Professional Documents
Culture Documents
US3727572
US3727572
[11]
3,727,572
[45] Apr. 17, 1973
[54] MARINE FIN 81' ABILllZER CONTROL CIRCUIT
[75] Inventors: Louis W. Nelson, Upper Marlboro; Charles R. Wesner, Crozet, both of Va,
[73] Assignee: Sperry Rand Corporation, New York, N.Y.
[22] Filed:
Oct. 22,1971
[21] Appl. No.: 191,676
[52] U.S. CR •................. 114/126, 114/122,244/77 E, 318/585
[51] Int. CD. , B63b 39/06
[58] Field of Search 114/122, 126;
244/77 R, 77 E; 318/489,585,588
[56] References Cited
UNITED STATES PATENTS
2,890,673 2,960,959 2,979,010
6/1959 11/1960 4/1961
Chadwick, Jr. : 114/122
Chadwick, Jr. et al., 114/126
Braddon et al 114/126
Primary Examiner-Milton Buchler Assistant Examiner-Stephen G. Kunin Attorney-Howard P. Terry
[57]
ABSTRACT
A fin stabilizer control circuit accepts signals from a roll angle sensor, a roll rate sensor and a ship's speed sensor. The signals are first processed in a lift order computer which includes an automatic gain control circuit in which the port and starboard lift orders are compared with the square of the ship's speed so as to vary the sensitivity of the control circuits with changes in ship speed and ship residual roll motion. The output signals from the lift order computer are applied to a stroke order computer along with feedback signals representing fin angle and lift. Either feedback signal may be selected for summing with the signal from the lift order computer to produce a stroke order signal that determines the rate of deflection of the stabilizing fins. Limiting circuits in the stroke order computer restrict the stroke order signal in accordance with the larger of the two feedback signals.
8 Claims, 3 Drawing Figures
ROLL ANGLE
ROLL RATE
S PE ED
LIFT ORDER COM PUTE R
11
FEEDBACK
PATENTEOAPR 171973
SHEET 1 OF 3
3,727.572
, ~-
0: '"
~o:~ "1
~
ow::::> o
w 0:00.. <t
_J W 1-0:::;; CD
(!) I- (/)00 °
<t
2 o w
<t 0: W
° LL
_J _J W
_J _J W
0 0 0..
0: 0: C/) 0: ~
W
..-- r- ~ °
~ ~ 0: C\J
0 > (!)
I-
.._ LL
-
_J I.J..
~
o
0: <t
o:W CD
I-Wl- °
LLO::::> W
_ 0.. W
_JO:::;; LL
00 "1
o "1
r'-I.-
L...-., INVENTORS LOUIS W NELSON
BfHA:J, ,~!(:?JJ
fJ ATTORNEY
PATENTED APR 171973
Z <t <.!l
W I<t a::
_j _j
o a::
+
_j
Wz u_ U<t <t<.!l
+
\j~
_j<t _ja:: o
a::
10) II'<)
3.727.572
SHEET 2 OF 3
~~~ r------------------ +- __ _. ~o
I-_j (fJ
I'<)
l()
Z
<t a
<.!l 0
0
I-
a:: 0 (\J
o_j
a. .
\J _jW a (!)
_jl- 0
o<t
_j a:: a:: III
_j a::
0 (\j W 0::: u,
a:: > a. W
--J I-
::>
W Q_
a:: :2:
<t W:2: I 0
:::> I- <! I
0 u
(fJ ::>,
Q_ o
::2:W
00::: _j
uQ_ __ J
iii
IN VENTORS
W . LOUIS W NELSON
I-u
N <tw 81':::C ». W?K:U
_jW I a::~ a
_j..J 0 _j0 W
oS 0 _j' W
a::"- '" 0> a.
<t Irr<) (fJ ATTORNEY U <.? «
o
_j
_j
o
W I- _j ~---------'\f',V\II,r__i._.'\N\I\,-----J <t<t
a::z _j<.!l
_j(j) o a::
.. J I I
_
<t <.'J
N >
z
PATENTED APR 1 71973
3.727,572
I()
I<) 0)
0)
~
0 OJ
...J 0
u, 0)
~ If) \J I);)
OJ I);)
0 INVENTORS
u, LOUIS W NELSON
.... ~LES R. WESNER
C\J u, BY ~ ~ (j,,-c?JJ_
> -
...J
r-, "i
I);) 0) ATTORNEY SHEET 3 Of 3
I I
JO)
0)
~
LL
..0 {\J
(!)
