OCT-28-2010 16:22 FROM:
Jens eps
okra its
Foe Ky
(ier
(esctnpeen
toaster. ovat
meds onto
Selene
comet
up out
weit pe
Bena te
ghee Mes
eae Wes
1 erate
HEBEAGLE TRANSPORTA 207-847-9368 Tossse2a76122 Pd
; Darel Rose mmo
Drummond\‘isozsu ere
PA eis drose@dwmtaw.com {800} 727-1961
teen St) Ad ay
Rie ertam ct eeetewenoes
October 14, 2009
Gloria Brown
Chebeague Transportation Co.
P.O. Box 27
Chebeague Island, ME 04017
RE: Exempt Status of Captain and Deckhand Positions
‘Dear Ms. Brown:
am writing to follow up on our conversations regarding whether the boat captain
and deckhands that operate the Chebeague Island boat trips between Chebeague Island
and Cousins Island are exempt from the overtime pay requirements of Federal and State
law, As set forth below, we believe that the boat captain would be considered exempt
from overtime pay requirements, and that the deckhands might be exempt depending on
specific facts regarding their job duties, the work schedule, and how they utilize the time
between boat trips. A discussion of these issues is set forth below.
In order for an employee to be exempt from the requirement that the employee be
paid overtime for hours worked more than 40 in a given work week, the employee must
meet two tests: 1) he or she must be paid on a salary basis, and 2) he or she must perform
“exempt work” as that phrase is defined by law. 29 CFR §541.602. If an employee
satisfies both of these tests, the employee is not paid for overtime hours worked.
In regard to the salaried basis test, an employee will be considered to be paid on a
salaried basis if the employee receives a set amount of pay on a weekly or bi-weekly basis
and that amount is not subject to reduction based on the quality of work performed or the
amount of work the employer has for the employee. Furthermore, the employee's
predetermined salary must be a minimum of $455 per week. 29 CFR §541.600(a). While
there are limited circumstances in which an employee’s pay may be cut pursuant to the
salaried basis test (¢.g. suspension for misconduet/exhaustion of paid sick leave), the
general rule is that the employee must receive the same amount of money each week.
Determining whether an employee performs exempt work is almost always more
complicated than determining whether they are paid on a salaried basis. Both the State
and Federal laws provide three major types of work that are exempt from overtime -
executive, professional, and administrative. While these are the main categories of work
that are exempt, there are other types of work that are exempt pursuant to Federal and
FFmenras.OCT-28-2018 16:22 FROM:CHEBEAGLE TRANSPORTA 207-847-9368 To: 1e882076122 P.2
October 14, 2009
Page 2
State law. The most relevant of these exceptions is the exclusion from overtime pay
requirements for any “employee employed as a seaman” (the term “mariner” is used in Maine
law). 29 USC § 213(b)(6). The term “seaman” is not defined in the statute, but it has been
defined by the Department of Labor regulations and court decisions. The regulations define the
term “seaman” as an employee who:
performs as master or subject to the authority, direction, and control of the master aboard
vessel, service which is rendered primarily as an aid in the operation of such vessel as a
means of transportation, provided he performs no substantial work of a different
character.
29 CFR §783.31. Courts have interpreted this to mean that approximately 80% of a seaman's
time must be utilized in the aid in the operation of the vessel on which they serve. The term
“seaman” has been interpreted to include members of the crew such as sailors, engineers, radio
operators, firemen, pursers, surgeons, cooks and stewards if, as in the usual ease, the service is of
the type necessary for the operation of the vessel
Boat Captain
As noted above, we believe itis likely that the boat captain will be considered exempt
from the overtime pay requirements of both Federal and State law. It is our understanding that
the boat captain is paid on a salaried basis. We further understand that the captain receives the
same pay without regard to either the number of boat trips taken in a specific day or the amount
of time he works on a given day. Assuming these facts to be accurate, the boat captain would
pass the salaried basis task.
It is also likely that the boat captain would qualify as a “seaman” as that term is defined
by Federal law, We understand that virtually all of the captain’s time is spent engaged in duties,
related to the operation of the boat. Furthermore, we understand that between boat runs he is
cither on-call waiting for the boat run or tending to duties related to the boats operation
Therefore, it is likely that the boat captain is exempt from the overtime pay requirements.
Deckhands
The salary basis test applies equally to deckhands as it does to the boat captain if both
are paid on the same basis. Thus, to the extent these employees receive a minimum of $455 per
week and receive their pay regardless of the amount of work to be performed or the hours they
are engaged in work, they would meet the salaried basis test
‘What is less clear, however, is whether the deckhands will be considered to perform.
“exempt” work. While we believe there is a strong argument that deckhands are also seamen,
the U.S. Department of Labor has taken a narrow view of the definition of the term “seaman.”
