cc

IN THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

NEW DELHI

WRIT NO 317/1993

IN THE MATTER OF

T.M.A. PAI FOUNDATION AND OTHERS..................................................................... (PETITIONERS)

V.

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS.......................................................................... (RESPONDENTS)

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS

c
THE 2011 MANFRED LACHS SPACE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION TABLE OF AUTHORITIESc
cc

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................... Ic

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION ..................................................................................... IIIc
TABLE OF AUTHOROTIES ............................................................................................... IVc
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ................................................................................................. VIIc
STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................................................................................... XXc
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS ....................................................................................... XXIIc
ARGUMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 1c
1.c IT¶S A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO SET UP EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS BY
MINORITIES SUBJECT TO SOME LIMITATIONS. .......................................................... 1c
1.1.c UNDER ARTICLE 30 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA MINORITIES HAVE A RIGHT TO
ESTABLISH AND ADMINISTER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS BUT SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS.ccc
2 2 2 c
c c c  
 c
c
  c  c c c  c 
 c c c


  ccc

2 2 2 2 c 
c 
c 
 c  c 
c 
 c  c c c  c c c


 c cc22ccc

2.c IS CASE OF PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS ( UNAIDED AND AIDED),

GOVERNMENT HAS RIGHT TO CONTROL AND REGULATE. .................................... 5c
IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE OF RELIGIOUS OR LINGUISTIC
MINORITY IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 30, THE STATE AND NOT THE COUNTRY
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS UNIT? ................................................................................ 6c
2.1.c STATE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS A UNIT FOR DETERMINATION OF MINORITY.ccc
2.2.c STATUS OF EDUCATION HAS CHANGED AFTER 42ND AMENDMENT HOWEVER THIS
DOES NOT EFFECT THE SCOPE OF ARTICLE 30.ccc

3.c TO WHAT EXTENT CAN THE RIGHTS OF AIDED PRIVATE MINORITY

INSTITUTIONS TO ADMINISTER BE REGULATED? ...................................................... 8c
3.1.c RIGHT UNDER ARTICLE 25 IS SUBJECT TO PUBLIC ORDER, MORALITY AND HEALTH
AND ALSO OTHER PROVISIONS OF PART III OF THE CONSTITUTION.ccc
3.2.c ARTICLE 26 IS COMPLEMENTARY TO ARTICLE 25(1)cc c
3.3.c ARTICLE 30 IS NOT ABSOLUTE BUT SUBJECT TO ARTICLE 29(2).c c

c
MEMORIAL FOR THE APPLICANT
THE 2011 MANFRED LACHS SPACE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION TABLE OF AUTHORITIESc
cc

3.4.c CATENA OF CASES SUPPORT THAT RIGHTS OF MINORITY ARE SUBJECT TO

REGULATION BY THE GOVERNMENT.cc
c
3.4.1.c 
cc

v. 
c


c!

"
cc
c

3.4.2.c
c
cc#
$ v c#
$c%
 c$c
c& ccc

3.4.3.c The Kerala Education Bill case, 1957ccc

3.4.4.c The D.A.V. College case [1971 (Supp.) SCR 688].ccc

3.4.5.c The St, Stephen¶s college caseccc

3.4.6.c The St, Xavier¶s College Case.ccc

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT ............................................................................................. 17c

c
c c

c
MEMORIAL FOR THE APPLICANT
THE 2011 MANFRED LACHS SPACE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION TABLE OF AUTHORITIESc
cc

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
c

cccc
ccc cc
cc
cc  c

cc
c!" c#cc
 cccc#

cc$
c%
ccc

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

c
 cccc$
c#

c&cV cc  cc c c$c c'

c
i
 

  
 
 

 
 
  

   

  
 
 

 
 
 
 
   
i
 
 

 



    



 


 

 
 

 

  
  
i
! 
 "
 


  
 i
i
 



 
#  
 
 " 


 
#
 
 i

i$
    
# 


 
   

c
c

c
MEMORIAL FOR THE APPLICANT
THE 2011 MANFRED LACHS SPACE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION TABLE OF AUTHORITIESc
cc

