You are on page 1of 30

, 21.1.

2003
COM(2003) 27

( )


I.

- ..................... 4

II.

................................................... 6

A.

;........................................................................................ 6

i.

................................................ 6

ii.

............................................................................................................. 6

iii.

................................................................................. 6

B.

;.............................................................. 7

i.


...................................................................................................................... 7

ii.

.............................. 7

iii.

................................. 8

iv.

.............................................................. 8

................. 9

i.

.............................................................................. 9

ii.

..................................................................................... 10

III.

.................................... 11

A.

; ................ 12

i.

.......................................................... 12

ii.

............................................................................................. 13

iii.

...................................................................... 15

iv.

............................. 16

.................................... 18

i.

............................................................................................ 18

ii.

.................................................................................................................. 20

iii.

....................................................... 21

iv.

................................................................................. 22

v.


................................................................................................................... 23

vi.

" "
............................................................................................... 24

............................................ 25
2

i.

............................................. 25

ii.

.................. 26

IV.

............................................................................ 27

A.

...................... 27

i.


...................................................................................................... 27

ii.

................................................................................................ 27

B.

28

i.

............................................. 28

ii.

............. 29

iii.

............................................... 29

I.

.


.
,
.
, ,
. ,
1960 1970, .
, .
,
1972 1998
29 45
.1

.

,
,2
.
() , - ,
-

.
, ,
, .
380
450 .

.
.

.

.

1
2

Enterpeneurship: Determinants and policy in a European US comparison, David B. Audretsch et al., 2002.
1991 1995,
1 307 000 189 000, Entrepreneurship: A survey of the
Literature, David B. Audretsch, O 2002.


.3 2000,
, .
2010,
,
. 2001,

.
, 15 .
2010.4

.
,5
.
,



. E, 2002

.6
2002,
.

2003
, ,
.7

,
.
, SEC (2000) 1823, 30.10.2000.

6707/02, 08.03.2002, COM (2002) 9
, 24.01.2002.
, 13.06.00
Feira 19-20 2000. 10 :






.

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/index_en.htm.
: ,
. 21 2003,
, .

II.

A.


, , ,
.
i.

.
,
,
.

, .


.
:
.
ii.

,
,
.
.

,

.8


.9
iii.

.

,
, , .
,
,
: , ,
10 ,

Kimmo Hyrsky Reflections on the advent of a more


enterprising culture in Finland: An exploratory study, Jyvskyl Studies, Business and Economics, 2001.
9
Findings from the Household Survey, SBS Performance Analysis, 31.03.2002.
10
, ,
.
8

. Global
Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) 7% 11

70%

.

, /
, ..
B.

i.


.12

.13 1990,
.
, 1994 1998, 8%
60%
.14 350.000
1993 1996.15


.16
, ,
,

.17
ii.

,
(..
), . ,
,
/ 3 1/2 . Global Entrepreneurship
Monitor (GEM) 2002 Summary Report, Reynolds, Bygrave, Autio and Hay.
12
Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature, David B. Audretsch, O 2002.
13
Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature, David B. Audretsch, O 2002.
14
Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands, Innovative entrepreneurship. New policy challenges
EIM, 2002.
15
350 000 6 . White Paper, Embracing
innovation: entrepreneurship and American economic growth, National Commission on Entrepreneurship
(NCOE) 2001.
16
Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature, D. Audretsch, O 2002,
Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European-US comparison, Audretsch, Thurik,
Verheul and Wennekers, 2002 GEM.
17
, 15223/01,
12.12.2001.
11


.
, , , ,
.
.
iii.

.

, ,
.
,
, .
, (
),
(, ).
, ""
,
.
.
,
. , 33% 45%

27% .18
iv.


,
.

,
,


.
, ,
( )


.
.19

Third European survey on working conditions 2000, E


. .
19

, (SEC) 1999, 1729, , 25.10.1999
:
, COM (2002) 347 , , 02.07.2002.
18


, .

,
.

.
.

;

,
.20
i.



. ,
.
67% 45% 21.

,
, , 6%
, 13% , 15%
18% .
10%.22
,
4,5%
,
, 6%
2% . ,
13%, .
.


Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature, David B. Audretsch, O 2002 Business
Demography in Europe, / . 5, E , 2002.
21
Flash 134 E, N 2002,
2002, .
22
.
, ,
,
. COMParative Entrepreneurship data
for International Analysis (Compendia 2000.1), EIM.
20

(
)
, .

,

.
, ,
,

.23 , 46%

25% .

: 20
500 Fortune 1960, 4
1998. , 8
25 , 1960.
, 1998 1960.24


11% 1990
,
7,4%, .
1990,
,25 .

.
1990, 19%
, 4%
6 .26
ii.


