activities is the act oI getting people together to accomplish desired goals and objectives using available resources eIIiciently and eIIectively. 4 !lanning 4 Organizing 4 StaIIing 4 Leading or directing 4 Controlling CHANGE MANAGEMENT CLunge munugement Is n sfrucfurod nronch fo shIffIng/frnnsIfIonIng IndIvIdunIs, fonms, nnd orgnnIznfIons from n curronf sfnfo fo n dosIrod fufuro sfnfo. f Is nn orgnnIznfIonnI rocoss nImod nf hoIIng omIoyoos fo nccof nnd ombrnco chnngos In fhoIr curronf busInoss onvIronmonf. CHANGE RELATED TO !EO!LE !orsonnoI chnngo CuIfurnI chnngo Cusfomor roInfIonshI mnnngomonf CHANGE RELATED TO ORGANIZATION Structural change Incremental organizational change Acquisition Merger CHANGE RELATED TO SYSTEM !rocoss orIonfod chnngo TochnoIogIcnI chnngo ConfInuous Imrovomonf IusInoss xnnsIon AST CHANGING ENVIRONMENT !InnnIng, ImIomonfIng nnd mnnngIng chnngo In n fnsf-chnngIng onvIronmonf Is IncronsIngIy fho sIfunfIon In whIch mosf orgnnIznfIons now work. ynnmIc onvIronmonfs such ns fhoso roquIro dynnmIc rocossos, ooIo, sysfoms nnd cuIfuro, osocInIIy for mnnngIng chnngo succossfuIIy, nofnbIy offocfIvoIy ofImIzIng orgnnIznfIonnI rosonso fo mnrkof oorfunIfIos nnd fhronfs. mowor ooIo fo mnko docIsIons nf n IocnI oornfIng IovoI - doIognfo rosonsIbIIIfy nnd owor ns much ns ossIbIo . sfnbIIsh forums, communIcnfIng mofhods nnd docIsIon-mnkIng. !nrfIcInfIon of Inforosfod ooIo Is ossonfInI. ncourngo, onnbIo nnd dovoIo cnnbIo ooIo. Adjusf rocruIfmonf, frnInIng nnd dovoIomonf fo nccoIornfo fho dovoIomonf of ooIo who confrIbufo osIfIvoIy fo n cuIfuro of omoworod dynnmIsm. RSISTANC TO CHANG INDIVIDUAL SOURCES AIT SC!!TY COOMC IACTO!S IA! OI !KOW SCT' IO!MATO !!OCSSC ORGANISATIONAL SOURCES MT IOC!S OI CAC C!O!! !TA T!AT TO !!TS T!AT TO STAIS !OW! !ATOS!S !SYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT IA!SS O! IAAC ITW : OW T M!OY S T!AT IY T M!OY! WAT T M!OY !!TS TO T JOI OVERCOMING RESISTANCE TO CHANGE !CATO A COMM!CATO !A!TC!ATO I!C S!!!O!T A COMMTMT COTATO MA!!ATO A COO!TATO SCTC !O! WO ACC!T CAC CO!CO CHANGE MANAGEMENT CHANGE MANAGEMENT MODEL NIAI 4 COMMITMNT umbnoss Whoro nm hondod voryfhIng-ns-usunI nffIfudo Iocus Tonm work f cnn`f hnon horo. 'IsIon ow good fhIngs woro In fho nsf. Co-oornfIon RSISTANC 3 XPIORATION Angor Whnfs goIng fo hnon fo mo oss nnd hurf SooIng ossIbIIIfIos & rosourcos Sfubbornnoss Chnos IInmIng ofhors ndocIsIvonoss ComInInIng xIorIng nIfornnfIvos & now skIIIs oubfIng your nbIIIfy CInrIfyIng gonIs I!SSS 'O!MT !' CAC Chnngo In qunIIfy of fho busInoss or fho orgnnIznfIon. IusInoss dovoIomonf Is nrfIy scIonfIfIc, nnd nrfIy subjocfIvo, bnsod on fho fooIIngs nnd wIshos of fho busInoss ownors or CO. Thoro nro dIfforonf wnys fo dovoIo n busInoss whIch nchIovo growfh nnd Imrovomonf. MTOS OI 'O!MT SnIos dovoIomonf ow roducf dovoIomonf ow mnrkof dovoIomonf IusInoss orgnnIznfIon, shno, sfrucfuro nnd rocossos dovoIomonf (og, oufsourcIng, o-busInoss, ofc) TooIs, oquImonf, Innf, IogIsfIcs nnd suIy-chnIn dovoIomonf !ooIo, mnnngomonf