TABLE OF AUTHOROTIES
c

c
D%&
' cc  
"(c c'()c(#*cccc

D%&
cc  
"cc( c'()c(#*cccc

D
 c )%c$*c c(#c
ccc

*+ 
'  c(*#c ccc

 (cc,D-
 ('  )cc(##cccc

./
 cc  
0" c' )cc(##ccc

 
'
cc'
+ 

 (c$*c c(#cccc

 
-cc  1D
" c(#*ccc
c

c+,c# -cc c'()c(#*cccc

c  /
cc2 
Dc' )cc(##cccc

  
'
cc3-Dc$*c c(c#c &ccc

1  0
"-"c  
3" c$*c c(#ccc2

c
MEMORIAL FOR THE APPLICANT
c

QUESTIONS PRESENTED
c

c $(c.!/*/cc012+3/2.4c*$5!.c.6c(/.c17c/+1#.$624c$2(.$.1.$62(c2+c

$0c(6c12+/*c !.c7*6,$($62(8c

c +6/(c2,,4*34 ),%,% +c' )cc(##cc*/91$*/c*/#62($+/*.$62c8c

c $(c #(/c 60c 7*$,./c $2(.$.1.$62(c 'c 12$+/+c 2+c $+/+)c #2c .!/*/c :/c c

56,/*23/2.c*/514.$62(c2+c$0c(6c.6c !.c/;./2.c8c

c $2c 6*+/*c .6c +/./*3$2/c .!/c /;$(./2#/c 60c */4$5$61(c 6*c 4$251$(.$#c

3$26*$.<c$2c*/4.$62c.6c *.$#4/c 
c !.c$(c.6c:/c.!/c 12$.c.!/c(../c

6*c.!/c#612.*<c(c !64/c8c

c .6c !.c/;./2.c#2c.!/c*$5!.(c60c$+/+c7*$,./c3$26*$.<c$2(.$.1.$62(c

.6c+3$2$(./*c:/c*/514./+8c



c
MEMORIAL FOR THE APPLICANT
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

STATEMENT OF FACTS
c
THE REASON FOR THE WRIT PETITION BY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
.c
c
 c


cc
cc
c
c>c


cc?



c
c 
c 
c c @c c c c >c @ c cc 
c 

-c c
c 
 c


c c @
-c c
c A
>c 
c c c 
c c c

>cc%c>c%c
cccc
ccc%
c

cc
 c 
-c 
c 
-c c 
c c 

c 
 c


c c 
c 
c
c>c cc- 
cc
>c

-cc
c>c
c

AN INTROSPECT AT THE EARLIER CASES DECIDED BY SUPREME COURT IS

REQUIRED

.c 

c c c (c #c
c 2 * 5  ( c c  
 %
  ( c '' )c c (##c )c A
c 

c .c c c c c c
c
c 1
c B
c '' )c c (##c )c c
c  c 

c c c



ccc
c
 c


ccc
 >c
cccc

>c



cc
-c-cccc
 c
')cc

-c$c%c c-c
ccCcc%c-ccc
c>ccc%c
ccc
c
c

DEMANDS OF THE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

6c cc cc


c
c
c
ccc#

c
cc c

-cc
cc

c
 c


c
c-cc?


cc
-c
%cccc
c
c
 c ')'-)cDc
 cc%
c
cccc
-

c
c
-
c


cc

c%cc
c
-c%c
cccc>c

 c
c$c%cc
ccc
c
 c


c cc c
>c
c
c


c 
c
c
c>ccc
 c


ccc
-

cc


ccc%
cc cc- 
cc

c cc

c

-cccA
cccA
>cc
ccc
c-c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc ==c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

A


ccc
 ccc-ccc

c


c%
c cc


 cccc
c%c
cccc cccc
-cc
cc
>c%c

c%
c-ccc


ccc


c$c
 c
C
c%c@ccc

c>ccccc-
-c
ccc
c



cc% ccc

c%
c-ccccc

-ccc
=
-cc
cccc
ccc-cc c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc ==
c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS

c $"cc c
-cccc
 c


c>c


cCccc



c
c1c
 c
ccc#

cc$
c3


ccc
-cc
cc


c
 c


ccCcc


c.c
-cc
cc


ccccc
-cccE
Fc0c
-ccc
/
cc

ccc
 c
ccccc ?

cc
c
c $ccc7
c$

c'1
cc
)c5cc*
-cc# cc
*- cc

-cc


c>c
-ccc- 
c
c $ccc
cc=
cc*
-
cc4
-

c3


c
c* 
cc

 c
cc(cccc>c cc
ccc1
c
c(cc
cc-cccc%c
ccccc
cc
 c
c
c .c
ccc=cc%
cc*
-cc
c7
c3

>c$

cc

c
c- c
c*
-cc
 cc
cCcc
cc
>cc cc cc


cc7c$$$ccc#

c
c
 cc
c >cc
 c')c
c
 c
c
cc ccCcc
 c ')c
c#ccccc
-cc

>ccCcc- 
c>cc
-cc-
cc %c
c   
-cc  1D
"c
c    
'
c'
+ 

 (c
c c .cB c/
c:
cc c
c .c+,c# -ccG c'()c(#*cHc
c .c(c("c -cc
å å
ccc.c(c;
"c# -c#

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc ==

c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

ARGUMENTS
c

1.c IT¶S A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO SET UP EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS BY MINORITIES

SUBJECT TO SOME LIMITATIONS.

1.1.cUnder Article 30 of the Constitution of India Minorities have a right to establish

and administer educational institutions but subject to limitations.

