Winfree Academy Charter Schools Summative Evaluation 2009-2010

Goal 1: To reduce any disparity in performance on assessment instruments administered under Subchapter B, Chapter 39 between students
identified as at risk of dropping out of school and all other district students.
Performance Objective 1: To increase percentage of at-risk students and all student subgroups (American Indian/Alaskan Native,
Asian/Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, White/not of Hispanic origin, Special Education, LEP, and Economically
Disadvantaged) taking 2010 TAKS tests who meet above minimum expectations on Mathematics tests, on each campus and in
each grade level by 10%.
Yellow=No Change, Unable to assess

Green = Increase due to no previous data or minimum Red = Decrease
size requirement not met
2008 TAKS Math Sum of All 2009 TAKS Math Sum of All Projected 2010 TAKS Math Actual
Charter School Data Grades Grades Sum of All Grades Change
All Students 33.00% 35.00% 46.00% 11.00%
African American Students 18.00% 28.00% 38.00% 10.00%
Hispanic Students 28.00% 26.00% 38.00% 12.00%
White Students 41.00% 45.00% 48.00% 3.00%
Native American * * * *
Asian/Pacific Islander 43.00% 36.00% * *
SPED Students 15.00% 30.00% 55.00% 25.00%
Economically Disadvantaged 28.00% 29.00% 42.00% 13.00%
LEP Students 16.00% 9.00% * *
At-Risk 32.00% 33.00% 45.00% 12.00%

Projected 2010 TAKS 9th Actual
Charter School Data 2008 TAKS 9th Grade Math 2009 TAKS 9th Grade Math Grade Math Change
All Students 21.00% 41.00% 34.00% -7.00%
African American Students 14.00% 17.00% * *
Hispanic Students 19.00% 25.00% 24.00% -1.00%
White Students 24.00% 67.00% 35.00% -32.00%
Asian/Pacific Islander * * * *
SPED Students 19.00% * * *
LEP Students 11.00% * * *
At-Risk 21.00% 33.00% 33.00% 0.00%

All Students 30.00% * 54.00% *
African American Students 11.00% * * *
Hispanic Students 25.00% * * *
White Students 39.00% * 58.00% *
Economically Disadvantaged 27.00% * * *
At-Risk 29.00% * 52.00% *

All Students 57.00% 35.00% 53.00% 18.00%
White Students 64.00% 44.00% 55.00% 11.00%
Asian/Pacific Islander * 38.00% * *
SPED Students 25.00% 27.00% 53.00% 26.00%
LEP Students 20.00% 10.00% * *
At-Risk 56.00% 33.00% 52.00% 19.00%

Asian/Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, White/not of Hispanic origin, Special Education, LEP and Economically
Disadvantaged) taking 2010 TAKS tests who meet above minimum expectations on Science tests, on each campus and in each
grade level by 10%.
2008 TAKS Science Sum of 2009 TAKS Science Sum of Projected 2010 TAKS Actual
Charter School Data All Grades All Grades Science Sum of All Grades Change
All Students 54.00% 51.00% 66.00% 15.00%
White Students 62.00% 67.00% 68.00% 1.00%
SPED Students 28.00% 29.00% 40.00% 11.00%
LEP Students 26.00% 16.00% * *
At-Risk 53.00% 49.00% 64.00% 15.00%

2008 TAKS 10th Grade 2009 TAKS 10th Grade Projected 2010 TAKS 10th Actual
Charter School Data Science Science Grade Science Change
All Students 43.00% * 63.00% *
At-Risk 44.00% * 60.00% *

Charter School Data Science Science Grade Science Change
All Students 70.00% 51.00% 67.00% 16.00%
White Students 77.00% 67.00% 68.00% 1.00%
SPED Students 56.00% 29.00% 44.00% 15.00%
LEP Students 33.00% 16.00% * *
At-Risk 69.00% 49.00% 65.00% 16.00%

Disadvantaged) taking 2010 TAKS tests who meet above minimum expectations on Reading/ELA tests, on each campus and in
Projected 2010 TAKS

2008 TAKS Reading/ELA Sum 2009 TAKS Reading/ELA Sum Reading/ELA Sum of All Actual
Charter School Data of All Grades of All Grades Grades Change
All Students 75.00% 71.00% 81.00% 10.00%
White Students 80.00% 77.00% 85.00% 8.00%
Native American 86.00% 50.00% * *
SPED Students 49.00% 52.00% 67.00% 15.00%
Economically Disadvantaged 69.00% 67.00% 65.00% -2.00%
LEP Students 57.00% 43.00% 68.00% 25.00%
At-Risk 74.00% 70.00% 80.00% 10.00%

