The document summarizes an anthropological article by Horace Miner that parodies American culture by describing a fictional society called the Nacirema. The Nacirema culture is analyzed from an intentionally ethnocentric viewpoint to highlight the cultural biases inherent in anthropological studies. The article serves as a reflexive contribution to ongoing debates about ethnocentric biases in social science research and how concepts are used to obscure these biases.
The document summarizes an anthropological article by Horace Miner that parodies American culture by describing a fictional society called the Nacirema. The Nacirema culture is analyzed from an intentionally ethnocentric viewpoint to highlight the cultural biases inherent in anthropological studies. The article serves as a reflexive contribution to ongoing debates about ethnocentric biases in social science research and how concepts are used to obscure these biases.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document summarizes an anthropological article by Horace Miner that parodies American culture by describing a fictional society called the Nacirema. The Nacirema culture is analyzed from an intentionally ethnocentric viewpoint to highlight the cultural biases inherent in anthropological studies. The article serves as a reflexive contribution to ongoing debates about ethnocentric biases in social science research and how concepts are used to obscure these biases.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Horace Miner: "Body Ritual among the Nacirema," American Anthropologist 58 (1956): 503-
507.
In your view the article - as it seems at first sight - can be described as:
biased - ethnocentric - eurocentric - cultural reductionism
Do you have any comments?
In this hoax anthropological article, H. Miner somewhat parodies American culture
(especially the „irrational“ obsession with human body, its „health“ and „beauty“) by example of fake Nacirema (American spelled backwards) Native American society. The Nacirema culture is described and analyzed from expressly ethnocentric point of view, which is pointed out by a quote from Malinowski closing the article: „Looking from far and above, from our high places of safety in the developed civilization, it is easy to see all the crudity and irrelevance of magic“. Of course, there is deeper meaning to Miner’s essay than just to make sophisticated fun of Americans, of cultural anthopology or both. It is reflexive contribution to ongoing debate about legitimaty of scientific knowledge and hidden eurocentric/ethnocentric bias of research in social sciences. Specially anthropology is often preoccupied with obscuring this fact, e.g. by using the concepts such as Miner uses in this study – cultural „configuration“ or „style“ (both originating from works by Ruth Benedict) and like, which only serve to give us supposedly easy and brief „key“ (key-word) to comprehension of different culture.
Kaufmann, EP and O. Zimmer, 'Dominant Ethnicity' and The 'Ethnic-Civic' Dichotomy in The Work of A. D. Smith', Nations & Nationalism, Special Issues 10.1 & 10.2 (March) 2004, Pp. 61-76