Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assess the pros and cons of Tata Motors’ acquisition of Jaguar and Land Rover. How
does the acquisition compare to other options the company could have pursued in
terms of growth?
Tata Motors main interest for the acquisition was not only to leverage past
synergies and M&A knowledge, but also more importantly, establish a global presence
within the automotive sector and remove its dependency on the Indian market, which was
facing greater competition from other foreign brands. The shareholder’s had a different
perspective as they felt it was over priced and not confident that Tata’s balance sheet
could handle this new debt. However, considering that the automotive market would
eventually recover, and that it paid Ford slightly more than half of what it paid for the
two brands, I believe that Tata Motors made a wise acquisition.
Several pros can be identified:
a. Reduce its dependence on the Indian market, which contributed to 90% of Tata’s
revenue. Additionally, it indicated its long-term strategic commitment to the global
automotive sector.
b. Establish a global footprint, and enter the high-end premier market segment. JLR
would broaden the current brand portfolio.
c. Improved business diversification for JLR products across newer markets (SE Asia),
and removing its traditionally dependency on US and European markets.
d. The two advanced design technology centers provide access to advanced technology
and facilitate growth of Tata Motors’ SUV market segment in India.
e. The synergistic presence of Corus Steel, which would provide a supplier cost
competitive advantage. Corus Steel is the main supplier of high-grade steel to the
automobile industry.
Several cons can be identified:
a. Increase in debt ratio from 1X to 2.5X, especially given that it had immense capital
expenditure due to the launch of Nano.
b. Downturn in the economy and higher gas prices resulted in a 5% decrease in
worldwide automotive market, and in particular, SUV and luxury brands were the
hardest hit.
c. Loan payment of $3 B for the acquisition, and subsequent rollover of this loan. An
additional loss of $510 M of JLR during the 1st ten months of the acquisition.
d. Strong presence of competitors like Mercedes, BMW, Lexus and Infinity, all of who
have an established presence within this market space.
Will Tata Motors be able to achieve its desired results for purchasing Jaguar and Land
Rover?
This acquisition highlights the underlying need for Tata Group’s global growth.
Enclosed below is the Strengths and Weakness section of the SWOT analysis, which is
used to determine whether the goals are achievable.
STRENGTHS WEAKNESS
- A strong reputation for successful acquisition - Inexperienced in luxury automobile branding.
and integration of other automotive companies. - Inexperienced in turning loss-making ventures;
(Daewoo) prior to the acquisition (except NELCO), Tata
- Experienced management capability and human Group had acquired already successful brands.
resource capacity. - Lack of global R&D and design capability,
- Strong balance sheets, due to diversified non- compared to its competitors.
automotive product portfolio.
- Established synergy of Corus, TACO and TCS.
- Developing and creating brand value and
experienced new product development and
deployment process.
Assess the merits of the approach Tata Motors planned to take with acquisition. What
challenges might it have to overcome?
Enclosed below is the Threats section of the SWOT analysis, which is used to
determine whether the goals are achievable.
THREATS
- Presence of well established competitors, who have already capacitized this market with their global
brands.
- JLR’s receding sales and brand image, and volatility for new automotive entry products.
- Economic downturn, resulting in decreased sales for the identified market segment.
- Ability of successful introduction into other SE Asia markets.
Considering the SWOT analysis, Tata motors approach to pre- and post
acquisition is sound. Having already established a global presence with other products
(Tetley and Corus) and successful integration with the holding company, it is now only
an exercise of realizing the threats and carefully defining a scope and plan to mitigate.
Given that the threats are more to do with the automotive industry, rather than core
competencies, I foresee a successful integration of the JLR brand with Tata Motors, albeit
a longer road than first anticipated.
References
1. http://seekingalpha.com/article/216121-progress-report-tata-motors-and-jlr
2. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/22877996/TATA-PROJECT-AND-CORPORATE-
PPT
3. http://machinist.in/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2265&Itemid=2
4. http://trak.in/tags/business/2010/07/01/land-rover-made-in-india/
5. http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/aug2009/gb20090811_307608_page
_2.htm
APPENDIX
Key Timeline - Jaguar
1922 - Founded in Blackpool as Swallow Sidecar company
1960 - Jaguar name first appeared in 1935
1975 - Nationalized in due to financial difficulties
1984 - Floated off as a separate co in the stock market
1990 – Acquired by Ford for $2.5B in 1989
A statement of ultra luxury, Holds Royal warrants, rarely advertised, Ford’s formula one
entry since 1990s