Charter School Data Reading Reading Grade Reading Change
All Students 72.00% 89.00% 90.00% 1.00%
White Students 79.00% 99.00% 92.00% -7.00%
SPED Students 57.00% 80.00% * *
At-Risk 71.00% 86.00% 88.00% 2.00%

Charter School Data 2008 TAKS 10th Grade ELA 2009 TAKS 10th Grade ELA Grade ELA Change
All Students 30.00% * 54.00% *
At-Risk 71.00% * 82.00% *

Charter School Data 2008 TAKS 11th Grade ELA 2009 TAKS 11th Grade ELA Grade ELA Change
All Students 86.00% 70.00% 74.00% 4.00%
White Students 88.00% 76.00% 77.00% 1.00%
Native American * 50.00% * *
SPED Students 50.00% 50.00% 63.00% 13.00%
LEP Students 56.00% 40.00% * *
At-Risk 85.00% 69.00% 74.00% 5.00%

Disadvantaged) taking 2010 TAKS tests who meet above minimum expectations on Social Studies tests, on each campus and in
2008 TAKS Social Studies 2009 TAKS Social Studies Projected 2010 TAKS Social Actual
Charter School Data Sum of All Grades Sum of All Grades Studies Sum of All Grades Change
All Students 83.00% 80.00% 87.00% 7.00%
White Students 86.00% 87.00% 86.00% -1.00%
SPED Students 66.00% 63.00% 70.00% 7.00%
LEP Students 67.00% 61.00% * *
At-Risk 82.00% 80.00% 83.00% 3.00%

2008 TAKS 10th Grade Social 2009 TAKS 10th Grade Social Projected 2010 TAKS 10th Actual
Charter School Data Studies Studies Grade Social Studies Change
All Students 75.00% * 82.00% *
At-Risk 74.00% * * *
2008 TAKS 11th Grade Social 2009 TAKS 11th Grade Social Projected 2010 TAKS 11th Actual
Charter School Data Studies Studies Grade Social Studies Change
All Students 94.00% 80.00% 85.00% 5.00%
White Students 98.00% 87.00% 86.00% -1.00%
SPED Students 92.00% 63.00% 69.00% 6.00%
LEP Students 78.00% 61.00% * *
At-Risk 82.00% 80.00% 84.00% 4.00%

*** AEA Indicator
2008 TAKS Progress 2009 TAKS Progress 2010 TAKS Progress

Measure Sum of All Grades Measure Sum of All Grades Measure Sum of All Grades Actual
Charter School Data Tested Tested Tested Change
All Students 70.00% 69.00% 88.00% 19.00%
White Students 76.00% 77.00% 92.00% 15.00%

Irving Campus Data Tested Tested Tested Change
All Students 62.00% 66.00% 81.00% 15.00%
White Students 69.00% 83.00% 87.00% 4.00%

Lewisville Campus Data Tested Tested Tested Change
All Students 78.00% 76.00% 88.00% 12.00%
White Students 80.00% 79.00% 94.00% 15.00%

Richardson Campus Data Tested Tested Tested Change
All Students 64.00% 62.00% 88.00% 26.00%
White Students 70.00% 80.00% 92.00% 12.00%

Grapevine Campus Data Tested Tested Tested Change
All Students 84.00% 79.00% 93.00% 14.00%
White Students 86.00% 82.00% 95.00% 13.00%

NRH Campus Data Tested Tested Tested Change
All Students 67.00% 68.00% 88.00% 20.00%
White Students 68.00% 73.00% 91.00% 18.00%

Denton Campus Data Tested Tested Tested Change
All Students 69.00% 67.00% 92.00% 25.00%
White Students 72.00% 70.00% 92.00% 22.00%
Summative Evaluation: Winfree Academy Charter Schools showed significant growth in student achievement as measured by the
2010 TAKS scores. The objectives were not met for all subpopulations. However, the TAKS Progress Measure Sum of All
Grades Tested (AEA Indicator) demonstrates a 10% or higher increase in passing scores for 30 of 35 possible measurements as
evidenced above.
Goal 2: To have 100% of all core academic classes taught by highly qualified teachers and 100% highly qualified staff will be maintained.
Performance Objective 1: 100% of core academic classes will be taught by highly qualified teachers, 100% of paraprofessionals
with instructional duties will meet NCLB requirements and 100% of highly qualified staff will be maintained.
Number of Core Academic

