A Study on the Selection of Measurement Frequency

and Types for Rock Slope Stability by Analyzing

the Weathering Sensitivity

1.

7.

2.

7.1 Mode Test

2.1

7.2

2.2

7.3

3.

7.4 (Chemical index

4.

of alteration)

5.

7.5

5.1

7.6

5.2

5.3

7.7

5.4

8.

5.5

6.
6.1
6.2
6.3

,
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
.
* 4

- 1 -

Abstract
With base rock as the subject, the purpose of this study is to select danger zones and
to select the location of survey, tools used for the survey, and the frequency of the
survey in order to induce stability and economic construction. For the purpose of the
study, data pertaining to the morphology of collapse and number of collapses of domestic
base rock were reviewed, and by selecting the slope of study, weathering sensitivity
analysis data that reveal the degree of weathering were collected and analyzed. Based on
the analysis of data gathered through the study, classes of weathering of study slopes
were selected, and different survey location, survey tools, and survey frequency for each
position were selected and presented.
Keywords : weathering sensitivity, Measurement Frequency

- 2 -

1.
,
. ,

. ,
,
.
,
.
,
.

2.
,
,
,

, .

2.1
1997
1 . ,
27.3% , ,
57.1% 46.7% ,
19.0% .

1. (, 1997)

(476.3km)

()

56

5
(8.9%)

3
(5.4%)

32
(57.1%)

3
(5.4%)

13
(23.2%)

(847.6km)

42

10
(23.8%)

1
(2.4%)

8
(19.0%)

6
(14.3%)

17
(40.5%)

(613.8km)

77

4
(5.2%)

8
(10.4%)

36
(46.7%)

21
(27.3%)

8
(10.4%)

175

19
(10.9%)

12
(6.9%)

76
(43.4%)

30
(17.1%)

38
(21.7%)

- 3 -

2.2
2002 422
, ,

. 245
, 2 . ,
,
. ,
,
17.0% 19.0% ,
. , 25.0%
.

2. (, 2002)

()

37

3
(7.0%)

4
(9.0%)

1
(4.0%)

5
(14.0%)

24
(66.0%)

80

8
(10.0%)

2
(2.0%)

14
(17.0%)

11
(14.0%)

45
(57.0%)

128

9
(7.0%)

3
(2.0%)

24
(19.0%)

32
(25.0%)

60
(47.0%)

245

20
(8.2%)

9
(3.7%)

39
(15.9%)

48
(19.6%)

129
(52.6%)

- 4 -

3.
, , ,
, ,
.

3 .

4.

, .
, , , , ,
.
,
. ,
,
,
. ,
, ,

. , ,
.
, , , , , .
4 .

5.
, ,
,
.
( )
.
.
.

- 5 -

 3. (,
2004)

()

,
(,)

()

()

) ()

() () ()

- 6 -

 4. (, 2004)

5.1
.
. ,
, ,
.
1 . ,

. ,
. ,

.

x
y

1.
5.2
,
,

- 7 -

 , ,
. , ,

,

. , .
2 .

x
y

2.

5.3
.
.

.
3 .

y
x

3.

- 8 -

5.4
,
.
, .

,
. ,

. 4 .
+

4.
5.5
,


. ,
.
,
.

, .

. 5 .

- 9 -

5.

6.
, , , ,
, . ,
,
.
, .

- 10 -

6.1
, , , ,
.
, 1
. ,
.
, , , ,
. , ,
. ,
. , .
.

1 .
, , .

5. (, 2003)

1/

1~2/

4~6/

1~2/

1/

1~2/

4~6/

1~2/

- 11 -

6.2
,
, , ,
. ,
,
,
.

.
5 .

6.3


.
, , .
, , , , ,
. 3.4 .

,
.
6 .
[]

[]

6. ( , 1996)

- 12 -

7.

(2004) .
, , . 7
, CBH-5, CBH-6
, 105.8m, 110.5m, CBH-5
, CBH-6 . TBH-5, TBH-6, CBH-10
, , ,
99.8m, 98.7m, 83.7m. CBH-9, CBH-11
, 94.2m, 86.3m.

