Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vol 41, No 4 - APRIL 2007 PHP 70
Vol 41, No 4 - APRIL 2007 PHP 70
00 Php 70. 00
Philippine society today is in crisis. Two radical causes are chronic lies and rampant injustices. Cheating during elections, graft and corrupt practices are glaring examples of lies and injustices.
Bishop Dinualdo Gutierrez, bishop of Marbel, Cotabato and chairman of National Secretariat for Social Action (NASSA); in his message for Alay Kapwa, the Lenten fund campaign of the episcopal conference of the Philippines.
ISSN 0300-4155 Asian Magazine for Human Transformation Through Education, Social Advocacy and Evangelization
P.O. Box 2481, 1099 Manila, Philippines
Copyright 1974 by Social Impact Foundation, Inc.
IMPACT
REMITTING ADDRESSES
When it comes to global warming, I dont exactly think President Bush is doing such a hot job.
Tiffany Cordero, a 12-year-old New Yorker in her speech at a rally in lower Manhattans Battery Park early this April 2007; aimed at drawing awareness to global warming.
I am uniting our Filipinos in this hour. I do not want to talk about politics. But I showed that I can manage these two different things.
Manny Pacquiao, in an interview right after winning the fight with Mexican Jorge Solis; in Texas, April 15, 2007.
The clamor of a crowd estimated at more than 300,000; protesting a possible presidential run by the pro-Islamic prime minister whose party has been eroding secular Turks longtime grip on power; on April 14 in Ankara, Turkey.
AUSTRALIA : Impact P.O. Box 2034, East Ivanhoe, Victoria 3079 BANGLADESH: 1. Community Center, 5 Sadar Road, Barisal; 2. The Priest-in-Charge, P.O. Box 152, Chittagong CAROLINE ISLANDS: Social Action Center, Inc., P.O. Box 202, Truk, Caroline Islands 96942 HONGKONG: Catholic Periodicals Subscription Office, Catholic Centre, 16, Caine Road, 11/F, Hong Kong INDIA: 1. Asian Trading Corp., 310, The Mirabelle, Lotus-House, 33A, Marine Lines, P.B. No. 11029, Bombay - 400 202; 2. Asian Trading Corp., 150 Brigade Rd., Bangalore - 56-0025 INDONESIA : 1. Y.S.T.M. Jl. Gunung Sahari III/7 Phone: 021-354700 Jakarta Pusat; 2. YPD Jl. Veteran 7, P.O. Box 1066, Semarang 5010; 3. Biro Sosial, Jl. Taman Srigunting 10, Semarang. JAPAN: Enderle Book Co. Ltd., Ichico Bldg., 1-5 Yotsudya Shinjukuku, Tokyo 160, Japan KOREA: J. R. Heisse, C.P.O.. Box 206, Seoul, Korea MALAYSIA: 1. Anthonian Store Sdn. Bhd., Wisma Anthonian, 235, Jalan Brickfields, Kuala Lumpur 09-08; 2. Catholic Information Services 50 E&F, Penang Rd., Penang NEW ZEALAND: Catholic Depot Ltd., 64 Wyndham Street, Auckland PAKISTAN: Fr. Joseph Louis, 8-Katchery Road, Lahore PHILIPPINES: P.O. Box 2950, 1099 Manila SINGAPORE: Select Books PTE. Ltd., 215 Tanglin Shopping Centre, 2/F 19, Tanglin Road, Singapore 10 TAIWAN: P.O. Box 8-146, Taipei 100 THAILAND: NASAC, 2 Saensuk, Prachasongkroh Road, Bangkok 10. U.S.A.: c/o Mrs. M. Taranella, Walsh Bldg., 1st Floor, Maryknoll, New York 10545
Published monthly by
Our family institution is weakening more and more, and it leads to a number of social problems.
Thailands Public Health Minister Mongkhol na Songkhla, said last week noting that family members are forced by economic pressures to leave for the big city and social structure is shifting towards the Western pattern of nuclear families.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES
Philippines Metro Manila Provincial Asia Middle East, Australia, New Zealand USA, Europe, Canada Africa, Caribbean, Latin America - 1 year - Php 750.00 - 1 year - Php 800.00 1 year 1 year 1 year 1 year - US$ 45.00 - US$ 50.00 - US$ 55.00 - US$ 60.00
EDITORIAL OFFICE: 3/F CBCP Bldg., 470 Gen. Luna St., Intramuros, Manila, Philippines Tel (632) 404-2182 Telefax (632) 404-1612 Visit our website at www.impactmagazine.net
I MPACT
CONTENTS
DESPITE the givens of the day, the Holy Week celebration in the Philippines this year was as thickly populated as before. The Visita Iglesia, for instance, observed in the evening of Holy Thursday was elbow to elbow along the road that connects the Manila Cathedral and San Agustin Church. In Quiapo Church, a friend couldnt place himself in due to the immediate swell of the crowd on the afternoon of Good Friday. Although on a different breath, the crowd on a sweltering noon was unbelievably huge in Barangay San Pedro Cutud in San Fernando City in Pampanga. The foreign and local media, the tourists, the penitentsor so the cast of characters were regardedand the organizers of a nine-count crucifixion of warm bodies were all glued to the main event of flagellations and nailings more fanatically heaved than the recent devastation of Solis by Manny Pacquiao. The religious sentiments and fanaticism during Holy Week in the Philippines are so profound to beg for comparison. Judging by the external looks of it, such spiritual manifestations would likely be enough to convert to thy-kingdom-come a good number of politicians clowning the streets in the country today. They hibernated for a day or two, but on Easter Sunday the politicians were back dancing on the streets deceiving people like insatiable ogres baiting on prospective victims. While religion is a virtue, politics in the Philippines is a vice. The only rub is, in times like the Holy Week nobody seems bothered about the chameleons that masterfully blends religion and politics and artistically transforms the mixture into a vote for public trustalbeit an age-old consequence of sure corruption and machinations of a public service turning into a self-service. For quite some time now, social scientists have been pursuing to understand some unsure phenomenon why Catholic countries, like the Philippines, are distinctively economically poor and politically chaotic. Could this be a problem with religion? With politics? Or both? The way Filipinos celebrate the Holy Week is very telling. In this issue, Kit Tatad poses Can anything good come out of this election? Very intriguing, this question, but certainly not in the same way Nathanael looked down on Nazareth in the Gospel of John. In our cover story, Msgr. Lope Robredillo writes Philippine PoliticsA Politics of Power? Indeed, it is true that our politics is about money and a between-life-and-death survival of the elite. Read on.
EDITORIAL
Woman ............................................................................. 23
COVER STORY
Celebrating the Gift of Womanhood: Putting an End to Violence Against Women .......... 16
ARTICLES
Pulpit and Platform: Discovering the Role of the Church in the State .......................................................... 4 Authentic Feminine Sexuality ...................................... 7 Cardinal Martini and Euthanasia: International Womens Day: Looking Back .............. 8 Multiculturalism and Islam: Suicide of the West and Womens Rights ....................................................... 9 A Catechism in Images: A Very Special Edition of the Compendium ...................................................... 11 Population Issue Revisited ......................................... 24 Twenty Five Years, Twenty Five Dreams ................ 25 More Than Business Behind Putins Visit to Italy ..................................................................... 27
STATEMENTS
Freedom to Choose the Candidates ......................... 12 A Month of Prayer and Peace for the Filipino Family in Celebration of National Womens Month ..........12 Holy Sees Statement on Status of Women ..............13 Message of the Holy Father Benedict XVI to The Youth of the World on the Occasion of the 22nd World Youth Day, 2007 ............................................... 14
DEPARTMENTS
Quote in the Act .............................................................. 2 News Features ............................................................... 20 From the Blogs ............................................................... 22 From the Inbox .............................................................. 28 Book Reviews ................................................................. 29 CINEMA Review .......................................................... 30 Quotes in Quiz ............................................................ 30 News Briefs ...................................................................... 31
Volume 41 Number 4
ARTICLES
othing in our electoral history quite resembles it. No issue defines the campaign; no question of policy or principle divides the parties and the candidates from one another; issues that had nearly pushed President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo out of power are no longer heard at all; party-switching among the candidates has made the opposition and the administration completely interchangeable. Despite our recurring history of political insanity, never before have we seen so unprincipled a campaign. The parties and candidates are no longer trying to outsmart each other; they are all simply trying to dupe us, the voters. They are all making deals among themselves, at our expense. The real conflict now is between the people and the politicians. This conflict must be resolved in favor of the people, but as of now, the politicians stand to gain everything and the people nothing. This is how it looks: There are two senatorial tickets, with 12 candidates each, representing the administrations Team Unity (TU) and the so-called Genuine Opposition. Both are synthetic tickets, each generously flavored with balimbings (star fruit)the Filipino argot for the unprincipled turncoat. Of the 12 TU candidates, threeSen. Edgardo Angara, former Senators Tito Sotto and Teresa Aquino Oretaare imports from the opposition. They composed the original ASO team, accused of biting the oppositions presidential candidate in 2004, Fernando Poe Jr. But of the 12 GO candidates, all but one candidate belong to walk-in parties not organic to the coalition, originally composed of PMP and PDP-Laban. Two of the three TU importsOreta and Sottoused to call President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo a bogus president, but seem to have had no difficulty merging into her team. Sotto had been talking to Malacaang, and Oreta had been seen in some Malacaang parties long before their defection, while Angara had never echoed the oppositions anti-Arroyo rhetoric and had nowhere to go after he was shut out of the United Opposition. On the GO ticket, nine of its 12 candidates had played a part in former President Joseph Estradas ouster in 2001 or in the opposition debacle in 2004. They do not seem to have any problems with one another. They do not seem to think any principles have been broken since they do not recall owning anything so breakable. But while TU carries the
Danding Cojuangcos Nationalist Peoples Coalition (NPC), have candidates on both tickets. NPC has two candidates with TU Oreta and Sotto, and four with GONikki Coseteng, Francis Escudero, Loren Legarda and John Osmena. Former NPC president Ernesto Maceda is playing a key role in GOs campaign, while boss Danding is backing Malacaang. To a lesser degree, the Liberal Party has Michael Defensor in TU, and Noynoy Aquino and Francis Pangilinan in GO, al-
