You are on page 1of 4

SAP Case Study

mySAP™ SUPPLY CHAIN


MANAGEMENT
AT MARICO
ENHANCING BRAND EQUITY
BY IMPROVING DISTRIBUTION
PERFORMANCE
AT A GLANCE: mySAP™ SUPPLY CHAIN Marico Industries, Ltd. is a leading India-based consumer
MANAGEMENT AT MARICO goods company with sales of Rs 6.96 billion (approximately
$142 million) for the fiscal year ending March 2002. With 6
Strategic Goals:
factories and about 1,000 employees, it has maintained steady
• Enhance long-term value of company brands by revenue and profitability growth throughout the past 10 years.
achieving excellence in distribution performance
Marico offers a range of products to the local and export
• Maintain market share growth in a competitive markets (primarily South Asia and the Middle East), including
environment with much larger, offshore rivals
refined edible oils, food products such as jams and sauces, niche
• Scale supply chain operations to sustain customer fabric care products, and hair oils.
service as the business grows

• Reduce total delivered cost Marico was incorporated in 1988 and began commercial opera-
tions in 1990 when it acquired the consumer products division
Approach: of Bombay Oil Industries. Since its inception, a key strength of
Marico shortened its planning cycle from 30 days to about
the company has been its ability to build brands.
15 days; revised its demand planning process to forecast
“sales out” (shipment from distributors to retailers); and
implemented an improved process to replenish its distrib- Marico has pursued a rigorous approach to creating and sus-
utors. The company focused on achieving relatively even taining its brands, focusing on understanding and anticipating
shipment levels throughout each month and developed consumer needs, innovating in distinct ways, developing adver-
internal collaborative processes to support planning. This tising campaigns to reinforce value delivered to consumers, and
approach was enabled by mySAP™ Supply Chain Manage-
tracking metrics that support product positioning strategies.
ment software, which includes demand planning and supply
network planning capabilities coupled with SAP® R/3® and The company’s approach has enabled it to pioneer polyethylene
SAP® Business Information Warehouse (SAP® BW). packaging for coconut oils, a cold-water clothes starching
product, and other unique developments. Marico faces com-
petition from large, well-capitalized international rivals such as
Results (achieved during 3Q01 to 1Q02):
ConAgra Foods and Unilever, domestic brands, and non-brand-
• Decreased stock-outs associated with distributor
sales to retailers by 33% ed products. Nevertheless, Marico’s approach has enabled the
company to create unique value for consumers and thereby to
• Reduced lost sales due to stock-outs by 28%, thereby
improving total revenue by 1.5% build significant market share in many product categories. Of
Marico’s nine brands, three are market leaders.
• Lowered excess distributor inventory by 33%
• Reduced late deliveries to distributors by 37.5% A key attribute of Marico’s brands is the widespread availability
• Reduced costs associated with supply chain exceptions of the company’s goods throughout India. Marico’s distribution
by 25% (for example, intracompany stock transfers,
truck detention costs)
network is key to ensuring that its products reach about 100
million people throughout the Indian subcontinent each
• Positioned the company for a vendor-managed inventory month. Marico produces 125 SKUs at its own factories and
implementation and further performance improvements
through 15 subcontracting manufacturers. It stores products at
32 warehouses and sells to 3,500 distributors. These distributors
in turn provide products to 1.6 million domestic retail outlets.
Marico’s peer companies in other countries recognize its CHALLENGES AND OBJECTIVES
strength in distribution; consequently, Marico has secured a Although Marico had achieved a compound annual growth
distribution alliance with Indo Nissin Foods and a distribution rate of about 18% during the 1990s, the company recognized in
agreement with Procter & Gamble. the latter part of the decade that it must renew its focus on
profitability in order to participate in long-term growth
Though Marico experienced robust expansion throughout opportunities. The company had become highly dependent on
the 1990s, the company realized that it would face challenges to its three leading brands for generating revenue and earnings,
continued profitable growth. Greater rivalry in its core markets and was facing increasing competition in the associated edible
meant it had to increase marketing expenditures. The company oil markets as well as in other product categories. This meant
also was unable to sustain the performance of its supply chain that Marico would have to increase its advertising expenditures
as its scale of operations grew. Marico was increasingly experi- to defend the market positions of its various products and con-
encing inaccurate forecasts, excess inventory, stock-outs, and tinue to invest in product development to ensure continued
delays in response to market requirements. These supply chain growth.
performance issues were reducing Marico’s cash flow and did
not support the product brand images the company had taken Moreover, even though distribution was a core strength for
care to develop. Marico, the performance of its supply chain network was not
keeping pace with the growing scale of its operations. For
In order to achieve sustained profitable growth, given market example, the company had a planning cycle of 30 days, and,
factors and the need to maintain its distribution effectiveness, during this period, was unable to respond to changes in
Marico determined that it must improve its supply chain demand. The bucketed time horizons for manufacturing and
capabilities. Specifically, the company focused on customer- distribution were not synchronized and distribution levels were
facing business processes as well as on its internal operations. uneven, with a weighting of 15%, 32%, and 53% for the first,
After a careful analysis of alternatives, Marico selected mySAP™ second, and final third of each month. This suboptimal skewing
Supply Chain Management (mySAP™ SCM) to enable the re- of distribution activity over time, coupled with low levels of
engineering of its associated planning and execution processes. forecast accuracy, led to a mismatch of supply and demand,
inventory build-ups at Marico and at its distributors, expired
Marico’s goals included improving forecast accuracy and products, and stock-outs – all of which adversely affected end-
delivery performance in order to sustain the widespread avail- consumer perceptions. Total delivered costs were increasing
ability of its products in the market and the associated positive due to storage capacity constraints, which often required inter-
perceptions of its brands. By concentrating on internal opera- warehouse stock transfers, temporary renting of additional
tions, Marico has been able to lower inventory and supply storage space, and truck demurrage. Also, spreadsheet-based
chain operating costs, particularly those expenses that could planning methods and multiple, nonintegrated transaction
be reduced through better planning in areas such as intracom- systems inhibited widespread visibility into essential data,
pany stock transfers. The company has achieved improved cash further compounding planning-process problems.
flow to fund future growth, sustained the viability of its inde-
pendent distributor network, and maintained those elements of Thus, key goals for Marico included improved forecast accuracy
its brands’ images that are tightly coupled with high availability and more uniform distribution levels throughout each month.
of its products to its customers. It also needed to reengineer its planning processes to more
effectively match supply and demand. As a result, costs would
SAP AG
Neurottstraße 16
69190 Walldorf
Germany
T +49/18 05/34 34 24 *
F +49/18 05/34 34 20 *
* Subject to charge
www.sap.com

