CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Orian et al v. Case No.

CV 11-6904 PSG (FFMx) Islamic Jihadfare Axis et al c/o CCR Jury de Medietate Linguae already and now again Demanded Motion to Intervene jus tertii for the USA

See In Re Primus, as to the axis of defendants in Jihadfare. Move to strike the first whole sentence appearing at Case 2:11-cv-06904PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 9 of 32 Page ID #:52., lines 1, 2, and 9, and lines 5,9,10, and 13 at Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 10 of 32 Page ID #:53. Counsel for the Islamic Jihadfare defendants, CCR, which has violated the FARA and Material Aid statutes in its persistent war on the US during the war on terror, has invented a fictitious definition interposing corrupt, a term of public law, as sufficient to color legally and officially approved, authorized, and supervised international labor programs with the pejorative colloquial appellations asserted as noted supra. Strike the term corrupt in reference to practices relating apparently only to nonpayment of corporate attorneys fees, at line 16, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 10 of 32 Page ID #:53. Indians not taxed is a status which applies to any noncitizen in California who is not Christianized (Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo), including Chicandian Marranos and other Jews of the tribes of Israel, line 11, Case 2:11-cv-06904PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 11 of 32 Page ID #:54. The US does not recognize any territory in the land of Israel as being Occupied, line 10, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 12 of 32 Page ID #:55. Indeed in Zivotofsky v Clinton, soon set for oral argument November 7, at SCUS, the briefs show the US maintains a basis for claims to sovereignty of Jerusalem cest qui est in trust for the Jewish people

under the Treaty of Versailles and US UK Convention for Administration of the Mandate for Palestine affecting capitulation rights of the US as victor over the Islamic Caliphate and Ottoman Empire.

Libelous wrongful deprivation of liberty incidental to reporting duties to administering authorities superintendents in situ, may be tortious, Shen v. Leo A. Daly Co., 222 F.3d 477 (8th Cir. 2000). http://ccrjustice.org/files/2011-0928_%20Kav_Laoved_Memo_in_Supp_MTS.pdf Lines 5,6,7 Case 2:11-cv06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 13 of 32 Page ID #:56. The Shen Court held: Shen contends the district court erred when it granted Daly's motion for judgment as a matter of We review the decision to grant judgmentlaw on the false imprisonment claim. as a matter of law de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Shen. See DiCarlo v. Keller Ladders, Inc., 211 False imprisonment is the unlawful restraintF.3d 465, 467 (8th Cir.2000). See Herbrickagainst his will of an individual's personal liberty. v. Samardick & Co., 169 Shen's liberty was restrained in thisNeb. 833, 101 N.W.2d 488, 491 (1960). And, ascase-he was not allowed to leave Taiwan. Shen correctly points out, the term false imprisonment is broader than just confinement within a jail or prison. He was free tomove about Taiwan, and was not restrained in any way in his daily activities. Shen's confinement, however, was to a whole country. Although it is difficult to define exactly how close the level of restraint must be, in this case the country of Taiwan is clearly too great an area within which to be falsely imprisoned. A hotel in Hawaii, or law offices in California, otoh, are not too great an area within which to be falsely imprisoned. The Supreme Court decision cannot be relied on, because it invokes Jewish law, namely, the law of kevod haberiyos (see Rav Soloveitchik zal), and thus reliance by this Court on that foreign court decision issued at Jerusalem, during pendency of US claims to the Holy City, would be contrary to the interdiction of the first article of amendment, the Establishment Clause (but consider Van Orden on Moshe as LawGiver, in

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/10/14/08-56415.pdf :

