Differences in Communication
WOMEN...
Use communication to
Use communiention to negotiate, in private and
control, in publie and in in cooperation.
competition.
2 Don't make themselves
Use more space when sitting. "comfortable."
Sena or
eaush avr comprar ret ae ia
man oh cave: hep ingcemiepurmeee comdmage manapttvamen_on_the_couch baHI Say & fender Differences in Communication
"Men are considered to be ‘selective processors’ who often: do not engage in
comprehensive processing of all available information before rendering judgment.
Instead, they seem fo rely on various heuristics in place of detailed message
elaboration. These heuristics involve a cue or cues that are highly available and
salient and convergently imply a particular inference.”
"Women, on the other hand, are considered
to be ‘comprehensive processors’ who
attempt to assimilate all available inform-
-ation before rendering judgment. Women
usually attempt effortful elaboration of all
available information unless they are res-
-tricted by memory constraints. Therefore,
women give equal weight to self-generated
and other-generated information, encode
more message claims, and elaborate on
specific claims more extensively.”
Exploring the Origins and Infecmatian Processing Differences
Between Men and Women: Implications for Advertisers,
by Sanjay Putrevu, Brock University
pg-8 _hitp:/huww amsroview org/articlee/putrew 10-2001.paf
-Women notice subtle changes in communication better than men.
- More likely to interpret messages as part of a global whole, opposed to men
who are more item-specific when it comes to messages.How did the message come at you?
What were the factors surrounding it?
What was the timing?
How long was the interaction? When did it take place?
Did others understand our intent?
Was the communication misheard? Did the reciever get
the same message that was sent? If not, was it the message,
the people, the environment?
Who ore the participants?
Who are you ahd who ate you trying to make others think
you are? Who is your audience? Are they making you think
they are something else, too? Is self-preservation playing
a role in how parties can effectively communicate?
Who has contro! over the interaction?
Who is the dominant in the conversation? The submissive?
We all decide how much we want to put into a conversation
Are we putting in a lot? A little?
What were they wearing?
Our clothes act a status symbols and stereotypes.
‘How we interpret a person's message depends on many human characteristics like memory,
beliefs, and values, Your mother sees your child hurt his knee sa she tells you, "You need to
look after your kids.” Though your mother was expressing a concern for any child’s safety, you
become offended because you interpret tas, “I'm falling to look after my kids." As another
Jexample, @ guy playfully tells @ git who looks at him, “Hey, stop checking me cut" The gir! may
interpret the guy's message as, "He's confident, playful, and challenging,” while an onlooker
may interpret the quy's message as being rude
The next time you talk to someone, stop assuming the message you send is the message
[someone receives. You prave your communication skis by being conscious of the fact
that people willinterpret yaur message the way you didn't intend for it be understned. Asking a
person for their understanding is a good way to ensure the tne of you share an accurate
understanding. Additonally, you can tell people you talk to-your understanding of what they say."