Critique of Argument no.

An overall analysis of the given argument reveals that the author

aims to (Overall Conclusion of the argument)

The argument is interesting for it reveals various logical strengths

and weaknesses/is very strong/ is weak , etc

Para 2-4

These paragraphs appear to assert .......(state the conclusion of

those paragraphs.) If one looks closely at the premises which
support this conclusion , they include three main reasons i.e.
a) ......... , b)................ c)............. The premises have a strong
inferential link with the argument /weak link/one of the premises
is not properly connected, etc. Moreover the author
employs/integrates, various independent/dependent premises to
support the main claim, however, since all three are
independent/dependent/ one of them is independent/all of them
are dependent /two of them and seem to be very strong/very
weak/ therefore they can independently support/dependently
support/weaken the basis of the argument(Fig 1.1 ) One further
notices strong inductive/deductive logic applied by the author
which appears to be strong/weak/cogent, valid/invalid/sound, etc.
Finally, the argument is strong because the author has been
careful enough not to make of use any fallacy/However, the
argument also presents a typical fallacy of appeal to emotion, etc.

Conclusion: Therefore, from an analytical viewpoint, one finds the

argument is very strong/ over all strong/extremely weak. However
had the author been careful of (so and so points: state the
weakness here)
Note:

1) no new argument/claim in conclusion. Conclusion should

show mental clarity, purpose of discussion, hasil-e-behas.

2) Headings all over must have same font size, same format in
entire paper.

3) Italicize, don't embolden.