,
. ,

8 , . The role of policy and institutions for


productivity and firm dynamics: Evidence from micro and industry data, . 329,
Stefano Scarpetta et. al., ECO/WKP(2002)15, 23.04.2002.
24
Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands: Innovative entrepreneurship. New policy challenges
EIM, , 2002 White Paper, Embracing innovation: entrepreneurship and
American economic growth, National Commission on Entrepreneurship (NCOE), 2001.
25
Business Demography in Europe, / . 5, E ,
2002
26
: ,
( 90-93 91-94), .
An international comparison of hypergrowth enterprises, EIM Small Business Research and Consultancy, in
Fostering Entrepreneurship in Europe, the UNICE Benchmarking Report, 1999.
23

10

. ,

. ,
.

.
,
,

.

.
,
. 30% 20 .
27.


.


.
III.

.
GEM ,
,
,
, , .

,
.

.
2002 ,
,
,
.28
,

.
.

20 , . .
/ . 1 2001, E , 2001.
28
2002/549/ 21 2002
, 2002/549/, L182, 11.07.2002.
27

11

,
.
,
.

- , .

,
,
. ,

.

,


.


.
.



.
, , ,
.
A.

i.

,
.

.

.
, ,

, 69%
76% .

. ,

.29
12

29

Benchmarking the administration of Start-ups, , 2002.

12

24 . ,

.
,
, , .

, 1999
.

( , ,
, ).

. , .
80%
1990
50% 2003.

:
.

,
.
.
,
.
,
.. ,
(business angels). GEM

2000 2001,
.

.

,
,

.
ii.

,
.

.

13

.


,
. ,
.

.
,

.

. , ,
,
.



.
""
.

.


. ,
,30

.
.
.


. ,
,
,
.

.

.31 ,
.
, "Draft Joint Employment Report", COM (2002) 621 ,
13.11.2002.
31
Flash 107 E, No 2001
30

14

, 96%
75% .32

, .
.
iii.


,

.
37%
15%
.

.

. GEM
2 7

3 4
.
( ,
)
.

.


.
.
.
,

.

.
, ,

.
,

,

32

Business transfers and successions in Austria, A , 2002.

15

.33
, ,

.34
,

. ,

.


.




.
"
" ,
,
. Campus Company Programme,

.
.


.
850
.35
iv.


.

.
.
,
16% 40%
.36

Nijenrode, 2000 De succesvolle ondernemer, Ministerie van


Economische Zaken en de Nederlandse Vereniging van Participatiemaatschappijen, Den Haag, ,
No 2001.
34
Best E , E , 2002.
35
Benchmarking of Business Incubators, E , 2002.
36
Annual Labour Force Statistics, E , 2001.
33

16

,
, . , ,

.

, ,
,
.37


WES Network,
.38

NUTEK, , " ",

.

.

. NUTEK
.

.
,
.
.



.39


.40 ,

Best Young Entrepreneurs,


Women Entrepreneurs, Co-Entrepreneurs and Ethnic Minority Entrepreneurs in the European Union and
Central and Eastern Europe, E , 2000.
38
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/entrepreneurship/craft/craft-women/wes.htm.
39
Young Entrepreneurs, Women Entrepreneurs, Co-Entrepreneurs and Ethnic Minority Entrepreneurs in the
European Union and Central and Eastern Europe, E , 2000.
40

, ,
2002.
37

17


.41
B

.
.
,

.42 ,

.
i.

,

,
.

, ,
.

.

.

.
Easy pay
.
EasyPay, ,
.
. EasyPay

www.indberetning.dk,
Webreg,
.
Webreg .


, COM (2001) 386 ,
11.07.2001,
, COM (2001) 127 , 13.03.2001.
42
/ . 1 2001, E
, 2001, European Business Survey, Grant Thornton, 2002; Business Views on Red Tape,
O, 2002.
41

18

(www.help-business.gv.at)
.
, ,
(@mtsweg online).
HELP,
.

.

,
50 . .43
44
,
,

.45


.46
2002


. .

.
(.. )47,


. 48, ,
,
,
.49
, . 9, E , 19.11.2001.
E - , COM (2001) 428 , 25.07.2001.
45
E - , COM (2002) 275 ,
, COM (2002) 276 ,
, COM (2002) 277 , " :
" , COM (2002) 278 05.06.2002.
46
Interactive Policy Making Initiative, IPM C (2001) 1014. Business Impact
Assessment Pilot Project, M 2002.
47
,"Risk Capital: A key to job creation in the European Union", SEC (1998) 552,
31.03.1998; , " :
, COM (1999) 232 , 11.05.1999.
48
, , o
, " - 2002", COM
(2002) 171, 11.04.2002.
49
"
", COM (2002) 441 ,
"" .
43
44

19


50
.
ii.

,
.
, ,
, ,
.
.

.51
,
,
52.
.


.53
, 54
,
,
.

.

.

.

