The document contains a crosstabulation of data on the gender and age of people in a sample and whether they manage their own funds or use a fund manager. It shows that among people aged 25-35, males are more likely to manage their own funds, while females of that age are more likely to use a fund manager. For those aged 35-45, the rates are more evenly split between self-management and using a fund manager for both males and females. Among those aged 45+, both males and females are more likely to use a fund manager than manage their own funds.
The document contains a crosstabulation of data on the gender and age of people in a sample and whether they manage their own funds or use a fund manager. It shows that among people aged 25-35, males are more likely to manage their own funds, while females of that age are more likely to use a fund manager. For those aged 35-45, the rates are more evenly split between self-management and using a fund manager for both males and females. Among those aged 45+, both males and females are more likely to use a fund manager than manage their own funds.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document contains a crosstabulation of data on the gender and age of people in a sample and whether they manage their own funds or use a fund manager. It shows that among people aged 25-35, males are more likely to manage their own funds, while females of that age are more likely to use a fund manager. For those aged 35-45, the rates are more evenly split between self-management and using a fund manager for both males and females. Among those aged 45+, both males and females are more likely to use a fund manager than manage their own funds.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Gender * management of funds * age of people in sample Crosstabulation
management of funds Total
age of people in sample yourself fund manager yourself 25-35 Gender male Count 25 27 52 % within Gender 48.1% 51.9% 100.0% % of Total 37.9% 40.9% 78.8% female Count 5 9 14 % within Gender 35.7% 64.3% 100.0% % of Total 7.6% 13.6% 21.2% Total Count 30 36 66 % within Gender 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% % of Total 45.5% 54.5% 100.0% 35-45 Gender male Count 45 40 85 % within Gender 52.9% 47.1% 100.0% % of Total 44.6% 39.6% 84.2% female Count 5 11 16 % within Gender 31.3% 68.8% 100.0% % of Total 5.0% 10.9% 15.8% Total Count 50 51 101 % within Gender 49.5% 50.5% 100.0% % of Total 49.5% 50.5% 100.0% 45+ Gender male Count 17 33 50 % within Gender 34.0% 66.0% 100.0% % of Total 25.8% 50.0% 75.8% female Count 7 9 16 % within Gender 43.8% 56.3% 100.0% % of Total 10.6% 13.6% 24.2% Total Count 24 42 66 % within Gender 36.4% 63.6% 100.0% % of Total 36.4% 63.6% 100.0%