~ 0 .... <{a OJW o...J ww WUl u,
---~
o
3,727,572
1
2
and a signal representing the square of the ship's speed. The lift order signal and the signal representing the square of ship's speed is applied to a stroke order computer. Signals from the stroke order computer are apThe present invention relates to systems for stabiliz- 5 plied to the port and starboard fin actuating
ing marine vessels against excessive rolling motion and mechanisms 11 and 13 respectively. Feedback signals
more specifically to roll stabilizing systems employing from the fin actuating mechanisms are all applied to the
adjustable fms projecting from either side of the ves- stroke order computer. The structure and mode of
sel's hull. operation of the lift order computer and the stroke
2. Description of the Prior Art 10 order computer will be described in detail. The fin ac-
Fin stabilizers for roll stabilization are well known in tuating mechanisms 11 and 13 are conventional
the art. U.S. Pat. No. 2,979,010 issued to F. D. Brad- devices. They may, for instance, be hydraulic devices
don et al. on Apr. II, 1961 and assigned to the present similar to those illustrated in the aforementioned Brad-
assignee, for instance, concerns a fin stabilization 15 don et al. patent. Feedback signals representing the in-
system in which the fins are positioned in accordance stantaneous fm angles as well as the vertical forces or
with a lift order command signal. Typically, the lift "lift" to which the fins are being subjected may be
order command signal actuates a hydraulic system derived in a straightforward manner. Fin angle transdu-
through a servo mechanism. cers are well known in the art. Lift transducers are
In prior art systems, the servo operates through a slip 20 described in detail in the aforementioned Braddon et
clutch. Large command signals drive the servo to its al. patent.
limit stops whereupon the slip clutch prevents further FIG. 2a represents, in functional form, the lift order
motion in the hydraulic stroke control system. In previ- computer and the associated components necessary to
ous systems, the limit. stops are manually adjusted to produce the lift order signals. The computer pre-ampli-
100 percent stroke. The slip clutches in such systems, 25 fier receives the various signals from the sensors and
however, may experience excessive wear. Further- converts these signals into voltages that may be ac-
more, in prior art systems, mechanical off-stroking is cepted by the lift order computer itself. Typically, the
typically used for maximum fin angles only. The limits roll angle signal may be an a.c. signal having a frequen-
cannot be programmed to meet changing require- cy of 400 Hertz and an amplitude of 75 millivolts per
30 degree of roll. This a.c. signal may be first passed through a demodulator 15 and a calibrating network 17 adjusted to produce a d.c. roll angle output signal from
The fin stabilizer circuit of the present invention the signal pre-amplifier having a magnitude of 500 mil-
receives signals representing the ship's roll angle, roll livolts per degree. The roll rate signal may typically be
rate, and speed. The roll acceleration is computed from 35 a d.c. signal having an amplitude of 3 volts per degree
the roll rate signal and speed squared is computed from per second. This roll rate signal may be calibrated in a
the ship's speed. By modifying the lift orders in ac- calibrating unit 19 to produce a roll rate output signal
cordance with the speed squared and the comparative typically in the range of 2 volts per degree per second.
value oft?e various.si.gnals, the circuit compe~sates.for 40 The signal representing ship's speed is also calibrated in
changes m fin activity caused by changesm ship's a calibrating unit 21. The output of the calibrating unit
speed and weather, and permits the fins to be used as 21 is then applied to a conventional squaring circuit 23
resonance dampers in severe seas. so as to derive a signal representing the square of a
ship's speed. The calibrating unit 21 is adjusted to pro- 45 vide signals having magnitudes that can be accepted by the remaining components in the system.
