Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • De Man 1996 Kant and Schiller

    Uploaded by

    spinozist
    11 views20 pages
    Theodor W. Adorno Aesthetic Theory Volume 87. Renate Lachmann Text and Memory: Intertextuality in Russian Modernism Volume 86. Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and proletarian Public sphere and experience Volume 84.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Theodor W. Adorno Aesthetic Theory Volume 87. Renate Lachmann Text and Memory: Intertextuality in Russian Modernism Volume 86. Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and proletarian Public sphere and experience Volume 84.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views20 pages

    De Man 1996 Kant and Schiller

    Uploaded by

    spinozist
    Theodor W. Adorno Aesthetic Theory Volume 87. Renate Lachmann Text and Memory: Intertextuality in Russian Modernism Volume 86. Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and proletarian Public sphere and experience Volume 84.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 20
    ance ‘Theory an History of Literate ‘ute py Wlad Goda an Jochen Seale Sase Younes otane 6. Votan. otune 4 Vetoes Nolemet ote 0. Valune'. Vee 7 Volane 5. Youne 7. Yooune 6. Voloness Yatune 8. olone Volume Venue. Yolane Yorume 9. Votan 57 Yosune Votune 5 “TeoloeW Adame Aste THO Feet tn Tn an Memory terete Racin Modern ‘Bec Hen no Yves Roy Uncosisfor Sele “Aver, Pectana ands Pablic ‘it ga leader gs Publ Sper and Experience ows Se ee tf he Borgen on Praia Publ Shae ade Pau ong roa Search fhe Wah ‘alge cove ature Te utero Pioophy Masten he fie Comerton SSNs elo Madey and Atte Cre: vein "asonlLieronre iy ks Border Witing The Madmen Tet an Uh Cues Mig See if on terore rae Npunten Language ond Den The Pace of Neat Sie ae aling The Pests of Bante Ral, iis sean be Nery Th operative Comma Wendie onan ont hina Moaery: Te Posies of Reding at beh Sci Secs Prax: Tex. Sect! Meaning Mag vd Naboo Aa ele Cons Reaing wt hres Cer 1,8. Tnty Wrage Nedanen edemizm and Hegenon:A Materia Cris cf eet ‘Aeris Pa Zs Oral Pee Anode ‘ge ngunbws Sav WordandPhansomin Were Cue Gre Ses uconand ver Poms of Dol deren dean Cia Wray 19521973. ml ee athe enon” Didier Cose Nareea Corman omic Bel Rhetrie ‘Be Caen Fond Clare: The Plier of uarrion PW Aero Musegsrd: Conran oft As FeeERae tne Emergence of Sc poe into adhe Por ie aes el Wad Gosh eating de Man Reaing EW Selig The Phos of Art ous an Prato Kia Fo Sterner n Stage’ Mera’ Maelo Pl Seah Dicer te Set Porcher bat nth ie, ep. 197 UBRARY U.C. RIVERSIDE Aesthetic Ideology Paul de Man Edited with an Introduction by Andrzej Warminski ‘Theory and History of Literature, Volume 65 University of Minnesota Press Mexseapls/ London Contents oe No uct anys da Ae ‘The Epistemology of Metaphor 34 f ) coi yee iy nt nso: Alegsis of Reiec dre) Warts 1 sa meet Nor ae occ rn Pascal's AllegnyofFenenoa 51 Se yr nye on ‘Phenomenaiy so Maen Kast 70 pony tie : Na eran N02 Sinan Symbolin Hage eer 9t La erst nixon Pa eos ir Cnr Catenin ate KantsMatntion 119 bela . Kantand Siler 129 aco |e wei ni i ‘The Conceptof irony 163 PE lew bert Replyto Reymond Geuss 185, Saves aes Index 188 fpowo meen) come 1 Wem Anton Tile Se, aie 9t —— | = | B. on a's MATERUALISN. ‘The language ofthe poets hcefore inno way partake of mimesis reflection, ‘oc even perception, in th sense which would low ink between see expe ce and understanding between perception and appreeption. Realism post Ines pheaomealism of experience which i bere being deni or inored “Kats looking at the wr jst as ne ses ive mun ha ib”) an abso, ‘ial formalism that enti o noton of eeeace o semios. Yet iti this Cazzelyaefereatal, phenomensl, »pthese formal tht will wa out ia te ble mong aes and find acoso the moral wold ef praca reso, pec al uw, and atonal plies. To peody Kent's site pocedue of detonary ‘ein teat! formalism tha animate ett udpment nthe dynamics Of he subline is what alld material. Thoreians of erate who far ‘hey may have deere or borayed the werd by being to formalist ae wory- ing aboot the wrong tg: ln the spi af Kes tid Critgu, they were not eal foralisie enough Kant and Schiller "have some chang in pace ode, Deo titi ave not write ota ee- tur; was not nectar nth cate beau I'm doling with much ease x. { would’t dre wo snprovse about Kant, bt abut Sehr i a ite easier now what going on, ao 0 there no ned or ch detailed xual, ‘Sowhat tts doing wile more theatre of anexposton fan aealy ght srguneat, moe ia he nate ofa clas hun alec. Therefore iis betes to ‘peakit—is iti casero ten o when t's poken han when is ead ‘Yelthe point ry to make, or the question to which uy to adress myself ‘by ths jtaposing Schl, and tying to tke acaper look at jt exacy what Inppeaed between Kaot and Seiler—-what bape when Sehiler comments very specially on Kan?'