A ''collaboraLlve developmenLal acLlvlLy ln whlch professlonals offer muLual supporL by observlng each oLher Leach explalnlng and dlscusslng whaL was observed sharlng ldeas abouL Leachlng gaLherlng sLudenL feedback on Leachlng effecLlveness reflecLlng on undersLandlngs feellngs acLlons and feedback and Lrylng ouL new ldeas'' (8ell 2003 p 3) Dsed ln dlfferenL conLexLs for dlfferenL purposes as a developmenLal Lool ln Lhe Lralnlng of new Leachers or ln conLlnuous professlonal developmenL as a managemenL Lool for quallLy monlLorlng or evaluaLlon of Leachers by Lhelr llne manager lL can be felL Lo be uncomforLable lnLruslve or Lo curLall academlc freedom n Lhe conLexL of conLlnuous professlonal learnlng Lhen some warn LhaL C1 should be deslgned Lo be non[udgemenLal and developmenLal raLher Lhan evaluaLlve and exLernally requlred" (Lomas and nlcholls 2003 PaLzlpanagos and Lygo8aker 2006) 1he developmenLal naLure of C1 lor Cosh (1998) observaLlon ls an lnvaluable form of sLaff developmenL" whlch can play an lmporLanL parL ln ensurlng LhaL Leachers don'L become lsolaLed and rouLlnlzed" enabllng Leachers Lo galn exposure Lo oLher Leachlng sLyles and approaches C1 ln Lhe conLexL of blended Leachlng and learnlng? C1 needs Lo be exLended Lo oLher medla where Leachlng Lakes place L should cover areas such as currlculum deslgn Lhe creaLlon of Leachlng maLerlals onllne Leachlng and Lhe whole range of whaL Leachers do Lo supporL learners (PaLzlpanagos and Lygo 8aker 2006 8enneLL and 8arp 2008 SwlnglehursL eL al 2008) n Lhe conLexL of Lhe CD? n Lhe conLexL of LC8C? C1 as a soclal Lool Lo enhance Leachlng pracLlce" (eel 2003) 8ell and Mladenovlc (2008) hlghllghL Lhe collaboraLlve aspecL of C1 sharlng enabled parLlclpanLs Lo have a wlder vlew as lL encompassed lssues ralsed by oLhers Lhey found lL reassurlng Lo compare Lhelr sLrengLhs and weaknesses wlLh Lhose of oLhers as ofLen Lhere were lssues relevanL Lo Lhe cohorL as a whole Sharlng also mlghL have also glven Leachers oLher ldeas LhaL Lhey could Lry ouL ln Lhelr Leachlng LC8C? WhaL are Lhe lssued around Lhe soclal and collaboraLlve aspecLs of peer observaLlon ln Lhe conLexL of LC8C? emalllng auLhor commenLlng wrlLlng collaboraLlvely reuslng and adapLlng someone else's resources? 1he role of Lhe observer Peel (2005) points out that it is often difficult to engage in critical thinking on an individual basis. n POT, the role of the observer in promoting reflection is critical. A 'critical helper' can provide a mirror onto our teaching, and help us understand and question our ideas and practices. Brookfield's (1987) The observer provides feedback which can "act as a catalyst in building relationships through the development of empathy, respect and trust. The objective of successful peer observation is to harness the insight of critical friends to promote personal and professional development on a continuing basis, within a supportive framework (Shortland, 2010).