though Pangilinan has apparently decided to go it alone. The NP has Ralph Recto in TU, and Cayetano and Villar in GO, although Villar seems to want to cut an independent posture. There is a more fundamental problem. Contesting the senatorial election is an administration that has tried but failed to abolish the Senate, and has therefore forfeited its right to field senatorial candidates, and an opposition that now wants to destroy what the entire nation had fought for by turning it into the family estate of some self-seeking families. TU is now made up of those who tried but failed to abolish the Senate and those who would have been abolished if the former had succeeded. GO is made up of those who would have been abolished, and those who were presumably opposed to the abolition, but who now want to do the Senate what they would not like the administration to do. Neither side, therefore, has anything to say to our people. What can the TU candidates say? That they regret having failed to abolish the Senate, but that they promise to succeed next time, if ever they are elected? And what can the GO candidates say? That since we have succeeded in saving the Senate, we should not allow the Pimentel family of Cagayan de Oro to have a larger presence in that body than the whole of Muslim Mindanao, and the Cayetano family of Taguig-Pateros to claim a privilege denied to all those who ever sat there, not to mention the 18 million or so families that make up the 90-million Filipino population? In January, the Senate dynasty issue and the capricious way of choosing senatorial candidates prompted me to resign from UNOas GO was called at the time. Reacting to my letter on that occasion, and to the public support it got across the nation, Estrada withdrew his son J.V. Ejercito from the race and asked his wife Sen. Loi Estrada not to seek reelection anymore, leaving his first son Jinggoy Estrada as the only Estrada in the Senate, and curing an abnormal situation that arose after his ouster from the presidency in 2001. But Estrada failed to ask the young Pimentel and Cayetano to follow JVs example. Neither did the older Pimentel and Cayetano ask their kin to do the same. So the dynasty candidates stayed on, saying there was yet no law against running for the Senate while ones father, mother, brother or sister was sitting there. This
was most unfortunate. To the average man in the street the dynasty candidates position is wrong. It is immoral, unconstitutional, and in extremely bad taste. It cannot be made the starting point of a senatorial career. Good taste alone should have deterred them, but it is not just a question of good taste. It is a question of lawmoral law and constitutional law. Even when the nation was but a portion of its present 90-million population, no one ever insisted on running for the Senate while his next of kin was sitting there. No law was needed to prevent them from doing so. It just wasnt done. Now, Cayetano and Pimentel insist there is no law against it. This, of course, is nonbiodegradable nonsense. Article II, Section 26 of the Constitution provides: The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law. For those who do not wish to play games with the law, there is more than enough law in that provision. But for those who want to put their personal interests above the Constitution, there will never be enough law, even if an enabling law existed. It is retrograde and perverse for anyone who wants to be a senator to argue that since there is no enabling law, what the Constitution says should be ignored. A trial lawyer might be forgiven such statement, but not someone who wants to write the nations laws. The absence of a law does not justify conduct that would surely be prohibited if the law existed. Laws are enacted so that, even without law, the people will conduct themselves in such a manner as though there was a law that prescribed it. St. Pauls letter to the Romans (2:14-15) says: When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness. Far from diminishing the constitutional mandate, therefore, the failure of Congress to enact the enabling law only sharpens the obligation of those who sit or want to sit in Congress to respect that mandate, rather than exploit the lack of an enabling law for their own personal advantage. Adjective law defines what is justifiable, but the idea of what is right and what is wrong always precedes any enactment. The good of society can only be secured
Volume 41 Number 4
by men and woman who will act not according to what is written in statute but above all according to what is written upon their hearts. Otherwise, our politics will remain no better than a pigsty, often unfit even for pigs. So much has been said about the candidates supposed intelligence. If true, that can never be concealed. But moral character defines a man much more than any display of intelligence. A man of intelligence will know the difference between right and wrong, but it takes a man of character to say No to something apparently desirable but morally wrong. An intelligent man without character has nothing to say to anybody, least of all to the nation. One who aspires to sit in the Senate must first be a man of character, whatever his level of intelligence. He should be able to argue against his self-interest and his appetite for power, pleasure or personal aggrandizement. He must be able to control his concupiscenceespecially if he is truly intelligent. Because GO failed to do his duty, the dynasty candidates now say, Let the people decide. But, of course. If the process is clean, the people will decide. But one who really wants to serve the people must only propose to them that which is morally desirable. He must not propose anything immoral in the hope that the people are ignorant enough or angry enough not to know or care about the difference. Demagogues and charlatans do that, but not men of real worth and substance. There is another fundamental problem. Despite the charges of lying, cheat-
ing, and stealing the opposition had raised against Mrs. Arroyo since 2004, they never insisted on electoral reforms. Within UNO, I was the only one who wanted to make electoral reforms a precondition for our participation in the elections. All the others were simply election-crazy, without any thought of what kind of elections they would be participating in. Now, they seem convinced the administration will cheat again. But whenever they are asked how they propose to prevent the cheating, they simply say they would rather leave it to the people. It is an absolute let-down. But even more heart-breaking are reports that some of them have already made secret contacts with former Comelec Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano, the reputed arch villain in the 2004 electoral scandal, as documented in the famous Garci tape, for possible help in the elections. To his credit, Garcillano reportedly rejected these approaches at the time. We do not know the latest developments. What is obvious is that some non-TU candidates will not mind benefiting from dirty elections. They also will not mind being helped by the administrations financially supported news forums and radio-TV programs. Some GO candidates have been shown to be outperforming their TU counterparts in some opinion polls. Some pro-opposition newspapers have trumpeted these results as signs of an inevitable landslide for the opposition. This is a total misreading of the actual situation. Since we have not heard any opposition candidate say anything truly damaging to the administration, we have to ask who among them truly represent the opposition.
Given the death of moral principles, and the dim prospects for clean and honest elections, political turbulence looms large on the horizon. No one can predict its precise timing, intensity and form, but it would be foolhardy to expect an uneventful summer. The people are eager to choose, but they have nothing and nobody to choose from. With the distinction between administration and opposition gone, the latter has ceased to be an alternative to the former. The people need an alternative to both. If this election were a public bidding on an infrastructure project, no contract would be awarded, in the absence of qualified bidders. If it were a literary, art, or similar competition, no one would be declared winner, in the absence of deserving entries. But as this is a senatorial election, the voters are expected to elect 12 senators at all cost, even if the first one gets only a hundred votes. In the novel Seeingby the Nobel Prize winner Jose Saramago, the people cast blank ballot papers to express their outrage during an election. And with such results. Taking off from this example, could we not flood the voting precincts with crossed ballots rather than filled ones, so that whoever are declared winners, assuming the overwhelming number of crossed ballots does not totally invalidate the process, will know that they are there in pure sufferance of the people? Whatever happens in May, we owe it to ourselves and to our children to tell our corrupt and power-hungry politicians in t he clearest and strongest possible terms that we have had enough of them and their kind. I
ARTICLES
I now move to a discussion of Church and State in Constitutional Law. Briefly, the constitutional provisions consist of three provisions which can be reduced to two. Article III, Section 5: No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion. Article II, Section 6: The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable. Article III, Section 5: No law shall be madeprohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights. These provisions are usually referred to as the non-establishment clause and
Volume 41 Number 4
Pulpit and Platform: Discovering the Role of the Church in the State
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602, 614 (1971). It has not, for instance, prevented the State from giving aid to sectarian schools. (Everson v. Board of Educ., 330 U.S. 1 (1047) (bus transportation); Board of Educ. V. Allen, 392 U.S. 236 (1968) textbooks); Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971) (teachers salaries, textbooks instructional materials); Earley v. DiCenso, 403 U.S. 602 (1971) (teachers salaries); Tilton v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 672 (1971) (secular college facilities); Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756 (1973) (maintenance and repair grants, tuition reimbursement and income tax relief). For our purpose, however, what is important to note is that the non-establishment clause, like the other provisions of the Bill of Rights, is a command addressed to the State. Thus only the State can violate it. As far as the churches are concerned, they can be beneficiaries of State violation of non-establishment but not the violator. Thus when politicians cry violation of church and state by the Church and by churchmen, what they are really doing is violating not only the free exercise clause but also freedom of speech and expression. 2. The free exercise clause I now come to free exercise of religion. The key provision on free exercise is found, like the provision on non-establishment, in Article III, Section 5. No law shall be madeprohibiting the free exercise thereof. Not content with that, Section 5 adds two other clauses: The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights. Cantwell v. Connecticut (310 U.S. 296, 303-, 1940) neatly summarized the meaning of the free exercise clause thus: The constitutional inhibition on legislation on the subject of religion has a double aspect. On the one hand, it forestalls compulsion by law of the acceptance of any creed or the practice of any form of worship. Freedom of conscience and freedom to adhere to such religious organization or form of worship as the individual may choose cannot be restricted by law. On the other hand, it safeguards the free exercise of the chose form of religion. Thus the amendment embraces two conceptsfreedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things, the second cannot be. The government is thus absolutely prohibited from inquiring into the truth of what a person believes. The moment, however, belief flows over into action, it becomes subject to government regulation. As I always tell my students, you are constitutionally free to believe that human sacrifice is the best form of worship. But the moment you tie up your mother in law, place her on an altar block and build a fire under it, you are inviting state intervention. A violation of the free exercise clause by the state can come in the form of either prohibition or compulsion. Philippine cases on free exercise of religion are relatively few but not uninteresting. Let me just focus for a while on the prohibition of religious test for the exercise of civil or political rights. This prohibition is a corollary of the guarantee of religious liberty. The purpose of this provision is to render government powerless to restore the historically and constitutionally discredited policy of probing religious beliefs by test oaths or limiting public offices to persons who have, or perhaps more properly, profess to have a belief in some particular kind of religious concept. (Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488, 494,1961). When the religious test that is imposed by law is overt and clear, the constitutional problem it presents is easy to resolve. Torcaso v. Watkins presented a clear case. At issue there was the state law which required belief in the existence of God as a qualification for a notary public commission. The Supreme Court had no difficulty in declaring the law to be an unconstitutional religious test. Another case is when the law prohibits a cleric from running for public office. This too has been rejected as unconstitutional. (McDAniel v. Paty, 435 US 618 (1978); Pamil v Teleron, L-34854, November 20, 1978). More recently, you will recall that the Supreme Court was asked to prohibit Cardinal Sin, Mike Velarde and other religious leaders from giving directions to their adherents on how to vote. The case was dismissed on technical grounds but the substantive question remains alive, at least in the mind of some. One person who expressed in very strong language his opposition to religious involvement in politics was Barry Goldwater. The occasion was when the Moral Majority leader Jerry Falwell criticized the nomination of Sandra Day OConnor to the Supreme Court. Goldwater