Kav LaOved v. Government of Israel, [2006] 910 Isr LR 260 (30 March 2006) available at http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files_eng/ 02/420/045/o28/02045420.o28.pdf . In his concurring opinion, Vice-President of the Supreme Court Emeritus Cheshin expressly thanked Kav for having brought the matter: Indeed, the foreign workers, the weak and vulnerable among us, have had the good fortune that good people [Kav LaOved] have voluntary come to their aid. These are the petitioners before us. By virtue of the merit of these compassionate people, we have been given the good fortune and the merit of protecting the human image of those workers. And we will protect them, the foreign workers, even though they have not asked this of us. Id. at 315. .
Moreover, the Judges opinion juris and ratio decidendi is only on the issue of jus tertii standing, and not on the substantive merits. In Al-Awlaki, the USDC DC rejected extraterritorial jus tertii standing under the doctrine of fugitive disentitlement, viz http://ccrjustice.org/files/2010.12.07_Al-Aulaqi %20Decision_0.pdf.. Strike expelled at Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 15 of 32 Page ID #:58 at line 22, and privilege at line 23. Being insolvent does not mean one cannot suffer damages from tortious activity. Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 17 of 32 Page ID #:60 Kav cannot claim SLAPP protection and aver a complete lack of connections to the state. See Al-Awlaki v Obama, https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgibin/show_public_doc?2008cv1902-56. Kav is not a foreign entity in the Article III alienage sense (Elk v Wilkins, Worcester v Georgia, Cherokee Nation v Georgia), line 17, Case 2:11-cv06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 22 of 32 Page ID #:65. The US Consul General at Jerusalem can effect service. http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m-b-z-v-clinton/ ,

www.state.gov/documents/organization/98779.pdf, www.state.gov/documents/organization/78199.pdf, www.state.gov/documents/organization/98780.pdf, unless and until the US relinquish claims (see Prize Cases, Brig Amy Warwick, A war may exist
where one of the belligerents claims sovereign rights as against the other.

(the other need not be a non-ally, merely one against whom a co-belligerent claims sovereign rights, see Status of Canton and Enderbury ad interim, 28 USC 91, and 48 USC 644a, Convention of the US and UK on Administering Canton and Enderbury, Treaty of Friendship with Kiribati)) and http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=goto&id=FRUS.FRUS1925v02&isize=M&submit=Go+to+page&page=12 . Aliens without ties to the US do not enjoy ANY Due Process protection, line 10, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 23 of 32 Page ID #:66. Line 5, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 24 of 32 Page ID #:67, arrest was attempted in California. Line 3, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 25 of 32 Page ID #:68, Plaintiffs could in theory participate in the CNMI foreign worker programs, if relieved from the conditions of bail by the proper Courts. The USDOJ FBI press releases invariably say the indictment is merely an accusation, and asserts the constitutional presumption of innocence, lines 7,8 http://ccrjustice.org/files/2011-09-28_ %20Kav_Laoved_Memo_in_Supp_MTS.pdf . Equitable tolling, line 20, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 25 of 32 Page ID #:68, applies, as does the proximate tortfeasor relations to the false imprisonment consequent libel (Shen v Leo Daly). Tortious interference exists as to prospective business, or Canadian business, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 27 of 32 Page ID #:70.

Line 17, a business owner, as alter ego for the firm, does not become a public figure incident publicity for the firm, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 27 of 32 Page ID #:70.

Line 7, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 29

of 32 Page ID #:72, for libel arising in Israel, the choice of law applies Jewish defamation law, and untruthness or its converse is no affirmative defense.

Iqbal is not a private tort suit. Doe v Yoo holds that persons who give advice or utter information, which causes others to wrongfully imprison, may be accountable. Fn37, p22, transcript is not certified. Fn38 in Hebrew, see 25 USC 2906, and the Treaty of Peace at Paris with Spain, 1898, (Nguyen v US, fn 1, 2003), and the Marranos in the Philippine Islands, and their Judezmo Judeo-Spanish languages. Line 12, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 Page 31
of 32 Page ID #:74, the H-2A program is a USDOL supervised, state labor wage determined, federally administered program, it is not anti-social or criminal behavior. The First Amendment affords no protection to aliens abroad: Case 2:11-cv06904-PSG -FFM Document 17 Filed 10/17/11 Page 8 of 21 Page ID #:548. Defendants are not permitted to maintain inconsistent contrary positions within the same litigation. They cannot aver the Constitution and Bill of Rights affords their actions abroad substantive protections, and yet argue the Fourteenth amendment due process protections of natural born citizens of the United States and Indians not taxed, when domiciled within any state in the character of state citizens thereof, shall enjoy due process in like to the Fifth amendment, and equal protection.