The roll angle and roll rate signals from the computer pre-amplifier are applied to the lift order computer. The lift order computer derives a first signal represent-
50 ing roll rate and a second signal representing roll angle, plus roll rate, plus acceleration. These signals are summed in a lift order limiter so as to provide port and starboard lift order output signals. The amplitudes of
FIG 1 represents a transverse section through a ship the signals from the lift order computer are modified by
employing a fin stabilizing system and illustrates the en- 55 a lift order automatic gain control circuit as will be
vironment in which the invention is intended to described.
operate. Port and starboard stabilizing fins project The automatic gain control circuit and the lift order
laterally from the sides of the vessel and function in a limiter cooperate with the lift order computer to com-
manner analogous to ailerons in an aircraft. Sensors de- bine the various control signals for optimum per-
teet the roll angle, roll rate and speed of the ship. Vari- 60 formance. It is known in the art to combine angle
ous types of sensors are known in the art. In many ap- signals, acceleration, and rate signals for specific pur-
plications, a rate gyro may be used to detect roll rate. poses. If a ship is displaced about its roll axis by a mo-
This value may then be integrated to derive the value of mentary torque, the ship will heel over to a maximum
roll angle and differentiated to derive the value of roll 65 displacement; then return to a level position. In return-
acceleration. Signals from the various sensors are ap- ing to the level position, the ship may oscillate several
plied to a lift order computer which processes the times before fmally coming to rest. Stabilization cir-
signals from the sensors to provide a lift order signal cuits may be used not only to minimize the maximum
MARINE FIN STABILIZER CONTROL CIRCUIT
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
ments,
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 isa sketch illustrating the operation of a fm stabilizer device using the principles of the invention, and
FIGS. 2a and 2b are schematic representations of a circuit useful in practicing the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
3
displacement of the ship, but also to eliminate the oscillations by proper damping. Roll stabilization might be used by applying a stabilizing torque which is exactly equal to and opposite the instantaneous displacement of the ship. It is known in the prior art, however, that by introducing control components corresponding to the acceleration and the rate of displacement, superior stabilization may be realized.
A typical damped displacement curve is a singlepeaked curve somewhat resembling a normaldistribu- 10 tion curve. The corresponding rate curve rises from zero in the same direction as the displacement curve, passes through a maximum before the maximum of the displacement curve, then decreases through zero to a 15 negative maximum near the end of the displacement curve, whereupon the rate curve again approaches zero from the opposite direction of the displacement curve. The corresponding acceieration curve rises from zero
in the same direction as the displacement curve, 20 quickly approaches a maximum, then decreases through zero at a time corresponding to the maximum
of the rate curve and proceeds to a negative maximum
at a time corresponding to the positive maximuin of the displacement curve. The acceleration curve then 25 proceeds through zero to a secondary maximum near the end of the displacement curve and finally approaches zero from the same direction as the displacement curve.
The more a control is responsive to acceleration, and to a lesser extent, the more the control is responsive to rate, the nearer the control will approach the ideal of completely neutralizing the disturbance. As was mentioned previously, the rate curve is opposite in sense to the displacement curve near the end of the recovery period. For this reason, the rate control is valuable for its positive damping effect. It will also be remembered that the acceleration control reaches a maximum before either the displacement or rate curves. For this reason, the acceleration control is valuable for its anticipatory effect in reducing displacement. The automatic gain control circuit, the lift order limiter, and the
lift order .cornputer circuits of the present invention make use of these observations to provide optimum stabilization regardless of ship speed or weather conditions.
In the automatic gain control circuit, the port and starboard signals from the lift order limiter are compared with a positive signal representing the square of 50 the ship's speed in the comparator amplifiers 25 and
27. The amplifier 25 supplies a positive input signal to
the integrator 29 when the port lift order is negative and greater in magnitude than the positive speed squared signal. Similarly, amplifier 27 supplies a positive input to the integrator 29 when the starboard lift order is negative and greater in magnitude than the positive speed squared signal. A mixing network 31 is adjusted to produce a voltage at the output of the integrator that is positive if the output of either amplifier 25 or 27 is positive and negative if both amplifier outputs are negative. The lift order signals are applied to the automatic gain control circuit in a negative feedback fashion. If the magnitude of the speed .squared reference exceeds both lift orders, the output of the integrator 29 increases which acts to increase the gain of the amplifiers in the lift order computer and thereby to
3,727,572
4
increase the magnitude of the lift order signals. If either lift order becomes more negative than the speed squared reference is positive, the integrator 29 output decreases so as to decrease the magnitude of the lift
5 order signals. In general, the average input to the integrator 29 is zero only when the integrator output raises the gain of the lift order computer to the point at which the absolute value of the lift order exceeds the
speed squared signal for more than 50 percent of the time. Since the amplifiers 25 and 27 constantly compare the lift order signals to the speed squared signal,
the sensitivity of the system varies with the changes in the ship's speed and ship residual roll motion.