said: The great decisions of government cannot be dictated by the concerns of religious factions We have succeeded for 205 years in keeping the affairs of the state from the uncompromising idealism of religious groups, and we mustnt stop now! Eloquent the words may be, but the second sentence could not have been more inaccurate historically. Whether you measure it against American history or Philippine history, the statement is false. Churches have influence American politics from the days of Jefferson down to the prophetic preaching of Martin Luther King and the pastoral letters of the American Bishops. Likewise in the Philippines religion has been involved in politics from the days of Fathers Gomez, Burgos and Zamora down to the pastoral letters on social justice and on the conduct of elections. I do not see this involvement coming to an end. Depending on circumstances, it can even intensify. Thus it is legitimate to ask how religion fits into the Philippine political culture. The issue can be broken down into several questions. (1) In their sermons and homilies, should religious leaders limit themselves to teaching general moral ideas,
e
obligation for all believers. Moreover, I also believe that, when it comes to contests for the formation of public policy, individuals cannot effectively deal with the vastness and complexity of issues. There is therefore need for organized action. But whether engaging in individual or in organized action, the questions I have enumerated need to be dealt with. For me, the simplest among the question is whether a member of the clergy, particularly on who runs a parish or diocese, should run for public office. Constitutionally, the prevailing view is that there is no constitutional obstacle for a cleric running for office. As to the obstacle arising from Canon Law prescription, it is not insurmountable. What remains therefore is a question of prudence or propriety. My view on this is that combining public office and religious ministry can strain churchstate relation and community unity. I would therefore follow the principle that one must choose between being fully a church minister or a public official. Combining the two can be both religiously and politically unhealthy. Another important question touches on the substance of the preaching of clergy and religious. By preaching I do not simply refer to sermons and homilies in church. In include any public or semi-public pronouncements. Should the clergy and churches limit themselves to teaching general moral ideas or may they advocate as conclusions specific political actions? Certainly no one will deny the clergy the right to preach about morality. That is their task and they would be remiss in their duties if they habitually avoid moral issues. Thus, no one should deny them the right to discuss publicly whether abortion is moral or immoral, or that the rich should or should not help the poor, or that employers should or should not pay workers a living wage, or that homosexual acts are sinful or not, or that wars are or are not morally wrong. This is all part of ordinary religious preaching. It is a different matter, however, when out of general moral teachings specific public positions are advocated such as impeachment, charter change, or even the banning of jueteng. Of course, there are specific conclusions that flow naturally from general positions. For instance, if a priest believes that consensual sexual acts of homosexuals done in the privacy of their bedrooms are not harmful to the public, the natural conclusion would be that they should not be criminalized. But spe-
ARTICLES
cific practical conclusions do not always come out naturally. The fact that an act is clearly sinful does not lead to the easy conclusion that therefore it should be penalized. If they were, our prisons would be more crowded than they already are. Why is it that people sometimes do not want their religious leaders to tell them what specific actions they should take or what political conclusions they should make? I believe that it is all part and parcel of being a citizen of a democracy. I have my own mind. Dont insult me. Let me draw my own conclusion! this is a perfectly legitimate attitude. To avoid alienating people who have such an attitude, a cleric must carefully and respectfully present his conclusions. If the practical conclusions are presented as the product of ones own study and are presented for people to agree or disagree with, then no one should feel insulted or offended. Another objection to specific pronouncements by clerics is that their competence and their access to needed facts for drawing conclusions are limited. Rarely is their expertise related to economics, law, sociology, or politics, etc. but specific conclusions about the morality of economic or political decisions can depend very much on the dynamics and nuances of these specialized fields. If the cleric has competence in these fields, then his conclusion can be more persuasive. But it is also good to remember that the people whose task it is to make important decisions that impact on the lives of people do not always have the needed expertise on what they may be talking about. Some lawmakers easily talk through their hat. Ego vero neminem nomino. But this no reason for a cleric to be reckless. While a cleric, however, should not be reckless in his statements, neither should he be inordinately pusillanimous. There are political and economic decisions that have great moral significance. These should be faced, with prudence, yes, but not with cowardly avoidance of conflict. Risks are part of the apostolic mission. Clerics do make mistakes, out of carelessness perhaps or through excess of zeal or even for more foolish reasons. But in my own estimate, mistakes and all, courageous stand of clerics and churches do more good than harm. The courage of the churches in the Philippines has made significant contribution to improving economic and political life. I
(This piece is lifted with permission from the talk given by Fr. Joaquin Bernas, SJ, at the Central Seminary of the University of Santo Tomas.)
or should they draw specific political conclusions? 2) Should they oppose or support particular political parties or candidates? (3) Should they refrain from running for public office? (4) Should they engage in movements that put pressure on political officials, e.g., through lobbying and demonstrations? (5) Should they advocate specific policy conclusions or should they limit themselves to general recommendations? (6) When engaging in debate on public issues, should they use religious arguments or only secular arguments? These are some of the questions that come up when one analyzes the objections to religious involvement in politics. They invite discussion and I shall attempt to present my own think on the subject. First of all, it is not enough to say the Constitution guarantees the freedom of expression of the clergy. The issue transcends mere constitutionality. Nor is it enough to assert that through the centuries Judaism and Christianity have firmly held that religious duty includes active involvement in politics and that Scripture indicates that God cares about justice and public morality. I too firmly believe that the pursuit of justice and morality is a religious
Abedin Taherkenareh/epa/Corbis
Volume 41 Number 4
ARTICLES
arital intimacy is one aspect of family relationship which has been the subject of so much controversy amongst married couples, the Church and the government. The subject has been recently exploited by extremist groups and is the bone of contention of various family planning proponents. In the Catholic Church, only natural family planning (NFP) methods are licit. Which NFP method is best should be left to the discretion and discernment of couples who decide to achieve, to postpone, or to avoid pregnancy. Natural Family Planning was known as Periodic Abstinence or Periodic Continence in the 19th century, and it is now included under the Fertility Awareness Based Methods of Family Planning. Church teaching does not in any way identify or specify any particular natural family planning method as a preferred or favored method for Christian couples. Determination of or the monitoring of the fertile and infertile days is left to the couples and does not preclude the use of calendars, thermometers, computers, beads or other instruments to aid them in doing so. Church teachings only prohibit direct interventions to the act of procreation. The need for scientific studies to aid couples in determining their periods of fertility or sterility is included in Pope Paul VIs Encyclical Letter Humane Vitae number 24 which states We wish now to express our encouragement to men of science, who can considerably advance the welfare of marriage and the family, along with peace of conscience, if by pooling their efforts they labor to explain more thoroughly the various conditions favoring a proper regulation of births. It is particularly desirable that according to the wish already expressed by Pope Pius XII, medical science succeed in providing a sufficiently secure basis for a regulation of birth, founded on the observance of natural rhythms. The Institute for Reproductive Health of Georgetown University with funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) developed the Standard Days Method, a modern scientific method of natural family planning. The SDM is a calendar-based method, and is taught as such. One way of identifying the fertile and infertile periods of a woman includes cycle calculations based on the observation of the first day of a womans cycle. In the case of the SDM, the calculations have been done for women whose cycles are within
10
1. Regarding the terms reproductive health care and reproductive health, the Holy See considers these terms in a more general concept of health. These terms embrace, each in its own way, the person in the entirety of his or her personality, mind and body. They foster the achievement of personal maturity in sexuality and in the mutual love and decision making that characterize the conjugal relationship in accordance with moral norms. The Holy See rejects the act of abortion or access to abortion as a dimension of these terms. 2. With reference to the terms family planning and family life education, in as much as it includes family planning, and any other terms regarding family planning education and services, the Holy See reiterates its well-known position concerning those family planning meth-