Disappeared News Larry Geller online said he was present at the USDC Hawaii courthouse and heard Susan French read from the materials at issue: line 16, Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 17 Filed 10/17/11
Page 12 of 21 Page ID

#:552 .

Israel is not a foreign country in toto, p. 8,9 Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG

-FFM Document 17 Filed 10/17/11 Page 16 of 21 Page ID #:556, remaining in the protection of the US. Line 28, p11 and onto p12 alleges publication to the prosecutors of an allegation of crime, and hence admits libel per se: Case 2:11-cv-06904-PSG -FFM Document 17 Filed 10/17/11 Page 19 of 21 Page ID #:559. The first amendment right of petition for redress does not apply extraterritorially where the US does not in fact exercise her de jure extraterritorial or capitulatory rights (Boumediene, Roger CS Lin v US, Treaty granting cession of the Guantanamo station previously thereto leased in consideration for relinquishment of 1898 Treaty of Peace at Paris with Spain claims upon relinquishment cest qui est to the Isle of Pines entrusted for the entire peoples of Cuba and protection as protgs/ressortissants/noncitizen nationals of the US (Gonzalez v Williams, Boyd v Gonzalez, Rabang v Boyd)). The US Attorney is neither the police, a local prosecutor, nor a regulatory agency, see 25 USC 175. Tortious speech affects abroad may be actionable, Doe v Rumsfeld https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2008cv1902-56 , and racist speech can give rise to a constitutional tort for wrongful imprisonment. Shen v. Leo A. Daly Co., 222 F.3d 477 (8th Cir. 2000) Actual service satisfies due process, Smith v United States (fn1 basis for maintenance of claims) http://ccrjustice.org/files/2011-10-17%20Bectarte %20Declaration%20in%20Supp%20of%20MTD.pdf. The claim of lack of legal compulsion is odd, since http://ccrjustice.org/files/2011-10-17%20Bernard%20Decl%20in%20Supp %20of%20Mot%20to%20Strike.pdf, FIDH et al aver that the reported wrongdoing was precisely imposition of such compulsion. Moreover the reply admits that legal proceedings were pending, and the implication of liability incident settlement, to an alien defendant abroad, is consonant due process, see Dismissal of Grant of Certiorari review, Supreme Court of the US, under the SCUS rules (thus preserving the de jure jurisdiction), in Estate of Henry Liu v Republic of China. The affidavit does not refer to any other person, only

form or media. Prayer for Relief 1. Declare that Jews in California, are Indians not taxed, Article I, Fourteenth Amendment, US Constitution, see Matter of Francisco Cuero, a Chicandian Mission Indian born at San Diego in the 1880s, not a citizen, but a domestic subject of the United States, held to wrongful detention in Mexico to involuntary military service tortuously against his privilege and immunity to the national protection abroad, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUSidx? type=turn&entity=FRUS.FRUS1902.p0871&id=FRUS.FRUS1902&isize=M&q 1=cuero&q2=citizen, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=boolean&size=First+100&q1=koszta&operator1=And&q2=protection&op erator2=And&q3=&rgn=Page+or+paragraph&size=First+100&work= , wrongful imprisonment of Apache children by Papago Indians retreated to Mexico, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS187273&entity=FRUS.FRUS187273.p0542&q1=ap ache&q2=papago&q3=children . 2. Declare that an Israel Defense Service oath to defend Israel including Jerusalem, is a declaration of intention, of alliance with the US, in statu quo (http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1924v02&entity=FRUS.FRUS1924v02.p0294&q1= jerusalem&q2=status%20&q3=capitulations, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgibin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1922v02&entity=FRUS.FRUS1922v02.p0396&q1= convention&q2=mandate&q3=palestine), and see the US State Department opinion contrary to Matter of Dragenice, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgibin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS187576v01&entity=FRUS.FRUS187576v01.p0318 &q1=chinese&q2=allegiance&q3=oath. See definition of the US and her allies as Allied Victors, in the Treaty of Peace at Paris with Italy, relinquishing Libya in trust to the US alliance, as a treaty party of the Allied and Associated Powers of the one part, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUSidx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1946v04&entity=FRUS.FRUS1946v04.p0013&q1= treaty&q2=italy&q3=one%20part . Accord, US DOS Aide Memoire to FEC, October 25, 1950, as travaux preparatoires to Article 2 (final version) of the Treaty of Peace at San Francisco with Japan (allied American Formosa