A selector switch 33 permits operation in the automatic mode or the manual mode. Although the switch 33 has been illustrated as a simple mechanical switch, it will be understood that the switch ordinarily would be constructed from a network of solid state switching devices. A voltage selecting network shown as a potentiometer 35 for use in the manual mode of operation
provides operator selected voltages having magnitudes comparable to those available from the automatic mode section.of the circuit.
Signals from the selector switch are applied through a signal level-adjusting circuit, functionally represented as a potentiometer 37, to gain control amplifiers 39 and 41.
The amplifier 39 provides an output signal that is
30 used in controlling the gain of an amplifier in the roll rate channel of the lift order computer. Similarly, the amplifier 41 provides an output signal that is used in controlling the gain of an amplifier in the roll angle, plus acceleration, plus roll rate channel of the lift order
35 computer. The amplifiers 39 and 41 are constructed so that the gain of amplifier 39 is larger than the gain of the amplifier.41. Thus, when an increasing voltage is applied to the amplifiers 39 and 41, the gain of the am-
40 plifier in the roll rate channel of the lift order computer will reach a maximum before the gain of the. corresponding amplifier in the roll angle plus roll rate, plus roll acceleration channel. Conversely, when the voltage applied to the amplifiers 39 and 41 is decreasing, the
45 gain control acts to first reduce the roll angle and roll acceleration components in the lift order before the roll Tate component is reduced. Since the primary signal for stabilization is roll rate, better stabilization in
rough seas is obtained than would be possible if all signals were reduced proportionately. Thus, in severe seas, fin activity can be reduced by using the fins as
resonance dampers while retaining full stabilization capability for milder weather.
It will also be noted that the same shaping of the gain 55 curve is present whether the device is being operated in the manual or automatic gain control mode.
The lift order computer receives the calibrated roll angle signal and calibrated roll rate signals . from the computer preamplifier. The roll rate signal is applied to
60 a potentiometer 43 and through a capacitor 45 to a selector switch 47. These components permit the module to be matched to the ship at installation by allowing cancellation of an unwanted acceleration signal
65 that may be generated due to mounting the roll angle sensor above or below the center of roll.
The roll rate signal is applied to an amplifier 49. The output of the amplifier 49 is applied to a potentiometer
3,727,572
5
6
51 which is adjusted in accordance with the natural biased by the signal to a level determined by the mag-
period of roll of the vessel. The output of the poten- nitude of the speed squared signal. Thus the output of
tiometer 51 is applied through a multiplier 53 whose the amplifier 69 is limited in accordance with the back
gain is controlled by the automatic gain control circuit bias applied to the diodes 81 and 83 which in turn is a
previously described. The output of the multiplier 53 5 function of the speed of the vessel.
constitutes the roll rate signal to be applied to the lift Each of the port and starboard lift order signals from
order limiter. the lift order limiter is applied to a stroke order com-
The output of the amplifier 49 is also applied to a dif- puter. A typical stroke order computer is illustrated in
ferentiating circuit 55. The output of the differentiating FIG. 2b of the drawings. The stroke order computer
circuit represents the roll acceleration signal. 10 receives the appropriate lift order signal from the lift
As explained previously, the potentiometer 43, order limiter on a terminal 85 and the signal represent-
together with the capacitor 45, and the switch 47 are ing the speed squared on a terminal 87. A first feed-
used to match the module to the ship at installation. back signal representative of the instantaneous angle of
The potentiometer 43 is adjusted to compensate for the 15 deflection of the fins is applied to the angle feedback
magnitude of the. unwanted acceleration signal. The terminal 89. A second feedback signal representative
switch 47 is thrown to the left as indicated when the of the vertical forces or lift being experienced by the
sensor is mounted below the center of roll of the ship. fins is applied to a lift feedback terminal 91. The lift
In this position the switch causes the signals from the and angle feedback signals are applied to amplifiers 93
potentiometer 43 to pass through the inverting arnplifi- 20 and 95 respectively which provide scaling and offset
er 57 in the roll angle plus rate, plus acceleration chan- compensation for the various feedback signals. The
nel. When the sensor is mounted above the center of . particular feedback signal desired is chosen by means
roll of the ship, the switch 47 is thrown to the right so of the feedback select means which includes SWitching
that the signal from the potentiometer is applied networks functionaily illustrated as simple double
directly to an amplifier 59 in the same channel. The roll 25 throw switches 97 and 99.
