The document outlines different types of impact calculus that can be used to compare and evaluate the risks of different impacts:
1. Probability - comparing how likely different impacts are to occur. For example, an economic collapse is more probable than a "grey goo" disaster.
2. Timeframe - comparing how quickly different impacts will happen. For example, an asteroid impact will cause extinction faster than global warming.
3. Magnitude - comparing the scale or severity of different impacts. For example, a nuclear war would kill more people than car accidents.
It also discusses other types of impact calculus like impact inclusivity, where one impact encompasses another, and how certain impacts can cause
The document outlines different types of impact calculus that can be used to compare and evaluate the risks of different impacts:
1. Probability - comparing how likely different impacts are to occur. For example, an economic collapse is more probable than a "grey goo" disaster.
2. Timeframe - comparing how quickly different impacts will happen. For example, an asteroid impact will cause extinction faster than global warming.
3. Magnitude - comparing the scale or severity of different impacts. For example, a nuclear war would kill more people than car accidents.
It also discusses other types of impact calculus like impact inclusivity, where one impact encompasses another, and how certain impacts can cause
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document outlines different types of impact calculus that can be used to compare and evaluate the risks of different impacts:
1. Probability - comparing how likely different impacts are to occur. For example, an economic collapse is more probable than a "grey goo" disaster.
2. Timeframe - comparing how quickly different impacts will happen. For example, an asteroid impact will cause extinction faster than global warming.
3. Magnitude - comparing the scale or severity of different impacts. For example, a nuclear war would kill more people than car accidents.
It also discusses other types of impact calculus like impact inclusivity, where one impact encompasses another, and how certain impacts can cause
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
e.g. Economic collapse is more probable than an outbreak of grey goo therefore, the risk of economic collapse outweighs the risk of a grey goo disaster.
2. Timeframe (one impact will happen faster)
e.g. An asteroid impact will cause extinction before Global warming will, therefore an asteroid Impact outweighs Global Warming.
3. Magnitude (one impact is bigger)
e.g. Nuke war kills more people than car accidents.
Other types of impact calculus
1. Impact inclusivity (one impact is inclusive of the other)
e.g. Global war is inclusive of a Taiwan war, therefore global war outweighs Taiwan war.
2. X creates Y (one impact causes the other impact to happen)
e.g. War causes genocide, therefore war outweighs genocide
3. Internal link short-circuiting (one impact prevents a positive impact
from happening) e.g. Nuke war halts clean air efforts in U.S, therefore nuclear war outweighs clean air efforts. 4. Reversibility e.g. Civil liberties lost in the name of security during a time of crisis can be restored later, but deaths caused by a lack of security are irreversible.
5. Pre-Fiat (as opposed to Post-Fiat)
e.g. Actual in-round education and actions should be weighed more than “imaginary” post-fiat impacts.
Framework arguments can also be considered impact calculus.
Arguments as to why the judge should adopt a utilitarian or consequentialist perspective or conversely a deontological perspective may change the way they compare impacts.