Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GRK Murty
An improbable feat, an unimaginable feat till it happened, took place in
Egypt: immediately after the Friday prayers, hundreds of thousands of
people bravely took to the streets in Cairo. Shedding off decades of
fear, Egyptians of all ages and religions, driven by the simple desire of
bettering their lives, assembled in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, demanding an
end to the 30-year rule of Hosni Mubarak. This collective demand for
driving out a regime, which was considered to be the most entrenched,
was peaceful—people did not resort to violence even when provoked
by the regime’s thugs. That this locally originated and well-organized
peaceful movement, backed by the strong determination of people,
could finally drive out the dictatorial regime in just 18 days, that too
without any external assistance, it is indeed a rare and incredible
display of ‘people power’.
2
economically, culturally and diplomatically it appeared to have been
overtaken by the neighbors.
3
known for years. Its GDP growth is confined to around 4-5%. Low
wages, rising food prices and high unemployment left the youth—two-
thirds of the Egyptians are under 30—in an unending frustration. They
felt that they had no future under the Mubarak regime that not only
resisted the demand for political opening under the plea that Muslim
fundamentalism would overtake the country, but also did not evince
interest in economic opening. It is this economic frustration, coupled
with their cry for freedom, both economically and politically, that
brought the youth of all hues on to the roads defying the authorities.
4
undernourishment that is stunting the growth of half the country’s
children is not addressed satisfactorily. So, what matters the most is
whether higher growth in economy is changing the lives of the poor,
else, the risk of insurgencies arising out of the surrounding inequalities
intensifies.
Which is why there is always a fear of revolt against the state if the
basic needs of common men are not met, that too, amidst plenty in
some quarters of the country. Fortunately, India, unlike Egypt, is a
democratic nation. But democracy by itself is not a guarantee against
the risk of insurgency, particularly in the light of the already existing
Maoist activity across the country. Indeed, such glaring inequality
across the nation is a strong incentive for the Maoists to bring more
people under their influence. And no one can afford to forget the fact
that the wealth of a society matters a lot to the sustainability of
democracy.
The moot question is: Can the India of today afford to remain
indifferent to these undercurrents? To be honest, the answer is: No!
For, the more glaring the economic inequalities are, the more intense
would be the political disturbances. It makes great sense to bear in
mind that be it democracy or autocracy, it doesn’t make any difference
5
when it comes to the power of people’s self-knowledge. It means, the
state has to govern. And it is the responsibility of all the political parties
to make the party in power work towards this end. Else, the writing is
clear on the wall.
*****
http://karpuramanjari.blogspot.com