President Bill Clinton and Congress in 1994 changed the tax laws to cap at $1 million the deduction corporations may take for executive compensation. The result was a dramatic shift in executive compensation away from cash and toward stock options. Failure to comply with the certification and disclosure requirements can result in steep fines and / or imprisonment.
President Bill Clinton and Congress in 1994 changed the tax laws to cap at $1 million the deduction corporations may take for executive compensation. The result was a dramatic shift in executive compensation away from cash and toward stock options. Failure to comply with the certification and disclosure requirements can result in steep fines and / or imprisonment.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
President Bill Clinton and Congress in 1994 changed the tax laws to cap at $1 million the deduction corporations may take for executive compensation. The result was a dramatic shift in executive compensation away from cash and toward stock options. Failure to comply with the certification and disclosure requirements can result in steep fines and / or imprisonment.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Root of the evil
* President Bill Clinton and Congress in 1994
changed the tax laws to cap at $1 million the
deduction corporations may take for executive
compensation.
* Performance or incentive-based forms of
compensation, most notably stock options,
however, were exempt from this cap (as they still
are).
* The result was a dramatic shift in executive
compensation away from cash and toward stock
options.SOX-What it meant
¢ For the first time in history, failure to comply
with the certification and disclosure
requirements can result in personal criminal
liability i.e. steep fines and/or imprisonment.
* Therefore compliance requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act is critical from both
corporate and personal standpoint.