Volume 41 Number 4
11
STATEMENTS
isters and brothers here and in all the world, we greet you in the name of our Risen Lord and ask God to fill you with the joy and the strength of the resurrection. Having opposed early Christians and, indeed, sought to bring many of them to trial for their faith, St. Paul was suddenly challenged by our Blessed Lord as he journeyed to Damascus. Within a short time he became a powerful messenger for Jesus. Reading his various epistles we see he has much to say on many aspects of the Christian faith. The statement he sets before the Philippians is regarded by many people as the most powerful: All I want is to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and to share his sufferings. In this short sentence he links the cross and the Resurrection. The sufferings he had to face for his faith lead him to become conscious of the power of the Resurrection given to those who truly believe, through the power of the Holy Spirit. Yet again, recent months have shown us much of the hardships and sufferings people have to endure, not least in this land. Much of this burden has arisen from mans inhumanity to men together with the deprivation of basic human dignity and rights, all caused by the siege imposed upon us. Our Blessed Lord challenges all of us; if we are to be his disciples we must take up our cross and follow him. In the midst of sufferings, we reach for the power of the Resurrection and the power of the Spirit that enables us to take away the oppressions that are imposed upon us. So, as we celebrate the joy of Easter we must examine carefully where we stand in relation to God. Many of us need to abandon the selfish instinct within us. If we truly seek the power of the Resurrection in our lives, then we must disre-
of trust and all can enjoy the same freedom and the same dignity. Then we would ask that you make a particular effort to encourage your particular nation to stop the embargo imposed upon us and to restore its aid to the Palestinians. Many vital areas of community are in a desperate plight as a result of the withholding of this aid, not least [among them, areas of] justice, economy, medicine and education, etc. As all Christians across the world celebrate Easter together we wish everyone, at home and abroad, that joy which our Blessed Lords resurrection brings. We ask God to bestow upon all the joy and the power of the resurrection so that the words of Jesus become real as he said: I came so that they might have life and have it more abundantly (John 10:10). Christ is Risen! He is risen indeed! May you experience a happy and holy Easter! Patriarchs and Heads of the Churches in Jerusalem Patriarch Theophilos III of Jerusalem Patriarch Michel Sabbah, R.C. Latin Patriarch Torkom I Manooghian, Armenian Orthodox Father Pierbattista Pizzaballa, OFM, Custos of the Holy Land Archbishop Anba Abraham, Coptic Orthodox Archbishop Swerios Malki Murad, Syrian-Orthodox Archbishop Abouna Mattias, Ethiopian Orthodox Archbishop Paul Sayyah, Maronite Bishop Suheil Dawani, Anglican Bishop Munib Younan, Lutheran Bishop Pierre Malki, SyrianCatholic Archbishop Georges Michel Bakar, Greek Catholic Father Rafael Minassian, Armenian Catholic
12
STATEMENTS
Re-living the Story: the Gift of Easter
t is with that message that we climax the cel ebration of Holy Week which started with Palm Sunday, leading to the Last Supper in Holy Thursday, with the night vigil, and Visita Iglesia, then the Stations of the Cross and its Veneration on Good Friday. A lot of people listened and reflected on the Seven Last Words of Jesus from the Cross. The real message of Holy Week is not only that Jesus Christ died for us, but that Jesus Christ also gave us hope for new life by rising to life from the dead. And so: The Lord is risen as he has foretold. Alleluia. All four Gospels narrate the event of the Resurrection with their respective nuances, indicating the individual authors reflection with insight on the historic event. All four evangelistsMark, Matthew, Luke and Johnnarrate that it was the women-disciples of Jesus, led by Mary Magdalene, a former sinner, who bravely came to the tomb and found Jesus was no longer there. This Gospel detail shows that sinners are also objects of the Resurrection news and can be channels through whom the Good News will spread. It was through the witness of women that the male-disciples of Jesus came to know about the Resurrection. Mary Magdalene and the other women were the ones instructed: Go tell his disciples and Peter that he is going ahead of you to Galilee, there you will see him (Mk. 16/17). St. Mark includes the initial and logical reaction of the women. Faced with an
extraordinary and unexpected event, it was natural for them to doubt and not to immediately act. In St. Lukes and St. Johns accounts that was also the initial reaction of the apostles: one of disbelief and wonderment (Lk. 24/41, Jn. 20/9). The Resurrection account in the Gospel of St. Matthew emphasizes one detail to solve doubt and unbelief. The appearance of an angel at the tomb, while frightening to the soldiers, was intended to dispel the fear of the women: Do not be afraid. I know that you are looking for Jesus who was crucified. He is not here. He has been raised, as he said. Come and see the place where he lay (Mt. 28/5-6). Matthew emphasizes the role of seeing in believing and in dispelling doubt. That is what happened to the women. That is what happened also to the other disciples. They were told not to be afraid (Mt. 28/10). They were told to see, to look at the empty tomb. For, somehow, to see is to believe. This is told in particular about the beloved disciple who reached the tomb ahead of St. Peter: He saw and believed (Jn. 20/8). But here, seeing can also mean seeing not only with the eyes, but also with the open mind. And for us in our time to see the resurrection is to believe in the witness of credible lives down through the centuries. The Resurrected Jesus himself removed the disciples doubt and disbelief, by opening their minds to understand the scriptures
Re-living / p. 26
e has let us know the mystery of his purpose, the hidden plan he so kindly made in Christ from the beginning to act upon when the times had run their course to the end; that he would bring everything together under Christ, as head, everything on earth (Eph. 1:9-10). St. Paul teaches us that Gods plan of salvation has this goal: one, holy society. One, holy society is taken up by our 2007 Alay Kapwa (AK) Evangelization Campaign when it proposes this theme: Katotohanan at Katarungan: Hamon sa Sambayanan Tungo sa Pagkakaisa at Kabanalan. Building a society which is one and holy requires witnessing to truth and justice. Witnessing to truth and justice is the challenge we must face. Philippine society today is in crisis. Two radical causes are chronic lies and rampant injustices. Cheating during elections, graft and corrupt practices are glaring examples of lies and injustices. The Catechism for Filipino Catholics (CFC) teaches us that lying plants seeds of division and mistrust in the minds of others, and thus weakens the whole network of social relationships which constitute the community (#1233). Injustices on the other hand destroy harmony: between individuals; between the state and its citizens; between states; and between a state and the community of nations (cf. Blessed John XXIII, Pacem in Terris, passim). To promote truth and justice in our society and, consequently, to facilitate the building
of one and holy Philippine society means to follow Jesus Christ who is the Way, the Truth and the Light (Jn. 14:6). And obey his will for us to hunger and thirst for what is right (Mt. 5:6). CFC states that Christ calls all Christians not only to a personal conversion of mind and heart. He also calls us to social responsibility, to work for the renewal of our communities, through love, justice, peace and freedom (#1135). In concrete, AK 2007 specifically challenges all believers in God, to have a paradigm shift from an unenlightened and passive member of Philippine society to an enlightened and active participant of social transformation. This means: (1) vote into office candidates who are committed to the common good, honest and competent; (2) monitor the performance of elected officials through lifestyle check and performance chart; (3) participate in the electoral processespolitical education, cleansing of voters lists, poll watching, vote count, among others; (4) campaign against charter change through a constituent assembly; (5) safeguard the nationalist and ecology friendly provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. Tough challenges all. But God is with us. May Mary, Mother of Social Justice, accompany us in our mission of building a Philippine society which is united and morally upright. Dinualdo D. Gutierrez, D.D. Chair, CBCP-ECSA-JP National Director, NASSA-JP
Volume 41 Number 4
13
STATEMENTS
s we enter Holy Week to commemorate the passion, death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, allow usyour pastorsto invite you to a communal examination of conscience over the serious problem of corruption in our country in general, and, in our beloved province of Pampanga, in particular. To be able to do this, let us begin, not by pointing an accusing finger on anybody, but by humbly admitting our own part in this social sin, in what we have done, and what we have failed to do. Let us feel genuine sorrow in our hearts either for having engaged actively in corrupt social practices, or for having tolerated them through our sheer inaction, indifference, or cynicism. Let us try to do concrete penance, not just individually, but also collectively, with a sincere resolve to make up for our actions and omissions through which we may have contributed to the aggravation of the social and moral disease that is afflicting the Pampanga society. The prophet Isaiah once called the whole Israelite nation to conversion, not by merely putting on sackcloth and ashes, or by merely engaging in ritual piety. Rather, he said, Put away your corruption from before my eyes; reject evil, choose the good, seek what is right (Isaiah 1:16-17a). He went back to the most basic kind of electionthe choice for good against evil, the choice for right against wrong, the choice for truth against falsehood. This is the same kind of choice that the Lord is also asking of us Capampangans, as we are again preparing for electionsone of the most precious expressions of democracy, but also one of the most flawed exercises in the political affairs of our country. Too often have we heard such cynical expressions as Let us leave politics to politicians...We have no choice anyway...That is none of our
camouflaged by the legal small town lottery (STL), making it easier for the former to carry on with its operation under the very noses of local government officials and law enforcers of the province. In the context of the forthcoming elections, we have reason to be seriously worried that money from jueteng will again serve as a decisive factor for the victory of certain candidates. Over the issue of questionable quarrying, we likewise echo the statement of the CBCP on January 29, 2006, over the ill effects of indiscriminate mining activities that do not abide by basic environmental laws and regulations, and which are suspiciously tolerated by government agencies that are supposed to be responsible for their monitoring. Our parish communities, especially those located in the vicinity of major quarry sites have reason to be worried for their safety especially during the rainy seasons, knowing how local government leaders have kept quiet about the absence of such safety measures. Furthermore, serious allegations of corruption involving millions of funds generated from quarrying activities in the province have yet to be accounted for by the people involved. Such allegations inevitably raise the issue about the possibility that the provincial government is being deprived of the muchneeded revenues that could be used for projects that will benefit the people. Again, in the context of the forthcoming elections, we have reason to be seriously worried that money from questionable quarrying may also serve as a decisive factor for the victory of certain candidates. As citizens of this country, we call on the faithful to actively participate in the forthcoming electoral exercise, either through partisan or nonpartisan forms of political involvement. It is the duty of our Catholic laity, in particular, to