Number of Core Academic Teachers Meeting Highly
Teachers Qualified Requirements Percentage
Charter School Data 53 53 100.00%
Irving 10 10 100.00%
Lewisville 8 8 100.00%
Richardson 9 9 100.00%
Grapevine 8 8 100.00%
NRH 10 10 100.00%
Denton 6 6 100.00%
Number of
Paraprofessionals with
Number of Instructional Duties Meeting
Paraprofessionals with NCLB Highly Qualified
Instructional Duties Requirements Percentage
Charter School Data 31 31 100.00%
Irving 7 7 100.00%
Lewisville 3 3 100.00%
Richardson 4 4 100.00%
Grapevine 3 3 100.00%
NRH 8 8 100.00%
Denton 6 6 100.00%
Summative Evaluation: 100% of core academic classes for the 2009-2010 school year were taught by highly qualified teachers as
defined by TEC 12.129. 100% of paraprofessionals with instructional duties were highly qualified as defined by NCLB
requirements.
Goal 3: To increase the number of students who that attain High School Completion Rate II.
Performance Objective 1: A dropout rate of 20% or less for all students and student groups will be maintained.
Charter
School Irving Lewisville Richardson Grapevine NRH Denton
All Students 7.90% 6.70% 11.80% 13.30% 3.00% 7.20% 2.80%
White Students 6.80% 6.50% 11.00% 12.80% 3.00% 6.40% 2.60%

Hispanic
Students 8.20% 6.90% 12.50% 12.10% 3.40% 7.90% 2.50%
African American
Students 10.50% 6.40% 14.10% 16.70% 3.30% 7.20% 4.80%
Asian/Pacific
Islander 9.30% 6.30% 12.00% 8.70% 0.00% 12.50% 0.00%
Native American 3.60% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Economically
Disadvantaged 7.50% 3.80% 10.30% 15.90% 4.30% 4.30% 3.50%
At-Risk 7.70% 6.00% 12.70% 13.90% 2.60% 5.30% 2.90%
Summative Evaluation: Objective 1 was met for all campuses and subpopulations reported by the Texas Education Agency (2008-
2009 Dropout Summary: Winfree Academy Charter Schools) released June 18, 2010.
Performance Objective 2: Completion Rate II of 60% or higher will be maintained.
Charter
School Irving Lewisville Richardson Grapevine NRH Denton
All Students 73.10% 67.70% 66.20% 66.80% 76.30% 72.50% N/A
At-Risk 77.40% 73.30% 69.00% 71.40% 78.40% 80.20% 77.40%
Summative Evaluation: Objective 2 was met for all campuses reported by the Texas Education Agency (Class of 2009 4-Year
Completion Summary: Winfree Academy Charter Schools) released June 18, 2010.
Performance Objective 3: Achieve 85% or higher ADA for all students
2007-2008 Attendance 2008-2009 Attendance 2009-2010 Attendance
Charter School Data 81.70% 79.70% 76.30%
Irving 81.90% 79.80% 75.40%
Lewisville 83.40% 79.10% 78.80%
Richardson 77.70% 75.80% 71.30%
Grapevine 84.50% 84.50% 85.30%
NRH 80.40% 78.80% 72.10%
Denton 84.60% 82.20% 80.10%
Summative Evaluation: Objective 3 was not met . Winfree Academy Charter Schools will continue to address Goal 3 in the 2010-2011
Charter School Instructional Plan.
Goal 4: Parents and community members will be partners in the education of Winfree Academy Charter School students.
Performance Objective 1: 70% or more of all students’ parents/guardians and/or family members will participate in at least one
school sponsored activity for/with their student.
Summative Evaluation: Winfree Academy Charter Schools increased its opportunities for parent/community involvement during
the 2009-2010 school year. This included two Linking Tree Mental Health Fairs, Saturday Open House on each campus, Get
Ready! parent/community post-high school workshops, and the creation of a parent volunteer council on each campus.
Additionally each campus held other parent/community involvement activities on their campus. From informal assessment,
parent/community involvement increased on all campuses. However, the way that the goal and objective were written,
parent/community involvement is unable to be formally assessed. Therefore, Objective 1 was not met due to inability to measure
the objective. Winfree Academy Charter Schools will continue to address Goal 4 in the 2010-2011 Charter School Instructional
Plan, in a specific and measurable format.
Goal 5 : To reduce any disparity in students graduating Recommended/Distinguished between students identified as at risk of dropping out
of school and all other district students.
Disadvantaged) graduating under the Recommended/Distinguished Graduation Plan.
Charter
2007-2008 School Irving Lewisville Richardson Grapevine NRH Denton
Minimum HSP
Graduates 259 40 48 50 54 35 32
Recommended
HSP Graduates 92 13 21 11 13 19 15
Total Graduates 351 53 69 61 67 54 47
Charter
Minimum HSP
Graduates 307 53 65 55 26 59 49
Recommended
HSP Graduates 168 29 16 23 31 33 36
Total Graduates 475 82 81 78 57 92 85
Charter
Minimum HSP
Graduates 260 47 45 24 31 68 45
Recommended
HSP Graduates 151 19 28 13 17 35 39
Total Graduates 411 66 73 37 48 103 84