entrustment by (Article 73 or assume duties for) to US et al (all the allied victors) as Administering Authorities, UN Charter Article 73, 77, 107): http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1950v06&entity=FRUS.FRUS1950v06.p1340&q1= formosa&q2=article%2073, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUSidx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1950v06&entity=FRUS.FRUS1950v06.p1346&q1= formosa&q2=article%2073, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgibin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1949v09&entity=FRUS.FRUS1949v09.p0371&q1= formosa&q2=article%20107 . 3. Declare the common law constitutional right of a trial free from anti-semitic bias, an impartial trial, on talibus de circumstantibus de medietate linguae, said right arising in England for the benefit of alien Jewish international merchants, as one of the the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country, protected under the Supremacy Clause through the Convention between the United States and Great Britain Regarding the Mandate for Palestine

WHEREAS by Article 95 of the Treaty of Peace with Turkey the High Contracting Parties agreed to entrust, by application of the provisions of the said Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as might be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a mandatory to be selected by the said Powers and further agreed that the mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2, 1917 by the British Government and adopted by the other Allied Powers in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil or religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country,. 4. Order the Clerk to empanel a Jews jury de medietate linguae, as Professor Deborah Ramirez (dramirez@neu.edu) has considered to be appropriate to remedy juror bias against minorities such as Chicandians, Marranos, or other

Jewish tribesman such as Motty, who is also the father of natural born citizen American Chinese-Jews (8 USC 1401(b)). 5. Declare that Mordechais wife is a Jew, and Indian, as Chinese, under the California Supreme Court precedent in People v Hall, and Omaha v Wilson Tribe (25 USC 194), and that their seed are, by 8 USC 1401(b), birth to a member of an aboriginal tribe, the Jews, or Chinese, thus, Indians and naturalized at birth (nationalized) by the statute. 6. Declare that the Orian family, as non-Christian households in California, with native born children, 8 USC 1401(b), under the Treaty of GuadalupeHidalgo, and Constitution, are recognized as Indians, see http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS188889v01p1&entity=FRUS.FRUS188889v01p1.p 0902&q1=indians&q2=guardian&q3=wards the treaty of Managua can afford no criterion, for in every case of dispute it may be argued that the rights of self-government on the one hand, or of sovereignty on the other, are invaded. The case is not without analogies. In the treaty with France of April 30, 1803, for the cession of Louisiana it is provided that "the inhabitants of the ceded territory shall be incorporated in the Union of the United States, and admitted as soon as possible, according to the principles of the Federal Constitution, to the enjoyment of all the rights, advantages, and immunities of citizens of the United States and in the mean time they shall be maintained and protected in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property, and the religion they profess." In the treaty with Spain of February 22, 1919, for the cession of Florida, it was stipulated that "4the inhabitants of the ceded territories shall be secured in the free exercise of their religion, without any restriction," and that they should be "admitted to the enjoyment of all the privileges, rights, and immunities of the citizens of the United States." By the terms of the treaty with Russia of March 30, 1867, for the cession of Alaska, the inhabitants, with the exception of uncivilized native tribes, are to be admitted to citizenship, "and shall be maintained and protected in

