2
THE POLITICS OF PRIMITIVISM
BAKUNIN ~ BAKHTIN
aspect has been
ideals, syntactical structure and logic, as
swell as everything associated with the bourgeoisie. But this apparent nihil
mn always implied a utopian alternative to the statns gus, which has three
aspects. Broadly speaking these can be called the philosophical, the popu
list and the primitive ~ althoug! want garde categories are often
inseparable, equally political and tend to be expressed in psychological
terms.
which also
image became misleadingly
terrorists, the basic principle of
associated
the turns
extreme individual
superseded those of the state,
mt. For Bakunin and bis lollowers, personal rights
which by definition were coer
Form of social organization;
had to be discarded
shnent (hich was sometimes de more than
eravon came 10 be conceived pry
mea ws requenly Bhysieal=feeing the mind through assaulting
had strong politcal ocerones. The commune was iden
ly or even spit
the route to its
Personal
wall
fied with the acting gt
IGS OF PRIMITIVISN,
on artistic creation as ‘process’, in place
- substituted fo ion of becoming’
‘ame antichierarchical ethos characterizes the populist aspect
is pethaps best defined 5 work,
ed from ava Russia
and restricted to literary theory, his path-breaking.s1 coewsky
and particularly Rabelais are not only representative, but also offer a
critical tool for analysing avant garde work. By contrast to classi
ration of genses,
wved by a singleness of voice and
carnivals, All of what has been defined as ‘great literature’
Renaissance is considered an aberration in the context of this 2
which incorporates contradictory elements, con
ith the grotesque, «
or the medern Mardi Gras, for Bak!
it both com
and contrary to
political organizat
antidote to the ‘official
motes an abstract spirit
rized by rigidity and ind
iat are denigrated or denied
her ‘vulgar’ bodily functions, “cru
tic categories, or social inferiors, Breaking taboos to signal
of the earthly upper classes,
res the concept of an atomized bourgeois indi
each festive participant conscious of “being a m
growing and renewed people’ This utopian ideal of com
extension Communism) -d and affirmed by
presented as not
labels f
ferary terms (with Rabelais as th
derives a radical theory of hume
in gargantuan themes of physical appetite and excremental or
genital imagery, corrosive parody, and abusive language, together with
fom whom BakAVANT GARDE THEATRE
violent
its of tone or the juxtaposition of contradictory fragments, invel
sion and materialistic hyperbole. Its indispensable traits are the grotesque
and ambivalence, which are seen as being integrally connected. On the
thematic level a deliberate stressing of the ugly or monstrous, the hall
formed or incomplete, and
and man, copulation and dismemberment) ‘goes along with verbal puns,
multiple viewpoints and switches in consciousness on a stylistic level
Artistic forms qualify as carnevalesque if they release imaginative and
sexual energies by subverting social, moral and aesthetic categories, no:
and prohibitions, Both the grotesque and ambivalence i displa
potentiality of an enticely different world, of another order, another
fe’; and this is associated w
definition offers an ‘abnormal’ viewpoint that is free from
ideas and official ‘truths’.' Ic also relates 10 the kind of psychol
universe created by Dostoevsky, where the disru
iterary logic, together with temporal and spat
inside the divided consciousness of an outcast whose pathological mentality
casts doubt on standard concepts of reality
himself pointed out che correspondence between the ‘dialogizing’
ness in Dostoevsky, and expressionist drama with its distorted
perspe subjectivity. But the parallels between his ideas and avant
garde theatre are far wider. Abusive parody, combined with the focus on
sical ugliné’s and moral monstrosity are the hallmarks of Alfred Jarcy's
nented plays. The positive function of madness, the inversion of moral
categories and the grotesque in all its aspects are central 10 Anton
Artaud’s work, An ambivalent attack on the sacred, the breaking of taboos
and the exaltation of the body characterize Jerzy Grotawski's theatre,
leading to a scarch for primal relationships beiween man and the natural
‘world. Sexual liberation and social revolution formed the core of the Living
Theatre, revolving around a universal ideal of community that was rep-
resented as a cosmic prin’ s Bacrault bo
created dramas based on Rabelais: one right ar the start of the avant garde
movement, the other as a direct response to the-student revolution of 1968,
Ina sense, sant garde theatre lie in the type
of radical laughter that Bakhtin saw as fandamental to the carnival spi
which is also evident in the dark expressionist depictions of urban existence
and the surrealist portrayals of the bourgeoisie although comedy is signally
absent from Artaud and! most later manifestations of the avant garde
This tendency to quasi-religious seriousness, which all too often led to
inflaced self-pretension, is the antithesis of Bakhtin's camival spirit. But
camevalesque qualities are the defining marks of avant garde drama: in
particular the emphasis on stage production as process
the fixed artsproduct of classical aesthetics; and the fusion of actors
audience, breaking down the barriers between performance and real
TRE POLITICS OF PRIMITIVISM
create a communion of (in theo
puts i, ‘Car the feast of be renewal. It
was hostile 0 al ed and completed’ — bath in society
and art ~ wi he stage as a metaphor:
in the sense that it docs not
acknowledge any distinction between actors and spectators.
