You are on page 1of 4

J.H. Kim et al.

/ Journal of Membrane Science 187 (2001) 4755



) 31 . 11 4 . 16 2 . 7 1 . 6 3 . 12 8 . 15 0 . 18
2 2 2
Pr 2

NMP OH
0

) 83 . 35 3 . 42 0 . 8 0 . 16 7 . 5 6 . 15 8 . 16
2 2 2
2

%HF O H
0
) 38 . 35 3 . 42 2 . 7 0 . 16 3 . 12 6 . 15 0 . 18
2 2 2
2

NMP O H
0
) 44 . 32 3 . 42 2 . 10 0 . 16 5 . 11 6 . 15 8 . 16
2 2 2
2

MAc O H
0
) 22 . 32 3 . 42 2 . 10 0 . 16 4 . 16 6 . 15 4 . 18
2 2 2
2

MSO O H
0
) 14 . 31 3 . 42 3 . 11 0 . 16 7 . 13 6 . 15 4 . 17
2 2 2
2

MF O H
0





Conversion Irom the two is by o (MPa
1/2
) 2.0455 o (cal
1/2
cm
-3/2
)
The relative permittivity oI a material Ior a Irequency oI zero is known as its static relative
permittivity or as its dielectric constant. The relative static permittivity oI a solvent is a
relative measure oI its polarity. For example, water (very polar) has a dielectric constant oI
80.10 at 20 C while n-hexane (very non-polar) has a dielectric constant oI 1.89 at 20 C












1 SolvenL CuLflux nonsolvenL lnflux oly Conc lncreased
2 SolvenL CuLflux nonsolvenL lnflux oly Conc consLanL
3 SolvenL CuLflux nonsolvenL lnflux oly Conc decreased

1)

2) 3)

You might also like