7. (, 2004)
,
3.0m~7.3m ,
11.0m~25.0m .
6 C-1
.

6. (, 2004)
(TM)

C-1

214273 370620

C-2

214363 370232

TBH-5
TBH-6
CBH-5

5.0m
22.8m
5.3m
23.7m
4.5m
20.0m

214342 370267

CBH-6
CBH-9

214383 370262

CBH-10

214226 370641

CBH-11

- 13 -

6.0m
25.0m
7.3m
22.0m
3.0m
11.0m
6.0m
22.0m

(TM)
X

214320 370640

214322 370196
214387 370170

214330 370099

7.1 Mode Test

MODE Test,
(, 2003). ()
.
(Mode Test)
1/3~1/8 (, 2000).
, , , ,
, .
8 9 .

21.4%
14.1%
8.4%

0.4%
7.6%
11.8%

5.2%

0.9%

28.7%

1.5%

8. () (, 2004)

38.4%

12.6%

20.9%

1.1%

8.8%

4.0%

14.2%

9. (, 2004)
7.2

,
. SiO2()
. , CBH-11(22.0) ,
100(wt %) .
, 100(wt %)
. 10 .

- 14 -

 10. (wt %)
7.3
,
, .
.

. 11
, 1+000, 1+200~1+500 ,
TBH-5, TBH-6, CBH-10 .

11. (, 2004)

7.4 (Chemical index of alteration)

(CIA)
. CIA 1982 Nesbitt and Young

.

CIA = [Al2O3/(Al2O3+CaO+Na2O+K2O)]*100

- 15 -

(1)

 () , , CIA
0~10, 10~30, 50, 50~55, CIA 45~55
. 12 (CIA)
, 12
. , CIA
(45~55) ,
. , TBH-6(5.3)
, CBH-9 CBH-11
. , CBH-9 > CBH-11 >
C-1 > TBH-6(23.7) C-2 CBH-6 CBH-10 TBH-5 CBH-5
TBH-6(5.3) . , CIA
, ,
.

12. (CIA) (, 2004)

7.5

,
. .
, 13 K() Mg()
. Mg() K() CBH-5,
CBH-9, CBH-11 ,
TBH-5(5.0), TBH-6(23.7) . ,
- 16 -

 , CBH-5
,
. , CBH-9 CBH-11 ,

, .

13. (, 2004)

7.6

,
. 14 .
CBH-5
, CBH-5
. , CBH-10
.

14. (, 2004)
- 17 -

7.7
6
7 .
,
8 .
15 3~5
. 16 CBH-9 2
, CBH-5, CBH-11 3, TBH-11 C-1 4
, TBH-6 5 , CBH-6,
CBH-10, C-2 4 .

7. (, 2003)

( )

, ( 50%)
1

, ,
.
, ( 10%)

, , 1~2
.
( 10%),

2~5
.

, ,
.

.
,

,
.

- 18 -

 8.

(extremely sensitive)

2~3/
()

(very sensitive)

2~3/
()

(moderately sensitive)

3~4/

(slightly sensitive)

4~6/

(nearly unsensitive)

(unsensitive)

- 19 -

 15. (, 2004)

16. () () (, 2004)

8.

.

1. ,
,
.
.
2. ,
. 15 ,
8 . 1~4
,
. , 5~6 ,
.
3. CBH-10 , 4 ,
, ,
,
, 1~2

- 20 -

 .
4. CBH-9, CBH-11 2 3 ,

. CBH-9 2~3
, CBH-11 3~4
.
5. CBH-5 3 ,
, ,
.
, ( )
3~4 .

,
, ,
.

1. (2003), ,
, , p. 51.
2. (2003), , p. 317.
3. (2004), , p. 801.
4. (1997), ,
, , p. 344.
5. (2003), ,
, , p. 243.
6. (1996), , , p. 345.
7. (2002), ,
, p. 303.
8. (2004), Manual, , p. 290.
9. Nesbitt and Young(1982), Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions

- 21 -