You are on page 1of 5

Republic of the Philippines

SUPREME COURT
Manila

EN BANC

A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC December 4, 2007

AMENDMENTS TO RULES 41, 45, 58 AND 65 OF THE RULES OF COURT

RESOLUTION

Acting on the recommendation of the Chairperson and Members of the Subcommittee on


the Revision of Rule 65 submitting for this Court�s consideration and approval the
proposed amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65 of the Rules of Court, the Court
Resolved to APPROVE the same.

This Resolution shall take effect on December 27. 2007 following its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation.

December 4, 2007.

RENATO S. PUNO
Chief Justice

LEONARO A. QUISUMBING CONSUELO YNARES-SANTIAGO


Associate Justice Associate Justice

ANGELINA SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ ANTONIO T. CARPIO


Associate Justice Associate Justice

MA. ALICIA AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ RENATO C. CORONA


Associate Justice Associate Justice

CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES ADOLFO S. AZCUNA


Associate Justice Associate Justice

DANTE O. TINGA MINITA V. CHICO-NAZARIO


Associate Justice Associate Justice

PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, JR. ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA


Associate Justice Associate Justice

RUBEN T. REYES TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE


Associate Justice CASTRO
Associate Justice

AMENDMENTS TO RULES 41, 45, 58 AND 65 OF THE RULES OF COURT

RULE 41

SECTION 1. Subject of appeal. � An appeal may be taken from a judgment or final order
that completely disposes of the case, or of a particular matter therein when declared by
these Rules to be appealable.

No appeal may be taken from:

a. An order denying a petition for relief or any similar motion seeking relief from
judgment;

b. An interlocutory order;

c. An order disallowing or dismissing an appeal;

d. An order denying a motion to set aside a judgment by consent, confession or


compromise on the ground of fraud, mistake or duress, or any other ground
vitiating consent;

e. An order of execution;

f. A judgment or final order for or against one or more of several parties or in


separate claims, counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party complaints,
while the main case is pending, unless the court allows an appeal therefrom;
and

g. An order dismissing an action without prejudice.


In any of the foregoing circumstances, the aggrieved party may file an appropriate special
civil action as provided in Rule 65.

RULE 45

SECTION 1. Filing of petition with Supreme Court. � A party desiring to appeal by


certiorari from a judgment, final order or resolution of the Court of Appeals, the
Sandiganbayan, the Court of Tax Appeals, the Regional Trial Court or other courts,
whenever authorized by law, may file with the Supreme Court a verified petition for review
on certiorari. The petition may include an application for a writ of preliminary injunction or
other provisional remedies and shall raise only questions of law, which must be distinctly
set forth. The petitioner may seek the same provisional remedies by verified motion filed in
the same action or proceeding at any time during its pendency.

RULE 58

SEC. 5. Preliminary injunction not granted without notice; exception. � No preliminary


injunction shall be granted without hearing and prior notice to the party or persons sought
to be enjoined. If it shall appear from facts shown by affidavits or by the verified application
that great or irreparable injury would result to the applicant before the matter can be heard
on notice, the court to which the application for preliminary injunction was made, may
issue ex parte a temporary restraining order to be effective only for a period of twenty (20)
days from service on the party or person sought to be enjoined, except as herein provided.
Within the twenty-day period, the court must order said party or person to show cause at a
specified time and place, why the injunction should not be granted. The court shall also
determine, within the same period, whether or not the preliminary injunction shall be
granted, and accordingly issue the corresponding order.

However, subject to the provisions of the preceding sections, if the matter is of extreme
urgency and the applicant will suffer grave injustice and irreparable injury, the executive
judge of a multiple-sala court or the presiding judge of a single-sala court may issue ex
parte a temporary restraining order effective for only seventy-two (72) hours from
issuance, but shall immediately comply with the provisions of the next preceding section
as to service of summons and the documents to be served therewith. Thereafter, within the
aforesaid seventy-two (72) hours, the judge before whom the case is pending shall
conduct a summary hearing to determine whether the temporary restraining order shall be
extended until the application for preliminary injunction can be heard. In no case shall the
total period of effectivity of the temporary restraining order exceed twenty (20) days,
including the original seventy-two hours provided herein.
In the event that the application for preliminary injunction is denied or not resolved within
the said period, the temporary restraining order is deemed automatically vacated. The
effectivity of a temporary restraining order is not extendible without need of any judicial
declaration to that effect, and no court shall have authority to extend or renew the same on
the same ground for which it was issued.

However, if issued by the Court of Appeals or a member thereof, the temporary restraining
order shall be effective for sixty (60) days from service on the party or person sought to be
enjoined. A restraining order issued by the Supreme Court or a member thereof shall be
effective until further orders.

The trial court, the Court of Appeals, the Sandiganbyan or the Court of Tax Appeals that
issued a writ of preliminary injunction against a lower court, board, officer, or quasi-judicial
agency shall decide the main case or petition within six (6) months from the issuance of
the writ.

RULE 65

Sec. 4. When and where to file the petition. � The petition shall be filed not later than sixty
(60) days from notice of the judgment, order or resolution. In case a motion for
reconsideration or new trial is timely filed, whether such motion is required or not, the
petition shall be filed not later than sixty (60) days counted from the notice of the denial of
the motion.

If the petition relates to an act or an omission of a municipal trial court or of a corporation,


a board, an officer or a person, it shall be filed with the Regional Trial Court exercising
jurisdiction over the territorial area as defined by the Supreme Court. It may also be filed
with the Court of Appeals or with the Sandiganbayan, whether or not the same is in aid of
the court�s appellate jurisdiction. If the petition involves an act or an omission of a quasi-
judicial agency, unless otherwise provided by law or these rules, the petition shall be filed
with and be cognizable only by the Court of Appeals.

In election cases involving an act or an omission of a municipal or a regional trial court, the
petition shall be filed exclusively with the Commission on Elections, in aid of its appellate
jurisdiction.

Sec. 7. Expediting proceedings; injunctive relief. � The court in which the petition is filed
may issue orders expediting the proceedings, and it may also grant a temporary
restraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction for the preservation of the rights of the
parties pending such proceedings. The petition shall not interrupt the course of the
principal case, unless a temporary restraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction has
been issued, enjoining the public respondent from further proceeding with the case.

The public respondent shall proceed with the principal case within ten (10) days from the
filing of a petition for certiorari with a higher court or tribunal, absent a temporary
restraining order or a preliminary injunction, or upon its expiration. Failure of the public
respondent to proceed with the principal case may be a ground for an administrative
charge.

Sec. 8. Proceedings after comment is filed. � After the comment or other pleadings
required by the court are filed, or the time for the filing thereof has expired, the court may
hear the case or require the parties to submit memoranda. If, after such hearing or filing of
memoranda or upon the expiration of the period for filing, the court finds that the
allegations of the petition are true, it shall render judgment for such relief to which the
petitioner is entitled.

However, the court may dismiss the petition if it finds the same patently without merit or
prosecuted manifestly for delay, or if the questions raised therein are too unsubstantial to
require consideration. In such event, the court may award in favor of the respondent treble
costs solidarily against the petitioner and counsel, in addition to subjecting counsel to
administrative sanctions under Rules 139 and 139-B of the Rules of Court.

The Court may impose motu proprio, based on res ipsa loquitur, other disciplinary
sanctions or measures on erring lawyers for patently dilatory and unmeritorious petitions
for certiorari.

x - - - - - - - - - nothing follows - - - - - - - - - - x

You might also like