—dat event, tat coco, andthe ctre of ht cocoate, which 3), not to ical explain ise complex, nd, Tappote, to some esta, pera. thas wth two mates, one of Ye [grea steal importnce, the second of ery puch more det impor far ese lect The fist as odo with the general problem of ie eceton of Kan the Cr tique, 0d special the receplon ofthe Crud f Judgment, animes Inporaae took that rene exceedingly porte hrophoe! he ietent ad wens censies and tha i sl steady ivoked) ether ely or inet. rad Se a cy Win Jer tl Towns goin ey sine or spec it Mee mn os vata Comal bach) en nen desert ‘su DxANTAND semen ‘You'll notice rece that when Walt Jackson Bate ad somehing article © ‘ay about he humans, te anthoity o which he refered rtf ell was Kant ‘And you may have nod tht when Frank Leticia was tying to get certain ‘ypesof contemporary cic which wil remain usaamed,t give them thei comeuppance, his efecace again was to Kant, he weat bck to Kant! So this is Simo joke, hit “bck to Kank” "Bu the presence ofthe hed Critique within ee discourse—also i hit county, and ina diferent way, of eouse in Germany and in France, tough ‘fequeny mone by all Kinds of ote ces, so tai isn lager Kant ove ‘35 but whole series of am inbetween tht eeepton of Kans verycom- lex (he eepton ofthe thi Critique) and not well inn. Tete ae allusions ‘oitrghtand le, btitis'teally explored. That's René Welles bok Kant it Bnglond? which 1 looked at ecendy abd whic sa remarkably tough-minded litle Book, fom which it eu that scaly the English Romani di’ gst Kanrigt eal But he wes the Critlue af Pure Reason rater ha he Critique of Fugen In tat whole indeed, ot es, of couse fo be dase, as Uhl I compler- But its pater which would some ene ry to evoke bere "There sems tobe clays regression fom the lncisveness and om the i> trom the isa impact ofthe rg. Tere isan tempi indeod these ‘Sany wut alle te way ia whic suggested hat Kat ca bread 1903 80 days ago, then Kants statement a very testening on, bot fer the ake of ‘hlosophy and fer te relationship between at and philosophy in sexe. So sorething very dre theaening is present here which oe fels the ned 0 Iridge—ie difculies, the obsacles which Kant as opnad up. So there i @ ‘egreson, a atempt to acount fer, domesticus the etc incivenes of ‘te orignal And that eas then totes ike those of Seiler, which under © {4 ust that. Out ofa tant ke Schiller Latre on Aethtic Ehcaton, oe ‘ter ext of Scie chat relate edly to Kat, whole ein in Germany — ‘in Gerny and elzownero—has been bom: «way of empherinng ofrevaorzng the austhete, a way of seting up the sete as exemplary a an exemplary cucgory, a a unlyag cgay, as « mol fo ducain, a «model even fr the ne, Anda ceain toe thts characte of Shiller sone whlch ca ‘esp esing houghoot the rineteent cera in Gecmany, which youhea fst, 1 Sei ito Ba, The iin ag So” Haran Maye Ses esi th eth Lae, er ew cen Cg ese Ca ‘Sem obs Ma's mtu Pny nr Py ap Davey ohn rm 90 oe 2 Ra Ma et Wee, aman Kb Bn 188-88 (een, Nee Ce a a an sem 0 in Scilly, bt which you thn hearin Sebpenhaee, which you hear in enly Nistache The ith of Tragedy is puely| Selina ts one, std oon yoo sl barn certain way In Heiegge, That one alvays— { crain aloo of an 2 ron valorization Qf a whichis freqoect ‘here taught tat tion it lvays appears Houble, it always sppexs ‘doubled with eal approach which s closer to tht of the xginal Kan an hich goo together with this much more positively floczed approach art We ‘Saw wat he joxapsion Beowen Schl and Kleit does, and we saw he way inhich Kleist es you back ina way o ceria of te more teatening Kantian insights in toms of Seiler Or you would find a play Uke that beeen Schopentauer end Nicosche the way in which Nictaiche—aot just te Nite Offi ir orgy bt Ne each eal aan {o Schopenhauer and, T would sy, "i ‘snd reKanies” wat ‘Schopenbaue stot sying. Or, woul even suet, otk a ae which ‘ant purty German, that something Ie that could be sid to goon btwo=n ‘eegger onthe ooe band and Dena on th oie, so tat the reading tat aida giver of Hetepae, ia which Heideggec wo ply the oe of Sehile, Dernide ould then apear as being cote to Kant, in 2 Kind of sii eal tamination of extn clam forte atonomy an the power of the aestii ‘hich eBlog asserted nthe wake of Seiler, Dune necessly inthe wae of Kant Tis sa very comples problem fo whic plan to make no coatibution ‘whatever, excep for looking tle more closely at hat ginal model, te ‘eationtiptetween Kao and Seiler, Becrte tt set pater which wll ‘peut and which would be a posible way in which toerganize te question of tie ‘senpion of Kat trougout he nineteeath cam, in Geman, though {you would find sir lementn Engle. Mathew Amel, fer insane, is ery ‘Schllesan, Who would be te equivalents, who wos be the Kant of Matbew ‘Aro? Ruskin? don't know. wort layla Wif—

    You might also like