2007-2008 Recommended 2008-2009 Recommended 2009-2010 Recommended Actual
HSP Graduate Percentage HSP Graduate Percentage HSP Graduate Percentage Change
Charter School Data 26.20% 35.40% 36.70% 1.30%
Irving 24.50% 35.40% 28.80% -6.60%
Lewisville 30.40% 19.80% 38.40% 18.60%
Richardson 18.00% 29.50% 35.10% 5.60%
Grapevine 19.40% 54.40% 35.40% -19.00%
NRH 35.20% 35.90% 34.00% -1.90%
Denton 31.90% 42.40% 46.40% 4.00%
Summative Evaluation: Winfree Academy Charter Schools increased the percentage of students graduating on the Recommended
or Distinguished plans. Furthermore, 3 out of 6 campuses demonstrated increased percentages of students graduating on these
plans. At the time of submission disaggregation by subpopulation was available due to conversion processes of PEIMS software.
The charter school will disaggregate information as stated in the performance objective when the data is available.

Winfree Academy Charter Schools Summative Evaluation 2009-2010

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Winfree Academy Charter Schools Summative Evaluation 2009-2010

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Goal 1: To reduce any disparity in performance on assessment instruments administered under Subchapter B, Chapter 39 between students

Yellow=No Change, Unable to assess

All Students 33.00% 35.00% 46.00% 11.00%

African American Students 18.00% 28.00% 38.00% 10.00%

Hispanic Students 28.00% 26.00% 38.00% 12.00%

White Students 41.00% 45.00% 48.00% 3.00%

Asian/Pacific Islander 43.00% 36.00% * *

SPED Students 15.00% 30.00% 55.00% 25.00%

Economically Disadvantaged 28.00% 29.00% 42.00% 13.00%

LEP Students 16.00% 9.00% * *

At-Risk 32.00% 33.00% 45.00% 12.00%

All Students 21.00% 41.00% 34.00% -7.00%

African American Students 14.00% 17.00% * *

Hispanic Students 19.00% 25.00% 24.00% -1.00%

White Students 24.00% 67.00% 35.00% -32.00%

SPED Students 19.00% * * *

Economically Disadvantaged 13.00% 18.00% 25.00% 7.00%

LEP Students 11.00% * * *

At-Risk 21.00% 33.00% 33.00% 0.00%

All Students 30.00% * 54.00% *

African American Students 11.00% * * *

Hispanic Students 25.00% * * *

White Students 39.00% * 58.00% *

SPED Students 5.00% * * *

Economically Disadvantaged 27.00% * * *

LEP Students 29.00% * * *

At-Risk 29.00% * 52.00% *

All Students 57.00% 35.00% 53.00% 18.00%

African American Students 43.00% 28.00% * *

Hispanic Students 50.00% 26.00% 49.00% 23.00%

White Students 64.00% 44.00% 55.00% 11.00%

Asian/Pacific Islander * 38.00% * *

SPED Students 25.00% 27.00% 53.00% 26.00%

Economically Disadvantaged 59.00% 29.00% 49.00% 20.00%

LEP Students 20.00% 10.00% * *

At-Risk 56.00% 33.00% 52.00% 19.00%

All Students 54.00% 51.00% 66.00% 15.00%

African American Students 37.00% 29.00% * *

Hispanic Students 47.00% 40.00% 54.00% 14.00%

White Students 62.00% 67.00% 68.00% 1.00%

Asian/Pacific Islander 67.00% 62.00% * *

SPED Students 28.00% 29.00% 40.00% 11.00%

Economically Disadvantaged 47.00% 41.00% 59.00% 18.00%

LEP Students 26.00% 16.00% * *

At-Risk 53.00% 49.00% 64.00% 15.00%

All Students 43.00% * 63.00% *

African American Students 21.00% * * *

Hispanic Students 41.00% * * *

White Students 51.00% * 69.00% *

SPED Students 21.00% * * *

Economically Disadvantaged 34.00% * * *

LEP Students 21.00% * * *

At-Risk 44.00% * 60.00% *

All Students 70.00% 51.00% 67.00% 16.00%

African American Students 67.00% 29.00% * *

Hispanic Students 56.00% 40.00% 57.00% 17.00%

White Students 77.00% 67.00% 68.00% 1.00%

Asian/Pacific Islander * 62.00% * *

SPED Students 56.00% 29.00% 44.00% 15.00%

Economically Disadvantaged 64.00% 41.00% 60.00% 19.00%

LEP Students 33.00% 16.00% * *

At-Risk 69.00% 49.00% 65.00% 16.00%

Projected 2010 TAKS