Professional Documents
Culture Documents
it influences the costs of the organization and potential bad decision can lead to very
serious damages to the organization.
The compensation and benefits strategy is derived from the overall HRM Strategy and
it has to be fully aligned. When the HRM Strategy sets the main objectives for the HRM
Function, the compensation and benefits strategy has to follow. When the overall HRM
Strategy states the low cost of services and employees, the compensation and benefits
strategy cannot target the highest salaries at all levels.
The compensation and benefits strategy sets the general rules for the compensation and
benefits area in the organization and the owners and leaders of the area. In some
organizations, the compensation and benefits department is just a support department for
the line management. In other organizations the compensation and benefits manager is a
very powerful employee in the organization with the right “veto”.
The compensation and benefits strategy sets the position of the organization on the job
market and defines the items in the total cash in the organization and their role. The role
of different components of the compensation is very important as the role of the
compensation components can differ. For example, the role of bonuses can be primarily
in performance reward or the retention of the employees and the organization has to
decide.
The compensation and benefits strategy has to reflect the reality in the industry and the
surrounding job market. The compensation strategy can set the wish to pay the lowest
possible salaries, but the HRM Function and the organization have to respect the reality
on the job market.
The compensation strategy needs a strong support from the top management as it sets
strong limits to the daily operation of the line management and they usually do not fully
agree with all the aspects included in the compensation and benefits strategywages,
nominal and real The return to labor in the production process; it may be denoted
either in terms of monetary units (nominal wages) or expressed in terms of
purchasing power (real wages). Real wages are simply money wages deflated by a
price index—an appropriately weighted average of prices of all goods and services.
Generally a real variable, such as the real interest rate, is one where the effects of
inflation have been factored in. A nominal variable is one where the effects of inflation have
not been accounted for. A few examples illustrate the difference:
Now suppose the inflation rate is 3% for that year. We can buy a basket of goods today and it
will cost $100, or we can buy that basket next year and it will cost $103. If we buy the bond
with a 6% nominal interest rate for $100, sell it after a year and get $106, buy a basket of
goods for $103, we will have $3 left over. So after factoring in inflation, our $100 bond will
earn us $3 in income; a real interest rate of 3%. The relationship between the nominal
interest rate, inflation, and the real interest rate is described by the Fisher Equation:
If inflation is positive, which it generally is, then the real interest rate is lower than the
nominal interest rate. If we have deflation and the inflation rate is negative, then the real
interest rate will be larger.
GDP, or Gross Domestic Product is the value of all the goods and services produced in a
country. The Nominal Gross Domestic Product measures the value of all the goods and
services produced expressed in current prices. On the other hand, Real Gross Domestic
Product measures the value of all the goods and services produced expressed in the prices of
some base year. An example:
Suppose in the year 2000, the economy of a country produced $100 billion worth of goods and
services based on year 2000 prices. Since we're using 2000 as a basis year, the nominal and
real GDP are the same. In the year 2001, the economy produced $110B worth of goods and
services based on year 2001 prices. Those same goods and services are instead valued at
$105B if year 2000 prices are used. Then:
Once again, if inflation is positive, then the Nominal GDP and Nominal GDP Growth Rate will
be less than their nominal counterparts. The difference between Nominal GDP and Real GDP is
used to measure inflation in a statistic called The GDP Deflator.
These work in the same way as the nominal interest rate. So if your nominal wage is $50,000
in 2002 and $55,000 in 2003, but the price level has risen by 12%, then your $55,000 in 2003
buys what $49,107 would have in 2002, so your real wage has gone done. You can calculate a
real wage in terms of some base year by the following:
Almost all other real variables can be calculated in the manner as Real Wages. The Federal
Reserve keeps statistics on items such as the Real Change in Private Inventories, Real
Disposable Income, Real Government Expenditures, Real Private Residential Fixed Investment,
etc. These are all statistics which account for inflation by using a base year for prices.
If you'd like to ask a question about nominal variables, real variables, or any other topic or
comment on this story, please use the feedback From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please
improve this article if you can. (November 2007)
This article does not cite any references or sources.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be
challenged and removed. (February 2007)
...but total compensation, including eg. health insurance, has been rising.
The term real wages refers to wages that have been adjusted for inflation. This term is
used in contrast to nominal wages or unadjusted wages.
The use of adjusted figures is used in undertaking some forms of economic analysis. For
example, in order to report on the relative economic successes of two nations, real wage
figures are much more useful than nominal figures.
