Professional Documents
Culture Documents
?download HortScience 40 7 Physiological Responses Carambola SWD
?download HortScience 40 7 Physiological Responses Carambola SWD
the greenhouse (CV = 17%) and VPD often mental factors were much different in the
has a significant effect on gs. two studies.
Reductions in E were related to reductions The reduction in ACO2 with decreasing
in Ψs for carambola trees in the greenhouse Ψs was presumably due to a direct nonlinear
(Fig. 4a) and in the field (Fig. 4b). This cur- effect of gs for trees in the greenhouse (Fig.
vilinear response of carambola trees differs 6a) and in the field (Fig. 6b). Ismail et al.
from previous results of Razi et al. (1992) (1994) also reported that increased stomatal
who found a linear relationship between ΨL resistance in young carambola trees limited
and E in carambola trees. This difference in CO2 uptake during drought stress. A reduction
response is possibly due to differences in soil in ACO2 for carambola trees in the greenhouse
properties in the two studies. and the field in Krome soils occurred when gs
Net CO2 assimilation decreased as Ψs de- fell below about 50 mmol·m–2·s–1, although
clined below about –1.0 MPa in trees grown in there was considerable variation in the data.
containers in the greenhouse (Fig. 5a), but the We also constructed ACO2/Ci curves (data not
critical value in the field was not clear from the shown) which were inconclusive for deter-
data (Fig. 5b), and the r2 value was quite low. At mining the relative contributions of stomatal
–2.0 MPa, ACO2 approached zero and became and nonstomatal conductivities to net carbon
negative at about –3.0 MPa. Similarly, Razi assimilation.
et al. (1992) observed that ACO2 of carambola The positive linear correlation between gs
trees decreased when leaf water potential fell and E (data not shown; r2 = 0.76 and 0.75 in
below –0.85 MPa. Maximum ACO2 values in the greenhouse and field, respectively) suggests
this study, about 10.0 µmol m–2s–1, especially that partial stomatal closure was essential to
for field trees were considerably greater than conserve water by reducing E. This partial
those reported by Ismail et al. (1994) of only stomatal closure resulted in a gradual decline
3.13 µmol m–2·s–1. We assume that environ- in ACO2 as soil water was initially depleted.
However, as SWD increased and plant drought sured within 2 min of each other to determine
stress increased, a further decline in gs (below their relationship. There was a strong linear
50 mmol·m–2·s–1) resulted in sharp decline in relationship between ΨL and Ψs for trees in
ACO2. This perhaps was an avoidance mecha- the greenhouse (r2 = 0.97 and in the field (r2 =
nism by carambola trees to conserve water 0.97) and values were very similar suggesting
by reducing E, while at the same time main- that either method could be used to measure
taining moderate ACO2 levels during periods water potential of carambola leaves. However,
of occasional or short-term drought stress. A Ψs may be better indicator of drought stress of
SWD <50% in Krome soils did not affect tree carambola trees in Krome very gravelly loam
gas exchange. soil than SWD as determined from measure-
It has been suggested that ΨL is a less reli- ments of soil water content.
able variable for making irrigation scheduling
decisions for fruit trees than Ψs due to the Literature Cited
inherent variability of ΨL under field condi- Al-Yahyai, R., B. Schaffer, F.S. Davies, and J.H.
tions (Garnier and Berger, 1985; McCutchan Crane. 2005. Four levels of soil moisture deple-
and Shackel, 1992; Naor, 2000). Enclosing tion minimally affect carambola phenological
leaves in a reflective, dark plastic bag for 1 cycles. HortTechnology 15:623–630.
to 2 h before water potential measurements Al-Yahyai, R., B. Schaffer, and F.S. Davies. 2003.
reduces E until an equilibrium is achieved Monitoring soil water content for irrigation
between the ΨL and the ΨS (Begg and Turner, scheduling in a carambola orchard in a grav-
1970), thus providing a more precise method elly limestone soil. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.
of determining tree water status (Garnier and 116:37–41.
Begg, J.E. and N.C. Turner. 1970. Water poten-
Berger, 1985; McCutchan and Shackel, 1992; tial gradients in field tobacco. Plant Physiol.
Naor, 2000; Shackel et al., 1997). In this study, 46:343–346.