the free enjoyment of their liberty, property, and religion. The uncivilized tribes will be subject to such laws and regulations as the United States may from time to time adopt in regard to aboriginal tribes of that country." In all these cases, as will be observed, the ceding Government has received assurances of the treatment to be accorded to the inhabitants of the ceded territory; but in no case in our diplomatic history ha' any one of these Governments asserted a right to intervene in our domestic affairs. Difficulties have at times arisen between the FederalGovernment and the inhabitants of Louisiana and Florida, but neither France nor Spain ever pretended that our treaty stipulations gave them a right to take part in the settlement of such disputes. The laws affecting the Territory of Alaska may be, and in some respects now are, unlike those governing the other Territories of the United States. But it must be apparent that were the Indians inhabiting those possessions to protest against alleged discriminations to the Czar of Russia, the treaty of 1867 would not authorize His Imperial Majesty to demand of the United States a different treatment of our Indian wards; and that such interposition, if-made, would certainly not be regarded favorably by this Government. The ceding government in such cases retains, and can retain, no right of control or supervision over the conduct of the guardian to whom it commits the inhabitants whose allegiance is changed. And so in the case under consideration. The stipulations of the treaty of Managua relative to the privileges to be accorded to the Mosquito Indians were not for the benefit of Great Britain, and are not enforceable by her, They were solely made for the benefit of those Indians, who were regarded by the express language of the treaty as at liberty to accept or reject its stipulations. Through their chief they did deliberately accept them, and on the withdrawal of British protection placed themselves under the sovereign power of the Republic of Nicaragua, and agreed to accept her public pledges as a sufficient guaranty that the agreements therein contained touching their right of self-government would be carried out in good faith. The President can not but regard the continued exercise of the claim on the part of Great Britain to interfere on behalf of these Indians as the assertion of a British protectorate in another formi; more especially when'this effort is directed to prohibiting Nicaragua from exercising

766 .

http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1902ap2&entity=FRUS.FRUS1902ap2.p043 3&q1=christian&q2=indians&q3=california DISCOVERY MADE BY UNITED STATES, ON MOTION BY MEXICO, RELATIVE TO INDIAN POPULATION OF CALIFORNIA. [Translation.] No. 293.1 EMBASSY OF THE MEXICAN UNITED STATES IN WASHINGTON, Bayshore, N Y., August 21, 1902. MR. ACTING SECRETARY: By direction of my Government, and in accordance with Article IV of the protocol of agreement between the Republic of Mexico and the United States of America for the settlement of certain questions raised in respect to the so-called Pious Fund of the Californias, signed on the 22d of May last, I have the honor to ask of the Department in your worthy charge a statement as to whether it is true that there are Indians who are not Christianized or who are still free from obedience to the authorities in the State of California. I take pleasure on this occasion in renewing to you the assurances of my high consideration. JosE F. GODOY. Hon. ALVEY A. ADEE. 42'5

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------PIOUS FUND OF THE CALIFORNlAS. [No. 17089.] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of State. lTo all to whom these presents shall come, greeting: I certify that the document hereunto annexed is under the seal of the Department of the Interior of the United States, and is entitled to

full faith and credit. In testimony whereof 1, John Hay, Secretary of State of the United States, have hereunto subscribed my name and caused the seal of the Department of State to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington this 9th day of September, A. D. 1902, and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and twenty-seventh. [SEAL.] JOHN HAY. Refer in reply to the following: Land 50909-1902. Special. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, OFFICE OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, Washiington, Septemyer 8, 1902. The honorable the SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. SiR: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt, by Department reference for immediate consideration and report, of a communication dated August 23, 1902, from the Secretary of State, setting forth that in accordance with Article IV of the protocol of agreement between the Republic of Mexico and the United States, for the settlement of certain questions raised in respect to the claim known as the Pious Fund of the Californias, signed on May 22, 1902, the Mexican Government has called upon the Department of State for a statement as to "whether it is true that there are Indians who are not Christianized or who are still free from obedience to the authorities of the State of California." The Secretary of State requests that such a statement be furnished to his Department for communication to the Mexican Government as speedily as possible, and that if the statement be made by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs his official character should be certified to under the seal of the Interior Department. By the term "not Christianized" is understood by this office to mean those Indians of California and their descendants who were not brought under the charge of the Franciscan fathers at or near the missions from and after 1769, the date of the founding of the Mission of San Diego de Alcala, at Diego, by Father Junipero. These Indians are to this day designated as "Mission Indians," though in an official