be more in line with best-in-class operations in the consumer Marico to distributors based on forecasted retail-level demand
industry. Inventory carrying costs and total supply chain costs and distributor inventory levels.
would be reduced, freeing cash flow to reinvest in growth-
generating activities. Marico targeted improvements in stock- Implementation of SAP® R/3® capabilities in finance, cost
out reductions and on-time delivery that would be a conse- accounting, materials management, production planning,
quence of better planning processes. These actions would quality management, and sales and distribution was started in
support the company’s branding initiatives as well as help June 2000 and went live quickly in a “big bang” implementation
ensure the profitable operation and continued viability of its in April 2001. Implementation of the demand planning and
distributor network. supply network planning capabilities of the SAP® Advanced
Planner & Optimizer of mySAP SCM – along with the SAP®
IMPLEMENTATION Business Information Warehouse (SAP® BW) – began in August
In 1999, Marico initiated a detailed evaluation of its supply 2000 and went live in a “big bang” implementation in May 2001.
chain operations to determine how best to reduce costs, satisfy Twenty-six staff members and 20 consultants assisted in the
customer needs, support its brands’ images, and position the project, using AcceleratedSAP™ (ASAP™) methodologies to en-
company for long-term growth. The company concluded that sure a rapid implementation. The scope included all company
sourcing and manufacturing were straightforward, while its dis- factories, warehouses and business offices; distributors; and
tribution operations were the key source of opportunity. Marico contract manufacturers, and the implementation achieved
procured only a few commodity raw materials (for example, systems integration that efficiently supported the new planning
vegetable oils and safflower seeds), had no major manufacturing and execution processes.
capacity constraints, had no sales seasonality associated with its
products, and minimized artificially induced demand surges by The implementation produced quick results. By early 2002,
avoiding the use of promotions. However, the distribution net- forecast accuracy was improved by 14%, and the levels of ship-
work was complex, with SKU/distribution point combinations ment activity through each third of a month had become more
numbering in the millions. even (25%, 32%, and 43%). The planning-cycle time was reduced
from 30 days to 15-20 days, and enhanced reporting facilitated
Marico focused on business processes that addressed internal management decision making. These results led to reduced
collaborative forecasting between its manufacturing sites and internal and distributor inventory, fewer stock-outs, lower levels
warehouses. The company defined clear responsibilities to of lost sales, and reduced supply chain exception-handling costs.
ensure that distribution from its warehouses to distributors
would meet service level and inventory objectives. Also, the In the future, Marico plans to implement vendor-managed
company implemented policies to distinguish the relative inventory (VMI) processes by making use of Internet-based
priority of SKUs and of distributors. integration of distributors’ stock levels into the company’s
SAP R/3 system. This VMI implementation will enable Marico
After a careful evaluation, Marico selected mySAP SCM to en- to further reduce the planning cycle to 10 days and ensure
able the associated planning and execution processes. These greater visibility into distributor operations, reduced inventory,
processes included calculation of monthly shipment require- lower supply chain management costs, and higher levels of
ments from its plants to its warehouses to support make-to- delivery performance. These results will continue to reinforce
stock operations, electronic transfer of stock level data from the the company’s branding initiatives and position Marico for
distributors to Marico, and push distribution of products from long-term, profitable growth.

50 059 358s (02/10)


2002 by SAP AG. All rights reserved. SAP, mySAP, mySAP.com, and other SAP products and services mentioned herein as well as their respective logos
©
are trademarks or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several other countries all over the world. MarketSet and Enterprise Buyer are jointly owned
trademarks of SAP AG and Commerce One. All other product and service names mentioned are the trademarks of their respective companies.
Printed on environmentally friendly paper.

You might also like