ΨL and Ψs from the same branch were mea- Crane, J.H. 1994. The carambola (starfruit). Fact
Sheet HS-12. Inst. Food. Agr. Sci., Univ. Fla., Developmental light level affects growth, mor-
Gainesville. phology, and leaf physiology of young carambola
Garnier, E. and A. Berger. 1985. Testing water trees. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:711–718.
potential in peach trees as an indicator of water McCutchan, H. and K. Shackel. 1992. Stem-water
stress. J. Hort. Sci. 60:47–56. potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress
Ismail, M.R. and K.M. Noor. 1996. Growth, water in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French).
relations, and physiological processes of star J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117:607–611.
fruit (Averrhoa carambola L.) plants under root Muñoz-Carpena, R., Y. Li, and T. Olczyk. 2002.
growth restriction. Sci. Hort. 66:51–58. Alternatives of low cost soil moisture monitoring
Ismail, M.R., S.W. Burrage, H. Tarmizi, and M.A. devices for vegetable production in south Florida.
Aziz. 1994. Growth, plant water relations, Inst. Food Agr. Sci., Univ. Fla., Gainesville,
photosynthesis rate, and accumulation of proline Miami–Dade County. Bul. ABE 333.
in young carambola plants in relation to water Naor, A. 2000. Midday stem water potential as a plant
stress. Sci. Hort. 60:101–114. water stress indicator for irrigation scheduling in
Ismail, M.R., M.K. Yusaf, and A. Masturi. 1996. fruit trees. Acta Hort. 537:447–454.
Growth and flowering of water stressed starfruit Neuhaus, A. 2003. Managing irrigation for yield
plants and response to ameliorated water stress. and fruit quality in avocado. PhD diss. Univ.
Proc. Intl. Conf. Trop. Fruit. Kuala Lampur, Western Australia., Perth.
Malaysia. 2:97–106. Nobel, C.V., R.W. Drew, and V. Slabaugh. 1996. Soil
Li, Y. and W. Klassen. 2001. South Florida initia- survey of Dade County area, Florida. USDA,
tive—Water quality research progress report. NRCS, Wash., D.C.
Res. Rpt. TREC-L101-7. Núñez-Elisea, R., B. Schaffer, M. Zekri, S.K.
Ludlow, M.M. 1998. Strategies of response to water O’Hair, and J.H. Crane. 2001. In situ soil-water
stress, p. 269–281. In: K. Kreeb, H. Richter, and characteristics curves for tropical fruit orchards
M. Hinckley (eds.). Structural and functional in trenched calcareous soil. HortTechnology
response to environmental stresses: Water short- 11:65–69.
age. SPB Acad. Publ., The Netherlands. Paltineanu, I.C. and J.L. Starr. 1997. Real-time soil
Marler, T.E., B. Schaffer, and J.H. Crane. 1994. water dynamics using multisensor capacitance
probes: Laboratory calibration. Soil Sci. Soc. Kester, B. Krueger, B. Lampinen, G. McGourty,
Amer. J. 61:1576–1585. W. Micke, E. Mitcham, B. Olsen, K. Pelletrau, H.
Razi, M.I., M. Awang, and S. Razlan. 1992. Effect of Philips, D. Ramos, L. Schwankl, S. Sibbett, R.
water stress on growth and physiology processes of Snyder, S. Southwick, M. Stevenson, M. Thorpe,
Averrhoa carambola. Acta Hort. 321:505–509. S. Weinbaum, and J. Yeager. 1997. Plant water
Salakpetch, S., D.W. Turner, and B. Dell. 1990. The status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous
flowering of carambola (Averrhoa carambola L.) fruit trees. HortTechnology 7:23–29.
is more strongly influenced by cultivar and water Stern, R.A., M. Meron, A. Noar, R. Wallach, B.
stress than by diurnal temperature variation and Bravdo, and S. Gazit. 1998. Effect of fall irrigation
photoperiod. Sci. Hort. 43:83–94. level in ‘Mauritius’ and ‘Floridian’ lychee on soil
Shackel, K.A., H. Ahmadi, W. Biasi, R. Buchner, and plant water status, flowering maturity, and
D. Goldhammer, S. Gurusinghe, J. Hasey, D. yield. J. Amer Soc. Hort. Sci. 123:150–155.