rate signal from the amplifier 49 is applied to the roll If lift feedback is selected, the lift feedback signal is
angle plus rate, plus acceleration channel through the summed with the lift order in a summing circuit 101,
resistor 63. Thus the signal at the input to the amplifier and the resulting error signal is amplified in an amplifi-
57 represents the sum of the roll angle and the roll rate. er 103. The gain of the amplifier 103 is adjusted by
This signal is applied to the amplifier 59 whose output 30 mans of a multiplier 105 which, in turn, is responsive to
passes through a potentiometer 61 which may be ad- the speed squared signal received at the terminal 87.
justed in accordance with the period of roll of the ship. The signal from the amplifier 103 passes through a
The signal from the potentiometer 61 is added to the second summing network 107 which is also connected
acceleration signal from the differentiating circuit 55 to receive a signal from the switch 99. The switch 99,
and applied to an amplifier 64. The signal from the am- 35 however, is connected to ground when the lift feedback
plifier 64 is applied to the multiplier amplifier 65 whose signal is to be received. Thus, the output of the
gain is controlled by the automatic gain control circuit summing network 107 is equal to the output of the am-
as previously described. The output of the multiplier 65 plifier 103. This output is applied in turn to an amplifier
represents aroll angle plus roll rate, plus roll accelera- 40 109 whose output represents the stroke order signal.
tion signal which is applied to the lift order limiter. . If angle feedback is selected, the switches 97 and 99
Thus the signals from the lift order computer are thrown to their lower positions as illustrated in FIG.
represent roll rate and a combination of roll angle, roll 2b. Under these conditions, the output of the summing
rate, and acceleration having relative magnitudes means 101 is equal to the lift order signal; and the angle
determined by the lift order automatic gain control cir- 45 feedback signal, after passing through the amplifier 95,
cuit. is applied directly to the summing means 107. Thus the
The signals from the lift order computer are applied signal applied to the amplifier 109 from the summing
to the lift order limiter where they are summed in a network 107 represents the sum of the signals from the
summing network 67 and applied to an amplifier 69 amplifier 103 and the angle feedback signal as modified
whose output represents the port lift order signal. The 50 by the amplifier 95. The output signal from the
output of the amplifier 69 is also applied to an· inverter summing means 107 is again amplified in amplifier 109
71 whose output constitutes the starboard lift order whose output again constitutes the stroke order signal.
signal. The output of the inverter 71 is applied to a A diode network 111 connected across the amplifier
calibrating circuit functionally illustrated as a poten- 109 provides fixed limits restricting the maximum
tiometer 73. The output signal from the potentiometer 55 swing of the stroke order signal.
73 is integrated in an integrator 75 and fed back to the In addition, variable limits are established by means
amplifier 69 through the resistor network. The integra- of a limiting circuit 113 connected in shunt with the
tor reduces the continuous d.c. offset at the output of diode circuit 111 and responding to the lift and angle
the amplifier 71 to zero. Such d.c. offset could result feedback signals so as to limit maximum swing of the
from a permanent list of the ship or from any circuitry 60 stroke order in accordance with the larger of the two
between the sensors and the lift order output that might feedback signals. The fixed and variable limit circuits
provide an undesired bias. operate so that the variable limit circuit restricts the
The lift order limiter also receives the speed squared stroke order signal to values within the range permitted
signal from the computer pre-amplifier. The speed 65 by the fixed limit circuit 111.