If nominal figures are used in an analysis, then statements may be incorrect. A report
could state: 'Country A is becoming wealthier each year than Country B because its wage
levels are rising by an average of $500 compared to $250 in Country B'. However, the
conclusion that this statement draws could be false if the values used are not adjusted for
inflation. An inflation rate of 100 percent in Country A will result in its citizens
becoming rapidly poorer than those of Country B where inflation is only 2 percent.
Taking inflation into account, the conclusion is quite different: 'Despite nominal wages in
Country A rising faster than those in Country B, real wages are falling significantly as the
currency halves in value each year'.
The importance of considering real wages also appears when looking at the history of a
single country. Looking back over the decades, annual wages were considerably less than
they are today. If only nominal wages are considered, the conclusion has to be that people
used to be a great deal poorer than today. The cost of living was also much lower. In
order to have an accurate view of a nation's wealth in any given year, inflation has to be
taken into account — and thus using real wages as the measuring stick.
Real wages are a useful economic measure, as opposed to nominal wages, which simply
show the monetary value of wages in that year. However, real wages does not take into
account other compensation like benefits or old age pensions. When including benefits
and wages, total compensation in the U.S., for example has risen steadily for the last 40
years.[1]
[edit] Example
Consider an example economy with the following wages over three years:
• Year 1: $20,000
• Year 2: $20,400
• Year 3: $20,808
Real Wage = W/P (W= wage, P= i, inflation, can also be subjugated as interest)
Also assume that the inflation in this economy is 2 percent p.a. These figures have very
different meanings depending on whether they are real wages or nominal wages.
If the figures that are shown are real wages, then it can be determined that wages have
increased by 2 percent after inflation has been taken into account. In effect, an individual
making this wage actually has more money than the previous year.
However, if the figures that are shown are nominal wages then the wages are not really
increasing at all. In absolute dollar amounts, an individual is bringing home more money
each year, but the increases in inflation actually zeroes out the increases in their salary.
Given that inflation is increasing at the same pace as wages, an individual cannot actually
afford to increase their consumption. The ability to make smart, informed
compensation and rewards decisions can be the difference between an under-
performing organization and a successful one. Saba Compensation is a compensation
management solution that improves talent retention and drives smarter decision-making
by providing a comprehensive view of employee success.
This approach improves performance, productivity, and talent retention rates, ensuring
your organization’s competitive advantage.
Compease salary administration software helps you develop and maintain competitive pay
rates, drive employee performance, and manage merit increases and compensation budgets.
Stay competitive in today's economy by ensuring that salaries are aligned with the market and
equitable within your organization.
Compease includes
• Compensation management
Reporting capabilities are extensive
and include compa-ratio reports and
current / projected salaries for
individuals.
• Salary updates
Annual salary updates ensure that
your compensation system remains
competitive.
• Job descriptions
Compease includes proforma job
descriptions.
Align compensation with employee performance
Compensation administration is closely linked to effective employee performance
management. Compease provides the budgeting and merit increase tools your managers need
to pay employees based on their performance ratings, current salary levels and experience.
To learn more about employee performance management and how to link compensation with
performance contact HRN to attend a Performance Pro product demonstration webinar.
Definition: That which constitutes, or is regarded as, an equivalent; that which makes good
the lack or variation of something else; that which compensates for loss or privation; amends;
remuneration; recompense.
Compensation 3
Definition: The extinction of debts of which two persons are reciprocally debtors by the
credits of which they are reciprocally creditors; the payment of a debt by a credit of equal
amount; a set-off.
Compensation 4
Compensation 5
Definition: An equivalent stipulated for in contracts for the sale of real estate, in which it is
customary to provide that errors in description, etc., shall not avoid, but shall be the subject
of compensation.
compensation 6
compensation 7
Definition: something (such as money) given or received as payment or reparation (as for a
service or loss or injury)
compensation 8
4. Definition: (psychiatry) a defense mechanism that conceals your undesirable
shortcomings by exaggerating desirable behaviors
[edit] References
Deferred Compensation
(1) Payment for goods or services.(2) Damages necessary to restore an injured party to his or her
position before the wrongdoing.(3) In eminent domain, payment to property owners for the value
of the property taken and any damage caused to the value of the remaining property.
The Complete Real Estate Encyclopedia by Denise L. Evans, JD & O. William Evans, JD. Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-
Hill Companies, Inc.
Compensation
Wages, commissions, tips, professional fees, and net self-employment income received for
services rendered; that is, earned income