sense that designation is now applied only to the descendants of the Mission Indians living in Southern California. The words Indians "who are still free from obedience to the autho.-ities of the State of California" are presumed to mean Indians who are residing on Indian reservations within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States. 426 PIOUS FUND OF THE CALIFORNIAS. The Mission Indians are probably all "Christianized," but with the exception of a few bands are occupying tribal reservations over which the State of California does not exercise jurisdiction. The bands not subject to State control are as follows: San Manuel (P.). San Pasqual. TWenty-nine Palms (P.). San Jacinto. Ramona (P.). Aqua Caliente (P.). Cahuilla. Los Coyotes. Mesa Grande (P.). Torros. Inaja (P.). Augustine (P.). La Posta (P.). Santa Rosa. Manzanita (P.). Morongo. Laguna (P.). Santa Ysabel (P.). Campo (P.). Cabezon (P.). Cuyapipe (P.). Tule River. The reservations marked "P." have been patented as "reservations" to the Indian bands or villages under the provisions of section 3 of the act of January 12, 1891.. (26 Stats., 712.) The Indians of the Hoopa Valley Reservation are not "Christianized" so far as this office is aware, and are still free from State control. The Indians. of the Round Valley Agency are not known to be "Christianized." Having been given allotments of land in severalty, they are, by the act of February 8, 1887 (24 Stats., 388), declared to be citizens of the United States and subject to all the laws of the State. They are therefore no longer free from obedience to the State authorities. Since the foregoing was prepared this office received, by Department

reference, a communication dated September 3, 1902, from the Acting Secretary of State, transmitting a copy of a cablegram dated September 2; 1902, from Mr. Ralston, agent and counsel of the United States in the matter of the arbitration of the Pious Fund claim, calling for information of the same character for the States of California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Utah, as well as for the last three reports of this office. Mut Ralston desires that the information reach him at The Hague by September 20, 1902. The information respecting the State of California being hereinbefore given, the other States will be taken up in their order. IDAHO. Coeur d'Alene Reserwation.-De Smet Mission (Roman Catholic) established under authority of act of March 3, 1891 (26 Stats., 1029). No statistics that Indians are "Christianized." Indians are not under jurisdiction of State. Fort Hall Reservation. No Roman Catholic missions established. Reservation to be allotted and surplus lands opened to settlement under agreement of March 3, 1891, ratified by the act of June 6, 1900 (31 Stats., 672), when the Indians will fall under the jurisdiction of the State. -Lapwai (Nez Percis) Reservation. Roman Catholic mission school established in 1860. No statistics as to "Christianizing" of Indians who are under jurisdiction of State. liemii Reservation.--No Roman Catholic institutions established. indians not under jurisdiction of State.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------7. Declare that the Thirteenth amendment confers US nationality on persons, US v Hodges 203 US 1, even if born abroad in Africa, or born in allegiance to the USA born King of Siam (born at Cambridge, Massachusetts Indian lands, United States occupied territories America), and thus the CIV 11 00257 EEOC v Del Monte et al DAE RLP USDC HI allegation of Thai and Asian individuals, should be judicially construed sua sponte, to confirm with the grant of habeas extraterritorially contrary to statute in Amistad, for aliens born abroad.