14
STATEMENTS
exert all efforts possible so that qualified, capable, honest, and God-fearing candidateswho can be instrumental in effecting change in politics towards good governanceare elected into office. It is also the duty of our Catholic laity, in collaboration with the religious and the clergy, to take an active part in the PPC-RVinitiated activities such as the education of voters towards a more discerning exercise of their right to vote, as well as in the guarding of votes on all levels of counting and canvassing, from the precinct to the municipal, to the provincial, up to the national levels. To insist upon the seriousness of this task, we recall the recent CBCP pastoral statement (January 28, 2007) that said, Many of our current political problems, which have hindered fuller economic development and social justice, especially for the poor, can be traced to unresolved questions concerning the conduct of past elections. As a nation, we cannot afford yet another controversial electoral exercise that further aggravates social distrust and hopelessness. As leaders of the Church, we challenge all candidates running for any government position in Pampanga to categorically and truthfully declare in public that they have not beenand will never beinvolved in JUETENG AND OTHER FORMS OF ILLEGAL GAMBLING, INDISCRIMINATE AND CORRUPT QUARRYING, VOTE-BUYING, ANY FORM OF CHEATING IN THE ELECTIONS, EXORBITANT CAMPAIGNING,VIOLENCE& EXTRA-JUDICIALKILLINGS, ILLEGAL DRUG BUSINESS. We call on all voters, especially the Catholic faithful, to reject any candidate who cannot truthfully and resolutely make any of the declarations listed above. We remind the faithful of their baptismal promise to reject evil, greater or lesser, and to choose the good at all times. We urge them also to remain vigilant even after election, over corrupt, immoral, and illegal practices in governance. We urge the laity to encourage and support decent, upright, qualified, and capable alternative candidates and to come up with multi-sectoral organizations and movements for good governance. We call especially on our youth to celebrate our Easter hope by rejecting cynicism and indifference, and by redirecting their energies towards the renewal of society. Dear brothers and sisters, we are a people of God whose Lenten task is to turn our backs from our sinful ways in order to face our Risen Lord. We invite our faithful, the voters and candidates to join all Christians in making the journey to Calvary where our Lord reigns on the throne of the Cross with love and forgiveness. May this love saturate our activities and purify our politics from hatreds and divisions. For it is only through our conversion that we can bring about a new province built on justice and love. As we celebrate our traditional Easter Salubongs reenactment of the removal of the black veil of sorrow from the Blessed Mother in her encounter with her Risen Son, we pray that the shroud of sinfulness that envelops our province be also taken away to give us a glimpse of the restored dignity of our people and our leaders redeemed by a God of love. Through the intercession of Virgen de los Remedios and Saint Joseph, we ask the Risen Lord to heal our province through the moral vision and power of the Gospel. May the Servant-Kingship of the Risen Christ, not the lure of power and wealth, lead and transform our beloved Pampanga. Issued here in the City of San Fernando, Pampanga, this 31st of March 2007. Paciano B. Aniceto, DD Archbishop of San Fernando, Pampanga Take an Active Part
My dear Reverend Fathers, Religious Sisters and Brothers, Lay Women and Men: May the Peace of the Risen Lord be with you all! The resurrection of Jesus Christ, is not only a historical event, a thing of the past. It is a reality that continues to have relevance in the present, in your life and mine a life that serves the truth and brings light and hope to a darkened and despairing world. The Letter of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) to Dioceses and Parishes dated 28 January 2007 expresses this relevance thus: In these two years past, we are only too aware, it has become easier to succumb to apathy and hopelessness about our country and its political life. But as followers of the crucified and risen Lord, we are called never to lose hope that creates energy and the love that creates responsibility. Therefore, let us be the followers of the crucified and risen Lord we are called to be. Let us be bringers of hope in the coming 14 May elections. May the following be of help: 1. We exhort the qualified and registered voters: GO OUT AND VOTE. It is your right and responsibility. 2. We plead with passion: Voters, DO NOT SELL YOUR VOTE; Candidates, DO NOT BUY VOTES! 3. We encourage the parishioners, the LOMAS (lay organizations, movements, associations and societies) in the parishes, and BECs: HELP MAKE THE 2007 ELECTIONS A CHAMP (clean, honest, authentic, meaningful, peaceful). Volunteer and get involved in our PPCRV (Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting) DSAC (Diocesan Social Action Center) activities such as voters education, poll watch and vote count. 4.We ask our lay leaders who are candidates: RESIGN OR TAKE A LEAVE OF ABSENCE FROM YOUR PARISH/ DIOCESANRESPONSIBILITIES.Thelayleaderswhowill win shall continue to be considered resigned or on leave. Those who will lose may re-apply and be re-admitted to their previous parish/diocesan responsibilities if approved by the proper decision-making body or authority. This statement is valid for the 14 May elections and succeeding ones unless revised by the proper authority. I end with the final exhortation of the CBCP letter: The Lord of truth and justice be with us all in this crucial undertaking to his greater praise and glory. And may Mary, Our Lady of Peace, intercede for us. I also bless you and your endeavors. Sincerely yours in Christ, Romulo T. De La Cruz, D.D. Bishop of San Jose de Antique 10 April 2007
Volume 41 Number 4
15
n theory, it is taught that in governance, all power derives from the people and the goal of politics is the common good. Because, by themselves, individuals, families and groups, cannot achieve full development in order to live a truly human life, it is the task of politics to make available to them the necessary material, cultural, moral and spiritual goods. Consequently, office holders are placed in power by the people not only to reconcile the particular goods of groups and individuals, but also to interpret common goods according to the guidelines of the majority and the effective good of all people. In view of the enormity of this responsibility, one cannot but admire politiciansthose who choose to undertake the heavy burden of this task. Politics: A Struggle for Power among the Elite But if the Philippine experience has anything to tell us, it is that politics is essentially a power game, played by a few elite, that hardly makes any marked improvement in the lives of the poor, since the common good is scarcely its goal. Of course, one can object that this is a generalization, and to generalize is to falsify, but still, it provides us a pattern, a framework, and a certain viewpoint to understand its workings. It does not, it is to be admitted, offer the whole truth which is beyond the capacity of an essay as short as this but it has something truthful to say. Who play the game? Philippine politics, especially in the national scene, is almost exclusive of the few who are rich, or their agents. Historically, the landowning class dominated politics before World War II, but partly because of the development of commerce and industry, the class of big businessmen and industrialists replaced it after the war. When Ferdinand Marcos ran the country through martial law, he replaced the post-war wealthy class with his own, but after EDSA I, the post-war elite repositioned themselves within the ruling class. Philippine politics is thus a game of the elite. But it is elitist both because those who play it are the few who are rich, and also because it has historically denied the active participation by the poor in the highest decision-making bodies. Probably not a single person who occupied a chair in the senate or in the house has been known to be poor, even if political aspirants tended to identify themselves with the poor. Diosdado Macapagal, I recall,
was known as the poor boy from Lubao. Joseph Estrada was perceived to be poor, and made Erap para sa mahirap his campaign slogan. Of course, one might today point to the existence of the party-list system that the post-Marcos constitution instituted, but as the Inquirer editorial (Apr 2, 2007 ) noted, the mechanism remains imperfect, even though it is impressive: impressive because it seeks to imbed representatives of the poor and the marginalized in Congress, which remains a bastion of the rich and privileged; imperfect, because partylist representatives sometimes turn out to be as privileged and well-connected as any traditional politician. Indeed, some of these party lists are connected with the entrenched oligarchy. A case in point is the first three nominees of the Ahon Pinoy, a party-list group newly accredited by the Comelec, which seeks to represent overseas Filipino workers most of whom are really poor and marginalized. These nominees, according to the editorial, are not OFWs, and cannot by any stretch of imagination be considered underprivileged: Ernesto Herrera III is a son of a labor leader and former senator, Bernardo Ople is a brother of a late labor secretary, senator and foreign secretary, and Dante Francis Ang is a son of a publisher and close Arroyo ally. Thus, even what is intended for the underprivileged could be circumvented and used to place the elite in power. In this game, it is the elite that vie for power among themselves. In a way, our politics could be described as a struggle for power among the rich and privileged who are more concerned with their own advantage and that of their own class than with the advantage of the majority who are poor. If it is not self-interest of the elite that guides politics, history and the present experience do not bear it out. Power, Aggrandizement and the Beneficiaries Why this vying for political power? Probably no one might say it explicitly, but it appears that political power gives the elite opportunities to increase their wealth. Indeed, to capture political power is to self-aggrandize. As Claro M. Recto observed as early as 1958, ours is essentially a pragmatic and a very simple [political education]. It boils down to opportunism through public office All the political offices [that is, from president to municipal mayor, from senator to municipal
councilor, etc.] are the open sesame to wealth and influence It is because of this political education that we have the elite of officials who, after several years of holding public office have been able to build from nothing handsome fortunes of varying magnitude on the opportunities afforded by the offices they held. Political power, in other words, is convertible to economic power. As President Diosdado Macapagal once noted, the president and the members of congress have powers that are so vast and potent that economic interests enter into a mutually protective alliance with them which results in a concentration of economic benefits in their combined hands.
