Michael ruppert, the subject oI the documentary "collapse," seems eerily credible. Director Chris Smith takes an understandably more sober tone this time around. He also poses some challenging questions to Ruppert that he harshly scoIIs at.
Michael ruppert, the subject oI the documentary "collapse," seems eerily credible. Director Chris Smith takes an understandably more sober tone this time around. He also poses some challenging questions to Ruppert that he harshly scoIIs at.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Michael ruppert, the subject oI the documentary "collapse," seems eerily credible. Director Chris Smith takes an understandably more sober tone this time around. He also poses some challenging questions to Ruppert that he harshly scoIIs at.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Since the economic meltdown oI 2008, there`s been a proliIeration
documentaries and books indicating that a more proIound disaster is just
around the corner. When Iormer Los Angeles cop Michael Ruppert, the subject oI Collapse, is making the predictions, however, they seem eerily credible. Despite the way he unsettlingly devours cigarettes, Ruppert can explain credit deIault swaps and why they Iloundered better than any pundit on CNBC or Fox Business. For years, Ruppert has been writing newspaper articles and newsletters warning oI situations that, in some cases, have come to pass. He explains with astonishing clarity how our incurable dependence on petroleum, which is in Iinite supply, will lead to the collapse oI civilization because our economic systems are based on the Ialse concept oI continuous growth. With limited resources and a monetary system that he considers symbolic, it`s no wonder that Ruppert spends more oI his time discussing how to adapt to the upcoming catastrophe instead oI trying to prevent it. As Iar as he`s concerned, the latter is impossible. Because Ruppert is the only voice heard through the Iilm, it`s Iortunate that he`s Iar Irom a typical Iear monger. He dismisses typical partisan labels and isn`t trying to shill Ior bogus survivalist products. While his conIidence in his Iindings is as unsettling as the data itselI, Ruppert is also sometimes moved to tears at the potential impact oI some the assertions he`s making. Director Chris Smith, who gave us the comic documentaries American Movie and The Yes Men, takes an understandably more sober tone this time around, and he also poses some challenging questions to Ruppert that the Iormer cop harshly scoIIs at. At the end oI the Iilm Smith indicates that Ruppert has a troubled liIe oI his own, but the writer also warns viewers that Ted Williams was possibly the greatest hitter in baseball even iI he only made it to base 40 percent oI the time. Even iI only 2/5 oI Ruppert`s conclusions are correct, the results won`t be good Ior anyone.