Also note the US Yankees attempted to send Freedmen as if slaves interdicted on the high seas, to the Danish West Indies, under the US Denmark Convention, during the civil war, to free pressure on the President from Yankees opposed to settling Freedmen not in their backyards. Viz http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1863p1&entity=FRUS.FRUS1863p1.p0115& q1=denmark&q2=slave&q3=high%20seas . Hence the legitimacy of the demand of the native US Virgindians, to be native ancestral Virgin Islanders, www.justice.gov/olc/testimony.pdf , or Caribindians. 8. Declare CCR cannot violate the Prospective Intervenors petitionary rights, in retaliation for motions to intervene in Al-Awlaki, which substantively informed the Courts judgment for the US therein on the contingent scope of the privilege and immunity of national protection abroad and special US duties in trust for the Jewish people under our Treaties by which we defeased of the Ottoman Empire the Islamic Caliphate, without any allegation the first amendment protected that foreign politico-legal tradition or it Sharia law, just as we de-Nazified Japan by eliminating their jihadist kamikaze State Shinto militarism on Formosa and in the other islands of delimited Japan, (JCS 1381/15). 9. Declare Kav LOved is an agent of the State of Israel, under FARA, and that the organization has done nothing to lift a finger to aid former foreign workers in Israel repatriated to the Philippines, Thailand or China. Same with FIDH or CCR. None of those counsel have ever lifted a finger to help the victims of US treaty apartheid (see the currently in force Treaty of Peace at Paris, then read 8 USC 1401-1408 in toto, as to native inhabitants excluding Asians, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgibin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1911&entity=FRUS.FRUS1911.p0152&q1=v elasco&q2=citizenship, http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgibin/FRUS/FRUS-idx? type=turn&id=FRUS.FRUS1898&entity=FRUS.FRUS1898.p1057&q1= alaska&q2=treaty&q3=native ). Kav cannot claim to be independent advocates and yet receive support from the ministries of the Jewish State of Israel. 10. Declare my Indonesian Muslim maid neighbor on the eighth floor

ought not be compelled to burn joss paper to the ancestral spirits in Buddhist Taoist ceremonies for her handicapable elderly native Formosan Indian ward. 11. Declare the 400,000 foreign workers on Formosa ought not have to pay the Interior Ministry approved foreign labor contractor firms one years wages in advance, even if they willingly agree to do so. If its wrong on Hawaii (USA v Fullard-Leo SCUS holds the US merely occupies the islands of the Kingdom of Hawaii, SAI v Obama), why aint it just as wrong on the similarly occupied Japanese relinquished territory of Formosa? 12. Declare the millions of Filipinas in Libya, UAE, Saudi Arabia, ought be free from involuntary servitude to Muslim supporters of Kav LOved, FIDH, and CCR in their Islamic Jihadfare against the USA and our Ally in the Jewish People and their State of Israel. 13. Encourage Maria Couri LaHood - #181365 to activate or if eligible apply
pro hac vice, or strike said appearance. See DMG Chambers CADC notice to CAND JSW Chambers in re counsel Easton and Levy, in TCRLO v KTMBC.

Respectfully, Dr. Paul Maas Risenhoover, jus tertii, Pro Se for the USA Robin Hood International Human Rights Legal Defense Fund Tainan, allied American Formosa trust territory, West Pacific, USA drpaulmaas@gmail.com

Certificate of Service by email to:

Wendy_Hernandez@cacd.uscourts.gov,

psg_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov,

mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com, hlanger@langergrogan.com, gbostwick@bostwickjassy.com, jpjassy@bostwickjassy.com, kvick@bostwickjassy.com, mlahood@ccrjustice.org, shinerlaw@gmail.com, "Mordechai Orian"

<mortorian@gmail.com>, "susan.french" <Susan.French@usdoj.gov>, "kevonne.small" <Kevonne.Small@usdoj.gov>, "Communications, Civil (CIV)" <Civil.Communications@usdoj.gov>, mollway_orders@hid.uscourts.gov, sophia_chang@cacd.uscourts.gov, dmg_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov, lado.legal@eeoc.gov

Appendix A

Maria Couri LaHood - #181365

Current Status: Inactive
This member is inactive, but is eligible to become active. See below for more details.