16
C O V E R S T O R Y
17
tween Fires, his term ended with a year that witnessed a deterioration of conditions for many of the poor. How power brings opportunities to wealth is probably a given in our politics. One who was glued to the TV during the impeachment trial of Estrada would recall that the prosecution presented witnesses and evidence on the former presidents involvement in illegal gambling and his maintenance of secret bank accounts, although his defense panel denied these allegations. It was also reported that when Marcos fled the country, the US Customs agents found suitcases of gold bricks and diamond jewelry. It is also alleged that they had certificates for gold bullion valued at billions of dollars. Imelda, of course, pointed out that his husband was already rich even before he became president, because he was already engaged in gold bars business. The use of public office for self-aggrandizement brings with it graft and corruption. Says David Timberman in his book, A Changeless Land: The use of public office for personal or highly particularistic purposes causes recurring cycles of scandal or alleged scandal at every level of government. The political outs charge the ins with corruption and abuse of power, only to have the same charges leveled at them if and when they
take office. Indeed, it is a paradox of Philippine politics that corruption is assumed to be endemic to politics and government, but at the same time exposing corruption is a time-tested political tactic and guaranteed vote-getter. The prevalence of corruption is a serious problem, but perhaps even more serious is the widespread presumption that corruption is unavoidable. This perpetuates the problem, reduces the credibility of political leaders and most importantly undermines the legitimacy of political institutions. In her book, Christianity Versus Corruption, Miriam Defensor Santiago presents a corruption case study in our country, and goes over various corruption scandals: P35.7 B laundered money scandal, P200 B national debt scandal, P60 B oil firms tax credit scam, P25 B IMPSA power contract scandal, P20 B IMPSA power contract midnight deal, P9.2 B centennial exposition public works scandal, P7.5 B congressional initiative allocation scandal, to mention a few in her enumeration. And yet, one wonders whether, in our history since pre-war politics, there has been a single high official from senator to president convicted of graft and corruption. That these seem to cease to scandalize, still less ignite public outrage simply indicates that people expect leaders to be corrupt. Indeed, although politicians are
18
C O V E R S T O R Y wont to level charges of corruption against their opponents come election period, yet there has hardly been any record of taking their accusation seriously to the point of bringing them to court, most likely because it would undermine the oligarchic class, affecting many people, and because the issue would be divisive. What about plunder? Plunder is simply a logical consequence of power politics for self-aggrandizement and power perpetuation. One is tempted to think that some of the elite assume the idea, like the kings of the old Europe did, that everything in their kingdom in a way belongs to them. It seems difficult to really distinguish what belongs to the government and what belongs to the ruling elite; otherwise, plunder would not be possible. In our political history, two presidents have been accused of plunder: Marcos and Estrada. Elections as Tool to Gain and Preserve Power If politics is viewed as politics of power, elections must be seen not just as a political exercise in which people choose those who will hold public office. Rather, they constitute a struggle among the elite to capture the power of the state. Elections, in other words, are a form of war in which opposing wealthy individuals seek to place themselves in a political advantage. Elections thus resolve the question as to who among the elite should have control over the countrys wealth and resources. Todays conduct of elections has reinforced the elites control of the wealth and resources because it costs a fortune to be elected to government positions. Since only the moneyed can afford to buy votes, give substantial donations, provide entertainment, engage in nationwide campaign, bribe officials, and use other means, fair or foul, it is logical why only the elite can run for public office. Many towns suffer a dearth of candidates, not because no one is intellectually qualified, but because few have the capacity to finance their candidacy. So, even at the local level, governance is becoming dominated by the local elite. Elections are therefore not opportunities for people to choose the best who can govern them, but not infrequently to choose who among the elite will have access to power. The result is that, elections have become an instrument for the continued dominance of the elite. Equally important, elections also function as a legitimization of that dominance, even if it is less than just. To lend credibility to his martial law regime that has been under attack from foreign observers and to appease restive citizens, Marcos allowed elections to be held in 1978. The result, which was condemned by the opposition as fraudulent, legitimized the Marcosian dominance, since his party, Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL), won 151 out of 161 seats. To legitimize his long tenure in office as president, Marcos called for presidential elections in 1981, in which he won by a margin of over 16 M votes or 91.4% against Alejo Santos of the Nacionalista Party who got 8.6% only. Of course, the largest opposition party at that time, Ninoy Aquinos Laban, seeing through the farce, did not field any candidate. Needless to say, the conduct of elections practically disenfranchises the poor. While it is true that theoretically, a poor man can run for president or senator, in practice, only the rich have the capacity to do so, for reasons we have noted above. Instrument of Elite Dominance and Power Perpetuation If monopolies are distributed among cronies, it is because, in order to survive and perpetuate themselves in power, the elite must share the benefits of power with their own trusted men. Which is why, ours has been described as politics of patronage. Says the CBCP Catechism: Derived from the feudal system of master and servant, the politics of patronage considers the relationship between public servant and ordinary citizen as that of patron (master) and client (servant). Rewards or benefits are distributed according to the loyalty of clients to their patrons. Clients or voters depend on their patron or public officials for every development project or assistance, and solutions to community problems. Rewards or development projects are distributed, then, on the basis not of justice due to people but on the basis of the government officials kindness and the loyalty of the people to the public official. Thus political leaders and followers who show support are rewarded with projects, money or jobs. Dependence and subservience, passivity and inaction on the part of citizens are characteristic of such a system. This accounts for the lack of viable organizations among the poor on the one hand, and the concentration of wealth on the other. Patronage politics helps the well-entrenched elite perpetuate themselves in office in three ways. First, people are so placed in debt that they have to pay in votes come election time. Second, a network of political relations is built and expanded within their political turf and becomes a machinery to assure victory. Third, it divides people into those who are loyal and those who are not, the better for the politicians to forestall any move by the clients to independently organize themselves into a powerful body. Pork Barrel, which is part of patronage politics, is one of the instruments of power perpetuation, though, admittedly, it has other uses. In the Philippines, probably because of its not so edifying connotations, it came under different brands Countrywide Development Fund (CDF) and Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF). At present, each senator
Volume 41 Number 4
19
C O V E R S T O R Y gets P200 M in pork barrel allocations, while each congressman receives P65 M. Those who benefit from it naturally continue to be indebted to the politician, and therefore could be counted upon for votes in the next elections. Having stayed long in office, some politicians seem to have developed a stance that treats public office as a family title that could be passed on from one generation to the next, That is to say, political power is perpetuated through family dynasty. One is led to conclude that the office practically becomes a family asset that protects its own business and other interests and shields it from political jeopardy. This probably explains why through generations we are familiar with surnames associated with politics, because they come up in almost every election period. Some of these well-known names may be mentioned: AquinosBenigno, Sr, Benigno Jr, Noynoy, Tessie, and Herminio. OsmeasSergio Sr, Sergio Jr, Lito, Sergio III. EstradasJoseph, Loi, Jinggoy, JV, Emilio Ramon. Marcoses Ferdinand, Imelda, Ferdinand Jr, Imee. Disenfranchisement of the Poor Because politics is meant for the continued dominance of the elite, the wealthy never really work for what could fundamentally better the lot of the poor. For one thing, they seem to think that what is good for them is also good for the constituents. If one may not admit that the ruling elite are deliberately blind to the needs of the poor, one has to say that they have a narrow worldview. As Miriam Defensor Santiago puts it, the biggest problem in our culture is that many among the Metro Manila rich identify their selfish private interests with the general interests of the public; and their narrow social values, with national values. The rich think that what is good for them is necessarily good for the country. This is the root cause of massive poverty in the Third World. Over the decades, the rich have succeeded in identifying their own social organization with the peace and order of society in general. Because of this worldview, the rich consider themselves the apostles of law and order. They support reform, but never a meaningful, even if peaceful, revolution. They will support reform as long as they remain rich, and the poor remain where they are. Their kind of reform is not only incremental, but also self-interested. Their obsession with peace is tied to their privileges under the status quo. This is why the rich must assume responsibility for widespread poverty. Indeed, even party-list mechanism, which was crafted into the 1987 Constitution with good intentions, could be used to advance the cause of the dominant power. Though the principle behind the system is lofty, it has been used, often enough, says a PDI editorial (Apr 3, 07), to smuggle political players into Congress, through the party-list backdoor. If Akbayan party-list Rep. Etta Rosales is correct, the Arroyo administration is now in the middle of an attempt to smuggle in its own party-list representative through that same door. Last week, she charged that the Comelec had accredited at least 11 suspect party-list groups, with varying degrees of connection to Malacaang or Palace officials. The object is clear: The administration has seen the potent role played by a bloc of like-minded party-list representatives in both attempts to impeach the President. Now, it wants to fill the party-list seats with friendly bodies. Politics in the Philippines: A History of Power Transfer It appears that Philippine politics is by and large a history of transfer of political power from one set of elite families to another, or within the same class. From 1946 to 1968, political powers changed hands largely between the two parties the Liberals and the Nacionalistas, which were both peopled by wealthy individuals. Neither of the two parties made any fundamental changes in the system, even though the party in power was always accused by the other of not giving the people a better deal. In the 1970s, Marcos declared martial law to destroy the oligarchic structure of society, but he ended up with crony capitalism by distributing monopolies to his own cronies. When Marcos fell from power in 1986, the elite that were removed from the center of power and privilege were restored and repositioned and continued the same elite politics. Now, in the 2007 elections, we principally have Genuine Opposition vs. Team Unity, but from the point of view of principles and outlook, one has difficulty in finding their marked differences, except in terms of personalities. It is simply a power struggle between two elite groups vying for power, pro-GMA and anti-GMA, but their agenda do not bear fundamental differences. Of course, seasons, personalities and names in our political history change, but the system that the elite ruling class had installed before the war remains the same. The majority, on the other hand, remains mired in poverty and alienated from the center of power and domination. The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done; and there is no new thing under the sun (Ecc 1:8).