squared signal is applied to a first amplifier 77 and then The angle feedback signal from the amplifier 95 is
to a second amplifier 79 arranged in a resistor network applied directly to the variable limit circuit 113. The
such that first and second diodes 81 and 83 are back- lift feedback signal from the amplifier 93 is inverted in
7
an amplifier 115 and then applied to the limit circuit 113. A diode circuit 117 in the input of the variable .limit circuit 113 applies the larger of the feedback signals to the amplifier 119 or the amplifier 121 depending upon the polarity of the feedback signal. The 5 output signals from the amplifiers 119 and 121 are applied to a resistance network 123 and a pair of limiting diodes 125 and 127. In summary, the fixed limit circuit 111 and the variable limit circuit 113 cooperate to provide a limiting signal which restricts the stroke order 10 signal to a value determined by the smaller of the fixed and variable limits.
In accordance with conventional practice, the stroke order signal may be used to operate a servo which controls the flow rate of a hydraulic pump by positioning a stroke shaft. The output of the pump then controls the speed and position of the fins used to stabilize the ship.
The circuit of the present invention generates a stroke order signal in which all gain changes are completed prior to the signal's entry into the stroke servo. The circuit also provides fixed and variable limits
on the stroke order signal wherein the variable limits are set by either the lift or angle feedback.
While the invention has been described in its
25
preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the words which have been used are words of description rather than limitation and that changes within the purview of the appended claims may be made without departing from the true scope and spirit of the invention in its broader aspects:
We claim:
1. A marine roll stabilization system of the type employing adjustable attitude fin stabilizers, said system compnsmg means to provide electrical signals . representative of the roll angle, roll rate, and speed of the vessel; means to derive an electrical signal
\. representative of the speed squared from said speed signal and an electrical signal representative of the roll acceleration from said roll rate signal; a lift order computer having a first channel for modifying said roll rate signal and a second channel for combining and modifying said roll angle, roll rate, and acceleration signals, each of said channels including an adjustable gain amplifier for varying the amplitude of the signal in that channel; summing means for adding the signals from said first and second channels; means responsive to the output of said summing means for producing direct and inverted lift order signals; comparator means for comparing the magnitudes of each of said lift order signals with said speed squared signals; circuit means responsive to the output of the comparator means for adjusting the gain of said adjustable gain amplifiers; said circuit means being constructed to increase the. gain of
3,727,572
8
said amplifiers when the magnitude of the speed squared signal exceeds the magnitude of both lift order signals and to decrease the gain of said amplifiers when
the magnitude of either lift order signal exceeds the magnitude of the speed squared signal; and stroke order computer means for driving said adjustable at-
titude fin stabilizers in response to said lift order signals.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein said circuit means includes integrating means arranged so that the output of said comparator means may be applied to the adjustable gain amplifiers through said integrating means. 3. The system of claim 2 wnerein the output of said
integrating means is applied to the adjustable gain am-
15 plifiers in said first and second channels through first and second gain control amplifiers respectively, said first gain control amplifier having a gain greater than said second gain control amplifier so that said roll rate signal in said first channel reaches a maximum before
20 the corresponding signal in said second channel in response to an increasing voltage from said integrating means and remains at a maximum level longer than the signal in said second channel in response to a decreasing voltage from said integrating means.
4. The system of claim 3 further including means to provide lift feedback signals indicative of the instantaneous lift being provided by said stabilizing fins and means to provide angle feedback signals indicative of . the instantaneous deflection angle of said stabilizing
30 fins, said stroke order computer means including means to combine either of said feedback signals with said lift order signals in a negative feedback relationship.
5. The system of Claim 4 in which said stroke order
35 computer means includes diode limiting means arranged so that the output signal from the stroke order computer means is restricted to fixed maximum positive and negative values.
6. The system of claim 5 in which said stroke order
40 computer means further includes variable limiting means responisve to the value of said feedback signals, said variable limiting means being adjusted to further restrict the output signal from said stroke order computer means to values within the range of said fixed
45 values.
7. The system of claim 6 in which said variable limiting means responds to the larger of said feedback signals.
8. The system of claim 7 in which the stroke order
50 computer means further includes a varaible gain amplifier connected to amplify the applied lift order signal by a gain factor which is a function of said speed squared signal.
*
*
*
*
*
55
60
65