$c
c  >c 
c c 
c !" c #c c %
c -c c c 
c c


 c


cc
 ccc#

cc
c >c
 c ')'-)c-
c

c 
-c c  c c 

Ic c 
c >c 
c c c >c c >c 
c c c


Jc 
c 
-c
c Ccc 

c c>c c  c c 
 c  ')c 
 c c

-
c c 
-c c >c 
-
c 

c c 
c c 

c c


c c


-
cc%
c% c
 cc
 c


c
 c ')'-)cc
 c

ccc
-cc c

Icc
-
c

cc
cc

c


 c


c .c
c c 
c 
c c c C
>c 
>c c % c c

-

cc
-
c


c% ccc
-cc
 c ')c'-)cccc
c


 c


c $c 

c 
 c 

')c
c c 
c c -
c c 
-ccc


-
c c
-

c 


c c 
c c 

c 
 c


c c 
c


c0c
 c ')c
c
 cc

>c


ccc 
ccc

>c



c c >c  c  >c 
c c c 
c %c 
-
c c --c c c

= 
c c c c 

c %c


 c $c c %c 
 c  ')c @c
c

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

c
 c ')'-)&cc
c>c
ccc>cc>c
ccc
c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc


->c c c c 

>c


c c c >c 

c c c -c c 
-
c

cc --cc>ccc

2 2 2 c
c c c  

 c
c
  c  c c c  c 
 c c c


  c

/
cccccc-ccccc
c%c
c
cc
c/c
c

c
c>ccc%c
c
cc
ccc
cccc
c

%
c  c %

c c 
-c c c =
c K
Kc 
 c  ')c '-)c c c c

=
c c c c c  c 


c c c 

Ic
c c c %
c
c c 
c
c

-cc%
ccA >cc- cc
 c ')cc

E6
Kc
c
c 
c 
c c Kc 

>c
c %
c c --Kc c Kc c c


c c c c c 
-c c

-Kc 0c
c #c L
c (c , c

4;,$$cc%cK
Kc
c
cc&?K.c%cK
Kc c
c >cc


-c c c %
c 
c 
c c 
Jc c 
-Jc c c Jc c
c
c  >c c

 >c
c
cccc%c
c
c
cc %
-c-c.c
c
-c


-ccc%cK
Kcc
c
cc
cccc >
-cMc
c$c
cc

 
c c
c c c %
c c % ?c 
-c c >c c
c
c c c


-

c $c
c 
c c c -
c c >c 
c c %
c
 c >c


c c c -c c c c

 c c % c c c 
c A
c c Mc


c 
-c c 
c .c %c K
Kc
c 
 >c 
c c 
-c c



 c 
c c Mc
Jc c 

 c c  c 
c
c %
c c c --Jc c

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

c Mc.
c2%c$
 c+

>cc-c
c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

%
c

 >c@ccMc
c-cc-
Jcc%
c
cc--cc


cc
Jcc
 c
c
ccc
-c%
c--cc
c

cccc


 Jcc >c
c%
cc--ccc
ccMc
Jc

ccc
-c
cc >c
c >c%>Jcc

>c
c%
ccc cc




 c
c--c%
cc ccc-cc>cKc

2222c 
c
c
 c c
c
 c c cc ccc


 c cc22cc

$c
c c  c 

c c 
 c  ')'-)c  >c c =
c 
Ic 
c


ccc
c.
c
 c>c cccccccccc

c %c /
c
c c c -c c c 

>c c
c 
 c
c c c 0
c L-c

:c
c
 (cc,D-
 (cccc

%c 
c c c %
c 
-c c c >c - c %@c 
c Cc 

 c



>c  >c 
c c c 
-c
c %
c c


 c
c --c .c Cc c


-cc -cc 
-c%c
c
 c ')'-)c
cc@cc-c
-c

c 
c c 
 c c
 c  c c c c c -c %
c c c >c

c 
c

c $c c  c c -c @c
c
c  c >c 

>c 
c c >c c



Icc$
ccc
c

-c

$c1
c B
Mc cc-cccc%
c
-cc
c
c%ccc

 %&?c

64   


 



 

 


   
  
 
  2   1
       

  6

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

c  
'
cc3-Dc$*c c(c#c &c c(#*cc

c  cc(##cccccc c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

$c
c 
c c K
Kc c c 
c c 
 c


c
c

c c 
c
c c 
c 
c c c c c 
c
c c 
c c

-

c
c -c c c c c 


c c c c 

>c
c %
c c

ccc.c c
-cc
cc
 c


ccc

c%
cc
-cc@cc-

cc


cc

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

2.c IS CASE OF PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS ( UNAIDED AND AIDED), GOVERNMENT

HAS RIGHT TO CONTROL AND REGULATE.

c-ccccccc
-cc
 c cc')c
ccc cc

%
ccccc
-cc
cA


c>cc

c
c
c
 -c c c 
-c c 
c c c 
c 
c Cc c c C
c c 
 c
cc 
ccc
cc

c
c>cA

-c

ccc c
-ccc -
-cc%@c
ccc
>c>c-
-cc
cc
 
c
c c -c >c c 5c 0c
c 
-c c c  c c
cc cc

-c
ccc>cc
c$
c

c.ccc
c @c
c 

c c c c -c c c c 

Ic c c c c
-%c c c 
 c


c c c c 
c
c c


c c c

c


c>ccc
cccc$c>ccc
c


c%
c
cc
-cc
c
c%c-
-c>cc%
cA


c>cc
c
>cccccc

>c$c%
c%ccC
 c
ccc
cc
%c c 
c 

c


 c c -
-c 
c 2

c >c c c %
c
 cccc

 c
c%
ccc



-ccc
c
cc@ccc

c c 

-c c 


-c 
 c


c 0c c c c


ccc
c
 >c>cccc-cc
c

c%
cc
c  c
c c  c 

c c c >c c c 
c 
c

 c


c
c c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE OF RELIGIOUS OR LINGUISTIC

MINORITY IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 30, THE STATE AND NOT THE COUNTRY
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS UNIT?c
2.1.cState should be considered as a unit for determination of minority.