nnd communIcnfIons (cnnbIIIfIos nnd frnInIng) dovoIomonf SfrnfogIc nrfnorshIs nnd dIsfrIbufIon roufos dovoIomonf nfornnfIonnI dovoIomonf AcquIsIfIons nnd dIsosnIs OTTER`S 8-STE! CHANGE MODEL 4 Create Urgency 4 orm a !owerIul Coalition 4 Create a Vision Ior Change 4 Communicate the Vision 4 Remove Obstacles 4 Create Short-term Wins 4 Build on the Change 4 Anchor the Changes in Corporate Culture UNSUCCESSFUL STORIES S!RINT NEXTEL MERGE (2007) ToIocommunIcnfIon comnny bnsod In ovorInnd nrk, knnsns (unIfod sfnfos). SrInf nnd T woro fho o. 3 nnd o. 5 IondIng rovIdors In fho !.S. mobIIo hono Indusfry Oosod mosfIy from rogIonnI nffIIInfos fhnf rovIdo wIroIoss sorvIcos on bohnIf of fho comnnIos comnny wouId bo vIoInfIng non-comofo ngroomonfs !nbrIdgonbIo cuIfurnI dIfforonco bofwoon fho fwo comnnIos nfogrnfIon rocoss wns dIffIcuIf BORLAND - ASHTON TATE (1991) In September oI 1991, ahn C.E.O. oI Borland, acquired Ashton-Tate Ior $440 million ahn, apparently did not consult with his management team prior to committing to acquire Ashton Tate This change was not a smooth one Borland had been marketing the !aradox database speciIically to compete with dBASE, and its programmers considered their system to be Iar superior to dBASE. An intense turI war broke out within the company. !aradox was deliberately down-played in the developer market since dBASE was now the largest Borland product. By the time dBASE Ior Windows was released, the market hardly noticed. Borland becomes one oI many companies that took on the MicrosoIt juggernaut and Iailed including Digital Research, Novell, and Word!erIect, to name a Iew. GM MOTORS Reasons that GM Iailed: Bad Iinancial policies - GM has been bankrupt since 2006 and has avoided a Iiling Ior years. used to sell cars in the Iorm oI highly proIitable car loans Uncompetitive vehicles cars were poorly designed and built , took too much time to manuIacture at high cost gnorIng comofIfIon CM hnd boon IgnorIng mnrkof comofIfIon for nbouf 50 yonrs In l954 comnny confroIIod 54 mnrkof InIIuro fo Innovnfo- CM focusod on rofIfIng from fInnnco. Idn`f cnro nbouf buIIdIng boffor cnrs. MnnngIng In fho bubbIo- mnnngors Ignorod oxfornnI chnngos. ETBLUE Reasons that ETBLUE Iailed Reliability the company did not have ability to perIormed the promised service dependably. Responsiveness did not show willingness to provide help in early stage oI crisis Assurance Iront line employees had no knowledge to share with passengers and they lost trust and conIidence oI passenger Tangibles insuIIicient appropriate physical Iacilities , equipment , personnel and communication materials leIt passengers improperly tended -~according to recent events still ET BLUE has no strategy dealing with the delays. -~company need to reconsider strategic planning dealing with delay causing situations. CONCLUSION Chnngo mnnngomonf Is Imorfnnf Chnngo mnnngomonf oncourngos omIoyoos fo fnko docIsIon nf IocnI oornfIng IovoI. nfIuoncIng omIoyoos fo bo ncfIvo In orgnnIznfIon.