Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What is a TIF?
A TIF (Tax Increment Financing) district is an area within a city that, after much careful study by the city and expert consultants, is found to be blighted and without hope of attracting private investment without some governmental intervention.
TIF assistance for eligible projects usually exceeds $1 million. 1) Source: City of Chicago website
In any of these cases, the new tax dollars go to the project fund controlled by the TIF district, not to the City, the schools, or any other taxing body. Money can be transferred between TIFs, but only between adjacent TIFs.
New development on vacant land that, before the new project was built, paid little or no taxes. Improvements to existing properties, such as an addition to a house, a factory, or a store. Taxes on existing properties could go up, either because of inflation (sometimes called "natural growth" in property values) or because of gentrification in the neighborhood.
Here's an example:
Example
Step 1. Base EAV Description Amount The total value of all property in the $10,000,000 TIF just before the TIF district was established. The total property value of the TIF one year after it was created. The difference between the Base EAV and the current EAV. The percentage of EAV (property value) that goes to taxes. The growth in property value multiplied by the tax rate - i.e., the new taxes that go to the TIF fund. $11,000,000
3. Growth in EAV
$1,000,000
4. Tax Rate
10%
5. Increment
10%
Source: Wikipedia
TIF Programs
Neighborhood Improvement Program TIFWorks Streamlined TIF Riverfront Improvement Fund Laboratory Facilities Fund
Ogden-Pulaski TIF
Ogden-Pulaski TIF
There are approximately 173 blocks
133 blocks (77%) are in the 24th Ward 40 blocks (23%) are in the 22nd Ward
Project Goals
Community that is stable, economically and racially diverse, secure and beautiful Comprehensive housing program that serves homeowners and renters of all income groups
Boundaries
Particulars
Sponsors/Developers-City of Chicago, LISC, Steans Family Foundation, LCDC Consultant- Johnson Research Group Wards-24,22 Date Created-4/9/08 Termination-4/9/33 Uses-Residential,Commercial TIFWorks Eligible
Preservation and enhancement of historic or architecturally significant buildings in the Project Area New investment and development opportunities
Project Highlights
Up to 20,000 square feet commercial development along Ogden Avenue, Pulaski Avenue, 16th Street (combination commercial and residential) Potential re-zoning of the area in the vicinity of Kedzie Avenue and Cermak Road from residential to commercial/light manufacturing. Up to 300 units of new housing (including affordable housing units) New job opportunities for local residents, including welfare to work programs and jobs for ex-offenders.
Issues
The will of local property owners-- who collectively will pay over $250,000,000 in property taxes over the next 23 yearsseems to be ignored in favor of a handful of influential foundations and taxexempt organizations. Up to 1,200 persons could be potentially displaced as a result of the implementation of the proposed TIF. Likewise, 635 residential units (1,200 people) could be impacted by building code violations. There are a substantial number of errors in the acquisition plan and the list of homes potentially displaced by the TIF. The plan was not developed with broad based community input. There is no indication that the City Department of Planning and Development is willing to change the proposed redevelopment plan and budget to take into account the suggestions provided during the two public meetings they convened on the TIF. There are no mechanisms in place for community oversight for development in the Lawndale community. The Lawndale Community Conservation Council was dissolved several years ago. There is no TIF Advisory Council.
The plan calls for racial and economic diversity, but does not articulate how this would be achieved. This is of particular concern in a community that is currently 93% African, with a median income of $18,342.