It is humbly submitted before this Hon¶ble court that Article 30(1) deals with religiousc



c c
-

c 


c .c 
-c %c c 
 c 
')c @c
c  c c

-
cc
-

c


cccccc
ccc
 c
cc.c
cccc-ccc
cc

-cK
-

c

>Kc
??
c
 c
cc
%
c K
-
c 

>Kc 
-c c c c 
-c
c
c c c
c  
c c %
c c
C
>cc

>cc%
cccc
c
$cc*+ 
'7ccA
ccc%cc

>c
>c%ccc

ccc
ccc
c 
cc$
cccc
ccc 
ccc
(c
-ccccc1
c$cccc>cc(ccB ccc 

-c
c c c 

>c c c c 
 >c c c 

>c
c c 
 c -
c
c
%
c c 
c


c %c 
c c c c 
>c c %c c %c %c c



c%ccc
cccc@ccc
cc
cc 

>c
>c
2c
 c

cc
cA
c%c=cc
c%cccccB c/
c
:
c K=c c c % c c c (c c B c c A >c c 

>c c c

c>cccc
c 
ccc(Fc
0c
c %c c 

-c c c +,c # -c 
c #c c c 
c %c c
!
c%cc
-
c

>c
cc(cc7Cc$cD%&
cc  
"cc
(8ccA
cc%ccc%c
cc
-
cc
-

c

>cc%c
c
%c c c 
c c =

-c c 

c c 
c #c
c c B c /
c :
c
cc #c ccc>c(C
c%c%c!
c%cc
-
c 

>c
cc
(c c 7Cc c -c >c >c c c c c
c  
c c c 
c >c $c
ccD%&
' cc  
"(9cc
c
cc
c
+,c# -cc%c= 
c
c%cccK%c
cc
-

cc
-
c


>cccC-c
c 
ccc(c
ccc
-cc%cc(cc

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

c  c(#*c c

c(cc

c

c c'()c(#*ccc

c c'()c(#*cc

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

cc
c 
ccc% cc$


Kc!%c.c(c#cCcc
c
c
c!
c%ccC
>c
c$
c>c cccc
-
c

>c
cccc
7Cc c
c @c c c c c 
c c 
c %c c !
c %c c 

>c

>c

2.2.cStatus of education has changed after 42nd Amendment however this does not effect
the scope of Article 30.

.c 0>?(c c c c #

c
 c 
c
c c #c 4
c
c/>cccc ccc

cc/>cc
c4
c$$$c7
c c -
 c
c
 
c c 
c %
c %c  >c c c Cc 
 >c .c C


c c c
7
c
c c @c %c c c % c c c c c $
c $c
c % c -
Ic c
--
 c 


ccc
 cc$c% ccc
 cc%
cc
c c 
 c (c c -c c (c 7
c >c -
 c
c  
c c 
c
!%c
 c
c-
cc
-ccc
-

cc
-
c

>ccc(cc
cc


c 
 c


c c 
c 
c .c 

>c c c c c 
 c 
c
cc
c
-c
-cc%c
c -
 
-c4--c
-cc
cc
c 
c c 
c c c c c c 
 c 
c c K
-

c 

>Kc %
c
ccc
c
c 
cccc
c%
cc
 c


c
c-ccc

c.c

c%
c-ccc
-
c

>c
c

c
cc
-
cc

-

c


cccccc
c
 c
c

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc


c(cc-ccc

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

3.c TO WHAT EXTENT CAN THE RIGHTS OF AIDED PRIVATE MINORITY

INSTITUTIONS TO ADMINISTER BE REGULATED?

3.1.cRight under Article 25 is subject to public order, morality and health and also

other provisions of Part III of the Constitution.

$c
c >c
cc
c!" c#cc
 cc-
cc cccc

c 
c c c 
-c c  >c c 
c c -c 
-
c .
c 
-c
%c
c c c.c
-c%cc 
 c')c @c
c
-cCcc
c
c
>cc  cc cccc

cc7c$$$ccc#

c.
c
% c c c c 
-c -
c c c c c ')c c c 
c c - c
c c
=
c c c 
-c % c 
 c c 

c c 7c $$$c c c #

c c
c c
=
c c
c c
c c %
c 
c c 
>c c  c .c - c %c
c>cc-c
c

c 
-cc
cc
>cc Jcc
% cccc
c%
cccc
 c>c>cc
c=
cc
cc
c
cc
cccc
cc-c
-
c0c= ccc
c -c 
c 
-
c
c c c c c c 
-c c 
-
c c 
-c c



c-c c
0c
 c')c-
c

c%ccccc@c>c %c- 
-cc

-c
>c 
c 

 c 

 c c c  c 

>c %
c >c c 
c %
c

-
c
cc
c>c(? c')cc
 c')c.
c
ccc
cc
c
-ccc
cc-c
-
cccccc
 c')c

 c')')cc >cc

cc
c%
c
-
c
c
ccc%
c
c %c c c c c  c 
-c c 
 c ')')c

c c
c c c c c
(cc@
-c>c %c
c 
ccc
-
c
ccc.c

cC


c
-c >c 
 c ')c  c c c @
-c c c %c
c  
c c 
c 

 c


 ccc c


c
c%
cc
-
c
c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

3.2.cArticle 26 is complementary to Article 25(1)

