Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ .ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ :ﺟﻴﻞ ﻻﻣﺒﺮﺕ ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ :ﻣﻬﺮﻱ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ .ﻧﺎﺷﺮ :ﻣﺮﮐﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﮎ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ .ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ .١٣٨٠ﻭﻳﺮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ:ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻲ .ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﺷﺶ :ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺋﻲ .ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﭼﺎﭖ :ﺍﻭﻝ ) (١٣٨٠ﻗﻴﻤﺖ:
٥٥٠٠ﺭﻳﺎﻝ .ﺷﺎﺑﻚ٩٦٤-٧٥١٩-٠١-× :
.١ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ
ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗـﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫـﺎﻱ ﻫـﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧـﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻤـﺎﻣﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﭘﺮﺱﻭﺟﻮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻓﺘﻮﻛﭙﻲ ،ﺑﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻳﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ؛
ﺧﺪﻣـﺎﺕ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫـﺮ ﻧـﻮﻉ ـ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ـ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤـﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﻲ ﺩﻫﻪﻱ ١٩٩٠ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗـﺮ ﺷـﺪﻥ ﻓـﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ،ﻣﺸﻜﻞﺗـﺮ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳـﻦ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ،ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ
ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺘـﺎﻳﺞ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪﻱ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻐﻴـﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﻣﻴﺰﻱ ،ﺑﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻢ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ :ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ،
ﺭﺷـﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ ـ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻱ ﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻢﺍﻳﻨﻚ
ﻃـﻴﻒ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺳﻴﻊﺗـﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﻧـﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻭ
ﺑـﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭﻫـﺎ ﻣﺤـﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ؛ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺻﺪﺍ ،ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ،ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ،ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ
ﻣﻌﻤـﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ ﺑـﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣـﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻋﺪﺩﻱ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﻡ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧـﺪ ،ﺍﻣـﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺁﻣـﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻗـﺎﻡ ﭼﺸـﻤﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ؛ ﺑﻌـﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜـﺎﻝ ،ﺍﺭﻗـﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻱ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ،
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺸﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ٤٠٠ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ١٩٩٢ﺗﺎ ١٩٩٥ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ).(١
ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ
ﺍﻳﻨـﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻱ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒ ﹰﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ،ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗـﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﺴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ،ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ٥
ﻣﻴﻠـﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧـﺔ ﻣﻴﺰﺑـﺎﻥ ﻛـﻪ ٣٠ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ١٥٠ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ) .(٢ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷﺪ
ﭼﺸـﻤﮕﻴﺮ ﺍﺧـﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗـﻮﺍﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﻇﻬـﻮﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻱ ﻭﺏ ﺟﻬـﺎﻧﻲ )ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ( ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ،ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﻱ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ،ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-1.htm 29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ Page 2 of 4
ﻋـﺎﻣﻞ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﻱ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮﻱ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔـﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﮔﻲ ﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪﻩﻱ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ
ﻣـﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻧـﻪ ﭼـﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ،ﭼـﺎﭖ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫـﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﻜـﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻄﺢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﺎﭘﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ
ﻧـﻮﺭﻱ ﻳـﻚ ﺍﺑـﺰﺍﺭ ﻣـﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﺳـﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ؛ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ،ﺳﺆﺍﻻﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻱ ﭼﺎﭘﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪﻱ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻳﻚ
ﻳـﻚ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔـﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺷـﻮﺍﺭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗـﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ،
ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ "ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮﮒ") (DIALOGﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ
ﺟﺴـﺘﺠﻮ ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ ﻳـﻚ ﻭﺍﺳـﻄﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣـﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻃـﻴﻒ ﮔﻴﺞﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻳﺎ ـ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ـ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻃﺮﺡ
ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ "ﺑﻴﺪﺯ")) (Bath Information and Data Services BIDSﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ "ﺑﺚ "( ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨـﺘﺮﻧﺖ ،ﻣﺴـﺘﻘﻴﻤ ﹰﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺷـﺮ ،ﻳـﺎ ﺑـﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻳﺴـﻚ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻱ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﻗﻄﻌـﻲ [ﻭ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ] ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜـﻪ ﺍﻣـﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻳﺴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ
ﺳﺨﺖ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ،ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ
ﻃـﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﺑـﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ ،ﺑﻌﻠـﺖ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ ﺗـﺮﻗﹼﻲ ﻧﺎﮔﻬـﺎﻧﻲ ﻛـﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻟـﻲ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺕﺗـﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻨﹼﻲ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ
ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ،ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﺑﺰﺭﮔﺮﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ
ﺑﻼﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﮔـﺮﺩﺩ ﺻـﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘـﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﻟﻎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻳﺎ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻱ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻋﺎﻗﻼﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧـﻪ ﻛـﻪ ﭘﻴﺸـﺮﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﺑـﻨﺪﻱ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﻝ ﻣﻘـﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮒﺗﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ "ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ") (workstationﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ
ﺍﻣﻜـﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺳـﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳـﻲ ﻣﺴـﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻧـﻴﺰ ،ﺩﻳﮕـﺮ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻔﺴﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻱ ﺗﺤﻮﻳـﻞ ﻣـﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ
ﭘﻴﺸﺎﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ )ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ(ﻛﻪ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺿﻤﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳـﻨﺪﻩ ﺑـﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ "ﺁﻧﻜﺎﻭﺭ")) (UnCoverﺍﺯ "ﻧﺎﻳﺖﺭﻳﺪﺭ" ﻭ "ﺍﻳﻨﺴﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻔﻮﺭﻣﻴﺸﻦ") (InsideInformationﺍﺯ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ( ،ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ،ﺑﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻱ ﭘﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ "ﻛﺎﺱ ـ ﻳﺎﺱ" )ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ()Current Alerting
، (Services combined with Individual Article Supply (CAS-IASﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ)
(searchﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ،ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ
ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪﻱ ﻧﻤـﺎﺑﺮ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳـﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻃـﺮﻳﻖ ﺷـﺒﻜﻪ ﻓـﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢﺁﻭﺭﻱ "ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻱ")Just-in-
(caseﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻤﻮﻗﻊ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﻱ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ
ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ
ﺩﻭ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﻱ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﻣﺆﺛﺮﻧﺪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺮ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺸـﺮ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺷـﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ .ﺍﺧـﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻴـﻦ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺷـﻴﻮﻩ ﭼـﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺸـﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﻣ ﹰﺎ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺷﻲ
ﺍﻟﻜـﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﻭ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-1.htm 29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ Page 3 of 4
ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻴﻂﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺸﺮ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ،ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ
ﺁﺩﻧﻴﺲ") (ADONISﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻴﻒ ﮔـﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﺭﺟـﺎﻉ ﺑـﻪ ﺧﺪﻣـﺎﺗﻲ ﻧﻈـﻴﺮ " ُ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﺯﻳﺴﺖﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻖ
ﺣـﻖ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ،ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻭﺷـﻨﻲ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺘـﺎﺑﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧـﺪ ،ﻭﻟـﻲ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺁﺳـﺎﻳﺶ ﺧـﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺩﻳﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ "ﺣﻖ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ")
(copyrightﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ
ﻫﻤﭽـﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧـﺎﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣـﻲ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮ ﻧﻈـﻴﺮ ﺁﻣـﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷـﺖ ،ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺗﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫـﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛـﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧـﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋـﻪ ﻧﻤـﺎﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ،ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ :ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺼﺮﻑﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺑـﺎﻭﺭ ﻋـﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﭘﻴﺸﺒﺮﺩ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺁﻥ .ﺑﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﺮ
ﭼﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻄﻮﺭ ﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻢﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ
ﺟـﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ـ ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭـ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﻼﻭﻩ
ﻼ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑـﺮﺧﻲ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻋﻲ ،ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫـﺎ ﺑﻪﻣـﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺑـﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻄﺢ ﺗﻮﺭّﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ـ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﭘﺰﺷـﻜﻲ ،ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻨـﻲ ﺑﻴـﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫـﺎﻱ ١٩٨٩ﻭ ١٩٩٤ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ١٠٠ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩﻱ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣـﻲ ﺗﻤـﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﻫـﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﺳـﻤﺖ [ﭘﺎﺳـﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ] ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ،ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﻣﺤﻜﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘـﻪ ﺍﺻـﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﺑـﺎ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﺷﺪﻩﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ
ﻧﺴﻞﻫـﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮﺑﻪﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﺁﻭﺭﻳـﻢ ،ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﺳﻴﻊﺗﺮ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﭘـﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻭ ﺳـﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﻩﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻭ "ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ")
(user interfaceﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺼﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ ،ﺑـﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻤﻠﻚ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋـﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ،ﻃﺒﻌ ﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﻨﻮﻧـﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ـ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥﻣﺪﺕ ـ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﭼﺎﭘﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻫـﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤـﺎ ،ﺗـﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﭼﺎﭘﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﻟﻜـﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ،ﻭ ﻧـﻴﺰ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ،ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﺷـﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ "ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺏ " ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ـ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌ ﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳـﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻘﻴﻪﻱ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﻱ "ﻣﻤﻜﻨﺎﺕ " ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔـﻴﺮﻧﺪ ـ ﺩﺭ ﺻـﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣـﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻱ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻗﻄﻌ ﹰﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ،ﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-1.htm 29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ Page 4 of 4
1. Library & Information Statistics Tables for the United Kingdom; compiled and
published for the British Library Research & Development by the Library &
Information Statistics Unit (LISu). Loughborough University, LISU, 1995.
2. The Gale Guide to Internet Databases. Ditroit, Gale Research, 1995.
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-1.htm 29/05/1381