Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Purpose
---
To get a job done Project & career Project, career, abroad dvt organizational development Negative for domestic career Good for global Essential for career executive suite Easy Extensive
----None
Cross-Cultural Entry
Culture Shock - the frustration and confusion that
results from being bombarded by too many new and uninterpretable cues, p. 263.
Mood
Patience and creativity remain essential. Effective global managers know that they dont know.
Problems:
organizational cultural shock effectiveness xenophobic response use of learned skills
Re-socialized Returnees
Proactive Returnees
Alienated Returnees
Oriented toward foreign country
Adler (2002), p. 280
Transition Strategies
Managing reentry through:
Communication: keep in touch with home office. Extent of validation: recognizing and valuing global experiences.
Japanese Firms
1. Inability to cope with larger overseas responsibilities 2. Difficulties with the new environment 3. Personal or emotional problems 4. Lack of technical competence 5. Inability of spouse to adjust
Three General Practices from successful companies: 1. When they send people abroad, the goal is not just to put out fires. Once expats have doused the flames, they are expected to generate new knowledge for the organization or to acquire skills that will help them become leaders.
Hofstedes Model
Differences across countries in work-related values. Sampled over 100,000 IBM employees across 40 countries. Four dimensions:
POWER DISTANCE INDIVIDUALISM VERSUS COLLECTIVISM UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE MASCULINITY VERSUS FEMININITY
Power distance:
Focuses on how a society deals with the fact that people are unequal in physical and intellectual capabilities. High power distance cultures are countries that let inequalities grow over time into inequalities of power and wealth (e.g. China). Low power distance cultures are societies that tried to play down such inequalities as much as possible (e.g. Denmark).
Uncertainty Avoidance:
Measures the extent to which different cultures accept ambiguous situations and tolerate uncertainty. High uncertainty avoidance cultures place a premium on job security, internal career patterns, retirement benefits, and so on. They also have a strong need for rules and regulations; managers are expected to issue clear instructions, and subordinate initiatives are tightly controlled (e.g. Japan, France, Spain). Lower uncertainty avoidance cultures are characterized by greater readiness to take risks and less emotional resistance to change (Sweden).
Country Hofstede Code Power Distance Individualism Masculinity Uncertainty Avoidance Arab_World (ARA) 80 38 52 68 Argentina (ARG) 49 46 56 86 Australia (AUL) 36 90 61 51 Austria (AUT) 11 55 79 70 Belgium (BEL) 65 75 54 94 Brazil (BRA) 69 38 49 76 Canada (CAN) 39 80 52 48 Chile (CHL) 63 23 28 86 Colombia (COL) 67 13 64 80 Costa_Rica (COS) 35 15 21 86 Denmark (DEN) 18 74 16 23 East_Africa (EAF) 64 27 41 52 Ecuador (ECA) 78 8 63 67 El_Salvador (SAL) 66 19 40 94 Finland (FIN) 33 63 26 59 France (FRA) 68 71 43 86 Germany (GER) 35 97 66 65 Great_Britain (GBR) 35 89 66 35 Greece (GRE) 60 35 57 112
Cu tr on y Ga mla u te a Hn _ o g o g Kn Id n ia I dns n o e ia Ia rn Ie n r la d Jpn aa S u _ oe o th K r a Mla s a y ia Mx o e ic Nth r n s e ela d NwZa n e _ e la d Nr a owy P k ta a is n Pn m aa a Pr eu P ilip in s h pe Pr g l otu a S gpr in a oe S u _ f ic o th A a r Sa p in S ee wd n S itz r n w ela d Tiwn a a Ta n h ila d Tr e uk y Uite _ ta s n d S te U ga r uy u
P wrD ta c o e is n e I d id a m n iv u lis 9 5 6 6 8 2 5 7 7 4 8 7 8 1 4 5 8 4 1 2 8 7 0 5 4 4 6 6 0 1 8 14 0 2 6 8 1 3 0 3 8 8 0 2 2 7 9 3 1 6 9 5 5 1 4 9 5 1 1 6 4 1 6 9 4 3 2 6 3 2 7 7 4 2 0 4 9 6 5 5 7 5 1 3 1 7 1 3 4 6 8 5 8 1 7 6 4 2 0 6 6 3 7 4 0 9 1 6 1 3 6
Ms u ity a c lin 3 7 5 7 5 6 4 6 4 3 6 8 9 5 3 9 5 0 6 9 1 4 5 8 8 5 0 4 4 4 2 6 4 3 1 4 8 6 3 4 2 5 7 0 4 5 3 4 4 5 6 2 3 8
Uc r in Ao a c n eta ty v id n e 11 0 2 9 4 0 4 8 5 9 3 5 9 2 8 5 3 6 8 2 5 3 4 9 5 0 7 0 8 6 8 7 4 4 14 0 8 4 9 8 6 2 9 5 8 6 9 6 4 8 5 4 6 10 0
C u try on P wr D ta deid a ma c lin U c rta tyAo o e is In iv u lisMs u ity n e in v id nc U ga ru u y 6 1 3 6 3 8 10 0 Vn z e e e u la 8 1 1 2 7 3 7 6 Ws Aric e t_ f a 7 7 2 0 4 6 5 4 A a ia lb n 9 0 2 0 8 0 7 0 B ltic R p b s a _ e u lic 4 0 6 0 3 0 5 0 B lg ria u a 7 0 5 0 5 0 8 0 Bu n h ta 9 4 5 2 3 2 2 8 B rk a F s u in _ a o 7 0 1 5 5 0 5 5 Cu a u a cs s 7 0 2 0 5 0 6 0 C in h a 8 0 1 5 5 5 4 0 C a ro tia 7 2 3 3 4 0 8 0 Ce h Rp b z c _ e u lic 3 5 6 0 4 5 6 0 D m ic n R p o in a _ e 6 5 3 0 6 5 4 5 Ey t gp 7 0 2 5 4 5 8 0 E io ia th p 7 0 2 0 6 5 5 5
Hofstede, Cultures Consequences
P eD n Idi uim o r it c nv as w s e a i dl 7 8 1 4 8 0 1 5 1 9 5 5 9 5 3 0 7 0 3 0 7 0 2 5 7 5 4 0 5 5 7 0 7 0 3 0 6 5 3 0 6 5 3 0 8 0 3 0 5 0 6 0 9 0 2 0 9 5 4 7 9 5 2 5 8 6 2 5 7 0 2 0 7 1 2 7 8 0 3 5 8 0 4 8 8 0 3 5 7 0 2 5 6 0 3 5 1 3 5 4 5 0 7 6 4 5 3 9
M ln a u iy s it c 4 6 4 0 7 9 7 0 4 5 6 0 6 5 6 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 6 0 7 0 4 0 4 0 6 0 4 3 4 0 1 9 1 0 3 5 5 2 4 0 4 0 4 7 7 0 6 8
U r i t Ad c n tn v ae cay o n e i 4 8 6 5 8 3 8 5 6 5 5 0 5 5 7 0 5 0 4 5 4 0 5 5 5 5 9 5 7 5 8 0 9 2 5 0 8 8 4 5 8 0 6 0 5 0 5 0 8 1 7 5 1 3
Individualism/Collectivism Collective
PAK TAI CHI
ISR
FIN
DEN
Catskills Roads
Issues: - Argentina, - Mexico, - New Jersey - Job changes