Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leadership and Teamwork: The Text Below Is A Translation From A Newspaper Article, Translated by Anne Penttilä
Leadership and Teamwork: The Text Below Is A Translation From A Newspaper Article, Translated by Anne Penttilä
The text below is a translation from a newspaper article, translated by Anne Penttil.
Living in constant uncertainty teaches us to go back to the source of the old truths: work communities can develop and be productive if they allow humanity, initiativity, creativity, learning new things, responsibility and freedom, cooperation and working to one's heart's content. Changing over from the hierarchical formality to cooperational teamwork is not the philosopher's stone of management that would solve and fix all the organization's problems. Very often the organization's and its members' insufficient ability to learn new operations and thinking models retards teaming. Good discussions within the work community are important for learning new operations models. The communication itself clarifies and improves the thoughts of every individual and those of the whole team too. The article series Leadership and Teamwork by the Vaasa University Continuing Education Center and the newspaper Pohjalainen studied in a new and a fresh way the dimensions of today's managment and leadership. The writers of these articles were the professors, researchers and teachers of the Department of management and organization, Faculty of Business Administration: professor Vesa Routamaa, researcher Virpi Asikainen and assistant Tiina Galln, assistant professor Jukka Peltoniemi and researcher Taru Hautala, researcher Riitta Strmmer, professor Jukka Vesalainen and chief assistant Kai Stenman. Journalist Sirpa Sainio attended to the editing and the journalistic layout of the articles. The Vaasa University Continuing Education Center thanks all the writers and cooperators of the Newspaper University Forum for the creditable contribution in the current theme. This publication offers another possibility for the utilization of the information conveyed by the Newspaper University Forum and we hope that it will arouse discussions.
Is the Time Ripe for Releasing Enthusiasm, Creativity and Cooperation Abilities?
By Vesa Routamaa
Ideas of leadership and teamwork which were invented already decades ago are now coming true
The recession in the beginning of this decade released several currents of change that were greater than usual in the labor market. The depression both forced and enabled the intensifying of the organizations' functions. Profitability and survival required checking of the organization and expense structures and also enhancing the productivity. Under the cover of recession it was possible to make necessary decisions, which in better times might have fallen down because of the resistance of the personnel and the organizations representing it. Very often the companies are developed rather because of the forcing circumstances or with the help of scattered and fashionable tricks sold by consultants, than because of the internalized knowledge and proactive planning of the management. In the public sector the organization development often focuses on essential basic problems because of barely sufficient appropriations. It even seems that after the recession the public sector organizations have seized on the development of the organizations more eagerly than enterprises.
The enterprises have been able to reduce permanent personnel without jeopardizing increase in productivity. However, it is a fact that now during the upspring there is pressure to increase work force, but the unreasonable extra expenses of the salaries and strict employment conditions delay the hiring of new personnel especially in small and medium-sized companies. In the public sector the recruitation ban (prohibition to hire new personnel) and the diminishing salary appropriations have same kind of effect.
help of teleinformatics maybe even true system organizations, which were first written about already in the 50's, will be born.
performing different duties to cooperate in the problem centered work. Work forms are changing. Work groups and teamwork are both old and established work forms. So much time has been wasted on inefficient teamwork. While the results of teamwork should beat the capacity of its best member, the reality is often a bad compromise on the level of the most average abilities. However teamwork is something else. In teamwork the best individuals can show their real abilities. The requirement for versatility in teams and projects is becoming general.
This is how things should already be, but the development takes its time. However, the new role of the manager and emphasizing the leading of people do not mean that the managing should become loose. Things and organizations need to be in order, but they are answered for by the capable units and self-directing teams more than before.
Later on the management of the organizations has not had enough knowledge to be able to make good use of these theoretical possibilities. Now the time seems to be ripe for arousing enthusiasm, creativity and cooperation by developing leadership and teamwork. However, this requires knowledge and experience in the effects of leadership on creativity, team structures and learning organization.
Creativity Promoting Managers Are Able to Rejoice at the Solutions Others Have Invented
By Virpi Asikainen and Tiina Galln
commitment of the management which can be seen in practice also. A mere clever word mongering about an imposing future is not enough to motivate others, even though it would be well presented. Talking about the favoring of risk taking is something else than understanding the human mistakes as an inevitable part of experimenting and creative activities. The projects are given goals that support the vision and the rules are agreed. For the success of innovation, it is essential to evaluate also the possibilities offered by external environment.
and evaluation, whereas others are either able to put them aside or experience even greater enthusiasm knowing that they really get feedback. All these factors are needed for creative solutions. The higher level each skill and motivation has reached, the better are the chances to achieve creativity.