y @ carnival, as the absence of footlights would destroy
has been seen as
t garde, which being ‘the experi-
istorically given itself a double task: to
destroy and to inve s are the more striking and significant
since there can be no question of influence. Baki self was cut off
from artistic developments in Europe, and shows a very limited knowledge
even of early expressionist theatre, while his study of Rabelais was only
written in 1940, remained unpublished until 1965, and first became av
able to the West (in an English translation from the Russian) in 1968,
some months after Barrault’s production of Rabelais
THE CULT OF THE PRIMITIVE
‘The thrust of Bakhtin’s work is also regressive — finding its ideals in
the return to a medieval survival of traditions from prehistory, already
marginalized in Rabelais’ time and imereasingly ellaced by social develop
ments that were the opposite of all they stood for ~ and this links earneval-
esque populism with the third aspect of the avant garde: primitivism. In the
theatre ¢ forms, apparen
y compleinentary. On the one hand there is the
"9 of the stage into a laboratory for exploriag fundamental
vestions about the natute of performance and the relationship between
actor and audience, On the other, the exploitation of irrationa e
exploration of dream states, the borrowing of archaic dramatic models,
logical mavcrial or tribal rituals, What unites the scientific with the
tipping down drama to the naked actor on a bare
ads to an interior focus on the psyche and to
inal or ditect physical communication. Both are
3" of theatre ~ whether in its primitive origins or by
vesting it of scenic or illus ‘accretions’ — as much as to the
psychological or prehistoric ‘roots? of ma
atavism itsel is a symptom of
he avant garde hostility to modernAVANT GARDE THEATRE
‘primitive’, it embodies an alternative value scale, In the same way the
point of exalting the unconscious an side of human nature is
to provide an antidote to a civilization that almost exclusively emphasizes
1¢ rational and intellectual. The conviction that bourgeois society destroys
the artistic indi ke Toller, surrealists
or absurdists Communist Party. Quite i
however, their motives were questioned by other communists, In the tot
arian state to which they were committed, their artistic approach would
bbe impossible, as the suicide of Mayakovsky had already demonstrated.
Yet it was no coincidence that Artavd described the ‘social suicide’ of Van
Gogh as a prototype for the modern artist, and defined an incoherent
scream of protest as the official voice of the avant garde.
‘dal protest might seem completely
just as primitivism could be seen simply as escapism, or the
mm the subconscious as retreat from reality. Indeed the miscon-
ception that ritualistic, mythical theatre and political theatre are mutu
exclusive opposites ~ epitomized in the Tynan/lonesco controversy (Zhe
Obsercer, 1958) ~ is far too commonly accepted. Perhaps this is because at
its extreme the avant garde repudiation of society cither harks back to a
tellingly described
jrely in a movement towards
itself as ‘anti-theatre rejects thematic mean-
that might be identified as an ideo-
logical position or ‘message tends (0 be justified ~ misleadingly and
paradoxically’ ~ as ‘theatre of pure form’ (Witkiewicz, 1921), or as drama
“that cannot serve any other kind of truth bu and therefore
has the sole function of revealing ‘the fandamental laws of [dramatic]
construction’ (lonesco, 1958). On one level such claims are an attempt to
align the stage with advances in other art forms. As the expressionist
director Jessner pat it as there is a pure (absolute) music and a
pure (absolute) painting, we must have pure theatre.”” But emphasizing
stylistic exploration at the expense of statement does not really rule out
commitment, despite some avant garde claims that any drama ‘Bated on
is outdated and ievelevant since
ings, logical
the most advanced phenomena are neither literary nor political, but
formal. If
bered, it will be for the ensembles of the
Theatre, Café la Mama and Grotowski, whose common factor is a
physical istic. theatre-language. revolutionary
and standing in opposition to... psychological ‘Aristotelian
time str
Leaving aside the incorrect assertion that ideological commitment auto-
matically rules out stylistic advances, which is clearly contradicted by the
THE POLITICS OF PRIMITIVISN
work of ideological artists like Bertolt Brecht, what is
stress on spiritual revolut
Mon is Mon being a representa!
determined by envivo: ‘change must
precede any alteration in consciousness. The avant garde reverses the
process, seeing a fundamental change in human nature as the prerequ
3 social alteration. As Eugenio Barba put it, ‘Our erat is the poss
of changing ourselves, and thus changing sociecy’ ~ the link:
primitivism are clear in Richard Schechner’s asser 1¢ ambition to
‘make theatre into ritual is nothing other than a wish to make performance
cllicacious, to use [theatrical] events to change people
Naturally in light of this political intention, the most appropriate ~ and
in fact the most frequently used ~ ritual forms were the “rites of passage’,
hropologists like Van Gennep as early as 1908, The basic
pattern here is the separation of participants trom their previous environ-
‘ment, frequently through sensory deprivation and disorientation: an action
that symbolizes a change in their nature, and their physical integration
to anew group. And recognition of
ding the treatment of the audience
in the Living Theatre
This borrowing of ritual forms to manipulate the audience is what
distinguishes avant garde aims most clearly from social or politically com-
mitted drama. Both kinds of theatre may repudiate existing social con-
change. But commitment uses logical structures ~
whether “dialectical” as in Brecht or the conventional cause-and-effect of
Bemard Shaw ~ since its aim is to promote a future programme (class
lution/eugenic evolution) through 2 conscious awareness of spe
desire for a ‘pit of philosophers’ is as typical as Brecht’
he ‘smoking-observing’ attitude of ‘experts’ in his audi
tence, and emotional responses are secondary, evoked only as a technique
of positive reinforcement for ofa
ly disturbing means: ‘In philosophical
valent 9 a basic change in existential condition;
that which he possessed before his in
‘This may seem an unrealistic expect
an audience who are not only self-aware but are also aware of the make-
believe and pretence inherent in stage performance. Yet, in the political
while the concept of a
‘one’s existential nature is the basis of the
major surviving secularized society. Baptism gives
ancnynious babies a spiritual and social identity, a name and a place in
1