Profile Information
The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: Address:

181365

Center for Constitutional Rights 666 Broadway 7th Fl New York, NY 10012 Map it

Phone Number: Fax Number: e-mail: Undergraduate School:

(212) 614-6464 (212) 614-6499 Not Available Univ of Notre Dame; Notre Dame IN

County: District: Sections:

Non-California Outside California None

Law School:

Univ of Michigan Law Sch; Ann Arbor MI

Status History

Effective Date Present 11/1/2001 12/27/1995

Status Change Inactive Inactive Admitted to The State Bar of California

Appendix B Highly significant ties of Kav la-Oved to the occupied Mission Indian sovereign alloidal lands ceded by Mexico contrary to the Thirteenth

Amendment enslaving the Muwekma Indians and Chicandian Marrano Jewish tribesman to the US Congress as property (Article V, US Constitution, insular tariff clauses asserting Congress administers trust territory noncitizen US national nonaliens as incident the property clause), formerly referred to as Alta California, or California (not a state because Congress has no authority to admission of areas under the jurisdiction of another, such as the occupied Mission Indian lands). Also note the exhorbitant salaries of the Kav laOved staff who average almost a million shekels a year per person, which is three times or more, what the Jewish State of Israel provide for the full-time Kollel Bochurim studying to be Judges (Dayanim). Both the California based Levinson Foundation of the Levinson Law Firm and the Los Angeles Jewish Federation have given to Kav LOved or its adjunct activities or projects. Kav L'Oved and UNICEF were also active. Importantly, the LA Federation has been somewhat involved in this issue beginning last October as a result of the fact that they are major donors to the Bialik-Rogozin School where 300 of the foreign-workers' children learn. The Federation has given the school $100,000 per year over the last five years. While The Levinson Foundation | Levinson Law Group Donations ...www.levinsonlawgroup.com/giving-back/ F. Linked Balances Balances in or linked to foreign currency are included at representative exchange rates as at balance sheet date. Below are particulars of the exchange rates: Representative Rates as at December 31 422: 4229 US dollar 2.823 2.827 Euro 5.3992 5.759

Pound Sterling 5.5289 9.99

Ford Foundation (*) 922,335 228,239 New Israel Fund 275,299 359,523 Heinrich Boell Foundation 935,223 922,222 Government of Denmark Delegation in Israel 929,922 Beracha Foundation 52,972 72,722 U.S. State Department - TIP 229,522 928,999 The Gimprich Family Foundation 52,235 Ch**** Aid Foundation 295,525 329,972 Conanima 83,522 392,222 Fritz Naphtali Foundation 52,222 52,222 The Samuel Sebba Charitable Trust 292,532 992,299 The Marc Rich Foundation - 82,298 European Union - 52,993 Buksenbaum-Neta Foundation - 32,222 Check Point - 92,222 Muasasat Foundation - 287,392 Zeev Bergman - 922,222 Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) 39,552 922,297 Netherlands Trade Union Confederation (FNV) 72,222 Zinuk Society - 927,889 Income from donations via the Internet 33,923 99,729 Income from other donors (**) 72,592 59,998 3,353,889 3,795,989

Annual Salary Cost 422: 4229 Name I.D. No. Position NIS NIS Zohar Hanna 222722952 Director 928,592 928,279 Duhi Khaled, Adv. 232922999 Legal Advisor 929,982 929,572 Livnat Yuval 239978922 Legal Advisor - 922,298 Idelevich Rachel 222392973 Director, Beer Sheva Branch - 922,789 Nepomneshi Jessica 299929295 Fund Raiser 972,229 Tanan Sarah 253922925 Director, Jerusalem Branch 937,538 Gonen Anat, Adv 235237327 Director, Haifa Branch - 922,222

Kidron Anat, Adv. 222993999 Attorney 922,923 -

The Levinson Foundation donated $2500 to Kav La'Oved. ... The Levinson Foundation's donation will assist Kav La'Oved in its mission