The stage of evaluation and testing usually requires most personnel, money and material, which emphasizes the significance of the organization's general resources. Even though the performing of the job has been the responsibility of a single team or a project, the testing and the realizing of the ideas has usually been carried out by the whole organization. Achievements should always be evaluated in order to make the creative aims motivating and significant. Both success and a total failure will always lead to the ending of the process. Success of some degree is likely to lead into a situation where the group still tries to solve the problem after it has reconsidered and reformed its aims. People find fair rewarding very important, not only concrete bonuses, but also other kind of recognition and encouragement.
The creative skills, expertise and motivation of individuals, are crucial when creativity is being prompted. What is needed, is the organization's ability to manage and support individual creativity. The organization has to have resources. The atmosphere has to show encouragement to creativity and innovations.
Earlier work was intensified by the means of "spade science": the bigger the man the bigger the spade
The traditional operations model of the organizations seems to be a very threatened species nowadays. A part of the period's tendencies consists of short time isms, whereas another part of them may have permanent effects on the organizations' way of thinking. Team organizations seem to belong to the latter group. The forming of teams is, in fact, one development stage in the organizations' constant aspiration to improve productivity and profitability. When industrial enterprising was still rather new, the intensifying followed the principles of so called "spade science" which was an aspiration to improve the productivity of an individual worker through rationalization: the bigger the man the bigger the spade and the bigger the heaps of coal. In addition to this, hierarchical organizations and the behavior unifying rules and directions were supposed to improve anticipation and diminish errors caused by the dissimilarity of people. This way of thinking is probably familiar to the modern organizations too.
The modern lean organizations, on their behalf, consider the needs of a customer as the basis of their action. The organization does not have intrinsic value. The organization is described as processes (e.g. production, the control of the customers, logistics, management, etc.) that produce additional value to customers and in which the central units of the work are not the hierarchical levels nor the separate departments, but the teams with complementary skills which have as straight connections to the customers as possible. Therefore all the members of the work community are expected to posses adequate knowledge and skills.
Compared to the traditional work groups teams have some differentiating features. A team consists of skilled and versatile employees or experts. All the team members can do almost everything the whole of the job requires. They can also replace each other. The team's principle is that the work is done in the same place where the decisions are made, as far as possible. Responsibility for the scheduling of work and for the results are alsodifferent as well as the pay systems, and the quantity of direct control is smaller than in the traditional work groups.
Semiautonomous work group is suitable for manufacturing industry in which employees are allowed to decide on production activities. However, other groups or teams perform supporting activities, such as quality control.
Even though teams are often described as loose and flexible organizations, they still have a cohesive structure. This structure forms the context in which the team's member is working. The structure of the team includes the tasks of the team, the roles and the statuses of the members and also the norms of the team. The basic task of every team is to set clear and understandable goals for their work. It is essential to increase work's efficiency, productivity, flexibility and competitiveness, but also its meaningfulness. In those organizations that successfully use teamwork the team members control their own productivity, expenses, budget and the quality of the work. Keeping to the schedule is essential because certain work processes have to be completed within the agreed schedule. In addition to that the teams take care of the development of new work methods, personnel relations and cooperation, and also see to the education, customer service and the informing of the stakeholders. Team members may have authorities to make big changes in the work processes without asking permission from others. The tasks may include the recruiting of new members too.
However, different kind of social appreciation may be attached to the unofficial roles of the team. In these cases it is a question of the role's status. A status hierarchy means a social rank within the team. The members of higher status are often so called unofficial leaders whose opinion affects the whole team. If the team is not unanimous in status hierarchy, harmful rivalry may follow. Another status hierarchy problem appears, if the leader with his assistants and yes-men forms an inner circle. The outsiders are not informed nor do they participate in decision making, but if necessary they are the ones who are made the scapegoats and black sheep.
It is not rare that even good ideas may have to wait for a long time before they are introduced in an organization. This has happened to the theoretical ideas behind the team organizations which were found already decades ago. Now it seems that the introduction of teams is becoming more common especially in such organizations in which the changed situations demand new work forms.
The survival learning is connected to experience, which forms the nuclear of the daily routines. The problems are solved on the basis of the old courses of action. The creative learning widens one's creative abilities and enables qualitative and structural changes in the work practices. Therefore it also enables bold leaps and takeoffs. The confusion and oppression connected to changes are often results of the effort to cope with the radically changing circumstances only with the help of survival learning. The old courses of action are too stiff to enable the finding of effective solutions to new problems. As a result follow exhaustion and frustration caused by the fruitlessness of the efforts. However, creative learning is not easy either, at least not in the beginning. People have to question all their earlier courses of action and maybe even completely change their way of thinking.
