Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Standard - Beyond LOGO
Business Standard - Beyond LOGO
ARIJIT BARMAN
hen the Burmans of Dabur approached DMA Yellow Works, now D Y Works, for a makeover of their corporate identity and brand, they wanted to actually drop the Banyan Tree from their logo. But DMA persuaded the promoters to rejuvenate the tree; tweaked the font and through a series of interventions that saw newer packaging, product extensions and communication, galvanised a more holistic change. It took a survey of 10,000 people across the country for Sanjeev Goenka to step out of his fathers shadow and create a legacy of his own. He also wanted his new group corporate identity RP-Sanjiv Goenka to reflect the clear demarcation of the business empire between him and elder brother Harsh. I had been wondering whether staying together could lead to a potential confusion between my son and nephew, he candidly explains with heir apparent Shashwat next to him. Reasons differ, circumstances vary but companies are finding compelling business reasons to acknowledge and invest in a brand framework for the entire corporation. From familial splits, operational realignments to internationalisation of business, and even global strategy shifts, corporate branding today is getting dovetailed with a bigger transformational journey that enterprises are undertaking. Its no longer an extension of the companys annual report, quips Santosh Desai MD & CEO of Future Brands. Strong, resonant corporate identities today are tools of enhancing business or assets that far transcend mere goodwill. Firstly, it creates consumer magnetism. Reputational management is now linked to corporate identity as it ring fences you from assaults. And in an environment of flux, scams and workforce migration, such softer associations are also engaging methods to retain tal-
was one such event coinciding as the branding program unfolded, says Shivnath Thukral, Essars Group President, Corporate Branding and Strategic Initiatives.
Similarly for many storied Indian companies, reinvention or repositioning to adapt with the changing times and lifestyles of their new set of stakeholders both at home and abroad are catalysts for rebranding. But connecting with a younger audience doesnt mean forsaking ones heritage especially when the brands equity in built on that. So Wipros sunflower got a splash of colour when it morphed into a cutting edge IT giant from its legacy businesses of vegetable oil and consumer products. Godrej retained its signature equity but gave a new visual language through a multi coloured ribbon, embodying the new philosophy of brighter living. In many cases, however, sheer business strategy drives change. ITC removed the dots in between to minimise the overhang of Imperial Tobacco. A simple move, which also allowed it to subsequently have
a wider FMCG and hospitality play, beyond cigarettes. Internationally too Philip Morris, says Raghavan, changed its name to Altria to insulate Kraft a group company from any negative rub offs. While retail centric ICICI Bank under KV Kamath had to shed its developmental credit bank credo, the name Calcutta State Electricity Supply was geographically limiting for the company that was planning to break out and diversify nationwide and the across the entire utility value chain. So both simply stuck to just their acronyms. UTI Bank rebranded as Axis after the end of a statutory term. In banking, where names are the sticky factor, UTI faced a trust deficit after the fiasco of US-64 and its name itself became a liability.
FAMILY PICTURE
As families grow and new generations come in, separate identities and lines of businesses also get demarcated. The landscape changes too with time. Even though traditionally the death of a patriarch like a Dhirubhai Ambani prompts succession issues, path breakers like Aditya
Vikram Birla stepped out of his family group to create his own set of business space and companies from scratch. This even when both his father and grandfather were alive. But splits are typically not amicable. Thus each party, while carving out his space, evaluates the equity of the original brand's legacy. If this is judged to be substantial, both parties often lay claim to important brand properties such as the name, strapline and logo, says Keshavan. Many perceive Anil Ambani tried to appropriate his fathers equity by adding his name in the new corporate branding of his business empire, after an acrimonious split with his elder brother Mukesh. For most investors who double up as Reliances biggest torch bearers, Dhirubhais name was the most premium currency for enhancing shareholder value. But after the rapprochement between the two last year, Anil Ambani dropped his name from the corporate logo for just the company name. On the other side of the spectrum are promoters like Gautam Thapar of Avantha or Future Groups Kishore
Biyani, who have dropped their family names for secular identities in an effort to detach from an individual and promote professionalism and pragmatism. Avantha as a holding company has strong child brands like Crompton Greaves, BILT which are also flourishing, says Parida. But among global business houses, Tatas are an exceptional example of codifying a brand architecture for perpetuity. Its a hugely diversified group with a legacy of minimal shareholding in many of its flagships, yet through a business excellence model and layered brand licensing, they have been able to create a sustainable hierarchy. Such a model allows them to not just leverage the Tata brand but also incentivises individual users to add value. Armed with a formal legal basis, Tata Sons, the groups holding company, can control how the brand will be used. Parts of such innovation may now even get replicated as many of their corporate peers like an L&T or a GMR are thinking along similar lines in their quest to create holding companies or to simply safeguard their business heritage and brand equity.