Professional Documents
Culture Documents
25 mars 2011
Ottawa, Ontario
Monsieur le Président,
You have taught us all – sometimes with modest rebuke, sometimes with stern force of
argument – to understand, to respect, and to cherish the rules of Canadian democracy,
and for that alone, all Canadians will be grateful to you.
This is a historic day in the life of the democracy you have served so well.
I have to inform the House that the Official Opposition has lost confidence in the
government.
1
Our motion asks the House to agree with the finding in the 27th report of the Standing
Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on March 21st.
This was a historic finding, Mr. Speaker. It was the first time that a parliamentary
committee has found the government in contempt.
Today, with this motion, we ask the House to do the same – to find the government in
contempt, and to withdraw the confidence of the House.
Avec cette motion, nous demandons aux députés de condamner le gouvernement pour
outrage au Parlement, et par conséquent de lui retirer la confiance de la Chambre.
De quels principes parlons-nous? Que le gouvernement doit offrir aux députes toute
l’information qu’ils jugent nécessaire afin de tenir l’exécutif redevable devant le peuple
canadien.
The principle at stake in this debate goes to the heart of parliamentary democracy: the
obligation of a government to provide members of this House with the information they
need in order to hold the government accountable to the people of Canada.
We are the people’s representatives. When the government spends money, the people
have a right to know what it is to be spent on. This Parliament does not write blank
cheques.
For four months, the opposition asked the government to tell the Canadian people the
true cost of their budget plans.
For four months, we demanded to know how much Canadian taxpayers were being
asked to pay for fighter jets, for prisons, and for corporate tax breaks.
For four months, this House – and the Canadian people – were stonewalled by this
government.
Pendant quatre mois, nous avons demandé le vrai coût des avions de chasse, des
prisons, et des baisses d’impôts pour les grandes entreprises.
Pendant quatre mois, nous n’avons reçu aucune réponse, mis à part le mépris et
l’arrogance de ce gouvernement.
2
Nous étions choqués, mais n’étions pas surpris.
Après tout c’est le même gouvernement qui a fermé le Parlement à deux reprises, le
même gouvernement qui était forcé par un de vos règlements de livrer des documents
dans le dossier des détenus afghans. Nous attendons toujours ces documents.
In the case of the Afghan documents, the government’s excuse for withholding the truth
was national security.
In the case of the budget documents, they did not even bother to come up with an
excuse.
You held that the rules of our democracy require the government to answer the
questions that Parliament wants answered. You sent the matter back to a committee for
action and they came back with a finding of contempt.
So this is why we are here now. The House must decide whether the government has
broken a basic rule of our democracy and therefore whether it can remain in office.
For our part, there is no doubt. You have spoken, Mr. Speaker. The committee has
spoken. And now the House must speak with a clear voice: a government that breaks
the rules and conceals facts from the Canadian people does not deserve to remain in
office.
To those who say an election is “unnecessary,” I reply: we did not seek an election, but
if we need one to replace a government that doesn’t respect democracy with one that
does, I can’t think of no more necessary an election!
It is not just democracy that this House must affirm this afternoon; it should also affirm
Canadians’ hunger for change.
After five years of Conservative government, it is time to say enough is enough. Enough
of the politics of fear. Enough of the politics of division. Enough of the politics of
personal destruction.
3
Regardez les priorités de ce gouvernement.
Il propose de dépenser mille fois plus sur les avions de chasse que sur l’aide aux
étudiants au cegep et à l’université. Nous disons non.
Il offre moins aux aînés pour toute l’année que ce qu’ils ont dépensé en une seule
journée au sommet du G-20. Nous disons non à ce gaspillage.
Le gouvernement propose de dépenser mille fois de plus sur les prisons que sur la
prévention du crime. Nous disons non, et encore non.
The priorities of this government, laid bare in its budget, reveal a government out of
touch and out of control.
No credible plan to tackle the deficit. No numbers we can believe in. No vision of how to
sustain our health care system. Not a word about affordable housing, or childcare, or
the pressing needs of Canadian families in poverty.
Instead: jets, jails, and giveaways to oil companies, insurance companies, and banks,
who are doing just fine, thank you.
So we need a change. We need to focus scarce resources where they really matter:
early learning and childcare; college and university education for all, especially
Aboriginal and immigrant Canadians; energy efficiency and green jobs; family care for
our loved ones in the home; and security and dignity in retirement.
All of this, plus a clear plan to clean up our country’s finances and get us back to
balance, without adding to the tax burden on Canadian families.
These are the priorities of our people. These are the needs we must serve.
These are the priorities at home. We have so much ground to catch up abroad.
We have a government that lost our place in the world, lost our place at the Security
Council of the United Nations.
We need a government that restores our honor on the international stage, a government
that understands the deep and committed internationalism in the hearts of our citizens.
Enfin, nous avons besoin d’un gouvernement des citoyens, redevable devant les
citoyens, au service des citoyens et de la démocratie.
4
Des membres de ce gouvernement sont accusés de fraude électorale; un proche du
Premier Ministre est accusé de trafic d’influence. Ça suffit. On est “pucapab.”
We have a government whose most senior members stand accused of electoral fraud.
We have a Prime Minister who appointed as his top advisor someone who served
prison time for stealing money from his clients, someone who now faces accusations of
influence peddling.
5
Canadians have had enough. This House has had enough.
Mauvais choix économiques. Bad choices for our families and our economy.
Monsieur le Président, je fais appel à tous les députés d’appuyer notre motion. I call on
all members of this House to support our motion.
Merci.
- 30 -
Contact: Renseignements :
Press Office Service de presse
Office of the Leader of the Opposition Cabinet du chef de l’Opposition
613-996-6740 613-996-6740