.ccc-c
-
c
c
c
c>c
 cc.
c
 c-
cc
-cc

>c 
-
c 

c c >c 
c c c =
c c 
-c c
c 
 c
!%c 
c 
-c c c c =
c
c c c c
c
c 
>c %
c 
c c

>cc c# c')cc
 cc-
cc
-
c

cc
-cc
c
c 

c


c c 
-
c c 
 c c .c
c c 
c c c

c c c 
 c


c c %

c c 
-c c c =
c
K
 c Kc .c %
c 
 c ')c -c c c c 
c c c

-ccc
cc-c
-
c
 cccc
ccc >cc
c
c 
c c >c 
-
c 

c c >c 
c c c =
c c 
-c

c
c.
c
cc
 cccc c%
cc
-ccc


 cc
c

c c c 
-
c 

c 
 c c c c c 

c c >c 
-
c
%c
c
c c C
>c c c 

>c 
-
c Cc c 
 c c c c  c c %c
>c -cccC
>ccc

>c
-
c
 cc-
cc
-ccC
>c
-
c


cc% c cc

>c
-
c

cc=
cc
-c
c

c

3.3.cArticle 30 is not absolute but subject to Article 29(2).

$cc=
cc
c
-cccc --c
cc cc
ccc
>c

ccc
 c


c.c
-cc
cc

c


cc
c
c
c
c>c
ccc
-cc >c
 c
c.c
-cc 
 c
c
c c
 c
 c ')c
cc%c>c
 c


c
c

c>ccc
c 
c 
c c c c c c 

Ic  c c 
c 

c c c -c  >c c

-
c c c --c c >c c c .c c c c =
c K>c 
 c



Kc
c
 c ')c% ccc>c
 c


c
c>c>cc
%
c
c 

c >c c c c 
c 
c cc c c $c c %c c c  
c

-c ?

c c 
c 
 c


c %c 
c >c c
5cccC
>ccc

>c
>cc>c

ccc

Iccc
-c >cc
-
cccc --c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

0c
ccc
c
 c
cc
c
 >c
c>c%
c
 c cc
cc
c %c c c #
c  >c +c $c
c 
c c c 

c c 
 c
 ')c%c
ccc
 cc

>c


c@
-c
cc
 c
c!c
-c c
c >c 
 c


c -c 
c
c  c c >c 

c  >c c c
-cc
-
cccc --ccA >c-

-ccccc

>c
cc

c?c

>cc%c


 c$c
c%c>cccc
ccc

cc
c#c
cc>c
c
 c cc
ccc=
c
%c>cc
cc

-cc

3.4.cCatena of cases support that rights of minority are subject to regulation by the

government.

3.4.1.c 
cc

v. 
c


c!

"
22

$c  
-c c  1D
" cc(cc
ccc%
c

cc

cccc-

-cc 
 c -c
cc(c c c

c >c c ( 
c #
c 
 >c c c 
c c c c c c 
=c c

c

c 
c

-cc

>cc
cc
c#c
c
 c
 ')c c  c c
c 

c %c c  >c c c -c c 
-
c c c
--c c >c c c c c %c c  c c c c  c 
-c c 
 c
')c.c
cc%ccc
-c
 
cc
 c ')ccc%c
c
c  c
c c 
 c -
c %c c c 
c 

c $c 
c 
c
c %c
cc %&?c
6
   
    
    
   
 
 

 

  

   
 

   '  


 
 

 
 
6
.
c -c c %c  c c c 
 
c c c #

c c 

c c c  c
cc
 c ')c
 c
c
ccccc

c
ccc

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

cG' )c(#*cGHc

cc

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc 
c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

3.4.2.c
c
cc#
$ v c#
$c%
 c$c
c& 2(

$cc  
'
cc'
+ 

 (cc(cc
cc
 c
c
c
cc%
c
ccc
>cc>c c cccc
cc
 c
ccc c%c/-
c%cccc 
cc

c>c
c
c c 
c  -
-c c c 
c c 

Ic c --c c %c %c /-
c 
Ic
- ?$
c c 

Ic c ?

