111,11111:1 Appraisal .

11 h, Institute-

Pl'Qr ... ;'mllr~ P""';dilll! Hr.nl'!Jlat-t· Su1~#i(J/l~

Instructor 'Evaluation Form

CHAPTER N.AME (ilf applicable) _..::6:.::;A::.::::%;w,:21{..?:<M~·'4.2.!l",-_.:O::.!'/-I;:...:.~/O:::__ _

LOCATION _J.<:tb""'i""()""''i#.''''-'if. .... j ... ?!<-r,,-''''a'-'-~,._'/ ... a DATE(S) ____,J,@"==.~0~~~-b::....::._ _

INSTRUCTOR _ _.:Y??Ell..t:l!:::.k..·_M2'A:u22"..1:.· ~.~._t:;:.jt.~¥A.~'.T~. _

Please rate the extent to which your instructor displayed the following characteristics. Use a separate form for each instructor:

iPoor Fair Average Good Excellent
1. Well prepared and organized 0 0 0 0 M
2. Followed program manual and objectives 0 0 0 0 /il1
3 .. Presented material In clear manner 0 0 0 1if D
4. Provided good mixture of lecture, discussion, and ecnvmes 0 0 0 0 Ji{
5. 'Made effective use of examples and war stories 0 0 0 q J4
,6. Presented application and relevancy of topic to real world 0 0 0 0 12(
situations
7. Raised challenging questions and problems for discussion 0 0 0 0 '!lr
8. Relded students' questions well 0 0 0 0 "
9. Presented material at suitable pace 0 0 0 1ll 0
10. Covered content in sufficient depth, given time constraints 0 0 0 0 N
11. Available for help 0 0 0 0 ti.f
12, Demonstrated mastery of subject and awareness of current 0 0 0 0 /if
developments in the field
13. Seemed genuinely conoerned with student achievement 0 0 0 0 ~
14. Overall rating 0 0 0 0 !t Instructor weaknesses: _

Would you take another course/seminar from this instructor?

M Yes

o No

If not, why not? _

Comments: _

IIII1 Appraisal

.11, 11111 Institute-

PI"Qft'","nn/,j I'mlltdillll Ikill ElMIt' $ul'Ulimuo

Instructor Evaluation Form

COURSE/SEMINAR NAME AND/OR NUMBER _tk __ Ve....:_/_::.t:>,t.:.,'(J;...l-1f_:_;e,.,:..:;...!_/....:::5:._· _4- __ b._, -_"_:J S'l:...:;e..:..:-...=~/...::::J:.__... _

LOCATION __ ~_:.v_.:.(=V'=,.,,-'6'-"'e~~ _-=0c........:....:I1 DATE(S) __ _]cf"'-+f/--'-I-""')::LV--!:::t7:__¥~ _

INSTRUCTOR_~:;~~~e~~f~~~JL,~' ___

Please rate the extent to which your instructor displayed the following characteristics. Use a separate form for each instructor:

Poor Fair Average Good, Excellent
1. Well prepared and organized 0 0 0 0 fJ
2. Followed program manual and objectives 0 0 0 0 ~
3. Presented material in clear manner 0 0 0 0 er
4. Provided good mixture of lecture, discussion, and activities 0 0 0 0 BJ
5. Made effective use of examples and war stories 0 0 0 q .@J
6. Presented application and relevancy of topic to real world 0 0 0 0 I?j
situations
7. Raised challenging questions and problems for discussion 0 0 0 0 I!
8. Fielded students' questions well 0 0 0 0 @
9. Presented material at suitable pace 0 0 0 0 ..I!J
10. Covered content in sufficient depth, given time constraints 0 0 0 0 I;!
11. Available for help 0 0 0 0 rlI
12. Demonstrated mastery of subject and awareness of current 0 0 0 0 ,0
developments in the field
13. Seemed genuinely concerned with student achievement 0 0 0 0 ~
#'
14. Overall rating 0 0 0 0 0
Instructor strengths: (}..v-r/ 'f-...e,"( 00 I>} ~1.,,'</1

Instructor weaknesses:
Would you take another course/seminar from this instructor? H Yes 0 No
If not, why not?

Comments: IIIII Appraisal

,II' I 1111, Institute'

Prqfe<$imrrr/s l'rrn,{dilll!' JleaJ Bnau: SoIUliOTu

Instructor Evaluation Form

COURSE/SEMINAR NAME AND/OR NUMBER () 15"(//;-7-0 PIP' &"J<--I- ¥ l-Itf~·: (Jtv<- 'Iff-try CO t:---XA .. ~ CHAPTER N,AME (I' applicable) C fr1'vIJut,/I.I? Ott. t D OkfJ-t!fb?c_

LOCATION _...!o..C___.J"QL(_,::.!:(,A:_.=M..!:....£,jtr~lL~J'---' _JtOl_.L!!'~~ .. :..::.,....:_ .... DATE(Sl -=g~': f-;j....:_l_l......:::..(_.&;~y _

f

INSTRUCTOR __ J.::__{)_,t--_L__%:....::r_J.f~T(.L) _

Please rate the extent to which your instructor displayed the following characteristics. Use a separate form for each instructor:

Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
1. Well prepared and organized 0 0 0 0 @
2. Followed program manual and objectives 0 0 0 0 6
3. Presented material in clear manner 0 0 0 0 6
4. Provided good mixture of lecture, discussion, and activltles 0 0 0 0 6
5. Made effective use of examples and war stories 0 0 0 0, ~
6. Presented application and relevancy of topic to real world 0 0 0 0 t;
situations
7. Raised challenging questions and problems for discussion 0 0 0 0 J6
8. Fielded students' questions well 0 0 0 0 ~
9. Presented material at suitable pace 0 0 0 0 ~
10. Covered content in sufficient depth, given time constraints 0 0 0 0 rr
11. Available for help 0 0 0 0 ff'"
12. Demonstrated mastery of subject and awareness or current 0 0 0 0 td'"
developments in the field
13. Seemed genuinely concerned with student achievement 0 0 0 0 -6
14. Overall rating 0 0 0 0 ..6
Instructor strengths:

Instructor weaknesses:
Would you take another course/seminar from this instructor? ..6 Yes 0 No
If not, why not?

Comments: III11 Appraisal

.11 1111, Institute"

p,.,.,rt<$iQnnl. P!'QJ:idilJl! Ileal EI[tJu Solutitl/IJ

Instructor Evaluation Form

COURSE/SEMINAR NAMEAND/OR NUMBE. Oe tiL \f"" Nb • ~ d:: <L '-« ,,-iI

CHA~ER NA~E(napp"cable) ~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LOCATION __ G_\_, ",_,.,J,_'_'-1 __ i>_/-t _ __,F_C_Jt:_r..._ __ DATE(S) __ .....:.r!.,/-)_J-+l_, 'D_Y' _

INSTRUCTOR ~~~.L.6.LJ_AD~~)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------~

Please rate the extent to which your instructor displayed the following characteristics. Use a separate form for each instructor;

Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
1. Well prepared and organized 0 0 0 0 Cl1"
2. Followed program manual and objectives 0 0 0 0 ~
3. Presented material in clear manner 0 0 0 0 ~
4,. Provided good mixture of lecture, dtscusslon, and aettvities 0 0 0 0 t!
5. Made effective use of examples and war stories 0 0 0 q ~
6. Presented application and relevancy of topic to real world 0 0 0 0 t2J
situations
7. Raised challenging questions and problems for discussion 0 0 0 0 ~
8. Fielded students' questions well 0 0 0 0 dJ
9. Pr,esented material at suitable pace 0 0 0 0 ~
10. Covered content in sufficient depth. given time constraints 0 0 0 0 6lJ
11. Available for help 0 0 0 0 d
12. Demonstrated mastery of subject and awareness of current 0 0 0 0 ~,
developments in the field
13. Seemed genuinely concerned with student achievement 0 0 0 0 ~
14. Overall rating 0 0 0 0 r#
Instructor strengths:

Instructor weaknesses:
Would you take another course/seminar from this instructor? ~ Yes 0 No
If not. why not?

Comments: 11111 Appraisal ,II 1111. Institute"

Prqf ess ;Qnnls Pml-'idi"l1 /((.(1/ E:fl(lt(; .solu[iml.l

Instructor Evaluation Form

COURSE/SEMINAR NAME AND/OR NUMBER ~-::;;;7--<1 <:.........'K __ J_c_L_v___;_P--'M_L;;_:__;Jf_,J_. :::.)_+----'---'C'------ _~'__..5_C-_M_r_N_-_( -_J _

CHAPTERNAME(Happ"Cable)~~_~~~e~~_-_O~( _~_~~L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LOCATION <:'0'- J MB..; S 0 ~ DATE(S) ---;·9JA+-{f-l ...l.oI3'-f/___::~:__i+· _

INSTRUCTOR _ ____:0=-_o_S_L-.l.P-,tJ.:.. __ ~_1s..L_f.'J_'_\_( .J _

Please rate the extent to which your instructor displayed the following characteristics. Use a separate form for each instructor:

Poor Fair Average Good IExcellent
1. Well prepared and organized 0 0 0 " 0
2. Followed program manual and objectives 0 0 0 • 0
3. Presented material in clear manner 0 0 0 • 0
4. Provided good mixture of lecture, discussion, and activities 0 0 • 0 0
5. Made effective use of examples and war stories 0 0 • n 0
6. Presented application and relevancy of topic to real world 0 0 0 • 0
situations
7. Raised challenging questions and problems for discussion 0 0 • 0 0
8. Relded students' questions well 0 0 0 • 0
9. Presented material at suitable pace 0 0 0 • 0
10. Covered content in sufficient depth, given time constraints 0 0 0 • 0
11. Available for help 0 0 0 j 0
12. Demonstrated mastery of subject and awareness of current 0 0 0 ii 0
developments In the field
.13. Seemed genuinely concerned with student achievement 0 0 0 0 •
14. Overall rating 0 0 0 ., 0
Instructor strengths: '::'lcas 0 J A t... I :t ~ I f' P f f.. (L f!. t' c (. C L 0 c; J i£ 0 ..J
,
Instructor weaknesses:
Would you take another course/seminar from this Instructor? • Yes 0 'No
If not, why not?

Comments: