Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Presentation by
Bruce D. Hartsell, LCSW
Lecturer
California State University, Bakersfield
1
Why study supervision?
Purposes of Supervision
°
unctions of supervision (Kadushin)
ï a. administration
ï b. education
ï c. supportive leadership
¢
Definition of Supervision
ï?
ï?
ï?
ã
Policy Bases of Supervision
ï a. Ethical
ï b. Legal
ï c. Professional
ï d. Institutional
(
Ethical Requirements ± NASW
ï a. 1.0¢ Competence
@ @ @
@ @ @
@ @ @
b. °.0V Administration
@ @ @
@ @ @
.
V
Ethical Requirements - Kohlberg
±
Legal Requirements
a. Business and Professions Code, Chapter 1¢,
Article ¢
- ³. . . supervised course of study . . .´
- ³responsibility for, and control of´
b. CCR Title 1(, Division 1±
Unprofessional conduct -
- aid or abet unlicensed practice
- permits one under ³supervision or control´
Professional Requirements
ï a. Based in ethics
ï b. Based in history
10
Institutional Requirements
ï a. Based in ethics
ï b. Based in professional norms
ï c. Based in law
ï - work must be supervised by MSW
ï - must meet at least 1.ã hours per week
ï OR SUPERVISION
11
Recommendations
1
What distinguishes supervision,
consultation, and collaboration?
1°
Distinctions -
1¢
Contexts of Supervision (Kadushin)
ï a. community
ï b. profession
ï c. organization
ï d. department
ï e. supervisor-supervisee
1ã
Significance (Kadushin)
1(
Significance --
1V
Significance --
1±
Significance --
1
Three Types of Supervision
ï Administrative
ï Educational
ï Supportive
0
Tasks of Administrative
Supervision
1
Administrative Tasks -
ï coordinating work
ï sharing information upwards, downwards,
and laterally
ï advocating change
ï buffering change
M
(Adair)
ï planning
ï initiating
ï controlling
ï supporting
ï informing
ï evaluating
°
þ
(Drucker)
ï set objectives
ï organize
ï motivate and communicate
ï measure
ï develop people
¢
Educational Supervision
ï acilitates learning
± Knowledge
± Skills
± Values
ï Applies learning theory
± Connects new to known
± Connects theory to practice
ã
M M
ï Instrumental issues ±
± information
± skills
± structures
± facilities
(
Supportive Supervision ßß
ï Personal issues ± emotional support
± recognition
± reassurance
± encouragement
± approval
± commendation
± catharsis
± desensitization
V
M
ï People
ï Problem
ï Place
ï Process
ï Personnel
±
M
ï theory
ï content
ï interpersonal process
ï intrapersonal process
M
ï Philosophy
ï Theory
ï Technique
°0
Roles and Models
ï Supervisor as manager, teacher, counselor
ï Developmental models
ï Discrimination model
ï Integrated (eclectic) model
ï Interactional model
ï Theory-specific models
ï Reflection
°1
`
þ
ï 1. relationship building, goal setting, and
contracting the conditions of supervision
ï . fluctuation between roles as counselor and
teacher as skill deficits and stresses arise
ï °. collegial role in response to growing expertise
and confidence
ï ¢. consultant role as the supervisee becomes self-
directed and independent
°
Another Developmental Model
(Loganbill)
ï stagnation
ï confusion
ï integration
°°
M
°¢
°ã
Discrimination Model
(Bernard & Goodyear)
ï three foci ±
± process skills
± conceptualization skills
± personalization skills
ï three supervisor roles ±
± teacher
± counselor
± consultant
°(
Integrated (Eclectic) Model
°V
Interactional Model
(Shulman)
°±
Interactional --
ï Middle Phase ± Work Phase
± Session tuning in
± Session Contracting
± Elaboration
± Empathy
± Sharing eelings
°
Interactional --
ï Middle Phase ± Continued
± Showing Vulnerability
± Demanding Work
± Pointing Out Obstacles
± Sharing Data
± Session Ending
ï Ending and Transition Phase
¢0
Theory-specific Models
ï psychodynamic
ï behavioral
ï cognitive
ï technical eclecticism
¢1
Reflection
ï guided questioning
ï assumes that increased awareness leads to
increased skill
¢
Recommendations
ï Choose models
ï Discuss models with your supervisor
ï Agree on one or more models
ï Use the agreed-on models
ï Evaluate use of the models
¢°
Steps in the Supervision Process
¢¢
Supervision Steps ßß
¢ã
Characteristics of a Good
Supervision Meeting
¢(
Meeting Characteristics ßß
ï provides helpful feedback
ï occurs in the context of a facilitative
learning process
ï is consistent with good teaching-learning
theory and practice
ï provides follow through and connection to
the next meeting
¢V
Recommendation
¢±
Content of a Supervision Session
¢
Diversity Issues
ï Diversity influences . . .
