LEONARD M, ROBINSON, #8313 a Ds
Attorney at Law
201 NW Hwy. 24, Ste. 140
P.O. Box 8138
Topeka, Kansas 66608-0138
(785) 233-7001
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS
DIVISION THO
In the Matter of the Marriage of
HAL RICHARDSON,
and Case No. 96-D-217
CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI,
Respondent.
)
)
Petitioner, ,
)
)
)
MOTION
COMES NOW Claudine Dombrowski, pursuant to the Court's Order
Suspending Parenting Time of December 29, 2000, wherein the Court
on its own motion suspended all parenting time for Claudine
Dombrowski with the minor child Rikki Dombrowski until further
order of the Court, and in the same order filed December 29, 2000,
ordered "Ms. Dombrowski shall be required to file a motion with
this Court to determine what, if any, parenting time should be
scheduled," and moves the Court to reinstate parenting time for
her and the minor child.
It is respectfully submitted that it is in the best interests
of the child to forthwith allow visitation of the minor child,
Rikki Dombrowski, with her mother, Claudine Dombrowski, and to
insure that the Court, the case manager, opposing counsel, and the
petitioner are given some assurance and protection, it isrequested at this time that the visitation commence forthwith with
the Safe Visit program.
In support of this motion a copy of the case manager's
correspondence to attorneys for the respondent and petitioner is
attached hereto and marked Exhibit A.
There are other issues dealing with child custody and
parenting time that should be dealt with in the future; however,
at this time and pursuant to the Court's order filed herein
December 29, 2000, respondent respectfully indicates to the Court
that it is vitally important and in the best interests of the
minor child, Rikki Dombrowski, that the visitation commence
forthwith under the Safe Visit program, and respondent shal
comply totally with the Court's orders in regard to Safe Visit if
the Court would on its own motion lift the suspension of its order
and order Safe Visit parenting time pursuant to the standard
provisions, and also pay the costs of the Safe Visit as pointed
out as appropriate in Mr. Harry Moore's letter of 16 January 2001.
The respondent Claudine Dombrowski gives assurance to Court,
counsel and petitioner that she will not make any attempt to take
the child upon her visits under the Safe Visit program if the
Court so allows.
Respectfully submitted:
: ON
Attorney for RespondentCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Leonard M. Robinson, hereby certify that I served
above and foregoing document on this 18th day of January, 2
to the following and in the following manner:
by hand-delivering:
ORIGINAL 1
Office of Mrs. Joyce D. Reeves, Clerk
Shawnee County District Court
Shawnee County Courthouse, Room 209
200 Southeast Seventh Street
Topeka, Kansas 66603-3969
COPY TO
Office of Mr. Harry Moore
Court Services
Shawnee County Courthouse
200 SE 7 Street
Topeka, KS 66603
CHAMBER COPY
Office of The Honorable Richard D. Anderson
District Court Judge - Division 2
Shawnee County Courthouse
200 SE 7" Street
Topeka, KS 66603
and by faxing:
copy To
Mr. Donald Hoffman
112 sw 7 street, Garden Suite
Topeka, KS 66603
Attorney for Petitioner
FAX 233-2173
Ms. Claudine Dombroski
FAX 775 402-5209
LEONARD ¥.
DIVORCEIDOMBROWSKiclaudineMotResVistKANSAS DISTRICT COURT
Shawace County Courthouse
200 SE Tt, Suse 104 Assistant Directors
eee ee ee
Cathy Leonhar, Dvector (785) 233-8200, Ex. 4004 Harry Moote, Special Series
Fax (185) 291 29380910 sarah D Mayn Rovale Series
16 January 2001
R,
eo, "9
My 'Y,
Donald Hoffman Leonard Robinson Wy _ 0
112 SW 7th St 201 NW HiWay 24 Uy,
Garden Suite Topeka, Ks 66608 y
Topeka, Ks 66603
Dear Messrs Hoffman and Robinson:
‘This past Friday, I received a telephone message from Mr. Robinson inquiring as to what my
position concerning visitation between Ms. Dombrowski and her daughter, Rikki, would be. At
this point, I would suggest to you the only viable option would be the Safe Visit program. This
would require the parents to complete an intake process with that agency. I would also suggest
that the costs for Safe Visit be borne by Ms. Dombrowski since it has been by her actions that this
case has reached this point.
This would be my recommendation to the Court under the Case Management statute, although my
role as a case manager has been skewered out of all reality for the past several months due to the
rather unusual nature of this case.
Should either of you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 23-8200, ext 4300,
Respectfully yours,
Swill pee
Harry Mopre’
Assistant Director