IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, No. 07-CV-2148
FETULLAH GULEN, Plaintiff
V.
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, et al., Defendants
Judge Dalzell.
Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Summary Judgment Response
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, No. 07-CV-2148
FETULLAH GULEN, Plaintiff
V.
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, et al., Defendants
Judge Dalzell.
Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Summary Judgment Response
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, No. 07-CV-2148
FETULLAH GULEN, Plaintiff
V.
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, et al., Defendants
Judge Dalzell.
Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Summary Judgment Response
ethan GOLEN.
Pint
Cin No. 7-6-2148
Pmt Fethals Galen, yan throgh andesgned coun files this Repl 0
‘he Defendans’ Summary lagen Response. The sminsrtive ear eflecs hat
Me ilen san ain of extendible ld fection 2 deine in
SUSC.SIISNbxIXA) and SCER §204SIHN3), Defendants dni of Pini’
‘rmigranpston wa binary an epac
Defends eres ase th Pi ot nthe fed af eduction ane
‘ha lai referes ae min the Fé of ebation Defends lo argu tat
‘Me Giles works mo aed in he ld of educa at niversesbocase hs works
rena euation mtn
Defendants. wile impemissynarowing he fk of “lasaton” wo enlase
“Me Gules wily concede that" most Pains an expert in elisiono oll
science.” (Df Rey. 20) “Sens” ala permissible id expe i the
evcednay ality saute USC. SIISNDMINA), Me Golen may soe considered
tohave extant sili inthe science” of olay opine, Under 20
CER 656.5
Stl with respecte which oles an universes commonly oe specie courses
eer scene ora means any Fel of knowl or
leading w a dere inthe knowledge anor sil” Colleges nd universes aan
sien Ths. it wuld be coment with
grec ine lds of tea po
‘he povermmens ove regulations to comer Me, Glen sexta bly nthe
cienses" a wel
Defeats reiforce heir ramen tht Me. Ginn el of
tac te mo cidene of his asm mebacogin
ing thar he as
(ef Resp. at 8) This simply nt we. The reson contin ane eden of\ ‘Giemsa trout he wor ll 5 othe cha ne Pai
‘educational methalolugy. Ther re numerous books submit to USCIS in the orignal,
a ee eae eee a
eee ar aa
‘establishing schools in Turkey. and this methodology has been published by Mr. Guten Republic.” (Def, Resp, at 19.) Again, the Defendants have impermissibly narrowed the
scope ofthe tut and eplations by etrting tir aplication to the United tae
(Gen: Hsu Penge Opinions (Chapters: “Galen at Ect an Religious
Teacher nM, Fthllah Gulen and Edveaton. "and Towra Glob Ciiizaton of
wre. Tolan (Chapters: “Educational Services Ae Spreating Thuphot the
World” “Edation fom Crate Grae,” and"A Movement Originating Is Own
Makstata fedation sf subtle othe US.
on scuareGucto methodologies wen many counties rogue works
Defends seco scout Me. Genes of apport by ein hat
only one ofthese ees is fom am exper ite i of ection” (Def. Reyp a 15)
Defendants contend sat De
‘Tech Unvesiythe only expen in eden cae se the ey rere fom a
scllege of education” Defendants claim "noe ofthe other smem-
he Gulen Moveren ater than by independent
rescarh insitucons: the University of Bimingha, the lsh Schoo of Esumenis,
Leeds Meopotian Univesity. he London Mile East Ise, the Mie Eastbare fade, Securing pate faping vues
cational mthnogy to sieve the none
Pate cing sources re alo extensively sed in he US,
as ameanso ase capt ooh pate and pic schol. Conary to he cornet
‘ofthe Defendants Mt Gen dos py oe acadenisw cask Nims in acne
Defends so aterapw squliy Pini’ work slay” becuse his
hus itl Plamis bok of mo relevance. Others in he eld il ase Me. Ges
published works starting pin for theirown rescach and scholarly material, The
omar the Adj Felt Man gig oP
Defendant als argu tht Panis not subi any evidence that es
utoredscoly ates nthe fis futon. He has not ened one ingle
‘ook or anil authored by him Scholarly or ot) ashe ld of dation”
fmphasis added} (De Resp a 2.) Pai submited evidence of hs om books
ok is the focus of cunework the university evel, Se Stplation
‘of Fact 146. Defendants scout his point by stating hat al the courses ite. .te
ursesonreigon optical scence. Non ofthese aires the subject of Cuca.”
(et Resp. 0120.)Mastin Word Trunstuon~ Comrise he Galen Movement. (AR pp. 351 ~
$52) This confcemse wan a iteration showcase of his work, Defendants tte that
oer seolan’ work was iplyed atthe conference. not Pits work (Def Resp. ot
122) Tha, Defendants argue tt the ato Scola must be present node othe
work oe feat in a"vhowease” For example i Pies is ot seat a show. it
may mete comered a sowie” of is work, This orgie i five Pints
‘ork mas "splayed in each session atthe conference Beas his wok ithe
ety bass fhe scaly material presente tthe conference Each session
revue amund Pants scolary week i edacaton an eos lerace
Defendants lai that Mi. Ges hs not played leading ore le in an
‘rpaniation under 8 CR 4204-5) Became the evidence incest the
tn orginztion bi aon network of projects inte by
Uhsexideeebecase Pm has
scan by ating ely works in the fe fue and aising ether on
hiner
‘Based on he foregoing he Pai surat that is Moto or Sar
‘tment shoal esas: an Defendants Meson fo Summary Sager shud be
sei
Respect abit,