ï a. the experience of problems
ï b. the description of problems
ï c. approaches to solving problems
ï d. perception of helpers
ã0
The Diversity Triangle
Client
Supervisor Supervisee
ã1
Supervisor Duties to Clients
( alvey)
ã
Supervisor Duties to Supervisee
(after alvey)
ï a. Select supervisee
ï b. Assess supervisee competence
ï c. Orient supervisee
ï d. Develop individualized supervision plan
ï e. Obtain informed consent for supervision
ã°
Duties --
ï f. Assign cases
ï g. Monitor cases
ï h. Document monitoring
ï i. Schedule and meet regularly for
supervision
ï j. Document supervision
ã¢
Recommendation
ãã
The Duty ± Negligence Issue
ã(
Negligence involves
ï a. Duty
ï b. Breach
ï c. Cause
ï d. Damage
ï . . . as shown by preponderance of evidence
ãV
Examples of Supervisor
Negligence ( alvey)
ï a. failing to adequately plan the
supervisee¶s work
ï b. giving inappropriate advice to the
supervisee
ï c. failing to get adequate information about
a client
ï d. assigning tasks that the supervisor knew
or should have known the trainee was not
qualified to perform
ã±
Vicarious Liability
ï Others may be legally liable for your acts or
omissions.
± Your supervisor
± Your agency administrator
± Your seminar instructor
± Other school officials
ã
Supervisor - Supervisee
Relationship Problems
ï unmatched expectations
ï fear of disclosure
ï supervision outside expertise
ï boundary issues with clients
ï boundary issues in supervisory relationship
(0
M M
ï games
ï supervisee discomfort with power
differential
ï supervisor discomfort with power
differential
ï organizational/structural barriers
(1
Problems in Client-Helper
Relationships
ï inadequate understanding
ï inadequate rapport
ï unclear contract
ï unrealistic expectations
ï lack of progress
ï boundary problems
(
u
ï Strong feelings
ï Extended sessions
ï Inappropriate communication
ï Off-hours phone calls
ï Inappropriate gift giving
(°
u
ßß
(¢
Responses to Client-Helper
Relationship Problems
(ã
Levels of Informed Consent ( alvey)
ï a. client consent to treatment by the
supervisee
ï b. client consent to supervision
ï c. supervisor consent to assume
responsibility
ï d. supervisee consent to supervision
ï e. institutional consent to comply with
supervision standards
((
Special issues with students ( alvey)
(V
Issues with Students --
(±
Considerations in assigning
clients ( alvey)
ï a. competencies and limitations of the
supervisee
ï b. complexity of the case
ï c. supervisee caseload numbers and
complexity
ï d. supervisor competencies and limitations
ï e. supervisor time for supervision
(
Documents to Demonstrate
Proper Supervision (after alvey)
ï a. emergency contact information
ï b. supervisee profile
ï c. plan for supervision
ï d. supervision agreement
ï e. caseload supervision log sheet
ï f. supervision progress notes
ï g. initial clinical summary
ï h. termination summary
V0
Recommendations to Reduce
Risk (after alvey)
ï a. Meet with each client during the
screening and assignment process.
ï b. Orient supervisees to informed consent,
dual relationship, and other ethical issues.
ï c. Require audio recordings on a structured
basis.
V1
To Reduce Risk --
ï d. Review recordings.
ï e. Regularly ask about personal reactions
to clients.
ï f. Document and follow up
recommendations.
ï g. Do not allow client contact or
supervision after hours.
V
Recommendations to
Avoid Dual Relationships ( alvey)
V°
To Avoid Dual Relationships --
V¢
Two more hints for self
protection
Vã
Responses to Client-Helper
Relationship Problems
V(
May a supervisor supervise
outside of expertise?
ï What is expertise?
VV
Elements of Expertise (after Oliver)
ï a. acceptable training in the field
ï b. appropriate licensure
ï c. substantial relevant experience
ï d. sound use of knowledge, skills, and
principles
ï e. familiarity with and rational basis for
rejecting alternative views
V±
Expertise --
V
?u
M
ï 1. Does not recognize or ignores relevant
information.
ï . Minimally recognizes relevant
information.
ï °. With coaching, can begin to apply
relevant information to situations.
ï ¢. Can identify and apply relevant
information in simple situations.
±0
M
ï ã. Can identify and apply relevant
information in complex situations.
ï (. Can identify and apply relevant
information from more than one perspective
to complex situations.
ï V. Can identify and apply relevant
information from several perspectives to
complex situations.
±1
M
ï ±. Can identify and apply relevant
information from several perspectives to
complex situations, and can clearly explain
the merits of each perspective in relation to
the field of knowledge.
±
Recommendation
ï Complete a needs assessment.
ï Prioritize learning needs.
ï Incorporate those priorities in the learning
agreement.
±°