You are on page 1of 38

Present and Future

Wind Energy in the U.S.

Jose Zayas
Manager, Wind Energy Technology Dept.
Sandia National Laboratories

www.sandia.gov/wind
jrzayas@sandia.gov

Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company,


for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration
under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
History of Wind Energy
pre - 1970

„ Prehistoric –
Maritime (Greek,
Viking)
„ Medieval – Persian,
Greek, England
„ 20th Century – Great
Plains
„ First Energy
Shortage -- 1974
History of Wind Energy
post - 1970

U.S. DOE develops


significant research
program in
response to the
energy crisis of
1974
History of Wind Energy
California Boom

Installed Capacity
1400

1200

1000
Livermore, CA -1982
800
MW

CA
600 rest of World

400

200

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987

AWEA, CEC, Renewable Energy World, Power Engineering, Earth Policy Institute, UC-Irvine
History of Wind Energy
California and World

Installed Capacity
80000

70000

60000

50000
MW

40000

30000

CA
20000
rest of World

10000

1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004

AWEA, CEC, Renewable Energy World, Power Engineering, Earth Policy Institute, UC-Irvine
Current U.S. Installation
„ Wind Energy Today (end of 2007)
• Total installed capacity: 16,879
MW (34 States)
Š 5,244 MW installed 2007
Š 45% increase from 2006
Š Accounted for 30% of new
installed capacity in 2007
• Over 9 billion dollars invested in
2007
• Installed cost: ~5-8¢/kWh
Installed capacity in the USA
Cumulative end 2007: 16,879 MW
8,000 24,000

7,000 21,000

6,000 18,000

Cumulative MW
5,000 15,000
Almost 5.5 TW Available Resource
MW

4,000 12,000

(Total U. S. Electric Capacity ≈ 1 TW in 2007) 3,000 9,000

2,000 6,000

1,000 3,000

0 0
1995 1998 2001 2004 2007
Installed MW Forecast Cumulative Cumul. forecast
The 10 Largest Markets
by end of 2007

Country 2005 2006 2007 Share % Cum. Share %


Germany 18,445 20,652 22,277 23.7% 24%
USA 9,181 11,635 16,879 18.0% 42%
Spain 10,027 11,614 14,714 15.7% 57%
India 4,388 6,228 7,845 8.3% 66%
P.R. China 1,264 2,588 5,875 6.2% 72%
Denmark 3,087 3,101 3,088 3.3% 75%
Italy 1,713 2,118 2,721 2.9% 78%
France 775 1,585 2,471 2.6% 81%
UK 1,336 1,967 2,394 2.5% 83%
Portugal 1,087 1,716 2,150 2.3% 86%
Total 51,303 63,203 80,415
Percent of World 86.4% 85.1% 85.5%
Source: BTM Consult ApS - March 2008
Germany On-Land Potential ≈ 100,000 MW
USA on-Land Potential > 1,200,000 MW
Wind Power’s Share of
World Power Generation
Generation Electricity gen. Electricity from all Wind Power's share
Technology by Wind Power gen. sources of the world's electricity
(BTM-C) (incl. Wind) IEA generation:
Year: TWh TWh %
1996 12.23 13,613 0.09%
1997 15.39 13,949 0.11%
1998 21.25 14,340 0.15%
1999 23.18 14,741 0.16%
2000 37.30 15,153 0.25%
2001 50.27 15,577 0.32%
2002 64.81 16,233 0.40%
2003 82.24 16,671 0.49%
2004 96.50 17,408 0.55%
2005 120.72 17,982 0.67%
2006 152.35 18,576 0.82%
2007 194.16 19,189 1.01%
2012 (forecast) 605.4 22,571 2.68%
2017 (est.) 1573.8 26,549 5.93%
Source: BTM Consult ApS - March 2008 ; World Figures: IEA World Energy Outlook 2007
Phenomenal Growth
Global Wind Industry

Cumulative Global Wind Power Development


Actual 1990-2007 Forecast 2008-2012 Prediction 2013-2017
700,000

„ 25% annual growth 600,000


rate, 1990-2007
(actual) 500,000

400,000
„ 25% annual growth
MW

rate 2008-2012 (BTM) 300,000

200,000
„ 19% annual growth
rate 2013-2017 (BTM) 100,000

0
1990 2007 2012 2017

Source: BTM Consult ApS - March 2008 Prediction Forecast Existing capacity
2007 Installed Energy Mix (U.S)
Wind Basics
Wind Power Basics
Air Density
Rotor Area Wind Speed

WindPower = ρAC V 1
2
3
P ∞
Wind Power output is
proportional to wind
speed cubed.

C P max ≅ 0.3 (Drag)


C P max ≅ 0.59 (Lift)
The Betz
Limit 1
Vi = Vw
3
16 ⎛ 1 3⎞
P= ⎜ ρ AVw ⎟
27 ⎝ 2 ⎠
The Physics of the Power Curve
Drives Technology Development
Facts about Wind Technology
„ Power in the wind is
proportional to wind speed
cubed
„ At best, we can capture 59%
(the Betz limit)
„ “Rated Power” governs the size
and cost of the entire turbine
infrastructure
„ Energy is power multiplied by
the amount of time spent at that
power level
„ Capacity Factor is the ratio of
total output to what would have
been generated if always
operating at Rated Power –
Meaningful metric
„ Wind shear puts higher winds at
greater elevation
Performance Enhancement Options
Power Resource
Pow er Curve Wind, Energy