"Tf, however, the boat captain spent significant periods of time (more than 20%) working on a boat in dry dock, the
captain might not be considered a “seaman”, but rather a laborer.OCT-28-2018 16:23 FROM:CHEBEAGLE TRANSPORTA 207-847-9368 TO: 18882076122 P.3
October 14, 2009
Page3
‘The Department of Labor representatives in Maine have taken the position that deckhands on a
ferry are not seamen both because 4 significant amount of their time is spent loading and
unloading baggage and because they appear to do little while the vessel is underway. We
understand, however, that Chebeague Island deckhands are not charged with loading and
unloading baggage or material. Furthermore, we believe that while the boat is underway, the
deckhands are charged with being prepared in case of an emergency as well as ensuring that
nothing interferes with the proper operation of the boat.
The argument as to why deckhands should be considered seaman is straightforward,
Under Federal law, Chebeague Island ferries are considered “small passenger” vessels and are
subject to Coast Guard inspection. 46 USC § 3301. As part of that inspection, the Coast Guard
determines the minimum number of individuals and crew necessary for safe operation of the
vessel. 46 USC § 8101(a). Federal law and Coast Guard regulations mandate that a vessel may
not be operated without having in its service the complement of deckhands required by the Coast
Guard. 46 USC § 8101(d). In fact, passengers are not permitted on the vessel without the
minimum complement of deckhands on board. 46 CFR § 176.100. Chebeague Island boats have
‘Coast Guard certifications requiring that there be a deckhand on board. Therefore, because a
deckhand is required by law to be on board for the safe operation for the vehicle, it would seem
axiomatic that the essence of the Chebeague Island deckhands’ job is to aid in the operation of
the ferry. Indeed, the fact that small passenger vessels have to have a complement of qualified
crew on board, and that the deckhands have to be trained to know their safety duties, makes clear
that deckhands are critical not only to the safe operation of the ferries, but literally to any
operation of the ferries.
However, while there is a strong argument that deckhands should be exempt from
overtime pay as seamen, there is also a substantial risk that the Department of Labor will not
agree with this assessment. Not only may the Department of Labor argue that these employees
are not engaged in seaman duty while on the boat, but the amount of time spent off the boat
could also be factored in to determine that they are not seaman. For example, if deckhands are
working on a boat in dry dock, or doing other work unrelated to the operation of a vessel, that
work would not be counted toward 80% seaman’s duties required by law.
However, even if deckhands are not exempt from overtime pay as seamen, a close look at
the definition of the phrase “hours worked” might still limit, or perhaps climinate, the overtime
liability risk to the Chebeague Transportation Company. An employce who is not exempt from
the overtime payment requirements, must be paid time and a half for all “hours worked” over 40
hours. However, not all hours for which an employee is paid are “hours worked” as that phrase
is defined by wage and hour laws. For example, an employee is not considered to work if: 1) the
‘employee is completely relieved from duty and allowed to leave the job; 2) the employee is
relieved until a definite, specified time; and 3) the relief period is long enough for the employee
to use the time as he or she sees fit. See generally, 29 CFR § 785.15. This testis fact-specific
and much will depend on whether deckhands are completely relieved from duty and whether
there is sufficient time between jobs for them to use as they see fit. In general, an employee
must have at least an hour off in order to meet this test, and they must be in a location where theyOCT-28-2018 16:23 FROM:CHEBEAGLE TRANSPORTA 227-647-9368 TO: 18882876122 eae
October 14, 2009
Page 4
can use the time productively. For example, if deckhands have an hour or more between boat
runs, and if in that time they can go home (assuming that their house is close to the dock or they
have transportation), then they might meet this test.
While waiting time may not constitute hours worked in the circumstances described
above, an employee who is subject to being called back to duty (“on-call time") may have these
hours counted toward overtime. As with waiting time, the compensability of on-call time
requires a fact-specific case-by-case analysis. The factors that a court might review to determine
whether to count on-call time as hours worked include: a) the frequency of calls during on-call
periods; b) how the employee uses the on-call time; ¢) the physical restrictions placed on an
employee while on-call; d) how close they must be to the workplace; and e) the time he or she
reports back to work (referred to as “response time”). In order for on-call time not to count as
‘compensable time or hours worked, the number of times the employee is actually called back to
‘work has to be fairly infrequent and the employee's time while on-call must be his or her own to
use as he or she pleases. Thus, if deckhands are subject to frequent call backs, the time that they
are off duty would likely count toward hours worked for overtime.
SUMMARY
‘Assuming the facts discussed above, we believe that boat captains who are operating the
vessels (or otherwise off duty) and paid on a salaried basis are exempt from overtime payment
laws as seaman. Deckhands may be exempt as seaman if 80% of their time is spent on board
vessels and they are performing seaman work. If they do not meet this test, they still might not
qualify for overtime if they have significant periods of down time in which they have no duties
and can use the time as their own.
Sincerely,
Danicl J. Rose
DIR/plf