--009 ELIG;RX LDM:167590,436772;PREV LDM:184063,703628;CHUNK:390,226462 As seen from generic QC report,the records count in both Elig and Rx dataset dec

reases than the previous one. As previously those records were present in chunk so redundant records are skipp ed which caused previous LDM count > latest LDM+CHUNK. --029 ELIG; LDM:60658,PREV LDM:63781,CHUNK:1348 As seen from generic QC report,the records of distinct members in Elig dataset h as been decreased than the previous one. Since previously those records were present in chunk so redundant records are sk ipped which caused previous LDM count > latest LDM+CHUNK. --144 RX; LDM:109757,PREV LDM:167399,CHUNK:29640 As seen from generic QC report,the records of distinct members in RX dataset has been decreased than the previous one. Since those records are already present in CHUNK so redundant records are skippe d which caused previous LDM count > latest LDM+CHUNK --4991 ELIG;CLM;RX Since LDM and PREV LDM are equal,so not an issue. --4992 ELIG;CLM;RX Since LDM and PREV LDM are equal,so not an issue. --4993 ELIG;CLM;RX As combined chunk lookup is created for Advisory Board, the records which need t o entered in chunk is already found in chunk lookup.This cause previous LDM coun t > latest LDM+CHUNK. --4994 ELIG;CLM;RX As combined chunk lookup is created for Advisory Board, the records which need t o entered in chunk is already found in chunk lookup.This cause previous LDM coun t > latest LDM+CHUNK. --500 RX; There is no RX dataset for client 500,so not an issue. --524 ELIG; LDM:85376,PREV LDM:259252,CHUNK:7220 --949 hlstaging select count(1) select count(1) select count(1) count from hp0949001110700_eligs; --30261858 from hp0949001110700_clm; --23848880 from hp0949001110700_rxclm;--8353743

--949 prev ldm count select count(1) from hp_eligibilities_949; --27695664 select count(1) from hp_claims_949; --43244468 select count(1) from hp_rxclaims_949;--13915756