4000
3500
3000
Power (kW)

2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Windspeed (m /s) Windspeed (m/s)

Turbine pow er Betz Pow er Rayleigh Probability Weibull Probability

Larger Rotor Taller Tower


Rotor costs increase Tower costs
with diameter cubed, increase with height
Rotor power grows with to the fourth power
the diameter squared

We can only win this battle if we build rotors that are smarter and
components that are lighter to beat the squared-cubed law.
U.S. Wind Resource Maps

Wind Power Classification

Wind Resource Wind Power Wind Speeda Wind Speeda


Power Potential Density at 50 m at 50 m at 50 m
Class W/m
2
m/s mph

3 Fair 300 - 400 6.4 - 7.0 14.3 - 15.7


4 Good 400 - 500 7.0 - 7.5 15.7 - 16.8
5 Excellent 500 - 600 7.5 - 8.0 16.8 - 17.9
6 Outstanding 600 - 800 8.0 - 8.8 17.9 - 19.7
7 Superb 800 - 1600 8.8 - 11.1 19.7 - 24.8
a
Wind speeds are based on a Weibull k value of 2.0

Copyright © 2008 3TIER, Inc. All Rights


Reserved. For permission to reproduce or
distribute: info@3tiergroup.com
Power Curve and Wind Speed
Distribution at Low Wind Site
Current Technology
and
Energy Cost
Wind Power
Small Wind
(1-1000 kW)
Utility-Scale Wind
(1-5 MW)
1

American Wind Energy Association


www.awea.org
Current Wind Turbine Systems

Conventional Drive Train

Hub

Gear Box

Direct Drive System


Pitch System
Yaw System
Generator

Tower Blade
Typical Turbine
Installation

Gamesa (Spain)

Vestas
(Denmark)

GE (US)

Enercon
(Germany)
Wind Industry
Trends & Costs
Size
$0.40 Cost per kWh
„ 1.5-5.0 MW
$0.30
„ Towers: 65-100 ~5-8 cents/kWh
meters $0.20

„ Blades: 34-60 $0.10


meters $0.00
„ Weight: 150-500 1980 1984 1988 1991 1995 2000 2005

tons
Typical Wind Farm
Components

„ Turbine
„ Foundations
„ Electrical collection system
„ Power quality conditioning
„ Substation
„ SCADA
„ Roads
„ Maintenance facilities
Offshore Wind Background

Shallow Transitional Deepwater


Land-based
Water Depth Floating
Technology
Technology Technology Technology

0m-30m

30m-60m

60m-900m
Offshore Wind
„ Technical challenges, higher costs
„ Close to load centers
„ 1000 MW installed in Europe
„ Limited shallow depths in U.S.
„ Proposals in U.S.
• Cape Cod (Cape Wind)
• Long Island (LIPA)
Understand External Conditions To
Define the Design Conditions
Problems and “Problems”
Production Fluctuates
• Load fluctuates significantly
• Even an all-fossil power system must ramp up
and down to follow the load
• Day-ahead wind
forecasting
• Wind is a
“negative load”
• Effects ramp
rates
EIA: 20% Wind Energy by 2030
Bird Collisions & Mortality

„ Problem documented in Altamont Pass


• One of nation’s largest concentrations of federally-protected raptors
• Abundant prey base (migration path)
• Heavy year-round raptor use
Acoustic Emission -Noise

Mod 1
Boone, NC

AWEA
20% Wind Energy
U.S. DOE Report, May 2008

Addresses
Scalability
20% Wind Scenario
20% Wind Scenario would 305 GW
require large ramp-up of wind

Installed Capacity as of
January 2008 = 16,904 MW
Scenario Installed Capacity vs.
Current Installed Capacity
18

16

Annual Installed Capacity (GW)


Capacity additions in 20% Scenario
14

12

10

Actual installations 4
2007: 5,329 MW Projected installations
2008: 7,500 MW* 2

0
06

08

10

12

14

16

18

20

22
20

20

20

20

20

20

20
20

20

Annual GW Installed
Source*: AWEA, 2008
CO2 Emissions from the
Electricity Sector
4,500
CO2 Emissions in the Electric Sector

4,000

3,500
(million metric tons)

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000 No New Wind Scenario CO2 emissions


20% Wind Scenario CO2 emissions
500 USCAP path to 80% below today’s levels by 2050

0
2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030
Challenges for Technology
from the Analysis Results

„ Massive growth in
installations
• ~12GW in 2006
• over 300GW in 2030
„ Widely distributed
across the nation
• Many high wind sites
• Substantial installation
in moderate resource
areas
• Some offshore is
needed
„ Performance is critical
• Capital cost
• Capacity Factor
• O&M
Benefits of Wind Power
„ Economic Development
• Lease payments, tax revenue

„ Cost Stability
„ Resource Diversity
• Domestic, inexhaustible, reduced risk

„ Environmental
• no CO2, SO2, NOx, mercury
• no mining or drilling
• no waste
• no water use

EIA: 20% Wind Energy by 2030


World-Wide Growth in Energy Demand Will Require
all Available Energy Technology Options
Integrated into a System

ƒ A complete portfolio of supply options: renewables, fossil, nuclear


ƒ Highly efficient and environmentally benign technologies
ƒ Fault-tolerant, self-healing infrastructures
ƒ Enhance physical and cyber security and safety
“…we could generate up to 20% of our
electricity needs through wind…”

President George W. Bush - February 21, 2006

Thank
Thank You!!!
You!!!

You might also like