Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A1.26
simplifies the calculations for ∂φ / ∂x . The transformation to cylindrical coordinates
requires that any reference to x,y in Equations A1.7.2 and A1.7.3 be eliminated. Using
the defining relations for cylindrical coordinates in Equation A1.7.1 provide
∂ρ ∂ρ
= cos φ = sin φ (A1.7.4)
∂x ∂y
Equation A1.7.2 also has terms such as ∂φ / ∂x which are easiest to calculate with
an implicit definition for φ
tan φ = y / x
The differential of the last expression gives
x dy − y dx
d tan φ =
x2
Note that the change in φ depends on dx and dy. If dx=0 then d tan φ = dy / x and so on.
However, elementary calculus provides the formula
d 1 dφ
tan φ = → d tan φ =
dφ cos φ
2
cos 2 φ
Combining the previous two equations for d(tan φ) provides
x dy − y dx
dφ = cos 2 φ
x2
Substituting the cylindrical form of x, y and collecting terms gives
cos φ sin φ
dφ = dy − dx
ρ ρ
Comparing this last equation with the definition for the differential dφ which is
∂φ ∂φ ∂φ
dφ = dy + dx + dz
∂y ∂x ∂z
gives
∂φ cos φ ∂φ sin φ ∂φ
= =− =0 (A1.7.5)
∂y ρ ∂x ρ ∂z
Therefore, ∂u / ∂x in Equation A1.7.2 can be written in cylindrical coordinates by
combining that equation with Equations A1.7.4 and A1.7.5.
∂u ∂ρ ∂φ ∂z sin φ
= uρ + uφ + uz = u ρ cos φ − uφ (A1.7.6)
∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ρ
The Laplacian requires the quantity ∂ 2 u / ∂x 2 be calculated. Brown and Churchill
make an interesting observation to simplify the procedure. In Equation A1.7.6, replace
“u” with “f” as a change in notation.
∂f ∂ρ ∂φ ∂z sin φ
= fρ + fφ + fz = f ρ cos φ − fφ
∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ρ
Next, note that if f=ux (the first derivative of u) then the last equation can equally well be
written as
∂u ∂ sin φ ∂
u xx = x = cos φ ux − ux
∂x ∂ρ ρ ∂φ
However, ux is known from Equation A1.7.6.
A1.27
∂u x ∂ sin φ sin φ ∂ sin φ
u xx = = cos φ u ρ cos φ − u φ − u ρ cos φ − u φ
∂x ∂ρ ρ ρ ∂φ ρ
Using ∂ cos φ / ∂φ = 0 = ∂ρ / ∂φ (etc.) provides
2 sin φ cos φ sin 2 φ sin 2 φ 2 sin φ cos φ
u xx = u ρρ cos 2 φ − u φρ + 2 u φφ + uρ + uφ (A1.7.7)
ρ ρ ρ ρ2
A1.28
Brown and Churchill not that the two sets of equations have similar form. Of course, the
variables x ≠ z etc. The table shows the following identification as far as the structure of
the equations are concerned.
Cyl : x ρ φ y
7 7 7 7
Sph : z r θ ρ
The basic idea is that the expressions derived in cylindrical coordinates should hold in
spherical coordinates so long as the above substitutions are made. Brown and Churchill
group the terms in cylindrical Laplacian (Equation A1.7.9) as
1 1
∇ 2 u = u zz + u ρρ + u ρ + 2 u φφ (A1.7.10)
← term 1→ ρ ρ
← term 2→ ← term 3→
The left side of Equation A1.7.12 is term #1 in Equation A1.7.10. Therefore the right-
hand side of Equation A1.7.12 gives term #1 in spherical coordinates.
Next, examine term #2 in Equation A1.7.10. Making the same identification
provides
A1.29
∂u y ∂u x ∂u
= + 2.9.13
∂y ρ ∂ρ ρ2 ∂φ
x → z
y → ρ
( y → ρ) ρ→r
ρ→r φ → θ
⇓ ⇓ ⇓
∂u ρ ∂u z ∂u
= + 2.9.14
∂ρ r ∂r r 2 ∂θ
Divide this last equation by ρ to get term #2
1 ∂u 1 ∂u z ∂u 1 ∂u cot φ ∂u
= + 2 = + 2 (A1.7.15)
ρ ∂ρ r ∂r ρr ∂θ r ∂r r ∂θ
since z / ρ = cot θ . Term #3 is easy, replace ρ by r sin θ to get
1 ∂ 2u 1 ∂ 2u
→ (A1.7.16)
ρ 2 ∂φ 2 r 2 sin 2 θ ∂φ 2
Combining all of the terms in Equations A1.7.3,6,7 provides
∂ 2 u 1 ∂u 1 ∂ 2 u 1 ∂u cot φ ∂u 1 ∂ 2u
∇ u= 2 +
2
+ + + 2 +
∂r r ∂r r 2 ∂θ 2 r ∂r r ∂θ r 2 sin 2 θ ∂φ 2
The author prefers the straight forward method that explicitly calculates ∂u / ∂x etc.
A1.30