20
N E W S FEATURES
ulticulturalism is not helping the West to be itself, nor is it helping the Muslims of Europe to integrate better in their new countries. I would like to demonstrate this point by examining the question of homosexuality and the family in the Islamic tradition and in todays Islamic world. Muslims in Italy and the debate on civil unions In Italy, it is the supporters of all-out cultural tolerance who are promoting a law on civil unions. They were preceded by other European countries where the same observation can be made. Strangely enough, Muslim communitieswho receive so much support from progressive liberalshave remained silent on this issue. For example, UCOIIan association of Italian Muslims which claims to represent the majority of Muslims given that it controls (often in financial terms) a large part of mosques in the country speaks only when it is politically convenient, when it spots the possibility of obtaining a right, a privilege, a prayer hall, a mosque, a reduction in working hours during Ramadan, a vacation for a pilgrimage to Mecca, etc. But members of UCOII do not weigh into the issues that are being debated in Italy. The problem of the value of the family and of homosexual couples seems to not interest them. This is a sign that they are not carrying forward a project of integration, but of revindication. It must be said that the question of de facto couples has never been put forward, either in the past (obviously) or in this day and age. Even more than is the case in Christianity, Islam puts the accent on procreation in marriage, and secondly on sexual pleasure, which falls exclusively under the framework of legality, whether in terms of marriage or concubinage. Outside of legal marriage or recognized concubinage, any sexual act is a grave sin, and this according to all Islamic schools of legal thought, whether Sunni or Shiite. Lets consider therefore what is Islams official position (as expressed in the most important schools of law) with regard to homosexuality; then, what is the reality in the Muslim world (yesterday and today) on the question of homosexuality; and lastly, what is the current legislation in various Muslim countries. The Koran and the Hadith on homosexuality
Islam has always been merciless on homosexual relations. Yet there is silence in Italy among Muslims on civil unions and homosexuality. There is a kind of manipulation of Islam on the part of liberal progressivism. If Europe and America want to change the concept of family, they must take account of universal religious traditions.
Volume 41 Number 4
21
22
EDITORIAL
of the votes who make candidates as winners or losers. In other words, it is good for a candidate to have many voters. It is however best for them to have good counters. It is good for political parties to proclaim their grand platforms and for their candidates to mount vigorous and unrelenting campaigns. To spend millions for their tri-media advertisements, to shake millions of hands, smile left and right, and to convince as many people as possible to vote for them when election day comes. But at the end of the day, what will make them actually win or lose are the three following considerations: Who are the ones counting the votes from the precinct to the COMELEC levels? Which one of the two or three people in-charge of counting the votes have they contracted? How much are they willing to pay to all those counting the votes for every thousand votes taken away from others and credited to their names instead. The Philippines is not rated number one in corruption all over the Asian continent for nothing. Which to say, the votes count most for those who are willing to be corrupt the most.
Volume 41 Number 4
23
N E W S FEATURES
24
N E W S FEATURES
25
ARTICLES
Multiculturalism / from p.23
offence against God (a sin), and no one can prevent someone from saying soas instead shamefully happened in the European Parliament with Italian M.P. and E.U. Commission-candidate Rocco Buttiglione. But law cannot always correspond with ethics. Ethics aims at the perfection of behavior, and must propose an ideal which will always been difficult to reach, but serves as a guide for man. Law indicates the minimum limit after which one can speak of a crime. Furthermore, and this is another crime, the media exercises unacceptable and immoral pressure on homosexuals: in the case of the 52 gays in Cairo, the press published their names, addresses, telephone numbers, and photos: this, and not homosexuality, would have merited incarceration. There is also a question of incoherence: Islamic moral represses homosexuality, but people usually tolerate it. It is not rare, for instance, in Egypt between an adult and a young man. It is so widespread that we have two terms in Arabic to indicate the active and passive parts (ars e khawal) of a couple. Conclusion: defending the family for the sake of dialogue with Islam I find that there is not much debate in Europe among Muslims on the question of homosexuality and on the value of the family as the union between a male and a female. I have only found an inter-religious statement issued in Lyon, France, in favor of the family. It is not a question, they say, of a debate on society, but of an unprecedented superior choice in humanitys history, given that the family as a union between a man and a woman is a gift that must be passed on to future generations. The letter goes on to say that the family is very fragile today, because adults are not able to help young people build their future. How can they acquire a solid formation, face the future with hope, respect the duties of a profession and build their own balanced family if the institution of marriage is relativized? In conclusion: 1. Religions and philosophies have the right to have their own scale of values, to consider that such and such an act is moral or immoral, virtuous or sinful. Every man has this right. On the condition however that such moral judgment does not affect judgment on the person and behav-
ior in his regard. The act is one thing, the person is another. 2. Religions have the duty, if they want to be of help to human society, to periodically, constantly, re-examine their positions, both in the light of foundational texts and of contemporary reflection. As Pope Benedict puts it: faith and reason must be harmonized and are inseparable one from the other. 3. Islam in particular is going through a phase of returning to its origins, to protect itself from a West that it judges to be irreligious and atheist. It faces the easy risk of regression. To achieve the harmonization between faith and reason, it is indispensable that faith not be explained only by men of religion, as our jargon goes (rigil al-dn), but also by scholars of scientific and humanistic disciplines. The drama of contemporary Islam is the dichotomy within the community, the umma: those who lead (or should lead) the community study only religious sciences and whatever explains these; those doing other studies do not interfere on the intelligence of faith. 4. The concept of family has had an almost unanimously recognized meaning ever since the existence of man, namely as the nucleus composed of a man and a woman with their children. The concept can extend to relatives of varying degrees, but the nucleus remains such. The fact of homosexuality has always existed in human history, which has tolerated it without legitimizing it. The West is proposing a new approach to the concept of family, presenting it as progressive. Being such a fundamental matter, it would be necesRe-living / from p. 13
sary to hold in account not only national opinion, but also the approach held by humanity as a whole. Europe and America (or parts of these) cannot think of themselves as the motor of humanity and of its progress: this can be true at the technological and scientific levels, not at the ethical and philosophical level. 5. Western behavior on matters pertaining to the family and to sex confirms Muslims in the idea that Western civilization is decadent, and they attribute this decadence to the loss of faith and religious practice. The more determined element reacts violently against this evil. How does one explain to traditional Muslims (the majority of them) that modernity is replete with values (even if there are deficiencies as in any human reality), if what appears of this civilization is contrary to certain recognized values? Islams battle against the West, seen as depraved, will continue, taking on violent forms, because Western behavior violates the conscience of the Muslim world on important points. 6. I would add a final question. Why, when it was a question of removing some visible signs of Christian tradition (the crucifix, nativity scene, etc) numerous voices were heard using the argument of avoiding offence against Muslims (as if a nativity scene were an offence to them!), and when it is a question so fundamental to them, there is no such talk? It is not perhaps that the liberal world is exploiting Muslims only when it suits their own opinions? This is not respect, but manipulationand Muslims (or also Arabs) are not so stupid to believe in it.