c c .c 

>c c c 
 c %c  -c
%
c 

c %c c
c 
c c c c c c 5C
c !
c #
>c c
cc%
c

c%c
ccc!
-c#c %cc$cc

c
c>c
c(cc:>c
c#ccc
c%cc
c
 c%c c
 c
 ')c$c

-c
cA
cc#c >Icc

cc
 c ')cc
cc
 cc
cc
 c ')c-cc
-c >ccc

Iccc

>c
-c$c %cc >c c ccc --c c 
 c  ')c
c %
c c A

c
c>c% cc c

Ic%c>c -cccC
>cc

>c-c
 cc
c c

Ic-
cc(c%cc
cc
 c ')c=c-
cc
(c c >>c %c 
c c 
-c c >c
c 0c 
 c c c  c 

Ic
-
c



c- >c c
 c ')c
cc
c-
cc
 c
cc
%-c >c
 cc

c
c
 c


ccc

c@
c$cc=c
 c 
 cc
cA
c- cc%
c
c
cc c
cc c

Ic%c>c
 -c c c C
>c c 

>c -c c -
c 
c c  c c 

Ic -
c




c >cc(cc
c

c-c
 c ')ccc
 c
-cc


Icc

c
c
 c


c

cc
c>cc(c.c

c
c

-c >cc

Ic -
-cc

>c-c%
ccc
cc c
ccc


Iccc ccc

IcccC
>c-ccc
 c
 c
-c
c
cccc
-ccc
c
cc
 c


ccc
cc%
c
>c@c

c>c%>cc=c ccc-cccc



c.c

-cc%
c
 c cc
cc-c-c >cK#  cc/
 c
*
-Kc
cA
c- cccc
cc cc


c$ccccc



c
c

cc
ccc(cc
cc
cc
c-c
-cc c

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

c$*c c(#cc

cc

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc



Ic

cc%c>c -cccC
>cc

>c-Jcc
@c
 c

cc
cc
c c
-c

3.4.3.c The Kerala Education Bill case, 195716

$ccB c+ 
'c
c#c-
ccc
cc
cc
 >cc

 c  c c 
c c c #

c .
c c %c c c c 
 c ')c c c
#

c c >c c 7
c c $
c c 
c c 

c c 
c #c c 
c
A
c 
-ccc

 c

>ccccc

cccB c/
c
:
c c%
cccc>ccB c4-
 
c >ccccc>c
c5ccc

ccc7
c# c')ccc:
ccc-

c
c %c  c Cc c c c 

c c c :
c c c  c c >c c
5cc# c')Jc# c')c
Icc5ccA
c>c->c
c  Jc # c ')c c
c 
->c c  c 
c  c c c c c c c c
5Jc# c cccc

ccc- 
cc-ccc c
>c c  
c cc c c c c 

c c 
c 
c c # c
')ccc-
-cc>c
C
cc

cc
c
cc
-c
ccc
ccc
 c ')cc#ccc-c
c%
c
-c
%
cc-ccc 
 cccK
@%
c 
 c ')c
c
c
ccc


Ic cc
c

c
c>c
 c


c

-c
ccc(cc
c -c  >c c 
-
c c c --c c >c c Kc *
-c c 7c $$$cc c
#

ccc
 c ccccc
c
 cc#c
ccc
 cc c
c c A >c 
 c Cc c 
c c 
>c c  c c c c c


c c 7c $$$c c c c 
c c c 
-c  >c c c 
c c
-c
-
c 
 cccc  c
-cc>c
-
c

cc
>c 
c c Cc c 
c c 
>c c  c c 
c c 

c



cc
-
cc
 ccc-c
c%c
c
ccc
-
c
cA
c>ccc

cc>c
cc%
c %c.c
 c 
-cc

c $
c
c c  c (c c 
-
c

c
c c 
 c ')c c c

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

c7-c cccc

cc$*c c(#c c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc


c
c >c 
 c


c % >c 

c cc (c c c c # c
')cccc
 ccc
-c>c
 c


c-
Ic>cc(cc


-c
ccc(cc
cccA
cc@cc
c>c
-
c

cc>c
c
c
cc


cccc>c
-
c%
cc>ccc
cc



cc
c>c
ccc cccc
c cc
cc 
c

c -
c c -
c 
c cc 
 c  ')c c c >c 
c c c 

Ic

-cc

c --c
cc cc
c%cccc
-cc
-ccc
# c')ccc
 c
ccc

Ic cc
c

c
c>c
 c



c 

c >c c (c c 

-c 
c c c (c c c -c  >c c

-
ccc --cc>ccc
0c
-c%
c
 c cc
cc-c
c
c%ccc
 c cc
cc
cc
c7c$$$ccc#

c%
c-cc c
-c.>cc-c
-ccc?cK#  cc/
 c*
-Kc.c=ccc-
 cc
c c c 
 c %c c 
c c
c c c c  c 
-c c 
c

c c c 
>c %
c 
c 

>c 

c 1c  c ')cc 
 c
 c >c 
c c c 

Ic 

-c
c c 
>c c $
c c >c c c 
-c c


c --c
cc cc
c%ccc
-ccccc$c
c
cc
c 

>c 
>c c 
 >c c
c --c 
c c  c >c c -c

 c


cccc
-cc
cc

c
 c


c
c
c
c
cc>c
ccc
-ccc
c


c --c
cc
 c c c
c %c
c c c  c 


c >c 
 c 
')c %
c c 
c
cAc
c c.
c
-c%c
cCcc# ccc
 c c%
c
cc
c

Ic cc
c

c
c>c
 c


c

c>cc(cc


-c
ccc(ccc-c >cc
-
ccc --cc>ccc

3.4.4.c The D.A.V. College case [1971 (Supp.) SCR 688].