, , ,
, 95%
,

( ).
50

57.2 Flash 128 "Public opinion in Europe: Views on business to cosumer


cross border trade", 14.11.2002.
51
,
" ", COM (2001) 582 ,
23.10.2001 Commission Staff Working Paper, Company Taxation in the
Internal Market SEC (2001) 1681, 23.10.2001.
52
Economic policy and the start-up, survival and growth of entrepreneurial ventures, Holtz-Eakin & Rosen,
prepared for the Small Business Administration, Washington DC, M 2001.
53
, "Draft Joint Employment Report", COM (2002) 621 ,
13.11.2002.
54
07.12.94 , 94/1069/E, L 385, 31.12.1994

20

iii.


.

,
.
1990,
, .
.55
,
56.
.
57.
.

, ,
. , 46%
() .
,
.
.58
2002
.59
2001,

(..
).60

.

, European Competitiveness Report, SEC (2002) 528, 21.05.2002.


" 5980/01 EDUC 23,
14.02.2001
57
T 25-64
20%
. 5% , (Structural Indicators)
Eurostat, 2002.
58
, , , , ,
, , , , , , ,
, , , .. European Business Panel Survey 2002,
Skills, mobility and training for competitiveness, Eurochambres, 2002.
59
,
- "
", COM (2002) 72 , 13.02.2002.
60

, COM (2001) 386 ,
11.07.2001.
55

56

21


.
.
iv.

,


.
20%
61.
,
.
,
. ,

.

.
( 50%
, 30% ). 7.000
, 2002,
,
.62
,
,

. ,

63. ,
,

.

Finnvera, ,
,
,
2.741 45,5 . 2001. 75%
. 3.400 35.000
.

61

European Business Survey, Grant Thornton, 2002


Annual survey of pan-European private equity and venture capital activities, EVCA 2002.
63
2000/819/ 20.12.2000
,
62

22


.

.
,
.
v.

,

. ,
, ,
.

.64
.
, ,
,
, .
.
,
.
.

.65

.66


( ),
.
. ,
,
(.. Veneto,
, Emilia Romagna). ,
Club dei Distretti Industriali,
40% 30.000 250.000
.

European Business Survey, Grant Thornton, 2002.


, ,
-
, COM (2002) 364 , 05.07.2002.
66
Shared modes of Compensation and Firm Performance: UK Evidence, Martin J. Conyon and Richard B.
Freeman (LSE and Harvard).
64
65

23

,
.
.

,

, .
, ,
, ,
,
.67

, .


.

68
.


.

,
69. ,
20%
70. ,
,
.

.
vi.

"
"
(intrapreneurship)



.
& ,

Internationalisation of European SMEs, Institut fur Soziologie, Friedrich Schiller


Universitt Jena et al., A, 2002.
68
:A study and analysis of management training techniques for the Heads of SMEs, particularly
using the ICTs, E , D 2000
69
" , " , 2002
70

SEC (2001) 1937, E , 28.11.2001
67

24

, (spin-offs) () :
" ". , ,

.
" ",
71. , ,
,
, , . ,
- .72

EXIST

, , .


,
.
.

.


. ,

, .
.

i.


.
.

.


73.
,
71

Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands New economy: new entrepreneurs!, Ministry of Economic Affairs and
EIM January 2001
72
Spin off start-ups in the Netherlands At first glance, EIM, M 2002.
73
" "
, 5980/01 EDUC 23, 14.02.2001
,
; , EDUC 27, 6365/02, 20.02.2002
COM (2001) 501

25

.

, ,
, , , ,
, .

.


. ,
, .

.
.

Strathclyde
.
.

.


.


,74 .

.75 45% ,
,
.
.
ii.


,

,
.
, ,
, ,
,

Seminar on Business Failure, E , Noordwijk, the


Netherlands, 10-11 M 2001.
75
Bankruptcy and a fresh start, E , 2002.
74

26

8%
,76

. , ,

.


.
,
3,5 . .77
IV.

A.

i.


.
.
,


. .

,

,
.
.


.
ii.

,
.


7.92% (1995-1997), The


Third System and Employment, CIRIEC, 2000.
77
Researching social enterprise, David Smallbone et al., the UK Small Business Service.
76

27


.

.


,
.
.
,

.
1

;
;
B.

i.

,
,
.

.



. ,
.


. ,
,
,
.

.
2 ( ,
- , , )

( , ,
(factoring) );

;

28

3 (
( ) () ,
);
( ,
, ,
);
4 ,
( , , )
(, , , , .
);
(, , )
( );
( ,
);
5

;
ii.

.


.
.
,
,
.
6
- (
,
,
);
7
(
, ,
);
8 - (spin-offs)
( , , ,

);
iii.

,
.
29


, ,
.

. , ,

, , , ,
, ,
.
9

(
, ,
,
,
,
);
10 ,
(
, ,
, ) (,
, );

30

You might also like