Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On the basis of return rate Kotak heads the first position with the highest
return rate of 6.42% where as Reliance seek 4th position with 6.00% return
and JM heads 6th position.
On the basis of ratings Reliance heads the first position with four rating
star. These rating stars are given by either Crisil or ICRA. The more the
ratings star the more better the performance of the funds, so it tells us in
short term fund reliance is doing well as compared to others.
Higher the expense ratio, the more the company has to expend. So DWS
short maturity has the highest expense ratio of 1.80 followed by Kotak
bond with 1.61 and reliance having the 2 nd least expense ratio which is 0.64.
So the company has very low expense which is very good for the company
and Reliance can easily more work on marketing strategy.
The standard deviation of reliance is quite low which is only 2.40 which is a
good sign and shows that the fund is able to generate stable and avg.
returns over the year, whereas the standard deviation for ICICI prudential is
high which is 3.73 and is not able to generate good returns.
The entire fund has equal R-square, this shows that all funds are equally
affected by factors other than market condition.
Beta is the statistical measure of portfolio sensitivity to market movement,
if the beta is higher than it shows the fund is very sensitive to market and
vice-versa. So here only HDFC, ICICI and reliance have the positive value
whereas all the other funds have negative value.
Alpha coefficient measures risk adjusted performance due to the specific
security rather than the overall market. A high value for alpha implies that
the stock or mutual fund has performed better. So here we see alpha value
for DWS is highest with 6.72 and reliance with the 3rd lowest value of
6.50.So this shows that DWS has perfumed much better than the others
funds and Reliance performed quite well.
As this is the open ended scheme so there is neither the entry load nor the
exit load for any funds.
The NAV of the fund differs because of the launch date and the risk and return provided by the
fund company.