Budget
Project Type
Analysis, Administration, Studies, etc. Property Acquisition, Site Prep, etc. Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings Public Improvements Relocation Expenses Job Training/Welfare to Work Day Care Services
Major Projects
Amount
$7,500,000 $10,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $5,000,000 $2,500,000 $6,000,000
Actual
SBIF 2010
Private Funding$2,000,000 TIF Funding-$1,000,000 2011 Allocation-$333,333
Speculative
Interest Subsidy
Total
$4,000,000
$100,000,000
Lawndale Corridor Initiative Concept, July, 2008 Projects outlined in February, 2008, Gapers Block Interview with Alderman Munoz CTA Bus Barn Open Space Senior Housing Industrial Corridor
Ogden-Pulaski TIF
Projected Revenues and Expenses
Item Incremental Property Tax Revenue (100% Collected) Incremental Property Tax Revenue (100% Collected) Incremental Property Tax Revenue (100% Collected) Unallocated Funds (Jan-11) Neighborhood Improvement Program Neighborhood Improvement Program Program Administration Program Administration Program Administration Street Resurfacing - Lawndale, Cermak to Ogden Green Alley - Grenshaw/ Roosevelt/ Keeler/ Kildare Reimbursement for TIF Eligibility Study Lighting - Cullerton, Pulaski to Keeler Street Resurfacing - Kevdale, 16th to 18th Lighting - Ridgeway Av., 16th to Ogden Lighting - Komensky, Roosevelt to 19th Small Business Improvement Fund Small Business Improvement Fund Small Business Improvement Fund Residential Lighting - Drake, Ogden to Cermak Alley Reconstruction - 13th St, Karlov, Kedvale, 14th St. Residential Lighting - Harding, 16th to Ogden Residential Lighting - Lawndale, 16th to Ogden Alley Construction - Cullerton, Kildare, 21st St, Kostner Projected Remaining Balance 2013 Year 2011 2012 2013 2011 2011 2012 2011 2012 2013 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2013 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 Amount 2,736,900.00 2,736,900.00 3,531,500.00 3,755,053.00 (500,000.00) (500,000.00) (24,700.00) (25,200.00) (25,700.00) (49,040.00) (287,000.00) (100,000.00) (130,000.00) (48,904.00) (195,000.00) (390,000.00) (500,000.00) (250,000.00) (250,000.00) (100,000.00) (219,000.00) (260,000.00) (195,000.00) (295,000.00) 8,415,809.00
Ogden-Pulaski TIF
Lawndale Corridor Development Initiative Project Concepts
Example Site: West Ogden Avenue and S. Millard Street 6-Story, Mixed Use Development Example Site: West Ogden Avenue and N. Millard Street 5-Story, Mixed Use Development
Residential Space 80,720 SF 30% Affordable Total Cost: $18.4 Million Loss: $100,000
Example Site: 19th Street and Pulaski 3-5-Story, Mixed Use Development
Tip #2: Know the Approval Process and the Rules of Engagement
Public Community Meeting Introduction to Community Development Commission Review by the Joint Review Board
Tip # 3: Know the Laws, Ordinances, Policies and Plans that Drive the TIF
State Code (Go to the State of Illinois General Assembly website, www.ilga.gov/and search under Tax Increment Financing to see what bills come up.) City of Chicago Website (Go to www.cityofchicago.org and search under TIF, City land sales, freedom of information request, interested party) TIF Redevelopment Plan Ordinances Housing Impact Study
Ask Chicago Department of Planning and Development to see copies of any plans referenced in the TIF Redevelopment Plan ordinance
How many home owners and local residents have received TIF assistance?
What economic development plans are in place to supplement the TIF? How have our schools and parks been impacted?
Tip # 5: Analyze the Redevelopment Plan from Your Own Vantage Point
If you are a resident, read to learn how your taxes may be impacted, or whats in it for you as a resident
Will my taxes go up? Will I or my neighbors be displaced? Will my property be taken through eminent domain?
If you are a business owner or leader of a chamber of commerce, read to learn how you or your members may be impacted
Does the plan bring in other businesses that are competitive with mine or my members? What incentives are offered to existing businesses? Will my business property or any of my members business properties be taken over through eminent domain?
Is there a potential for divided loyalty? In some cases, elected officials sit on boards of directors of organizations that sponsor or support TIFs. How do they handle the competing interests of the electorate and the community-based organization? Is there potential for the plan to displace one group of people in favor of another? Are advisory committees staffed through an open, nonpartisan political process? Are the interests of low income taxpayers, who must ultimately pay for and reimburse all costs, adequately represented? What do they get out of the deal? Do special interest groups have a greater voice than local residents? Are there win-win strategies to minimize conflicts and even the playing field?
Tip #9: Know Where Your Elected Officials Stand on the Issues
Have meetings with Alderman, Cook County Commissioner, State Representative, State Senator, Congressman, Senators Host town hall meetings and other public meetings Review voting records Read articles in local press
Negative
Attempts to discredit groups and their messages advocating change Leaders are often isolated and labeled as trouble makers Exclusion from key meetings by community gatekeepers Key stakeholders begin to distance themselves Retaliation
Focusing on past successes serves as encouragement when chips are down Communicating success maintains momentum Documentation of progress attracts others to your process Documenting mistakes helps you keep from repeating them Sharing lessons learned with others provides an excellent opportunity to promote your agenda, increase capacity of others; receive constructive feedback and establish long term relationships.
Further Information
For further information regarding this presentation, contact Valerie F. Leonard at 773-21-3137 or valeriefleonard@msn.com. This presentation has been archived at http://lawndalealliance.blogspot.com. You may visit this blog to review archived files from the Lawndale Alliance.