(Lk. 24/45). He told them to remember: Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, that the Son of Man must be handed over to sinners, and be crucified and on the third day rise again (Lk. 24/6). And they remembered. Seeing the empty tomb, they remembered. The Easter Celebration followed by six weeks called post Easter is one long season of remembering of the Church. The season includes the many apparitions of the Risen Lord to strengthen the Christian community with the significance of Easter for life. The gift of Easter is what Christ gives to whomever he appears Peace be with you (Jn. 20/21), the peace which enables even a doubting Thomas to believe and
say My Lord and my God (Jn. 20/28). The gift of Easter is what the disciples then received, and the whole Church now receives: Receive the Holy Spirit, (Jn. 20/ 22). The gift of Easter is in being able to say once more to God Yes, Lord, you know that I love you (Jn. 21/15) and to say also to one another Yes, and I love you too. The gift of Easter is to see Jesus again, to remember what He taught and did, to live and celebrate our resurrection in Jesus. Yes, indeed, the Lord is risen as he has foretold. Alleluia. +ANGEL N. LAGDAMEO Archbishop of Jaro CBCP President April 8, 2007
26
FROM THE B L O G S
million pesos while sizable is still, imaginable, still countable to relatively many people. A billion pesos become already difficult to count and even highly improbable to have for the big majority of Filipinos. But a trillion pesos this is definitely an amount that baffles the mind of almost all Filipinos. For the present administration however, trillions of pesos are peanuts. And this is especially true when Malacaang indulges in incurring debts from all possible local and international sources. There is one thing both interesting and disgusting in this matter of national debts. This: The government incurs the debt at will while the people make the payments per force. No big deal if the foreseen national debt this year has a mind-boggling total estimate of pesos 3.82. So what if the debt becomes much more in the years ahead. In fact, to incur more and bigger debts has become a matter of course for the present administration. The principle and the practice remain the same: the government owes and the people pay. The government is wallowing in money while the people are suffering from hunger and want. No Filipino is spared from paying taxes from birth to death. It is not enough that those who are able pay direct taxes. It was not enough that even the poorest paid value added tax for all consumer goods they need. They are now even required to pay the infamous e-vat for exactly the same items they consume. Rice and corn, clothes and shoes, milk cotton and diapersnot to mention gasoline, fuel, and all other consumers items are infallibly taxed and a good number of poor people do not even know that the water they drink and the medicine they need, are all taxed by the government, direct and indirect taxes are all meant not only to pay for BIG government expenses but to pay as well for also big government debts. The truly disturbing fact is that the present administration has been long since making money by deliberately and resolutely marketing abroad people them-
selves. It is not a secret that the country is kept financially afloat by the taxed remittances of OFWs, a good number of whom are working like veritable slaves. So on goes the ominous and odious reality in this country. The present administration goes on borrowing money while the citizens continue paying with their hard earned pesos. And where does all the money go? This is another thorny issue, another sad story, another sorrowful mystery.
www.ovc.blogspot.com
cially in the writing and counting of votes. No. They are neither expecting a very orderly and altogether peaceful election. But yes. They are anxious and desirous of having even but a basically honest and sufficiently credible elections this coming May 2007. It is the least that people like to witnessfair and credible elections. Even this early however, there are already marked indications that the forthcoming elections might not even meet the minimum expectation of the common people in the country, needless to say this is once again bad news for the forthcoming supposedly democratic exercise. The names of some smooth operators are already being mentioned. There are also indications that even certain government institutions have began working to favor the pro-administration congressional candidates. It is not a secret that illegal gambling money is funding the election expenses of certain aspirants for public office. There is also the founded suspicion that even public funds are helping promote the candidacy of pro-government candidates.
www.ovc.blogspot.com
Volume 41 Number 4
27
FROM THE I N B O X
A Glass of Milk
ONE day, a poor boy who was selling goods from door to door to pay his way through school, found he had only one thin dime left, and he was hungry. He decided he would ask for a meal at the next house. However, he lost his nerve when a lovely young woman opened the door. Instead of a meal he asked for a drink of water. She thought he looked hungry so brought him a large glass of milk. He drank it so slowly, and then asked, How much do I owe you? You dont owe me anything, she replied. Mother has taught us never to accept pay for a kindness. He said ... Then I thank you from my heart. As Howard Kelly left that house, he not only felt stronger physically, but his faith in God and man was strong also. He had been ready to give up and quit. Many years later that same young woman became critically ill. The local doctors were baffled. They finally sent her to the big city, where they called in specialists to study her rare disease. Dr. Howard Kelly was called in for the consultation. When he heard the name of the town she came from, a strange light filled his eyes. Immediately he rose and went down the hall of the hospital to her room. Dressed in his doctors gown he went in to see her. He recognized her at once. He went back to the consultation room determined to do his best to save her life. From that day he gave special attention to her case. After a long struggle, the battle was won. Dr. Kelly requested the business office to pass the final bill to him for approval. He looked at it, then, wrote something on the edge and the bill was sent to her room. She feared to open it, for she was sure it would take the rest of her life to pay for it all. Finally she looked, and something caught her attention on the side of the bill. She read these words ... Paid in full with one glass of milk. (Signed) Dr. Howard Kelly. Tears of joy flooded her eyes as her happy heart prayed: Thank You, God, that Your love has spread broad through human hearts and hands. Theres a saying which goes something like this: Bread cast on the waters comes back to you. The good deed you do today may benefit you or someone you love at the least expected time. If you never see the deed again at least you will have made the world a better place - And, after all, isnt that what life is all about?
rowena.dalanon@cbcpworld.net
Why Worry
For months I noticed the painted rock that sat on Karens coffee table. The rock was painted and its face had a smile that just made you smile when you looked at it. I examined the rock and painted on the bottom was why worry. Curious I asked Karen where she got the rock. She told me that during a very stressful time in her life, a friend that she worked with gave her the rock. Her friend told her that when she looked at this rock, she was to remember not to worry so much. Her friend called it her worry not bug. There was a poem with the rock, she went and got it and as I read the poem I thought how true it was: 40% will never happen, for anxiety is the result of a tired mind, 30% concerns old decisions which cannot be altered, 12% centers in criticism, mostly untrue, made by people who feel inferior, 10% is related to my health which worsens while I worry, and only 8% is legitimate, showing that life does have real problems which may be met head-on when I have eliminated senseless worries. Karen went on to explain that she used to worry about everything and everyone. She now uses the rock as a reminder not to worry about the things she cannot change. She also went on to tell me that when she finds herself worrying, she asks herself what percentage this worry is. Most of the time she found what she was worrying about was the 40% - things that will never happen.
rowena.dalanon@cbcpworld.net
28
B O O K REVIEWS
Volume 41 Number 4
29
ENTERTAINMENT
Chris Gardner (Will Smith) was a math whiz in high school but never had further education. Now married and with a young son Christopher (Jaden Christopher Syre Smith, Wills real-life son), Chris makes a living selling bone-density scanning machines but even with his wife Linda (Thandie Newton) working at two jobs,
they can hardly make both ends meet. Finally his frustrated wife leaves home, leaving Christ and his son to fend for themselves. With such heavy financial burdens and having only each other they are evicted from their home and left with no choice but to sleep in welfare institutions
and on the streets. But the persevering Chris gets a break when he impresses a high-ranking corporate man by solving the Rubrik Cube puzzle. Based on a true story, The Pursuit of Happyness is half comedy and half drama that makes use of but a handful of actors. Outside of the father and the son roles that form the essence of the story, the rest of the actors, however, are given limited screen time. There is obviously good chemistry between the two Smiths--it seems they did not need to act to perform--although delving deeper into their characters could have improved the movie and turned it from good to great. Director Gabriele Muccino captures and highlights in a dramatic context the nuances of the father-son relationship. The Pursuit of Happyness is definitely not Oscar material but it is worthy of the viewers time and it merits our support for its message: persevering in faith against all odds, fighting for your passions and principles despite the personal hardships encountered. The movies main achievement is bringing the real-life story of Chris Gardner to the theaters and voicing its message to the whole world. The whole family will find an uplifting story in the movie though it would be especially good for fathers and sons to see the film together.
ANSWER TO THE LAST ISSUE: OUR SOULS MAY LOSE THEIR PLACE AND EVEN DISTURB OTHER PEOPLE'S IF WE ARE ALWAYS TRIVIAL ACTIONS - WHICH OFTEN ARE NOT REAL DEFECTS AT ALL, BUT WE CONSTRUE THEM WRONGLY THROUGH OUR IGNORANCE OF THEIR MOTIVES. - ST. THERESA OF AVILA QUOTES IN QUIZ Booklets available at BOOKSALE stores in SM, Robinsons and selected malls in Manila. For mail order text 0919 2803036.
30
Fire gutted Asias larg- Country seeks bids for Blogs for evangelization HRW: Civilians bear est Benedictine monas- nuclear plants gaining popularity cost of rising insurgent tery attacks The government of Blogging is becoming
Investigators are trying to figure out what sparked a fire at a historic and Asias largest Benedictine monastery in Waegwan, this country. Officials say every piece of fire fighting equipment in the community was on the scene of the 5-hour blaze, but nothing could be done to salvage the building owned by the Benedictines of Sankt Ottilien Germany, which, with its 136 monks is the largest Benedictine community in Asia. At the main House in Waegwan, there are usually about 75 monks, and other communities dependent on the Abbey exits in various parts of the territory. Iran is seeking bids to build two nuclear plants near the southern port city of Bushehr. The announcement comes amid a standoff with the West over Irans nuclear ambitions. Ahmad Fayyazbakhsh, deputy chief of Irans Atomic Energy Organization, said firms from the world, including the United States could bid on the project. more effective in reaching the Japanese youth for evangelization as Church leaders here have set up their own Weblogs and gaining growing interest contact and blog questions from the Internet surfers. Bishops Isao Kikuchi of Nigaya diocese and Kenjiro Koriyama of Kagoschima are just two of the many prelates and priests who update their blogs regularly. Getting much feedback from the public, the initiative is said to have became interactive for an exchange of idea and opinions. The Catholic community in Japan has decided to focus attention on evangelization on the web as a new forum for announcing the Good News.
PALESTINE
NEPAL
Civilian deaths from insurgent attacks here rose dramatically over the past 15 months, and many were the result of insurgents failure to respect the laws of war, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said. In a report, the group described how Afghan insurgent groups, primarily Taliban and Hezb-e Islami forces, sharply escalated attacks in 2006 and early 2007. The report shows how insurgents have repeatedly, directly targeted civilians for attack, and how even attacks directed at Afghan and international military forces have been launched without due regard for civilians.
IRAQ
BELGIUM
Volume 41 Number 4
31