.c
 >cc
 c cc
 c

cccc

c-
cc
c#c
c
c +,c # -c c G c '()c (#*c Hc (c c c 

c c c 5c 2@c
1

>c c
ccc-
I
ccc(cc7Cc
c   c
c c
c c
c %
c c -
-c >c %c c c 
Jc c >c %c c
 c c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc


ccc1

>cccccc# -c.cccc

c
%c -ccc-cc>c%c
 
cc
 c
c$c%ccc
 c
 ')c
c %
c c 
 c 
')c
c c %
c >c (
c c c 

Ic
 
-c c



c c
@c c 
-c -c c 
 c  ')c c 
-c -c c

 c 
')c c  >c 
 c c c 


c c c 
-
c c --c $c
c c
>c c 
 c 
')c c c 

>c  c c c c 
-
c 

>c c % c c c

-

c

>c$c
c

c
c
c
cccccccc
-ccc%c
 c
-c% c ccc ccc
-
cc
-

c

>ccc
-cc
c
c 

c 
 c


c c
c 
c c 
 >c 
-c
c 


c
--c
cc c%
c
-c%c
cCccc- >c%ccc(c
c 


-c c 


-c c = c c
c c .
c 
-c
c c Cc c
# c ')c c 
 c  c %
c 
c c c 

Ic  c c 
c 

c
c >c

 c


c %
c
c 

c >c c (c c 
c 
c c c (c c c
-c >cc
-
ccc --cc>ccc 
c
c
ccc%c
 c
cc
?
@ccc
c
cc
c
-c %>cc-c

3.4.5.c The St, Stephen¶s college case

.c A
c c c
 >c c 
 c  ')c %
c 
 c 
')c c 
c
c c c '(c
(Mc)ccc
c
ccccc
c>cc#c
c>cc
c K%c c c 
-
c 
c c c c -Kc +
-c %
c c
 >c c c %c

 c
c%ccc-cc-c cc %&?c
6
 
  
 




%  
 % 
:i
     
% 9i


 1   

  4 
 
  %  9i
  %  :i
       
   
   

   

   
 ;

   
6
c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

3.4.6.c The St, Xavier¶s College Case17.

.c
-ccc


cc

c
 c


ccccc@
-cc
 c - 
c
c c c c


c *-
I
-c c c 
-c c 

c

 c


c  c c
 c c 
-c c  ?

c c - 
c  c c
% >c
ccc

-cc-cc-

c%
c

-cc


cc

c
cccc

>c


c.c- 
cKc
>cc cc??cccc
 ccccc
c
c- 
ccc
 cccc


cc

c 
c c @
-c c


c c 
c 
 c c 
c c c 

>c

>c c c c %c c c
Kc $c
c 

 c c c 

c c 
c
- 
c %
c c c 
c %
c c c 

>c


c  c @c c 
c



c c-

c:cc- 
c c >cc
>c c c

-cc
c 

>c c c c


c .c c  c c c c @c %c c %c
C
c??ccc
-cccc= ccc


cccc
-c
c
-ccc


cc
cc

c
c
 c


c*- 
c
ccc
cc%cC
c c c
ccc c.
c
c
c
%c
cccccc c
c
c
0c c 

c c 
c !" c #c
c D 
 c   ) % 8c c
1  0
"-"c  
3"  9c
cc
c
 cc
cCc
c
 ccc
 c
c cccCcc
 c ')cc
$c c
-c c c 
c -c
c c c  c c
c c c c 

>c

 c


c c %
c 
c %c 
 c c 
 c 
c c 

c c

 c ')cc
cc
 c:c
c>cccccA
c
cccc

c %c
c c c c 

c
c 
c 

>c 
 c


c 

>c
c ccccc c=c@
-c
c
%cc
 c
c-
c
c
 c
')c
cc
cc

c
ccc.c#

c
c7c$$$cc
c 
c c -
c >c  c 
-c  c 
-c c
c 7c $$$c c c #

c c

cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccc

cc(c;
"c# -c(
>cc(cc5Ccc' )cc(##cc

c$*c c(c#c
c

c$*c c(c#cc

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

Cccc cc

ccc
c7c$c
c

 cccccc

cc#

c% cc-
ccc c
-ccc
-
cc
-

c

>c
%
c% c ccc
cc

c
 c


c
ccccc
c
c 
c %
c c c 7c c c #

c c 
c 

 c c c c
c c

c c 


c c 
 c


c >c c 
-
c c
-

c



cc %ccc ccc#

c
cc >cccc
c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

c

.c (c #cc $
c -c c L-cc 
c 

c 

c %
c c C-c :c %
c


ccL
c:2B
 c#
cL
cc$
cL
c5:7
@cL
cc,2Bc
L
c c (*Cc :c L
c c ((39
c L
c 
C
c 7>c L
c @c :c
L
c Bc5c: @
cL
c7c,@c *
cL
c*c7 cL
c(c2c,
c
c cc&c
c
c4
-