Difficulties in giving up the old courses of action usually are the biggest obstacles for learning new things. Unwillingness to unlearning has also been called change resistance. Difficulties in giving up dear old photographs, smoking or the earlier learned things belong to the same category. In enterprises this human feature may, at the worst, cause bankruptcy.
A feature coming more and more common is the very short interval between the estimation of the situation and the action itself. At this point it is important to pay attention also to people's evaluations, instincts and intuitive abilities.
sparrows, it is not very realistic to hope that the goals set for the organization would be effectively achieved. At the worst, the goals have been understood in various ways too, and therefore even the vigorous attempts pull the entity to different directions.
A common vision: everybody in the organization knows what kind of future the organization is heading for The constant developing of the employees' know-how which, at its best, is effectively achieved through work Flexible organization in which as much power and responsibility has been given to the teams as possible. Effective learning orientation, learning from mistakes, learning from others and team learning, which all sensitize everybody to think from the perspective of learning. System thinking, in other words, everybody in the organization understands its systematic entity and the interaction between the matters. A committed and an inspiring management, which especially concentrates on the supporting of learning. Wide participation, in other words a culture which inspires everybody to add their mite to the pile. Open and effective flow of information which includes both open discussion and effective systems. Indicators of development which help everybody to develop their own work and the operations models of the organization, and to redirect their activities too, if necessary. Bonus schemes that stimulate learning, trying and ideation.
Most organizations adjust and gradually develop their activities within the existing products, markets, services and technology. The earlier success directs their development. They react mechanically and in a routine like manner to the changes in the environment and try to avoid risks. This prevents diversity of opinions, experimenting and risk taking. The survival abilities of these organizations can not endure big changes in the markets.
In creative organizations the change is seen as the engine of development. A network based and team structured organization reforms itself through constant evaluation. Sincerity, creativity and system thinking characterize the actions of the organization. A netting process with other companies may be an inspiration for learning. It may be stimulated by cooperation with a client or a supplier. Ideas are sought from the best practices of other organizations and the limits are bravely broken.
According to the modern idea, the development is seen as a constant qualitative change, which means that tensions and developmental challenges are an inseparable part of everyday activities. It is useless to hope that this change would suddenly end and we would get back to the peace of the good old days. It will not happen! The challenge of today's work communities is to make the biggest part of learning to take place in its natural environment, in the work, as the organized teaching is expensive and slow, and often found ineffective. On-the-job learning has become a part of the company's competition strategy. It pays attention to both short and long term needs. The most important precondition is the creation of development supporting activity culture and the developing of learning supporting systems.
The Finnish work communities still do not make enough developing suggestions
The professionals teaching and lecturing on teamwork are unanimous in the usefulness of their product. However most of them can not present any supporting research reports on how the benefits of teamwork show in the organizations. We, for our part, try to moderate this lack by studying the experiences in the teamwork among the Finnish men and women working in metal industry. In the spring of 1996 we sent a questionnaire to one thousand members of the Metalworkers Union. In return mail we got 244 appropriately filled forms. The results presented here are based on that material. The actual research report has not been published yet, and therefore these research results are definitely fresh.
Committed, satisfied
We assume on the basis of the earlier knowledge that the high commitment and good job satisfaction of the employees have a positive effect on the profitability of the enterprise. One of the teamwork's basic ideas is that when people are given more responsibility and freedom they voluntarily release both quantitative and qualitative energy to their work. People working in teams should therefore be more committed and satisfied with their job than people in more traditional employment. Majority (56.1 %) of the people who filled and returned our research questionnaires work in enterprises that employ 25100 people. Correspondingly the biggest individual sectors and their mainly used production forms were as follows: 1. The manufacturing of metal products: 70 % produced in series. 2. The manufacturing of machines and equipment: 65 % in one-off production. 3. The electric products and instruments: 60 % produced in series. The manufacturing of metal products was clearly the biggest user of process production (70 %).
Especially interesting is the fact that the people working in so called false teams are not any more committed than those who do not belong to teams at all. Actually the situation is quite the opposite: nominal teams seem to lower commitment. Noteworthy is also the fact that in the group C commitment is not any higher than in the groups B or D. This result shuts out the possibility that such enterprises which practice teamwork would somehow be better than others and their personnel more committed than that of other enterprises.
Table 2 describes the division of job satisfaction which follows the same lines as the division of commitment. People in the group A are clearly more satisfied than others. Especially notable is the fact that only 2,7 % of people working in real teams are not satisfied with their job. Correspondingly a little over 20 % of the employees in other groups are not satisfied.