an intended beneficiary if a reasonable person in the position of the
beneficiary would believe that the promisee intended to confer on the beneficiary the right to bring suit
to enforce the contract. Other factors include whether performance is rendered directly to the third
party, whether the third party has the right to control the details of performance, and whether the third
party is expressly designated as a beneficiary in the contract.
Agency relationships normally are consensual: they arise by voluntary consent and agreement between
the parties.
4A. When is a principal liable for the agent’s actions with respect to third parties? When is the agent
liable?
A disclosed or partially disclosed principal is liable to a third party for a contract made by an agent who
is acting within the scope of her or his authority. If the agent exceeds the scope of authority and the
principal fails to ratify the contract, the agent may be liable (and the principal may not).
When neither the fact of agency nor the identity of the principal is disclosed, the agent is liable, and if
an agent has acted within the scope of his or her authority, the undisclosed principal is also liable. Each
party is liable for his or her own torts and crimes. A principal may also be liable for an agent’s torts
committed within the course or scope of employment. A principal is liable for an agent’s crime if the
principal participated by conspiracy or other action.
A franchise is any arrangement in which the owner of a trademark, a trade name, or a copyright
licenses others to use the trademark, trade name, or copyright in the selling of goods or services. The
majority of franchises are distributorships, chain-style business operations, or manufacturing or
processing-plant arrangements.
A franchise contract typically covers such issues as the franchisee’s payment for the franchise, any
lease or purchase of the business premises, any lease of purchase of equipment, the location of the
franchise, the territory to be served, the business organization of the franchisee, quality standards to be
met, the degree of supervision and control by the franchisor, pricing arrangements, and termination of
the franchise.
The rights and duties of partners may be whatever the partners declare them to be. In the absence of
partners’ agreements to the contrary, the law imposes certain rights and duties. These include a sharing
of profits and losses in equal measure, the ability to assign a partnership interest, equal rights in
managing the firm (subject to majority rule), access to all of the firm’s books and records, an
accounting of assets and profits, and a sharing of the firm’s property. The duties include fiduciary
duties, being bound to third parties through contracts entered into with other partners, and liability for
the firm’s debts and liabilities.
4A. What advantages do limited liability partnerships offer to businesspersons that are not offered
by general partnerships?
Advantages of limited liability partnerships over general partnerships include that, depending on the
applicable state statute, the liability of their partners for partnership and partners’ debts and torts can be
limited to the amount of the partners’ investments. Another advantage is the flexibility of these entities
in regard to taxation and management.
2A. How are limited liability companies formed, and who decides how they will be managed and
operated?
To form a limited liability company (LLC), articles of organization must be filed with a central state
agency (usually the secretary of state’s office). A few states also require that a notice of the intention to
form an LLC be published in a local newspaper. The members can decide how to operate the business.
If there is no agreement, the state LLC statute will govern the outcome, and if there is no statute on the
issue, partnership law principles apply.
A joint venture is an enterprise in which two or more persons or business entities combine their efforts
or their property for a single transaction or project, or a related series of transactions or projects.
Generally, partnership law applies to joint ventures, although joint venturers have less implied and
apparent authority than partners because they have less power to bind the members of their
organization.
2A. What steps are involved in bringing a corporation into existence? Who is liable for
preincorporation contracts?
The steps to bring a corporation into existence are (1) preliminary organizational and promotional
undertakings and (2) the legal process of incorporation.
A promoter (one who takes the preliminary steps in organizing a corporation) is liable on
preincorporation contracts unless the other contracting party agrees not to hold the promoter liable or
the corporation assumes the contract by novation.
4A. In what circumstances might a court disregard the corporate entity (“pierce the corporate veil”)
and hold the shareholders personally liable?
Generally, when the corporate privilege is abused for personal benefit or when the corporate business is
treated in such a careless manner that the corporation and the shareholder in control are no longer
separate entities, a court will require an owner to assume personal liability. Commingled assets, fraud,
noncompliance with corporate formalities, and thin capitalization are among the circumstances that
may justify piercing the corporate veil.
2A. Directors are expected to use their best judgment in managing the corporation. What must
directors do to avoid liability for honest mistakes of judgment and poor business decisions?
Directors and officers must exercise due care in performing their duties. They are expected to be
informed on corporate matters. They are expected to act in accord with their own knowledge and
training. Directors are expected to exercise a reasonable amount of supervision when they delegate
work to others. Directors are expected to attend board of directors’ meetings. In general, directors and
officers must act in good faith, in what they consider to be the best interests of the corporation, and
with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a similar position would exercise in similar
circumstances. This requires an informed decision, with a rational basis, and with no conflict between
the decision maker’s personal interest and the interest of the corporation.
4A. If a group of shareholders perceives that the corporation has suffered a wrong and the directors
refuse to take action, can the shareholders compel the directors to act? If so, how?
The shareholders cannot compel the directors to act to redress a wrong suffered by the corporation, but
if the directors refuse to act, the shareholders can act on behalf of the firm by filing what is known as a
shareholder’s derivative suit. Any damages recovered by the suit normally go into the corporation’s
treasury, not to the shareholders personally.
First, the board of directors of each corporation involved must approve the merger or consolidation
plan. Second, the shareholders of each corporation must approve the plan, by vote, at a shareholders’
meeting. Third, the plan (articles of merger or consolidation) is filed, usually with the secretary of state.
And fourth, the state issues a certificate of merger to the surviving corporation or a certificate of
consolidation to the newly consolidated corporation.
To resist a takeover, a target company may make a self-tender, or resort to one of several other tactics,
which have colorful names, including “taking” a poison pill, selling a crown jewel, imposing a lobster
trap on shareholders, using a Pac-Man defense, practicing a scorched earth policy, amending its articles
to add shark repellent, or soliciting a merger with a white knight. Among other things, these involve
selling company assets, restricting the conversion of corporate stock, attempting a takeover of the
acquiring firm, and merging with a firm that offers a more favorable price for stock.
The adverse possessor’s possession must be (1) actual and exclusive; (2) open, visible, and notorious,
not secret or clandestine; (3) continuous and peaceable for the statutory period of time; and (4) hostile
and adverse.
4A. What is a leasehold estate? What types of leasehold estates, or tenancies, can be created when
real property is leased?
A leasehold estate is property in the possession of a tenant. Leasehold estates include tenancies for
years, periodic tenancies, tenancies at will, and tenancies at sufferance.