cc
-
c


ccc>cc=
cK

>Kcc
 c
c
cc#

c(
c-
I
ccc(c
c$
c c cc
-

c
c
ccccc

-cc

>cc
c%
ccc(cccc
% cc$
c.c
-
cc
-

c


c%cccccc
c
 c

cccc
cc%
cc
c
c 
 c 
')c -
c 
-
c c
-

c 


c c 
-c c 
c c 

c

 c


cc
c
c.cccc%cKc
c
Kc

cc

 c
 c


c% ccc>c
 c
c
c
c 

c c c c 
c 

>c 
 c


c 
Ic ( c %c
c c 
c c  
c
c 
 >c 
c c c - c >c c (c c c
1

>c'=cc

-ccA


cc

c

cc
-


>c
c
c
cc
c)c*
-cc
cc
-cc
 ccc
-c
c 

c 
 c


c c 
c 
c c  c c 
 c 
c c
c #

c c (c 5c c c 1

>c >c c c 
 c c
c
%
c c 
-c
c c c 
c 

>c


c 
c %c c c


ccc
c
 c


c
ccc
ccc
c
cc


c .c 
-c c 

c c 
-c c  c c c  c c - c
cc
-c
 ccc

cccc
c
cc
c
cc cc

cc-c# -cc
 c


c.c
c
c
c
cc@c>cc

>c
 c


c
c% cc-c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

>c
 c ')cc% cccc ccc

cc-cc
-
cc

c --cc>ccc$cc%c
ccc-
ccccc

c%c
>c6cc
cc
c-cc
cccc$c
ccc
c
 c


c
cc cc
 cc
-ccc
cc c>cc(c->c
c>cc@c

c
c
c c 

>c


c >c c
c %c c c c c 

c c % c c
 
c c c c c c c c 
c c c c  
c c
c
c
 cc
-c
 c -c cccc
cc
c.c
ccc 
c c c ccc ?


c/cc

c 

>c


c -c cc
-c 
c c c c c 

c %
c
=

-c
c 
-c c 
c c c c  -c 
c c
c c c .c



c%
c
cc
c= c
c
c $ccccc%
c-

-c
cc
 c


c
c% cc

 cc
c 
>c -

-c 
c c 
c >? c c - 
c c 

c c c 
c c
%
c

c%
cc-cc
c
c -c>c
cc
c c%
c
c 
c 
>c c c c.c 
c >c c 
c 
c -c c c
ccc>cc1

>ccc5c %c>c
-ccc
c
cccccc>c


 c


c?ccccc %c

ccc

>ccc-cc
c.c
>c>c c
ccc
ccc

c
c-ccc
c
 c


ccc
cc
c
$ccccc


c
c%
cc

 ccc-ccc

>cc

cc

c cc%ccc%@c
ccc
>c
c
c (cccc>c

c- 
-ccc


c
cc
ccc
c 
c 

>c 
 c


c c - >c c c  c  c c


 ccc

cc-

cc% cc

cc


ccc1

>c
c :c c c c 
c %
c c
c c c c >??>c 3-c
@c

c c c 
-c c ?
-c c 


c  c c c c
3-c  c c c c c c  c c c >c = c 
-c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc

->c !%c c 
 c c c  
c c 
-c c c c @
-c



>c
cccc c>cc3-c
 c0c
-cc-
c
c c  >c %c c Cc c 
c c 

c c 
c c

c %
c c c c  c c
c c 

c 
c 
 c  c c

cc
ccc
 c cc
cc>ccC

 c
ccc@c
c +

c L-c .c ccc 
-c 

c %c c  %>c 
c
c

cA


c 
c=
ccc

c
-ccc
cc
c


 cc
-c
cccccc
 c


c*- 
cc
cc-
-c
c

cc
-ccccc%c
c
c
c
>cc(c%
c

-c%

 c


c cc3-ccc

5D1

>c 
c c c 
c %
c c  


c
cc-

cc 
ccc 
c%c$c-c
?
c

>c
 c



c c - 
c %
c %

c c @c c 
c 
c c - c
% ccc 
c 
.c cc
c 
cccc
c

cc

-cc

-c
ccc
.c=cc- 
c%
c
ccccc
cc?




c
c
c .c
c 
c%c
c(c(Mc# -cc
ccc6c(c
c
c@cc

 c ')cc
c >cccA
c
cc>
-cc c
 c ')cc
c
 c ')ccc-
c
c cc


c .cc c >c
c#c
c1
c B
Mcccc

cc
cc
c =c %c
c  c c 
>c 
c
c c  c 
-c
c


 c !%c c 

 c c c  c c c 

c c c


-c
c c * c  c c c cc =
c c -
c c



ccc%ccc

-c


c .c=
cK
Kc
cc
 ccc#

ccc
 c
c
c  c  c c c 
>c  c  c c c c ?-c  c $c
 c

 c 
c .c =
c K
 c


Kc c


c c

c
c%cK
Kc
ccc
c.c
-cc
cc

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc  c
PROJECT WORK ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT c
cc



c
 c


c
c-ccc#

cc c

Icc


 c ')'-)ccccc


c

 >cc 
 c
c  c 

Ic c c

-cc
cc

c
 c


cc
 c ')'-)cccc

c 
-c %
c c Cc c c 

c c 
 c  ')c c ')c !%c 

>c



c%
ccc
-cc
cc -
-ccc

>c-c
ccc
c
c
c
cC-c

c
c
c
c
c
c
c

*$../2c(1:3$(($62c62c:/!40c60c*/(762+/2.(cc 
c