Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MTA Soot Blowing
MTA Soot Blowing
Made By : Aman Singhal (102028) Chandan Kr Nirala (1020 ) Gaurav Srivastava (102005) ET-09 (C&I),NTPC, Badarpur
OUTLINE
Basic Concepts of Fuzzy Logic Fuzzy Decision Making Process Soot Blowing:Conventional method v/s Intelligent system Observations from Existing Systems : SWBS & PADO Fuzzy based Intelligent Soot Blowing Parameters & Performance Data Conclusion
Fuzzy logic is conceptually easy to understand. Implementing design objectives, that are difficult to express mathematically, in Linguistic or descriptive rules. No need for a mathematical model, based on natural language Relatively Simple, Adaptive and Flexible Less sensitive to system fluctuations Fuzzy logic can model nonlinear functions of arbitrary complexity Fuzzy logic can be blended with conventional control techniques
Fuzzy set indicates how much (to which extent) an element belongs to it. Element x belongs to set A with a certain degree of membership: A(x) [0,1]
Fuzzy Set
A fuzzy set F in a universe of discourse U is characterized by membership function F, which takes values in the interval [0,1], i.e., F: U [0,1]
Defining linguistic terms for all input & output variables Defining membership functions for all fuzzy sets Specifying conditions and conclusions for all rules i.e the rule base Choosing appropriate fuzzy operators for reasoning i.e. the fuzzy inference method Experimenting and validating the system
Soot Blowing optimization Optimum fuel combustion Load frequency control Control of hydraulic drives Speed control of induction motor
Soot Blowing
Conventional Method v/s Intelligent System
Intended to blow off the deposits on the furnace and heater surfaces Generally, the performance is proportional to the square of the jet nozzle diameter and jet pressure, and inversely proportional to the distance between jet nozzle and the heating surface Remotely and sequentially operated from a separate panel in the control room.
Clean soot off walls and heater surfaces in the boiler Improve surface heat transfer Maintain balance between radiation & convection zone heat transfer Reduce attemperation spray rates Lower furnace exit gas temperature (FEGT) Reduce NOx emissions
Current Methodology
Traditionally been performed on a schedule rather than optimized based on actual fouling conditions in the boiler Every alternate morning shift for water wall and evening for APH No consideration for the amount of soot deposition No parameter observed particularly for the identification of soot blowing regions.
Certain boiler stages are blown unnecessarily leading to heat rate penalty. Excessive soot blowing results in erosion of tube surfaces. Improper soot blowing affect furnace exit gas temperature Under-sootblowing results in decreased heat transfer rate Overall reduced boiler efficiency.
Establishing optimized operation of wall blowers Achieving optimum heat absorption in the furnace Limiting attemperation spray Intelligent Soot Blowing is the solution !!
Expert system to indicate individual section cleanliness to determine correct soot blowing scheme Estimate the cleanliness factor of the furnace followed by firing of a group of blowers where soot blowing is actually needed
Improves boiler performance as furnace heat absorption can be maintained optimally Reduces NOx emissions Minimizes disturbances caused by soot blower activation Optimal balance between furnace and convective pass heat transfer Improve soot blower life and reduce maintenance cost Reduced attemperation spray rates Reduced tube erosion
Heat flux study by m/s. BHEL in unit 1& 2 boilers at RTPS in April 1996 Arrangements for heat flux measurements using portable HF probes & optical pyrometer Automated system was dedicated in Jan 2002 Operation is based on combustion regime - depends on burner tilt, excess air, mill combination, no. Of mills in service, etc.
Based on the direct measurement of furnace heat flux at a number of selected locations within the furnace Soot blower operation based on heat transfer need or demand 56 blowers and 32 heat flux sensors mounted near the wall blowers covering all the elevations SH Spray water flow and Heat Flux reduction are taken as index of optimized decision Heat absorbed per unit area is calculated by multiplying heat coefficient (obtained experimentally by thermal mapping) and the wall tube differential temperature (measured by K Type Thermocouple)
Improved Performance
The relevant heating surfaces included in the soot blowing optimization are: Furnace SH panelette SH platen RH LTSH Economizer
Fuzzy rule-based Expert system to estimate the cleanliness factor (CF) of the furnace Calculates the heat absorbed and the degree of individual stage fouling in the form of CF No need of heat flux sensors Advises on 'When' and 'Where' to Soot Blow, depending on a single index, CF.
Description
The mathematical methodology of finding the cleanliness factor of the following regions in the boiler:
Parameter Identification
Following input variables are identified for fuzzification :
LTSH metal temperature Total spray flow Burner Tilt Mill Combination Load Elapsed Time since last soot blow
Block Diagram
Conclusion
With the existing instrumentations it is possible to determine the Cleanliness Factor of Furnace, Reheater, Final Superheater, LTSH and Economizer. This gives better information on soot deposition and heat transfer in Furnace and convective zones. Indirect method of assessing furnace condition is superior to direct method of measuring the heat flux as the heat flux meters are expensive and if failed, it requires unit shutdown for replacement.
THANK YOU
(Special Thanks to Mr. P.S. Chowdhury, EOC, NTPC for his expert guidance on the subject)